Wheeler & Adams (2009) noted that:
p. pp. 9-10
or Expressions of Interest. (emphasis added – while government has done so, the EAC continues to question the prudency and rational of the government's choices given outstanding issues argued above). This mandate review process would need...
AI summary The EAC questions the prudency of the government's choices in the mandate review process and suggests integrating environmental and non-cost variables into regulatory planning. It advocates for full-cost accounting approaches and greater consideration of carbon life cycle and greenhouse gas reduction targets within the UARB's processes. The EAC also encourages the UARB to ensure NSPI's IRP includes sustainability variables in scenario planning.