ogy,50(12), pp 2445-2459 - P03188, CIMFP EXHIBIT, 2018 Response to Grant Thornton Question 6.2, Submission during the Judicial Inquiry by Nalcor Energy, also referred as RFI response to NP-NLH-00 2838
AI summary The text references a 2018 submission by Nalcor Energy during a judicial inquiry, responding to Grant Thornton's Question 6.2. It is cited as an RFI response to matter NP-NLH-00 2838, linked to the CIMFP exhibit and P03188.
Article 18. Indemnity, Consequential Damages and Insurance - 18.1 Indemnity. The Parties shall at all times indemnify, defend, and hold the other Party harmless from, any and all damages, losses, claims, including claims and actions relati...
AI summary Article 18 outlines mutual indemnification obligations between parties under the LGIA, excluding cases of gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing. If the Indemnifying Party fails to defend a claim, the Indemnified Party may act at the Indemnifying Party's expense.
- 30.9 Amendment. The Parties may by mutual agreement amend this LGIA by a written instrument duly executed by the Parties. - 30.10 Modification by the Parties. The Parties may by mutual agreement amend the Appendices to this LGIA by a wri...
AI summary The article outlines procedures for amending the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA), including mutual agreements, unilateral filings with FERC under sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act, and clarification that the agreement does not create a partnership. Both parties retain rights to protest each other's filings with FERC.
NSPML Responses to Small Business Advocate Information Requests 1 Request IR-01: 7 why the outages occurred, as well as setting out reasonable remediation plans. 8 9 c) NLH is responsible for paying for all non-Maritime Link assets, which...
AI summary The text outlines NSPML's responses to information requests regarding outages, cost responsibilities, and legal agreements with NLH. It also discusses the potential for a separate process to develop a mitigation mechanism if the Holdback is terminated, highlighting the benefits of such a process.
- NS Block, measured in MWh (excluding Make-up Energy), is received during each of 12 - consecutive months."[41](#page-18-1) In introducing this requirement, the Board also stated: - NSPML/NS Power may apply to the Board for relief if it c...
AI summary The requirement mandates NSPML to receive twelve consecutive months of NS Block volumes (excluding Make-up Energy) at least 90% of the total monthly volumes called for under the Energy and Capacity Agreement. This prevents over-reliance on Make-up volumes and ensures consistency and predictability in volume delivery.
Request IR-6: Please refer to Exhibit N-1, section 5.0 - a) Please explain why NSPML waited nearly two years after the end of the "Compliance Period" to request cessation of the Holdback Mechanism. - b) NSPML identifies several additional...
AI summary NSPML questions delays in ending the Holdback Mechanism, evaluates outages for Good Utility Practice compliance, and challenges accountability for third-party transmission outages. It also seeks clarification on contractual obligations tied to NS Block deliveries and the relevance of design flaws to utility performance standards.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →