Topic:"Participant Costs Benefits" in M12780

Section 79I. The requirements of section 79I have been summarized above. E1 submits that the 2027–2031 DSM Plan satisfies both elements of this mandatory approval test as described in section 2.1.3. In its 2025 decision on the application...

AI summary E1 asserts its 2027–2031 DSM Plan meets section 79I of the PUA. The NSEB's 2025 decision (M12282) clarified DSM's statutory purpose, while a 2020 decision (M08888) addressed non-energy benefits in cost-effectiveness testing. The application relies on these precedents for regulatory approval.

r approval for the use of measure-level Non-Energy Benefits within the context of Cost-Effectiveness testing associated with future DSM planning regulatory processes, April 15, 2020, page 19, para 47.

AI summary Approval is granted for incorporating measure-level Non-Energy Benefits into Cost-Effectiveness testing within future Demand-Side Management (DSM) planning regulatory processes, as referenced in a document dated April 15, 2020, page 19, para 47.

3.3 DEMAND RESPONSE The demand response design in the 2027–2031 DSM Plan was informed by a combination of observed implementation experience, updated modelling assumptions, evaluation insights, DSMAG member feedback, and alignment with sys...

AI summary The 2027–2031 DSM Plan's demand response design prioritizes cost-effectiveness, achievability, and system value, informed by E1's refined assumptions, DSMAG feedback, and alignment with NS Power's IRP. Residential participation remains limited due to variable results, but Eco Shift's inclusion is justified for resilience and long-term maturation. Peer jurisdictions indicate improving cost-effectiveness over time.

d reducing GHGs). M12282, NSEB Decision, E1 Application for approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating DSM Plans, December 10, 2025, page 65, para 163. E1 focused on building electrification measures to leverage existing p...

AI summary E1 evaluated strategic electrification measures (e.g., heat pumps) under the modified-PAC test, finding they increased electricity costs despite GHG reductions. NS Power's lack of long-run marginal emissions data limited analysis. The NSEB's 2025 BCA Decision requires DSM to reduce costs, which these measures failed to meet.

4.4 DSM CONTINUES TO BE THE LEAST RISK OPTION - DSM is a low-risk energy investment as there is: - Certainty with respect to the level in investment; - No unexpected costs associated with an investment in DSM; and - No variability in the c...

AI summary DSM is identified as the least risky energy investment due to capped spending, no unexpected costs, and E1's consistent performance. Ratepayers benefit from cost certainty, while fuel and capital projects by NS Power carry higher risks and volatility. E1's reliability ensures adherence to approved spending levels, minimizing financial uncertainty.

4.5.2 2 027–2 03 1 RBIA Investment at the Preferred Plan level would result in average rate impacts that range between -0.1 percent and +0.9 percent by rate class, averaged over the lifetime of measures [(Figure 6)](#page-50-0). These figu...

AI summary Investment in the Preferred Plan for 2027–2031 results in minimal rate impacts (−0.1% to +0.9%) but significant bill reductions (0.04% to 37%) for DSM participants. Figures 6–8 illustrate these impacts, highlighting benefits for all customers despite negligible rate changes.

3 5. THE BALANCED PLAN APPROACH - 4 The portfolio was developed in accordance with the "Balanced Plan Approach" outlined in the - 5 Standardized Filing Framework, which directs E1 to "produce DSM Resource Plans that balance multiple - 6 as...

AI summary E1 developed a portfolio under the 'Balanced Plan Approach' to balance DSM aspects, achieving 435.4 GWh energy savings, 85.0 MW demand savings, and other metrics by 2031. Principles include energy/capacity avoidance, cost efficiency, non-electric benefits, and equitable access. The plan emphasizes value for Nova Scotians through diversified programs and market engagement.

9 5.4 NON-ELECTRIC AND NON-ENERGY BENEFITS - Non-electric and non-energy benefits—such as improved comfort, health and safety, housing quality, - productivity, and market awareness—are realized as ancillary outcomes of cost-effective DSM -...

AI summary The section discusses non-electric and non-energy benefits from DSM programs, highlighting their role in improving living conditions and operational reliability, particularly in residential, low-income, and business sectors. The Plan emphasizes affordability and cost-effectiveness, ensuring these benefits support, but do not override, long-term system value and ratepayer savings.

1 5.6 BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS AND MAINTENANCE OF MARKET PRESENCE 2 In developing the 2027–2031 DSM portfolio, E1 gave deliberate consideration to the maintenance of 3 strong business relationships and a stable market presence as essential e...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) emphasizes maintaining strong business relationships and market stability in its 2027–2031 DSM portfolio to ensure cost-efficient program delivery. The approach prioritizes continuity, incremental changes, and market confidence, preserving scale and breadth across customer segments while aligning with the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB)'s expectations for achievable and prudent DSM plans.

14. CONCLUSION The 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan delivers cost-effective DSM resources in accordance with the requirements of the PUA , which directs that DSM be undertaken in the best interests of NS Power customers. With a portfolio level...

AI summary The 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan meets cost-effectiveness thresholds under the PUA, delivering $682.5M in ratepayer benefits with a 2.4 PAC result. It prioritizes affordability, avoids growth, and integrates solar-PV for Mi'kmaw communities while maintaining investment levels from the 2026 DSM Extension. The plan balances short-term affordability with long-term system benefits.

9.3 PARTICIPANT BILL IMPACTS - For the DSM scenario, within each rate class in each year, total annual savings (i.e., current-year - savings plus persistent savings from past years) are divided equally amongst the number of active - partic...

AI summary The DSM scenario assumes equal annual savings per participant across rate classes, ignoring varying participation depths. E1's RBIA includes free-riders, leading to underestimated average savings. Total Customers category allocates DSM savings equally to all customers, not differentiating between participants and non-participants.

ies 8 Schedule "B": Compensation 9 Schedule "C": Performance Requirements 10 Schedule "D": Confidentiality Agreement 11 Schedule "E": Approved EECA DSM Resource Plan

AI summary The document outlines schedules related to compensation, performance requirements, confidentiality agreements, and an approved energy efficiency DSM resource plan, highlighting regulatory components of a Nova Scotia utility proceeding.

46 Compensation 47

AI summary The document section titled '46 Compensation' contains minimal content, with only a heading and a number (47) present. No substantive details, arguments, or references are provided in the text.

4. PRICE & PAYMENT - 4.1 NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for DSM as set out in Schedule "B" Compensation (the " Contract Price "). - 4.2 The Contract Price shall constitute full compensation for the DSM, and no additional compensation sha...

AI summary NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for Demand Side Management (DSM) per Schedule B's Contract Price, which covers full compensation with no additional payments. Monthly payments are due on the first business day of each month, including HST. Withholding requirements for non-residents and cooperation to ensure proper tax deductions are outlined.

38 Compensation 39

AI summary The section on compensation outlines regulatory considerations, though no detailed information is provided in the text.

d rate class); xiv. Total lifetime ratepayer benefits; xv. Total spending (reported by program and rate class); xvi. Customer satisfaction; and xvii. Actual Program Administrator Cost test results. SCHEDULE D CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOS...

AI summary Schedule C outlines metrics for evaluating demand-side management programs, including ratepayer benefits and cost tests. Schedule D details a confidentiality agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, governed by Nova Scotia legislation and the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

4.3.1 Balanced Plan Approach - E1 will produce DSM Resource Plans that balance multiple aspects of DSM for the benefit of - customers, including: - Short-term and long-term energy and capacity avoidance; - Program delivery costs; - Avoided...

AI summary E1 will develop DSM Resource Plans balancing energy and capacity avoidance, program costs, avoided investments, non-electric benefits, program diversity, business relationships, market access, and rate impacts to ensure equitable customer benefits.

Performance Indicators - E1 will propose DSM resource specific performance indicators within each DSM Resource Plan - application for consideration and approval by the Board. Performance indicators may include - annual incremental and cumu...

AI summary E1 will propose DSM-specific performance indicators for approval by the Board, including energy savings, peak demand reductions, low-income impacts, demand response capacity, ratepayer benefits, spending, and PAC test results, with the Board retaining authority to order additional metrics.

DEMAND RESPONSE (2025) - o In the Residential Demand Response program component, fewer domestic hot water direct load controllers were installed than planned, and enrolment of batteries and EV telematics and charger devices, fell short of...

AI summary The 2025 Demand Response programs faced underperformance due to lower-than-expected installations of domestic hot water controllers, reduced battery and EV device enrolment, and challenges in BNI program participation. E1, a new program, struggled with customer understanding. Expenditures remained high despite lower capacity results due to early-year foundational activities and cost structures.

2 4.7 Additional 2025 Performance Indicators - 3 The NSUARB approved additional Performance Indicators as identified in the Supply - Agreement. 22 4 In 2025, results of E1's additional Performance Indicators are as follows: - 5 Total lifet...

AI summary The NSUARB approved additional 2025 performance indicators under the Supply Agreement. E1 achieved $170.7 million in lifetime ratepayer benefits, an 89.0 Customer Satisfaction Index, and 87% program awareness. Results align with 2024 figures. The provincial government extended the DSM Plan period to 2027-2031 following stakeholder feedback.

ustomers. Together, these customer losses constitute the attrition rate. Treatment participants do not receive Efficiency Insights reports after their accounts become inactive or they switch to solar. This attrition explains why the number...

AI summary The document discusses attrition rates among treatment and control group customers in a program, noting a decline in active participants since March 2024. Attrition rates for waves 1, 2, and 3 were 1.1%, 1.2%, and 1.8% between January–April 2025. Control group attrition rates are similar but not reflected in participation history figures. Figures 28–30 illustrate active participants and attrition trends.

\ \ For regular Retrofit projects, the evaluation methodology included a sample size of n=18, but participant interviews were conducted for only 15 projects (completed by 13 unique participants). Participants who completed the remaining th...

AI summary The evaluation methodology for Retrofit projects included a sample size of 18, but only 15 projects were interviewed, with three remaining participants unreachable or declining. For compressed air leak audit projects, a census approach was used with three participants, one of whom declined to be interviewed.

Synapse Response: - Table 3 on page 26 of Alice Napoleon's evidence does not include Enabling Strategies (ES). The labels on - the total rows in the evidence incorrectly note that ES is included when ES is not included. - Please find an up...

AI summary The Synapse Response addresses an error in Table 3 from Alice Napoleon's evidence, where Enabling Strategies (ES) was incorrectly included in the totals. The table has been updated to include ES, with corrected benefit cost ratios for PAC and Modified PAC Test, and the decimal points have been removed for clarity.

1. INTERVENOR Solar Nova Scotia is a non-profit industry association representing solar energy and distributed energy stakeholders across Nova Scotia. The organization works to support the responsible growth of distributed energy resources...

AI summary Solar Nova Scotia, a non-profit industry association, represents solar energy and distributed energy stakeholders in Nova Scotia. It advocates for the responsible growth and integration of distributed energy resources into the electricity system, emphasizing benefits for ratepayers and the broader economy.

ons to approved plans where circumstances warrant such action in the public interest." a. When is the potential for a plan amendment assessed? Is it on an annual basis? If so, when during each year? - b. How many times, from 2020 to presen...

AI summary The proceeding seeks information on E1's criteria for amending approved DSM plans, including instances of significant changes in avoided costs, market conditions, legislative shifts, and other events impacting plan feasibility from 2020 to present, as well as thresholds for budget or savings changes triggering amendments.