Topic:"Multi Year Planning Cycle" in M03324

ring the balloting—have resulted in a project schedule extension of approximately six months. The projected completion date has been moved from the second quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010. 2006-06 Reliability Coordination. The...

AI summary Project timelines for reliability coordination and transmission loading relief standards were extended due to NERC staff additions, increased coordination demands, and additional comment periods. Delays added six to twelve months to completion dates, with phase two and three adjustments pushing completion to 2010.

NPCC Reliability Reference Directory # 1 Design and Operation of the Bulk Power System December 1, 2009 Revisions pertaining to the Appendices or any other portion of the document such as Links glossary terms, etc., only RCC Members will n...

AI summary The document outlines the revision process for the NPCC Reliability Reference Directory, requiring RCC Members to approve updates. It mandates triennial updates to align with NERC standards and references related NPCC documents on power system protection and emergency operations.

3.0 The Study Year to be considered It is suggested that a study year of 4 to 6 years from the reporting date is a realistic one, both from the viewpoint of minimum lead times required for construction, and the ability to alter plans or fa...

AI summary The suggested study year for planning considerations is 4–6 years from the reporting date, allowing for construction lead times and plan adjustments. Longer-term reviews may be conducted beyond 6 years to address marginal conditions requiring extended solutions.

3.0 Time Period to be Considered The time period to be considered for a Planning Coordinator's Comprehensive Resource Review will be five years and be undertaken every three years. In subsequent years, the Planning Coordinator shall conduc...

AI summary The Planning Coordinator must conduct a five-year Comprehensive Resource Review every three years, followed by Annual Interim Reviews covering remaining years. The Task Force may recommend an earlier Comprehensive Review based on interim results. Reviews are typically presented to the Task Force before the first year of the assessed period.

3.2 Follow-up The following activities are required to ensure the continuous validity of the plan.

AI summary The section outlines the necessity of follow-up activities to maintain the ongoing validity of a plan, emphasizing continuous efforts to ensure its effectiveness and relevance over time.

Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking 0 April 1, 2005 Effective Date New 0 August 8, 2005 Removed "Proposed" from Effective Date Errata 1 November 1, 2006 Adopted by Board of Trustees Revised Adopted by Board of Trustees: Nov...

AI summary The document outlines version history for a regulatory proceeding, including an effective date of April 1, 2005, an erratum removing 'Proposed' from the effective date in August 2005, and adoption by the Board of Trustees on November 1, 2006, with an effective date of January 1, 2007.

4. Applicability: - 4.1. Load-Serving Entities. - 4.2. Resource Planners. - 4.3. Transmission Service Providers. - 4.4. Balancing Authorities. - 4.5. Transmission Planners, when their associated Transmission Service Provider has elected to...

AI summary The applicability section outlines entities subject to the standard, including Load-Serving Entities, Resource Planners, and Transmission Service Providers. The effective date depends on regulatory approval, with a 12-month delay post-approval by NERC or applicable authorities.

l. The Prioritization Tool prioritizes standards development projects based, in part, on risks and policy issues of each project that are then quantified and ranked. This ranking will help to identify higher priority projects in order for...

AI summary The Prioritization Tool ranks reliability standards projects by risk and policy impact, endorsed by NERC in 2011. It shaped the 2011-2013 Plan, categorizing projects into high priority, ongoing, and additional initiatives. The tool aimed to optimize resource allocation and focus on key reliability issues.

10. NERC and the Regional Entities should update annually their rolling three-year goals. a. Discuss the proposal with the REBG to identify whether it is generally supported and what steps would be required to implement it. NERC is working...

AI summary NERC and Regional Entities are proposed to annually update their rolling three-year goals. NERC is collaborating with REBG to assess implementation steps, with Strategic Goals for 2012-2014 tied to business planning. The proposal references a Commission order from September 16, 2010.

4. Applicability - 4.1. Transmission Owner. - 4.2. Distribution Provider that owns a transmission Protection System. - 4.3. Generator Owner. - 5. (Proposed) Effective Date: The first day of the first calendar quarter, one year after applic...

AI summary Section 4 outlines applicability to Transmission Owners, Distribution Providers with transmission Protection Systems, and Generator Owners. Section 5 sets the effective date as one year post-regulatory approval or Board of Trustees' adoption, whichever applies.