HomeOperating ExpensesM03097Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Operating Expenses" in M03097

Matter: CI# 28098 - P-128.07 - NSPI WO -  Authority to Overspend the Tufts Cove 6 Waste Heat Recovery Project - $8,699,864Approximate value for approval of $8.5 million.
5 passages 4 documents

Operating Expenses across all matters →

N-7NSPI Reply Submission 8/6/2010 2 passages
Operating Savings Resulting from Automation p. p. 0
Operating Savings Resulting from Automation Incremental costs associated with the increased automation of the facility are offset by the ongoing operating costs which would otherwise be required to staff this facility. The economic effect...

AI summary NSPI argues that increased automation reduces staffing requirements, leading to cost savings and avoiding a project NPV deterioration of $2.3 million. Automation allows a smaller operating team, offsetting incremental capital expenditures with labour cost savings. The economic analysis is detailed in Attachment 2.

Capital Cost $78M Capital Cost $76.44M p. p. 10
Capital Cost $78M Capital Cost $76.44M Capital Costs Difference Nominal $ (K$) 0 0 0 0 90 -225 -218 -214 -208 -203 -197 -192 -187 -181 -176 -170 -164 -159 -153 -147 -142 -136 -130 -124 -1,457.1 %) (Discount Rate is 6.62 Reduced capital - n...

AI summary The text presents capital cost differences and operating costs for a project, including a nominal difference of -1,457.1 K$ and a discount rate of 6.62%. It details capital costs for TUC 6 No Duct Firing and operating costs for 5 power engineers, which include an incremental increase of $3.72M.

05797Board Decision 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 0
ount of automation and controls. Everyone of those requires a device change, so you're automating the piece of equipment instead of it being a manual operation with a valve which is the easiest one to explain. You're essentially taking awa...

AI summary The discussion centers on automation upgrades in a steam plant, which required significant capital investment but reduced the need for manual operations and staff. The automation changes involved adding controlled devices, cabling, and design modifications, leading to a reduction in FTE requirements and an increase in the project's net present value.

04691Information Request IR-1 to IR-20 issued by Board Staff to NSPI 6/30/2010 1 passage
c. Please quantify these additional benefits.
c. Please quantify these additional benefits. 1 Request IR-9: 30 in the original cost estimate. 31 f. Please provide the estimated operating cost saving due to this design change. 1 Request IR-14: 2 Reference Capital Cost Breakdown Table 3...

AI summary The text contains a series of requests related to quantifying benefits, operating cost savings, and economic analyses of design changes and capital expenditures. Questions focus on cooling loads, pump models, maintenance costs, and NPV economic analysis for capital spending.

05797Board Decision 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 0
ount of automation and controls. Everyone of those requires a device change, so you're automating the piece of equipment instead of it being a manual operation with a valve which is the easiest one to explain. You're essentially taking awa...

AI summary The discussion outlines the automation upgrades at a steam plant, which required replacing manual devices with automated ones, leading to a reduction in staffing needs. This change involved capital expenditures but resulted in operating savings. The project's complexity increased, requiring more commissioning and start-up staff due to the lack of similar plants for reference.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →