E-3ENSC 2011 DSM Evaluation Report prepared by Econoler
156 passages
.................................... 34 4.1.9 Fuel Substitution Pilot ................................................................................................... 36 4.1.10 Low Income Program ...........................................
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency programs, including residential and commercial initiatives like the Low Income Program and Performance Plus Program, and references an evaluation of 2011 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes sections on fuel substitution pilots and business energy rebates.
5 Table 15: Recommendations for the Retail Markdown Program......................................................... 27 Table 16: Recommendations for the Low Income Renter Program .................................................... 29 Tab...
AI summary The document lists tables with recommendations for various energy efficiency and demand-side management programs, including low-income initiatives, residential retrofits, and business rebates. It references an evaluation of 2011 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and an executive summary from ECONOL:R.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program The evaluated net energy savings are lower than those tracked by ENSC by approximately 26 percent. This difference is mainly due to...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program's evaluated net energy savings are 26% lower than ENSC's tracking due to adjusted EnerGuide point values and revised unitary savings. The Fuel Substitution Pilot showed higher net savings than ENSC's tracking. Econoler adjusted savings calculations for pilot projects and prescriptive measures based on updated studies.
coming successful. The Evaluator has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Table 16: Recommendations for the Low Income Renter Program
AI summary The Evaluator provides recommendations aimed at optimizing specific aspects of the Low Income Renter Program, as outlined in Table 16.
No. Recommendations LIR-R1. Monitor program barriers and participant concerns: To make sure to go forward with the program and in the right direction, program barriers and participant concerns will have to be watched closely. They should b...
AI summary The recommendations highlight the need to monitor program barriers and participant concerns, particularly around perceived health risks like mercury in CFLs, and improve measure sustainability by providing more information on product benefits and usage to prevent removal and ensure energy savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary Therefore, it is not surprising to learn that satisfaction towards the program was very high among participants. Indeed, most participants expressed their satisfaction w...
AI summary The MURR program received high satisfaction from participants and program partners. Despite plans to reconfigure the program in 2012, the Evaluator provided recommendations to optimize specific aspects of the program.
e future. The Evaluator has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Table 17: Recommendations for the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program
AI summary The Evaluator provides recommendations aimed at optimizing specific aspects of the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, as outlined in Table 17.
on the use of power bars with integrated timer. This strategy could help participants use the product correctly as they would be aware of all its advantages. Ref.: 5725 31 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of targeting multi-unit renters with energy efficiency programs, as they are less likely to install energy-efficient products due to not owning the property or being responsible for electricity bills. The low level of free-ridership indicates the program's effectiveness in encouraging participation.
s to natural gas heating systems present higher unitary savings as these systems seldom require the use of a secondary heating system. 4.1.10 Low Income Program The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income program demonstrated that the program ha...
AI summary The Low Income Program, evaluated in 2011, demonstrated significant success with 5,103 participants and generated notable energy and demand savings. However, confusion arose due to program name changes, and recommendations are made to improve clarity and optimize program aspects.
ciency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary Table 21: Recommendations for the Low Income Program
AI summary The document presents Table 21, which outlines recommendations for the Low Income Program under the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The table is part of an overall executive summary that likely discusses energy efficiency initiatives and their implications for low-income households.
h of the following income categories best describes your total annual household income before taxes in 2010? Stop me when I reach the right category. [READ LIST; SELECT ONE RESPONSE] 1. Less than $15,000 2. $15,000 - $24,999 3. $25,000 - $...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about household income and gender, followed by an appendix outlining an on-site visit protocol for an appliance retirement program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
ults –Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product ...................................... 38 Table 30: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator ........................................ 39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Efficient...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter (LIR) program, which installs energy-efficient products in subsidized housing for low-income renters in Nova Scotia. The evaluation involved interviews, site visits, and a survey of participants.
inted by stakeholders of the low-income rental market. Such needs include, among others, achieving energy efficiency upgrades in homes and providing further information on energy-efficient behaviours. In order to be eligible, participants...
AI summary The LIR program aimed to achieve energy efficiency upgrades in low-income rental homes and promote energy-efficient behaviors. It installed various energy-efficient products and achieved significant electricity and demand savings in 2011. The program was evaluated as having good potential for success as a pilot targeting an unexplored market.
of on-site visits in order to have a reasonable precision level that would allow for the establishment of installation rates for CFLs, LED nightlights and faucet aerators. Ref.: 5725 viii Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Effi...
AI summary The document discusses the need for more precise evaluation of savings in the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program. It highlights the need to collect additional data, such as heating types and air conditioning use, to improve the accuracy of impact evaluations and ensure that new lighting products effectively replace less efficient ones.
At first, Econoler had planned to validate such information during on-site visits but participants did not know the exact wattage of the old lamps replaced in their home. Ref.: 5725 ix Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficie...
AI summary The Low Income Renter (LIR) program, launched by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in March 2011, installs energy-efficient products in low-income rental housing. The program initially focused on subsidized housing and later expanded to include mini-home parks. It is modeled after the direct install component of the Low Income program and is expected to expand to the wider rental market in 2012.
and low-flow showerheads. The LIR program was designed as a first test of entering the low-income rental market. It is anticipated that the program will be offered to the wider rental market in 2012. The LIR program aimed to achieve net el...
AI summary The LIR program was introduced as a pilot to enter the low-income rental market with the goal of achieving electricity and demand savings. It is expected to expand to a wider rental market in 2012. The program's logic model outlines the causal relationships between activities and market changes, and the methodology includes interviews and surveys for evaluation.
list of questions and topics to include in the program partner interviews for the process evaluation was finalized. 2.2.3 In-Depth Interviews with Program Partners Interview with Delivery Agent In September, one in-depth interview was cond...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used in evaluating the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, including in-depth interviews with the program delivery agent and its subcontractor, as well as on-site visits to validate product installations and savings assumptions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The methodology used for the on-site visits under the LIR program is further explained in the program impact evaluation section of this report. A copy of the site visit protocol is...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used for on-site visits and telephone surveys conducted under the Low Income Renter (LIR) program. A survey of 70 participants was conducted to assess program impact, satisfaction, and recommendations for improvement.
ually included in program manuals intended for internal use. The table below lists the information found in the LIR program manual. Table 4: Program Manual Content LIR Program Program Manual Content Manual Document revisions N/A Program de...
AI summary This document outlines the content of the LIR Program manual, including program description, objectives, eligibility criteria, program partners, savings calculations, budget, cost-effectiveness tests, market studies, marketing plans, and evaluation plans. It is part of an evaluation report from 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
more, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for the...
AI summary The report discusses the need for standardizing program manuals and reviews the tracking sheet for the Low Income Renter (LIR) program. It highlights the tracking sheet's functionality, including unique project identification numbers and energy savings calculations, but notes missing customer information and inconsistencies in product categorization.
type, power and number of old lamps. This information could be used for validating the baseline case and for ensuring that the new lamps installed actually replaced less efficient lamps. > Ensure that all customer information is filled in...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of systematically collecting customer information for program evaluation, such as names, postal codes, and phone numbers, to support activities like customer surveys and on-site visits. It also highlights the success of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, which had 4,920 participants and benefited from collaboration between ENSC and housing authorities.
interviewed under the process evaluation of the LIR program: the DA and the DA’s subcontractor. Both of them are very satisfied with their relationship with ENSC’s team as well as the overall program. One aspect of the program that still l...
AI summary The LIR program has seen satisfaction from the DA and its subcontractor, though marketing and outreach efforts are seen as areas for improvement. The DA noted challenges with a third-party marketing provider and complex implementation processes. Limited demand due to low leads from housing authorities and tenant reluctance over CFLs are identified as barriers.
concerns are related to CFLs (too dim, presence of mercury, etc.). Questions to investigate these barriers were included in the participant survey. It appears that only one respondent out of 70 has Ref.: 5725 10 Efficient Products – Low In...
AI summary The document discusses concerns about CFLs, including their dimness and mercury content, and mentions that only one out of 70 survey respondents expressed concerns about mercury. It highlights the need to monitor program barriers and adjust marketing strategies. The DA suggests using NSPI's customer database to target eligible participants, while ENSC must determine if this data is accessible.
r market of low-income housing is a population difficult to survey. Furthermore, some inconsistencies in respondents’ answers were sometimes observed. 3.6.1 Participation Motivations and Barriers The main reason for participating in the LI...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in surveying the low-income housing market and highlights that the primary motivation for participating in the LIR program is saving on energy costs and bills, with 64% of respondents citing this as the main reason.
15 Refused 5 Don’t know 7 65 Ref.: 5725 11 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The vast majority of participants did not have any concerns about taking part in the progra...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program found that 93% of participants had no concerns about joining the program, while only 3% had concerns, primarily related to health risks. Most participants retained all installed energy efficiency products, with 89% keeping them and 7% removing at least one.
89 Don’t know 3 Refused 1 Ref.: 5725 12 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report From the very few participants who indicated having removed at least one energy-efficient prod...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses participant experiences with energy-efficient products, noting that some removed them due to performance or health concerns. It also highlights that 60% of participants changed their energy use behavior after receiving information during product installation visits.
2 Other 17 Don’t know 14 Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Just under four in 10 participants indicated that the products installed were successful in low...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program found that 37% of participants noticed a decrease in energy bills after installation, while 30% saw no change and 11% saw an increase. A significant portion (21%) were uncertain about the impact due to recent installation or lack of information.
ed improved indoor lighting (81%), while one- half indicate that the products have provided longer lasting hot water (53%). Another three in 10 have noticed fewer drafts throughout their home (29%). Ref.: 5725 14 Efficient Products – Low I...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the impact of products installed through the Low Income Renter (LIR) program, noting that 81% of participants reported improved indoor lighting, 53% longer lasting hot water, and 29% fewer drafts. However, the report cautions that the latter finding may be inconsistent due to the absence of air sealing measures in the program. Most participants expressed satisfaction with the program, with 78% rating it 4 or 5 out of 5.
of 1 or 2 to express their dissatisfaction (5% combined), while just under two in 10 offered a mid-range score of 3 (16%). Table 12: Overall Experience with the LIR program Level of Satisfaction 2011 Sample Size 69 Very satisfied – 5 55% 4...
AI summary The LIR program received high satisfaction ratings in 2011, with 55% of participants very satisfied and 23% satisfied. The primary reasons for satisfaction included lower energy bills, good service, and energy savings. These findings are based on a sample size of 69 participants.
that more was expected of the program, although the small sample size warrants caution in the interpretation of these results. Table 14: Neutral Impression of the Program Reasons for Being Neutral 2011 (#) Sample Size 11 Don’t like the lig...
AI summary The evaluation report notes that participants had a neutral impression of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, with some expressing dissatisfaction due to bills not decreasing as expected. A small sample size limits the interpretation of results.
69% 27 5 Overall communication 62 66% 18 10 2 4 Don’t know/no answer removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 17 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.5 Recommendations for...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Low Income Renter Program found that 81% of respondents had no recommendations for improvement, while the remaining 19% suggested improvements such as better lighting products, more product options, and increased information on installed products.
ation, such as the power of lamps replaced, was also collected to validate the parameters used in the unitary savings calculations. 4.1.1 On-Site Visit Sampling and Protocol Sampling Methodology A total of 15 on-site visits were conducted...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of ENSC’s Low Income Renter (LIR) program involved 15 on-site visits to validate product installations and unitary savings calculations. Sampling focused on Halifax and Dartmouth due to high installation rates, and product removal rates and reasons were documented.
efore, the nightlights installed in rooms that are not affected by daylight are likely to remain 5 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, “Technical Reference Manual,” Pennsylvania, June 2011. Ref.: 5725 23 Efficient Products – Low Income...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings from LED nightlights installed under the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It calculates the unitary savings value based on displaced wattage and average operating time, using data from on-site visits and daylight exposure in Halifax.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Seasonal LED Lights ENSC offers seasonal LED lights to LIR program participants. The unitary savings estimate for this product is 17.52 kWh per set of lamps. This value is bas...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) provides seasonal LED lights to low-income renters (LIR) as part of its energy efficiency programs. The unitary savings estimate for this initiative is 17.52 kWh per set of lamps, calculated based on the wattage of old incandescent sets and new LED sets, along with their usage patterns.
deemed acceptable for most products promoted through ENSC programs. Therefore, the unitary savings value that is used in the current evaluation is 176.30 kWh per year. 4.2.6 Low-Flow Showerheads For low-flow showerheads, ENSC uses a unitar...
AI summary The unitary savings value for low-flow showerheads promoted through ENSC programs is 157 kWh, based on data from the OPA report and assumptions about flow rates, shower frequency, and temperature. This value is used to evaluate energy savings in the Low Income Renter Program.
minutes Average Shower Temperature 40°C (104°F) Annual Savings 377 kWh per household Econoler considers these parameters reliable and conservative. On its website, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) promotes the installation of low-flow show...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from low-flow showerheads and power bars with integrated timers under the Low Income Renter Program. It references Natural Resources Canada and the Ontario Power Authority for savings estimates, using 377 kWh and 53 kWh as unitary savings values respectively.
stalled through the LIR program. This unitary savings value is also used in the ENSC Retail Markdown Program and the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter program. 4.2.8 Pipe Insulation The LIR program proposes the installatio...
AI summary The LIR program includes energy efficiency measures such as pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps for renters. ENSC uses unitary savings values based on past evaluations, including the 2009 Low Income Homeowner program and the OPA report. The savings values are adjusted based on pipe sizes commonly used in residential settings.
Low-flow showerheads 4 4 100% 100% Power bars with timer 7 0 0% 0% Pipe insulation 3 3 100% 100% Ref.: 5725 30 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Hot water tank wraps 3...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program in 2011 shows high installation rates for items like low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, and hot water tank wraps. A minor issue was noted with CFLs, where only one participant out of 70 removed a CFL, though this was considered a localized occurrence.
essed in the future by ensuring that participants have received all the necessary information to use the timer and that they understand the necessity of using it to achieve the desired energy savings. In a few cases (low-flow showerheads,...
AI summary The report discusses the installation rates for energy-efficient products in the Low Income Renter (LIR) program, noting 100% installation rates for several items. It also details the energy-to-demand ratio used to calculate demand savings and provides revised gross savings for the program, both at the meter and generator levels.
el are also estimated in Table 25, using a line loss factor between the meter and the generator of 1.1043 (provided by NSPI). They correspond to energy and demand savings of 5.492 GWh and 1.231 MW. Ref.: 5725 32 Efficient Products – Low In...
AI summary The text references Table 25, which estimates energy and demand savings from the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, using a line loss factor provided by NSPI. The savings are reported as 5.492 GWh of energy and 1.231 MW of demand.
0 0.153 0.304 – at Generator (GWh) Demand Savings Energy-to-demand ratio 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 Total Gross Demand 0.515 0.195 0.004 0.050 0.001 0.137 0.122 0 0.031 0.062 Savings – at Meter (MW) Line loss factor...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically the replacement of lighting products with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in the Low Income Renter (LIR) program. This change increases heating load in winter and decreases cooling load in summer due to the reduced heat output of CFLs.
ccepted software building energy analysis program developed under funding from the U.S. Department of Energy. 17 Statistics Canada (CANSIM), Households having air conditioning, Nova Scotia, 2009. Ref.: 5725 34 Efficient Products – Low Inco...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, including an analysis of interactive effects factors for energy-efficient products like CFLs and LED nightlights across different heating and air conditioning scenarios.
not possible to determine whether participants would install the lights inside our outside. Therefore, Econoler used the most reliable data available for the calculation of the interactive effects. 18 From DA information and Statistics Can...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects factor for seasonal LED lights in the context of the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It uses data on the percentage of residences using electric heating and calculates the impact of LED light installations on energy savings.
istics Canada. 21 RETScreen International, Normalized climate data for Halifax International Airport, Natural Resources Canada, 1997-2010. 22 From DA information and Statistics Canada. Ref.: 5725 36 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter P...
AI summary The LIR program provides free energy-efficient product installations for low-income renters. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) is assumed to be 1 due to minimal distortion effects. Net savings are calculated using interactive effects for each product category, resulting in total energy and demand savings of 4.335 GWh and 0.976 MW at the meter, and 4.809 GWh and 1.078 MW at the generator.
ther. Table 29 presents the details of the calculation. Overall, the total net energy and demand savings amount to 4.335 GWh and 0.976 MW at the meter, and 4.809 GWh and 1.078 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Low Inc...
AI summary The document provides evaluation results for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, highlighting net energy and demand savings. The total net energy savings are 4.335 GWh at the meter and 4.809 GWh at the generator, with corresponding demand savings of 0.976 MW and 1.078 MW.
duct replacements, pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps are not negligible. Interactive effects factors were estimated for these products and used in the net savings calculations. Ref.: 5725 39 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Pr...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings calculations for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, including adjustments to line loss factors and the inclusion of installation rates and interactive effects factors to improve estimation accuracy. These changes reduced program savings estimates, but significant savings were still observed in the program's first year.
ly based on past evaluation results, market intelligence, secondary research and other sources. The program manual should document these parameters so that the PM and the Evaluator can keep track of the assumptions used to estimate the pro...
AI summary The document discusses the need to improve the program manual for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by documenting parameters, standardizing content, and ensuring it serves as a reference for program modifications and staff changes.
market, the Evaluator recommends keeping the same program name in program documentation and ensuring that all program partners use the formal program name. Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends maintaining the same program name in program documentation and ensuring that all program partners use the formal program name for consistency in the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX II - PROGRAM THEORY Low Income Renter Program Program Theory and Performance Indicators The following table explains the relationship between the different levels of the lo...
AI summary The Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation aims to provide energy-efficient products to low-income renters through collaboration with municipal and provincial housing authorities. The program theory outlines the process of gaining access, enrolling participants, and installing energy-efficient products.
energy-efficient products to install directly date of change, addition or retrieval in a in low-income dwellings, free of charge. record along with their deemed savings.
AI summary The text outlines a program that provides energy-efficient products for free installation in low-income dwellings, with a requirement to record the date of change, addition, or retrieval along with deemed savings.
types of residences, should results in an lead to increased availability of energy- accelerated rate of penetration in the market efficient equipment. for these products. Ref.: 5725 44 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficie...
AI summary The report discusses the demographics of respondents in the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, highlighting that over one-third reside in townhouses or duplexes, and the distribution of residence types among participants.
50 Four 16 Don’t know 1 Ref.: 5725 45 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Just over one-third of participants are the only residents of their abode (36%). Four in 10 resp...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program shows that 36% of participants live alone, 40% live with two or three people, and 21% live with four or more people. Additionally, 74% of respondents pay their entire electric bill, while 7% have electricity included in their rent.
pay a shared portion of their electric bill (4%) or pay a flat fee to the housing authority of their place of residence (4%). Table 34: Electric Bill Payment Situation Pay Electric Bills 2011 Sample Size 70 Pay all of the electric bill 74%...
AI summary The text discusses the payment situation for electric bills among low-income renters, noting that most pay all of their electric bill, while a small percentage pay a shared portion or a flat fee. It also provides demographic data on the age distribution of survey participants.
ploma (29%). A combined two in 10 respondents indicate having a certificate, diploma or degree from a college (11%), or a university (7%). Table 36: Education Education 2011 Sample Size 70 Less than high school graduation diploma 29% High...
AI summary The document provides demographic data from the 2011 evaluation report of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It highlights that 43% of respondents had an annual household income below $15,000, and 29% did not answer the income question. Education levels were also reported, with 29% having less than a high school diploma.
comparable proportion make any amount over $25,000 (14%). Of note, a relatively high proportion did not answer this question (29%). Table 37: Annual Household Income Income 2011 Sample Size 70 Less than $15,000 43% $15,000 - $24,999 14 $25...
AI summary The document presents data on annual household income and gender distribution of respondents, highlighting a high proportion of low income and a majority of female participants. It references an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV - INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Low Income Renter Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source: Progra...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Low Income Renter Program, including its name change from Low Income Direct Install, challenges in evaluating intangible benefits, and questions about data tracking and gross savings calculations. The report also highlights the program's outreach strategies and participation processes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report C: It would be useful to know what kind of arrangement there is between the building administration and the low-income renter (for each building) in regards to the method of sharing...
AI summary The text discusses questions and comments related to the evaluation of a program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on cost-sharing arrangements between building administrations and low-income renters, process evaluation, program theory, and barriers addressed by the program. It also asks about evaluation plans, marketing strategies, and data management challenges.
ifficult 10 is very easy) Q: Any other subject the PM wishes to include in the process examination of the program partners and or participants. Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. Ref.: 5725 50 Efficient Products – Low Incom...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report and questionnaire for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Low-Income Renter Program, focusing on gathering feedback from program partners and participants. It includes instructions for completing the form and questions about the partner's role and experience with the program.
poration 2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On a scale from 1 to 10 (wher...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions aimed at evaluating the Low Income Renter Program, focusing on participant satisfaction, program complexity, marketing efforts, and relationships with program partners. The survey includes rating scales and open-ended questions for feedback.
On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is excellent), how would you rate your relationship with the other program partners or subcontractors (Clean Nova Scotia) in this program? Score: Q9a - If your answer to Q9 was equal to o...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program delivered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks about program partner relationships, lead sources, market confusion, barriers to implementation, program name changes, and complaints received.
y of that program? Yes: If yes, from which party? (Please do not mention names, just the position of the party.) No Don’t know Not applicable Q15a- What was the complaint about? Ref.: 5725 55 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program...
AI summary This text is part of a survey questionnaire from the 2011 Evaluation Report of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes instructions for participants and a list of questions to be answered confidentially.
99. Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] [IF REFUSED, ASK “Can we schedule a more convenient time for you to conduct this survey?” [SCHEDULED, IF NECESSARY, FOR: _] Ref.: 5725 57 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary This section of the survey asks participants about their continued residence in the house involved in the program, their primary reason for participating, and whether they had any concerns before joining. It focuses on program evaluation and participant feedback.
Refused) [GO TO P4] P3. Were there any other reasons? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE. SAME LIST AS P2] P4. Before participating, did you have any concerns about taking part in the program? 1. Yes [ASK P5] 2. No 98. Don’t know) 99. (Refused)...
AI summary The document outlines a survey conducted for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about participants' concerns, satisfaction levels, and reasons for dissatisfaction with the program.
overall. What was the SINGLE most important reason you were dissatisfied with the program overall? [DO NOT READ. PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE – SAME LIST AS P8] P8. [IF DISSATISFIED—P6= 1 or 2] Were there any other reaso...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, focusing on reasons for dissatisfaction or lack of satisfaction with the program, including installation delays, product dissatisfaction, and evaluator experience.
f air conditioning) 7. (Close doors and windows) 8. (Turn off appliances) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 60 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluati...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation evaluation report asks participants in the Low Income Renter Program about energy efficiency measures they installed and whether they later removed any of them from their homes. It lists various measures and provides response options.
ntegrated timer 96. Other (specify: ) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 61 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report VA4. FO...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the removal of efficient products by low-income renters and the effects of energy conservation measures on their energy bills. It includes response options for why products were removed and asks about changes in energy bills following the installation of measures.
lasting hot water 3. Improved indoor lighting 4. Improved outdoor lighting 96. (Other [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) 1 (Yes) 2 (No) 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) Section R - Interest in other possible measures and recommendatio...
AI summary The document presents survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on interest in additional energy-saving measures and recommendations for improving the program. It includes options for products and measures not covered by the program and invites respondents to provide feedback on how the program could be improved.
[SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) R3. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the program? PROBE: Anything else? 1. (Offer more products/measures to be installed) 2. (Offer more information on the produc...
AI summary The document contains survey responses and demographic questions from a program evaluation report, focusing on recommendations for improving the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes responses on product offerings, communication, and work quality, along with demographic data on residence type and bedroom count.
4. (College certificate or diploma) 5. (University degree, certificate or diploma) 97. Other (SPECIFY: ) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 65 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Ev...
AI summary This document contains survey questions and an on-site visit protocol from the 2011 evaluation report of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The survey collects information on participants' education, income, and gender, while the protocol outlines general information for on-site visits.
PROTOCOL 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of visit: Order ID: Site contact name: Telephone: Address: Type of dwelling: Single-unit: Semi-attached: Other: Duplex/Triplex: Multi-unit: 2 INFORMATION RELATIVE TO MEASURES CFLs (Twister) Database Info...
AI summary This document outlines a protocol for recording information related to the installation of energy-efficient products, such as CFLs and LED nightlights, under the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for data collection and validation.
mitment and involvement required from the tenants. This would prevent losing tenants who would have showed up to the events but did not because the information was confusing. MURR-R2. Improve measure sustainability: The on-site visits reve...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of tenant engagement and information provision in energy efficiency programs for multi-unit renters. It highlights the need for continued outreach, improved product usage education, and program sustainability to ensure long-term energy savings and participant satisfaction.
that the MURR program was new this year and was targeting multi-unit renters, which often represent customers that are less interested in energy efficiency, explains this low level of free-ridership. This result is in line with the survey...
AI summary The MURR program targets multi-unit renters, a group less likely to engage in energy efficiency. Survey results show that the program's free installation of energy-efficient products was a key factor in participation, with low free-ridership (17%). Internal spillover effects were also observed, as participants were influenced to purchase more energy-efficient products after program involvement.
ship level for the program corresponded to the weighted average of the final adjusted free-ridership levels calculated for each participant with the energy savings associated with each participant. Ref.: 5725 54 160, rue Saint-Paul, bureau...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a low-income program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on the impact and process of the program, including the calculation of free-ridership levels and energy savings associated with participants.
VIEW GUIDE WITH OUTREACH AGENT ..................................................... 77 APPENDIX VII - PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE .......................................................... 84 Ref.: 5725 iii Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Low Income Program from 2011. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.
ble 29: Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps ........................... 48 Table 30: Evaluation Results – Gross and Net Savings ..................................................................... 49 Ta...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Low Income program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which provides incentives for energy-saving measures in low-income residential households across Nova Scotia. The evaluation includes interviews, on-site visits, and a survey of 70 participants.
r-owned households all across Nova Scotia by providing incentives to homeowners. Two categories of energy efficiency measures are offered through the Low Income program: Scope I and Scope II measures. Scope I measures include mainly buildi...
AI summary The Low Income program in Nova Scotia offers energy efficiency measures divided into Scope I and Scope II, funded by electricity ratepayers or provincial funds. The program collaborates with multiple agencies and includes a pilot project in First Nations communities. Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) plays a key role in qualifying participants and conducting audits.
rate under the program to conduct the initial energy audit that assesses the measures to be implemented as well the final audit that confirms the measures implemented and provides an EnerGuide rating. The Low Income program aimed at achiev...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income program showed significant success with 5,103 participants and 7.636 GWh of net energy savings. However, program partners noted confusion caused by the program's name changes, including the use of 'Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP)' and 'Low Income Program.' Marketing research suggested that 'Low Income Program' is the most appropriate name.
rch conducted by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) indicated that the “Low Income Program” name was best suited for the program, efforts will have to be put forth to eliminate all confusion in the market. Program partners identified the main b...
AI summary The Low Income Program's name is deemed appropriate, though efforts are needed to eliminate market confusion. Program partners identified participant enrolment as a main barrier, but a new delivery model implemented in 2011 aims to address this by offering direct installs and conducting initial audits. Participant satisfaction is high, and program partners are also satisfied with the program and their collaboration with ENSC. Energy savings are calculated using EnerGuide points and prescriptive measures.
1,274 Faucet Aerators 86 176.3 Low-Flow Showerheads 157 377 Hot Water Heater Pipe Insulation 74 74 Hot Water Heater Tank Wraps 399 270 Ref.: 5725 viii Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report RECOMMENDAT...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation recommends assessing the installation rate of prescriptive measures, noting that only 13% of total energy savings came from EnerGuide points, with the rest from on-site installations.
Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Low Income program is aimed at facilitating the implementation of cost-effective electrical-saving measures in residential low-incom...
AI summary The Low Income program, administered by ENSC, provides energy efficiency measures for low-income households in Nova Scotia. It includes two scopes of work, with funding sources varying based on heating type. Eligibility is determined by income and home ownership criteria, and delivery agents conduct energy audits and implement measures.
to the estimated use of electric space heating. When the home has multiple fuel sources, the DA will estimate, after talking with the homeowner, the percentage of heating supplied by each fuel source. Scope II covers the implementation of...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency measures in homes, including the use of electric space heating and the replacement of non-efficient appliances with ENERGY STAR®-qualified models. It also highlights a pilot project conducted by the Low Income Program in two First Nations communities in Nova Scotia, which involved the direct installation of energy-efficient products.
2011 Evaluation Report savings resulting from this pilot project were claimed with the savings of the Low Income program in the impact evaluation. In 2011, the program had a net energy savings goal of 4.70 GWh and 1.00 MW for demand saving...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Low Income Program's energy savings goals, including a net energy savings target of 4.70 GWh and 1.00 MW for demand savings. It also references a program logic model and methodology used in the evaluation.
Resources Canada. For additional information: http://198.103.48.154/eng/software_tools/hot2000.html. 3 The population for the 2011 survey was 594 participants at the time of conducting the survey. Ref.: 5725 6 Low Income Program Efficiency...
AI summary This section discusses the process evaluation of the Low Income program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on program design and delivery effectiveness. The evaluation involved interviews with program managers, partners, and a telephone survey of participants. A program manual is described as an essential tool for staff and evaluators, containing customized components tailored to the organization's needs.
nuals intended for internal use. The table below presents such information as well as that found in the Low Income program manual. Table 4: Program Manual Content Low Income Program Manual Content Program Manual Document revisions Program...
AI summary The document outlines the content of program manuals, specifically focusing on the Low Income Program, including sections such as program description, eligibility criteria, budget, and evaluation plans. It references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
ons Marketing plan Evaluation plan Program theory Logic model Program process flow chart Partner or participant process flow chart Program forms Information included in the program manual Information partially included in the program manua...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the Low Income program manual and found it useful but recommended revisions to the process flow chart, inclusion of EnerGuide audit and trainer activities, and monitoring of outreach activities with performance indicators.
ed as part of the EEH program where customers could save money by uniting to buy the same product. For more information on the Team Buy approach, visit the following website: http://www.teambuy.ca/. Ref.: 5725 10 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The text discusses the need for a verification protocol to identify inconsistencies in the tracking sheet and the recommendation to use energy consumption data from HOT2000 for more accurate energy savings calculations within the Low Income Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
mportant to the PM are covered. The two most important components of the plan are the evaluation methodology as well as the pre- and post-data required to apply the selected methodology. > Address the confusion around the program name: The...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of a clear program name for the Low Income Program, noting that past name changes have caused confusion among participants. Marketing research indicated that the current name is preferred for its clarity.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.5 ON-SITE VISITS The on-site visits conducted as part of the evaluation of the Low Income program aimed at assessing the procedure and the ecoEnergy protocol that the energy advis...
AI summary The on-site visits for the Low Income program were evaluated to assess adherence to the ecoEnergy protocol. Advisors followed procedures well, but there were opportunities for improvement. The evaluation noted proper data collection and timing aligned with protocol guidelines.
ould be provided to the participants, especially because this issue represents a high energy savings potential in low-income households when compared to typical residential buildings. Ref.: 5725 12 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of providing informational materials to low-income households participating in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the potential for significant energy savings and the need for improved understanding of energy efficiency measures.
improvement, increased value of the property), would be another opportunity for improving the energy efficiency of low-income residential buildings. 3.6 RELATIONSHIP WITH PARTNERS Four program partners were interviewed under the process ev...
AI summary The evaluation of the Low Income program highlights high satisfaction among partners regarding the program's overall performance and collaboration. However, some confusion arose due to the program name change and marketing challenges, with one DA expressing concerns about poor training and outreach. The name 'Low Income' was found to be preferred for clarity despite some resident discomfort with the label.
sociated with this expression. However, marketing research done by NSPI when the program was initiated found that the present program name (Low Income) was preferred because it was clear and explicit. Several complaints were received from...
AI summary The Low Income Program faced complaints about insufficient measures and timelines, but participant satisfaction was high at 91%. Program partners suggest improving eligibility processes to increase enrolment, with recommendations including open applications and expanding income eligibility. The new delivery model is expected to address these barriers.
source used, while another DA recommends increasing the eligible income range. However, the new delivery model implemented by ENSC should improve program enrolment and address this important barrier. In order to improve the program, progra...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations to improve the low-income program, including adjusting the eligible income range, reducing the number of organizations involved, and enhancing communication between the Delivery Agent (DA) and the Organization (OA). It also mentions a telephone survey of 70 participants, though results are noted to be cautious due to challenges in surveying the low-income housing market.
5 16 Don’t know 13 24 13 Multiple responses 6 It should be noted that newspaper or bill inserts were not part of the 2011 marketing campaign of the Low Income program. If these answers show inconsistencies, they may also refer to ENSC’s co...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Low Income Program highlights that saving money on electricity is the primary motivator for participation, followed by improving insulation, obtaining free services, and making home improvements. The report also notes that newspaper or bill inserts were not part of the 2011 marketing campaign.
1 power bars To save energy 16 17 6 11 Overall good 2 2 5 2 idea/needed it To know home’s energy efficiency 3 level Older home 2 To improve resale 2 value Other 2 4 3 2 9 10 None 4 Don’t know 5 35 10 52 13 Refused 4 5 27 Multiple responses...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation indicates that only 4% of respondents had concerns about participating, with some worried about potential costs despite the program being marketed as free.
2010. One respondent was concerned about having to pay some cost, and similarly, one did not believe that it was really free. Table 7: Participation Concerns Participation Concerns 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 55 62 70 Had concerns about par...
AI summary The text discusses participation concerns in a program, noting that in 2010, some respondents were worried about having to pay costs and doubted the program was truly free. The data shows a decrease in concerns over the years, with specific concerns like eligibility and mess also mentioned.
1 Low-flow faucet aerators 1 Electric kettles with auto shut-off 1 Don’t know/refused 1 Reason 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 2 6 8 Did not believe any changes would result in 2 1 lower energy bills Hassle factor, too much disruption to my dai...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that very few participants in the Low Income Program removed energy efficiency measures, with only 3% or 2 respondents doing so. One removed CFLs due to non-compatibility with dimmer switches, while another removed low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, and power bars.
wo respondents removed CFLs while the other stated having removed low-flow showerheads, low-flow faucet aerators and power bars. The removal of CFLs was due to non-compatibility with dimmer switches. Table 9: Measure Removal Verification R...
AI summary The document discusses the removal of energy efficiency measures by respondents, with some removing CFLs due to dimmer switch incompatibility and others removing low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, and power bars. A table summarizes the removal rates and specific measures removed.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.4 Impact of the Program The Low Income program had a positive impact on many aspects for participants. Three-quarters of participants agree that the measures implemented by the...
AI summary The Low Income program had a positive impact on participants, with 76% reporting even temperatures throughout their homes and 69% finding it more convenient to control temperature automatically. Other benefits included reduced drafts, improved hot water and lighting, and reduced noise levels from replaced appliances.
Other 8 3 16 Don’t know 8 16 2 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 21 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Three in 10 respondents have noticed a drop in their energy bill (30%) while 16 percent have notic...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation indicates that 30% of respondents noticed a drop in their energy bills, 16% noticed an increase, and 52% saw no change or found it too soon to tell. These findings are consistent with previous years, though no participants have completed a full heating season yet.
16 Don’t know 15 11 1 Refused 1 Ref.: 5725 22 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.5 Satisfaction with Program Participants were extremely satisfied with the Low Income program since almost all o...
AI summary Participants in the Low Income Program reported high satisfaction levels, with 96% rating the program as 'very satisfied/satisfied.' Specific areas such as courtesy of energy evaluators, quality of work, and energy evaluations also received high satisfaction ratings, though overall program communication was slightly lower than in previous years.
nication (83%), which was deemed less satisfactory for the year 2011 than in 2010, although not statistically significant. Table 14: Satisfaction with Low Income Program Satisfaction with Program 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 55 62 70 Program...
AI summary The satisfaction levels for the Low Income Program in 2011 were slightly higher than in 2010, though not statistically significant. The program overall had high satisfaction rates, but some aspects such as the energy efficiency presentation and quality of work completed saw lower satisfaction levels.
Overall program communication 93 83 Percentage very satisfied/satisfied Don’t know/no answer removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 23 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The small number of participa...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation found that while most participants were satisfied, three respondents expressed dissatisfaction due to unmet expectations regarding insulation upgrades, refrigerator size, and thermostat installation. All respondents, however, would recommend the program to others.
2011 Evaluation Report The next table shows the summary of surveyed recommendations for improving the program. Table 17: Recommendations to Improve Program Recommendations to Improve Program 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 55 62 70 Offer more p...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report summarizes recommendations for improving a program based on survey responses from 2009 to 2011. Respondents suggested offering more products, improving communication, and increasing awareness. A diagram developed by ENSC in late 2011 was viewed as helpful for simplifying the Low Income program participation process.
This result indicates that the participation process flow chart developed by ENSC in late 2011 was a good initiative as it will potentially simplify the participation of future program participants. Table 18: Provision of a Diagram Illustr...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the impact of the Low Income Program in 2011, focusing on energy and demand savings. It references a participation process flow chart developed by ENSC in late 2011, which was intended to simplify program participation for future participants.
stomers, electricity consumption for the last three years and the corresponding heating degree-days for each period and for each customer were assembled totalling 9,791 observations (billing periods). Before running the analysis, it was ne...
AI summary The analysis involved compiling electricity consumption and heating degree-day data for 9,791 billing periods. After filtering for participants with electrical space heating and valid winter billing periods, only 35 participants remained, making billing analysis unreliable. Energy and demand savings were instead calculated using unitary savings from the EEH program, with Econoler refining the data using survey outcomes. Net savings were evaluated using interactive effects factors and NTGR.
a using outcomes from the participant survey conducted with Low Income program participants. Finally, the program net savings were evaluated by applying the interactive effects factors and the NTGR. Ref.: 5725 26 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income Program's gross savings is based on the EEH program analysis, using unitary savings estimates from various studies, including a 2011 Ontario Power Authority report, to calculate savings for prescriptive measures implemented through different programs.
or townhouses (respectively 221 kWh per year and 295 kWh per year), it was deemed a conservative assumption to consider that 100 percent of all program participants resided in single-detached houses. In light of the above, Econoler estimat...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings estimates for various products installed under the Low Income program and First Nation pilot project, including programmable thermostats, electric kettles, and power bars with integrated timers. Econoler and ENSC used specific unitary savings values based on previous studies and evaluations.
rmed the proportion of 40 percent used for this electronic device. Therefore, Econoler continued using the unitary savings value of 53 kWh per year for the installed power bars with integrated timer. 4.2.9 Dehumidifiers The Low Income prog...
AI summary The Low Income Program promoted replacing inefficient dehumidifiers with more efficient models. Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) used a unitary savings value of 108 kWh per year for each replaced dehumidifier, based on a Wisconsin program evaluation. For this year's evaluation, the estimated savings per replaced dehumidifier was 686 kWh per year.
ed to keep a conservative approach and considered neither additional consumption nor energy savings for the new dehumidifiers installed in houses where there was no dehumidifier before the project. 19 The Cadmus Group, Evaluation of the On...
AI summary In 2011, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) promoted replacing old refrigerators with more efficient models through the Low Income program. A unitary savings value of 850 kWh per year was used, based on prior evaluations. Econoler estimated that replacing old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR models could save 817 kWh per year.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 24: Unitary Savings Calculation for Freezer Replacement Parameters Values Base Annual Consumption – Old Freezers 916 kWh New Annual Consumption – New Freezers 279 kWh Annual Unitary Savings 637 kWh 4.2.12 Refri...
AI summary In 2011, the Low Income program facilitated the retirement of old refrigerators, with ENSC using a unitary savings value of 776 kWh per year. This was based on the 2010 evaluation of the ARet program. Econoler estimated a higher average unitary savings value of 1,016 kWh per year for freezer retirements, calculated using data from the recycling facility.
electricity. Otherwise, Econoler set the unitary 21 Natural Resources Canada, Personal: Residential – Better Water Use Means Bigger Savings, http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca, date modified: 2009-06-26. Ref.: 5725 41 Low Income Program Efficiency...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the savings values for low-flow showerheads and pipe insulation under the Low Income Program and First Nation pilot project. Econoler used a unitary savings value of 377 kWh per showerhead and 74 kWh per year per 10 feet of insulated pipe, based on evaluations and reports.
ed pipe size found in the OPA report. In addition, the Evaluator calculated savings for this product only when the energy used for domestic water heating was electricity. 4.2.17 Hot Water Tank Wraps Hot water tank wraps were installed in h...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from hot water tank wraps and low-flow showerheads under the Low Income program in 2011. It references savings estimates from the OPA report and the 2009 impact evaluation of the Low Income Homeowner program. The Evaluator considered only electricity usage for domestic water heating in calculating savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements suc...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects in energy efficiency programs, specifically how replacing inefficient lighting with CFLs or LEDs in low-income homes affects heating and cooling loads. A -9.8% interactive effects factor was applied based on a 1992 study, adjusted for modern construction practices.
sheet (all the empty cells and the “Other,” “N/A” and “?” entries were removed from this calculation). A total of 906 participant households from the 5,090 were mainly heated with electric systems. Ref.: 5725 46 Low Income Program Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses an evaluation of a low-income program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on interactive effects of energy-efficient lighting products in Nova Scotia. It calculates the proportion of residences with electric heating and air conditioning and their impact.
without Air Conditioning 82% x 82% = 67.2% 0.0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -9.8% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the Low Income program and First Nation pilot projects, interactive effects of -1...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the Low Income program and First Nation pilot projects. It estimates -100% interactive effects during heating periods in electrically heated homes and +100% during cooling periods in homes with air conditioning, based on climate data from Halifax.
r -9.0% For all other products installed, interactive effects were considered as negligible. 4.4 NET-TO-GROSS RATIO The Low Income program offers free energy audits and implementation of energy efficiency measures for low-income homeowners...
AI summary The Low Income program provides free energy audits and efficiency measures to low-income homeowners. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) is assumed to be 1 due to minimal distortion effects. Net savings are calculated using gross evaluation savings, interactive effects factors, and NTGR, resulting in 6.910 GWh and 1.477 MW energy and demand savings at the meter, and 7.636 GWh and 1.632 MW at the generator.
1.105 Total Net Demand Savings 0.202 0.728 0.131 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.047 0.068 0.017 0.012 (MW) – at the Generator Ref.: 5725 49 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The document presents a table showing Total Net Demand Savings in MW at the Generator for various years, and references an evaluation report from 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on a Low Income Program.
sure that the DAs have sufficient staff and a protocol in place that would allow ensuring that all final audits are completed within a short period after the measures are implemented. Ref.: 5725 53 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text emphasizes the need for Delivery Agents (DAs) to have sufficient staff and protocols to ensure timely completion of final audits after energy efficiency measures are implemented. It references an evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Program 12. Address the confusion around the program name: The program has carried Design and a few names through its existence (Low Income program and Low Income Implementation Homeowners). It was also integrated with the REAP program. Ac...
AI summary The document discusses the confusion caused by multiple names used for a low-income energy efficiency program and recommends clarifying the program's name. It also highlights the need for energy advisors to thoroughly explain the program's process, incentives, and energy concepts to participants to improve understanding and engagement.
potential impacts. Energy advisor should therefore spend some time on site for explaining the household energy consumption and minimum energy savings basics to the participants. During on-site visits, energy advisors could, for instance, e...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of energy advisors spending time on-site to explain household energy consumption and energy savings basics to participants, particularly in low-income households. It highlights the need to inform participants about the potential side effects of energy efficiency measures on comfort and health, as well as the benefits of air leakage reduction.
On-Sites Visits 15. Encourage the energy advisor to provide participants with booklets: Under its ecoENERGY program, NRCan developed a series of booklets for homeowners aiming to explain energy efficiency concepts and potential measures fo...
AI summary The text discusses improving program communications and participant engagement by providing informational materials and reducing the number of organizations involved in the program to streamline processes and reduce confusion.
s to use the simulation trainees, dates and evaluation forms. software HOT2000 and other aspects of the energy audit such as the blower door test, etc. 3 Several organizations are Records of leads from each organization. cooperating with E...
AI summary The document outlines the process for identifying and assisting low-income households through energy efficiency programs. It includes steps such as referrals, audits, and approval of energy-saving measures. The focus is on program implementation and performance evaluation.
Low Income Households Program Theory and Performance Indicators The following table explains the relationship between the different levels of the logic model. # Program Theory Performance Indicators 6 Once the decision is made, the DA Comp...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency measures for low-income households, highlighting the roles of different organizations in providing incentives. ENSC provides incentives for electricity-related measures, while the provincial government and NRCan provide incentives for envelope measures and pre-approved sets of measures, respectively.
le window for electricity savings measures as well as other energy-saving measures. The first is funded by ratepayers and the second by taxpayers. 8 Implementing the EE measure will Each measure has its own deemed savings along with reduce...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency (EE) measures and their funding sources, the impact of increasing participant numbers on program confidence, the role of specialized contractors in market transformation, and the evaluation of a low-income energy efficiency program.
Low Income Households Program Theory and Performance Indicators The following table explains the relationship between the different levels of the logic model. # Program Theory Performance Indicators 11 Sustainable energy savings will occur...
AI summary The document discusses the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on program theory and performance indicators related to sustainable energy savings and emission reductions. It also includes demographic data about participants, such as housing types and household sizes.
2011 Sample size 55 62 70 1 56% 56% 43% 2 33 27 26 3 6 6 23 4 or more 6 10 9 Year round or Seasonal Home 2009 2010 2011 Sample size 70 Year round residence 100% Ref.: 5725 62 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalu...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights demographic data of respondents, showing that 84% are aged 45 or older, with a majority being female (67%). The report includes a table (Table 33) summarizing age and gender distribution.
decrease compared with 2010 findings, while over four in 10 have a household income between $15,000 and $24,000 (44%). (D8, D9) Table 34: Education and Income Education 2009 2010 2011 Sample size 55 62 70 Less than high school graduation c...
AI summary The text provides data on education levels and income distribution, noting a decrease in lower education levels and an increase in household income between $15,000 and $24,000. It references Table 34 and a 2011 evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Pay Electric Bills 2011 Sample size 70 Yes 100% Ref.: 5725 64 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV - INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Low Income House...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from 2011 focusing on the Low Income Household program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes an interview guide with the program manager to assess the status of various recommendations and changes to the program, such as the name change from REAP and the inclusion of appliances like refrigerators and freezers.
program manual they are if they are of a certain age. If they are not included anymore, what is the reason? Q: Scope I are mainly envelope measure and Scope II are prescriptive measures. Correct? Ref.: 5725 65 Low Income Program Efficiency...
AI summary The text includes questions and references related to a low-income program evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Topics include program scope, funding responsibilities, and the status of recommendations. There are also inquiries about energy audit processes and program modifications.
elivery agent who trains the energy auditors or NRCan? Q: IN the program objectives, the reduction of arrears on their electricity bill is one of them? Page 7 The logic model needs to be modified: 1. In the program activity line- there sho...
AI summary The text discusses modifications to a logic model for a low-income energy program, including training of delivery agents, audit processes, and referrals. It also references program name changes and qualifying measure updates over time.
e Household Program 4. And now, Low Income Homeowner Care to comment? Q: We understand that the qualifying measures have changed from last year, correct? Source Program Manual Page 3 C: It is not easy to read who does what in the introduct...
AI summary The text discusses feedback on the Low Income Homeowner Program, including suggestions for improving clarity in the program manual, concerns about budget management, and questions about protocols for replacing and disposing of CFLs. It also references an evaluation report and mentions the need for performance indicators and process evaluations.
re the program partners how many are they and their roles so we can ask the proper questions when we interview them for the process evaluation. Q: Do you do a cost-effectiveness test post evaluation? Q: When the program was initially desig...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions for a process evaluation of the Low-Income Households energy efficiency program, including inquiries about program partners, cost-effectiveness testing, evaluation plans, marketing strategies, and database usability. It also references an evaluation report and provides instructions for completing a questionnaire.
a score? Reason(s): Q3 – Did you receive any complaints from participants in the program? Yes What was (were) the complaint(s) about? No Don’t Know Refused Not applicable Ref.: 5725 71 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions from an evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. Questions focus on participant complaints, ease of participation, program satisfaction, and suggestions for improvement. The report includes placeholders for responses and does not provide specific answers.
Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q8 – Last year, have you been interviewed by another evaluator about the same program? Yes No Not applicable Q8a – If you answered Yes to Q8, we would like your opinion on t...
AI summary The text is a section from an evaluation report on the Low-Income Households Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about the frequency of program evaluations, the number of partners involved, and the quality of relationships with other partners in the program.
rtner: Score: Name of partner: Score: Name of partner: Score: Q10a – If any of your answers to Q8 was equal to or less than 8, would you care to share the reason or reasons for such a score? Q11 – Who provides you with leads for potential...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions aimed at gathering feedback on the Low Income Program and other related initiatives managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It explores issues such as program name changes, implementation challenges, complaints from partners, and barriers to program execution.
tion of the partner.) No Don’t know Q15a- What was the complaint about? Q16 – In your opinion, what are the main barriers to the implementation of that program by order of importance? Ref.: 5725 75 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report and interview guide related to the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It includes questions about program implementation barriers and participant expectations, emphasizing confidentiality and outreach processes.
GUIDE WITH OUTREACH AGENT PROCESS EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENSC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM PARTNERS Program Name: Low-Income Households How to fill this form: This is a word document that integrates some form features. All you have to d...
AI summary This document is a process evaluation questionnaire for ENSC energy efficiency program partners, specifically focusing on the Low-Income Households program. It asks partners to provide information about their role, the duration of their involvement, and their perception of the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC.
applicable It was the same Program Administrator I had to deal with a new PA The transition went smoothly The transition caused some delays or adjustments Other, please comment Q2 - On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is ex...
AI summary The text consists of survey questions and response options related to the Low Income Program under the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 Evaluation Report. It asks about the Program Administrator's performance, participant satisfaction, complaints, and suggestions for improvement.
regard to the marketing and outreach activities to implement the program? Q 7a - If your answer to Q7 was equal to or less than 8, would you care to share the reason or reasons for such a score? Ref.: 5725 79 Low Income Program Efficiency...
AI summary The text consists of a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Low-Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It focuses on program implementation, including marketing, outreach, partner involvement, and evaluation frequency.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q9b1- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment: Q10- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is excellent), how would you rate your relationship with the othe...
AI summary The text contains survey questions from the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Evaluation Report, focusing on program partner relationships, program name changes, and program modifications. It includes questions about leads, confusion in the market, and complaints from partners.
djust to the way you work Requires minor changes to the way you work Requires major changes to the way you work No opinion Q15- Did you receive any complaints from other program partners? Yes: If yes, from which partners? (Please do not me...
AI summary The text includes survey questions from an evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It asks about complaints from program partners, barriers to program implementation, and participant expectations regarding appliance replacement.
011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VII - PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Participant Questionnaire Low Income Homeowners October 26, 2011 I1. Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report appendix containing a participant questionnaire for the Low Income Homeowners Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It aims to gather feedback from participants regarding their experience with energy efficiency services provided through the program.
luation of your home and then installed or given you a variety of energy-saving measures such as light bulbs, appliances, insulation, or weather stripping. Do you recall participating in this program? 1. Yes [CONTINUE] No, I don’t remember...
AI summary This text outlines a survey process related to the Low Income Homeowners Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes prompts for respondents to recall participation in the program and asks about their experience and satisfaction with it.
e for you to conduct this survey?” [SCHEDULED, IF NECESSARY, FOR: _] Section P- Program notoriety, Reasons for participating and Overall satisfaction with the program P1. How did you learn about the Low Income Homeowners program? [DO NOT R...
AI summary This section of the survey asks participants how they learned about the Low Income Homeowners program and whether they still reside in the house that was part of the program. It includes multiple response options and instructions for handling different responses.
for other assistance programs – social assistance, heating assistance rebate) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 86 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report P7. Thinking o...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Low Income Homeowners Program, including options for responses and references to an evaluation report from 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
to 5, where 1 means “very dissatisfied” and 5 means “very satisfied”, please tell me how satisfied you are with your experience with each aspect of the program. DO NOT ROTATE - DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE Ref.: 5725 87 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The text presents a survey questionnaire evaluating customer satisfaction with the Low Income Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on aspects such as communication, energy evaluation, time required for work, and quality of installed energy conservation measures.
/99 P15.a. Energy conservation measures installed 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 b. Quality of the work completed 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 P16. Has the information you received from the energy evaluation changed your behavior in terms of how you use energy at hom...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy conservation measures installed, behavior changes post-energy evaluation, and whether participants removed any energy efficiency measures from their homes. It focuses on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and includes skip instructions for the evaluation report.
3. Has there been no change in your bills VOLUNTEERED 4. It is too soon to tell) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refusal) Section IM - Impact of measures IM1. Please indicate how each of the following has changed since participating in the Low Incom...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Low Income Homeowners Program on participants' comfort, energy bills, and energy efficiency knowledge. It includes survey questions about changes in comfort levels and energy savings measures installed in homes.
6. Improved indoor and outdoor lighting 96. Other [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Section VP- Value of the program to customers VP2. Would you recommend the Low Income Homeowners program to a family member or friend? 1. Yes 2....
AI summary The document includes survey questions related to the Low Income Homeowners program, focusing on customer satisfaction, barriers to participation, and reasons for not installing recommended energy efficiency measures. It explores the program's value to customers and identifies potential issues such as cost concerns, lack of information, and perceived low incentives.
you choose not to install or implement in your home? [READ – ACCEPT multiple responses] REMOVE FROM LIST MEASURES THAT WERE INSTALLED THROUGH THE PROGRAM (CORRESPOND TO “1” IN THE DATABASE) 1. Building envelope measures such as: insulation...
AI summary This document lists measures installed through a program and provides options for removing them from a list. It also references an evaluation report for the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report B3. FOR EACH MEASURE, RESPONDENT CHOSE NOT TO INSTALL (B2): Why did you choose not to install or implement this energy efficiency measure in your home? [DO NOT READ] 1. (No time to...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report asks respondents about reasons for not implementing energy efficiency measures and gathers recommendations for improving the Low Income Homeowners program. It includes options for responses regarding time, hassle, trust, and suggestions for program improvements.
Program have facilitated your participation in the program? Would you say it would have facilitated your participation in the program significantly, somewhat, slightly or not at all? IF RESPONDENT SEEMS TO NEED EXTRA EXPLANATION : By that,...
AI summary The text is a survey excerpt asking respondents about their experience with a program's facilitation of participation and demographic information. It includes response options for perceived assistance and questions about residence type and bedroom count.
IFY: ] 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) D2. How many bedrooms are in your home? [98=DK; Enter zero for a studio apartment with no bedrooms] D4. Do you pay the electric bills for your home? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) D5. Is y...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions related to residential characteristics, including number of bedrooms, occupancy, household size, age group, and educational attainment of the head of household. These questions are part of a data collection process, likely for program evaluation purposes.
3. (Trades certificate or diploma) 4. (College certificate or diploma) 5. (University certificate or diploma) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) D9. Which of the following income categories best describes your total annual household income bef...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about education levels and household income from 2010, followed by a reference to an evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and a report on the Performance Plus Program Impact and Process Evaluation 2011.
interested in internal procedures. Q: Do you have a participation flow chart that illustrates the different steps for the participants that could be a good support for the program manual writing? Ref.: 5725 80 Commercial & Industrial Custo...
AI summary The text includes questions and comments related to program eligibility, internal procedures, terminology consistency, time limits, and program funding caps in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program. Concerns are raised about free-ridership, clarity of documentation, and potential barriers caused by funding limitations.
he most important barrier by three respondents, followed by a lack of contact with program representatives by two respondents. Table 8: Barriers to Program Participation Any Barriers 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 50 65 61 No 88% 90% 8...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to program participation, highlighting the most important barrier as identified by respondents. It also examines building ownership status and the need for owner permission, with a small percentage of renters reporting needing permission, though none found it a significant barrier.