HomeNon Energy ImpactsM08059Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Non Energy Impacts" in M08059

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) - Generation Utilization and Optimization
3 passages 3 documents

Non Energy Impacts across all matters →

69697Synapse Energy Economics - Comments 1 passage
Section 20
va Scotia’s current system, but also ramping and ancillary service requirements under different scenarios of increased penetration of wind resources and utilization of, for example, storage resources. Supply‐side assessment for future year...

AI summary The analysis examines Nova Scotia’s energy system under increased wind penetration and storage utilization, emphasizing winter gas availability from New England. New England’s GHG reduction targets may lower natural gas prices in the Maritimes, impacting supply-side planning. Attachments include studies on storage costs and grid adequacy.

69706SBA - Comments 1 passage
Section 1
D a ™ Blackburn Law April 27, 2017 VIA EMAIL Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 383 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M07540 — Nova Scotia Power Inc. 2...

AI summary Blackburn Law comments on Nova Scotia Power's 2016 System Outlook Report, arguing that retaining coal plants as peaking units during winter high-demand periods, despite reduced coal burning, still poses environmental risks from coal pile management, dust control, and ash handling. NS Power defends this approach as economically viable, though it plans to retire Lingan 2 post-Maritime Link. The SBA highlights environmental and reliability concerns.

70759Response to Stakeholder Comments on Proposed Terms of Reference - Track 1 passage
Section 33
ce for NSPI customers. A portfolio of alternatives, rather than a single substitution of new capacity for coal plants,16 is likely the lowest cost among competing alternatives to coal plant retention. We suggest a rigorous analytical appro...

AI summary The text advocates for a portfolio of alternatives to coal plant retention, emphasizing comprehensive analysis using tools like PLEXOS. It stresses evaluating both demand-side (energy efficiency, demand response) and supply-side options, considering cost trends and greenhouse gas reduction value. A rigorous approach is needed to explore demand-side capabilities and their impact on capacity needs.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →