HomeOperating ExpensesM10473Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Operating Expenses" in M10473

Matter: E-ENS-R-22 EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application
10 passages 9 documents

Operating Expenses across all matters →

E-8E1(CA) RIR-1 to RIR-7 1 passage
Energy, Demand, Expenditures, and Participants p. p. 3
Energy, Demand, Expenditures, and Participants The calculations used in this document use the general term "savings". The same calculations are applied to energy savings, peak demand savings, and program expenditures.

AI summary The document explains that calculations use the term 'savings' to represent energy savings, peak demand savings, and program expenditures. The same methodology applies across these categories without specific entity references.

E-9E1(IG) RIR-1 to RIR-33 1 passage
E1 Responses to Industrial Group (IG) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 12
E1 Responses to Industrial Group (IG) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Installation (EPI) have a TRC less than one and are installed when E1 is already in the home, acquiring the savings immediately while preventing the need for E1 or...

AI summary E1 argues that measures with TRC less than one provide utility benefits exceeding costs, supported by PAC ratios ≥1.0. EPI installations improve customer experience by upgrading all lighting, avoiding future costs and ensuring immediate savings. These measures are prioritized over those with TRC >1.

E-10E1(IPONS) RIR-1 to RIR-16 2 passages
E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 11
E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 energy. Other potential benefits include lower maintenance costs, higher occupancy rates, - 2 increased tenant satisfa...

AI summary E1 outlines benefits of energy efficiency in buildings, including lower maintenance costs, higher occupancy rates, improved tenant satisfaction, better indoor air quality, reduced mold risk, avoided capital repair costs, and increased property value in response to IPOANS information requests.

E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 11
E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-16: DSM PROGRAMS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING & LOW INCOME HOUSING PROVIDERS : The requirements of the Affordable Mul...

AI summary IPOANS argues that Nova Scotia's Affordable Multi-family Housing (AMH) program's strict rent controls, below CPI increases, and rising operating costs may degrade rental housing quality. E1 responds that participation in the program does not cause deterioration, citing potential for property upgrades.

E-12E1(NSUARB) RIR-1 to RIR-41 1 passage
Section 53
Residual Suggested ID # Original finding Original Finding Description Status Remaining gaps Recommendations risk level timeframe 3.1 Access controls While EfficiencyOne has developed various Remediated + While EfficiencyOne has EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has implemented logical access controls, but there are inconsistencies, especially with third-party IT providers, leading to a high risk. The original recommendations have been addressed, but further action is needed to align with the rate of access and permissions reviews.

E-25-(i)Resume of A. Napoleon 1 passage
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE p. p. 0
d cash flow, expense, and income data; created budgets; devised and implemented procedures to increase administrative efficiency; implemented new accounting system with minimal disruption to workflow. As Project Administrator, coordinated...

AI summary The text outlines professional responsibilities in financial and project management, including budget creation, administrative efficiency improvements, accounting system implementation, software feature coordination, user manual development, and technical proposal editing. No specific claims or regulatory arguments are presented.

E-29Rebuttal Evidence - E1 1 passage
2. INVESTMENT ALLOCATION p. pp. 3-4
ratios " with lessor regard to the other key DSM plan design principles would be a departure from the Standardized Filing Framework and inconsistent with the consensus nature of the agreement itself. Additionally, E1 would note that, throu...

AI summary E1 argues that deviating from the Standardized Filing Framework would contradict the consensus agreement and that flexibility in investment allocation under NSUARB-approved DSM plans allows program adjustments based on performance. E1 also warns that following the Small Business Advocate's suggestion could defund low-income programs, contrary to the Plan's design principles.

E-312023-2025 EOne NSPI Supply Agreement Fully Executed 1 passage
14 p. p. 81
14 Component Description Benefit or Cost Avoided Cost of Transmission & Distribution EE & DR – the avoided cost of transmission and distribution represents the costs avoided, due to DSM, on transmission and distribution infrastructure with...

AI summary The text discusses the avoided costs associated with energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs, including avoided costs of transmission, distribution, capacity, and carbon. It also outlines program administration costs and incentives, noting that incentives are treated as a transfer in the TRC test but as a cost in the PAC. Benefits and costs are evaluated on a net present value basis.

87301Board Decision 1 passage
[122] The E1 response referenced by the Industrial Group stated: p. p. 38
[122] The E1 response referenced by the Industrial Group stated: There are several reasons why a measure might be included despite having a TRC ratio less than one. Given that many of the reasons are global across all measures, E1 has prov...

AI summary E1 argues that measures with TRC ratios below 1 can still be justified due to understated avoided costs, non-energy benefits, bundling with higher TRC measures, and program-level cost-effectiveness screening. The Industrial Group recommends individual measure justification for TRC failures, while E1 emphasizes program-level screening and customer experience benefits.

87301Board Decision 1 passage
[122] The E1 response referenced by the Industrial Group stated: p. p. 38
[122] The E1 response referenced by the Industrial Group stated: There are several reasons why a measure might be included despite having a TRC ratio less than one. Given that many of the reasons are global across all measures, E1 has prov...

AI summary E1 argues that measures with TRC ratios below 1 may still be justified due to understated avoided costs, non-energy benefits, low-income targeting, market presence, and bundling with higher TRC measures. It emphasizes program-level cost-effectiveness screening and customer experience. The Industrial Group recommends individual measure justification for TRC failures.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →