E-22010 DSM Evaluation Reports - Final Report - February 28, 2011 2/28/2011
25 passages
ENT PRODUCTS – RETAIL PROGRAM (POWER DOWN - PD) ............................................................... 14 3.4.1 CFL Component ...........................................................................................................
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency programs including retail and direct installation initiatives, home energy assessments, new housing programs, appliance retirement/replacement, and support for low-income households. It also references an executive summary evaluating program impacts and processes.
dditional spot audits or site inspections by program staff for a sample of participants: SBLS, LIH, and DI.2 The DSM Administrator should consider devoting resources to conduct spot audits or site inspections, on a quarterly basis, on a sa...
AI summary The DSM Administrator is recommended to conduct quarterly spot audits/inspections for SBLS, LIH, and DI participants, increasing frequency if issues are found. Missing data in billing records for SBLS participants (multiple meters not included) complicates analysis, requiring improved tracking methods.
ome cases requiring several days before requests could be fulfilled.3 These delays were especially problematic for generating monthly participation lists required by NMR to complete telephone surveys. 1.3.3 Recommendations Data tracking an...
AI summary The 2010 DSM program evaluation highlighted delays in data fulfillment due to resource allocation during the transition to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. While a centralized data system was implemented, improvements in data entry, reporting, and tracking remain critical for effective program management and evaluation.
oncurrent with this evaluation. NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executive Summary Page 6 The DSM Administrator should examine their data tracking processes and procedures for each program and consider the following recommendations regardi...
AI summary The evaluation recommends improving data tracking protocols for DSM programs, including standardizing data entry, automating reports, enhancing audit processes for specific programs, and ensuring systems capture historical billing data to support program evaluation and management.
3.1 C&I Custom Program (C&I) The C&I Custom program is a well run program with a well-documented and detailed data tracking process, rigorous policies and procedures to screen out free-riders, and a rigorous monitoring and verification (M&...
AI summary The C&I Custom program demonstrated strong energy savings in 2010 but missed demand targets. NMR recommends adapting incentives to include demand response. Program success was driven by expanded outreach via Sales Leads, though long implementation timelines may delay impact realization. The program's rigorous M&V and free-rider screening were noted as strengths.
p levels continue to rise, consider adjusting the if it continues to increase it may become an area of concern. screening procedures used to identify free-riders. C&I-F2. C&I-R2. Due to the compressed time frame between the end of the prog...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in the C&I Custom program's evaluation process, including compressed timelines, data entry errors, and the need for improved screening procedures and evaluation schedules to ensure accurate and rigorous impact assessments.
please tell me if you are very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied with your experience with that specific aspect of the program. VS S Neither Dissat V.Dissat DK/Ref a. Program marke...
AI summary The text presents a survey format asking participants to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the Power Down program, followed by questions about barriers to participation and recommendations for improvement. It includes rating scales and open-ended questions for feedback.
Marketing and Verification: 16. Please explain the various marketing activities utilized by each program. What do you think is particularly good about program marketing? How could program marketing be improved? 17. Overall, how successful...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to program marketing, delivery, success, free-ridership safeguards, coverage gaps, and the adoption of 2009 recommendations. It also asks about program strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements.
Scotia Power? If not, what data should be captured? Do you think the data is being captured and communicated in the most efficient possible way? IF NO: How could the data capture and communication be improved? 16. [IF NOT MENTIONED ABOVE]...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to data collection and program delivery processes for energy efficiency initiatives. It focuses on data capture, communication, and program implementation, including audit timelines, customer follow-up, and challenges in program delivery.
se in the mean and median consumption for the pre to post period. The comparison of the NAC between groups for each period demonstrates that the control group is well matched to the participant group. Table 2-3: Distribution of Electric NA...
AI summary The text discusses the analysis of energy consumption data for participants and control groups before and after program installation, using statistical methods to quantify energy impacts. The analysis involved stratification based on pre-participation NAC to ensure accurate projections of program savings.
16. In general, how well do you think the program tracking and reporting process is working? Do you believe all the necessary data is being captured and passed on to Conserve Nova Scotia? To Nova Scotia Power? If not, what data should be c...
AI summary The text asks about the effectiveness of the program tracking and reporting process, data capture, program delivery timing, vendor selection, and factors affecting program delivery. It seeks improvements and insights into the delivery process and vendor relationships.
tion explored issues that included program administration, satisfaction, motivation, barriers to participation and how the rebates incentivized participants to implement energy efficiency measures. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Pa...
AI summary The impact evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program found that it achieved 680 MWh of energy savings and 810 kW of demand savings, falling short of the energy savings target of 2,000 MWh but exceeding the demand savings target of 640 kW. Net savings were calculated using a 46% net-to-gross ratio.
10. What are the major components and activities of the program, and what are they intended to accomplish? a. In the short term? b. Intermediate term? c. Long term? 11. What are the key outputs from each activity? 12. Is there any sequence...
AI summary The questions focus on the structure, sequence, and measurement of program activities, outputs, and outcomes over short, intermediate, and long-term periods. They also explore assumptions related to resource availability, customer motivation, and program effectiveness.
Marketing and Verification: 17. Please explain the various marketing activities utilized by each program. What do you think is particularly good about program marketing? How could program marketing be improved? 18. Overall, how successful...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to program marketing, delivery, success, free-ridership safeguards, coverage gaps, and evaluation of past recommendations. It also asks about program strengths, weaknesses, and needed improvements.
will be terminated once the legislation is enacted. The impact evaluation was based on visits to nine sites with installed lighting and visits with four of the six major distributors for the program. Impact Evaluation Findings For the BER...
AI summary The impact evaluation of the BER and SLC programs found that combined net generator-level impacts were 6,748.3 MWh of energy savings and 1,267.3 kW of demand savings, falling short of the combined program targets of 10,000 MWh and 2,420.0 kW. The evaluation used site visits, program records, and telephone surveys to estimate free-ridership and spillover effects.
avings goal of 3,410 kW. However, the 2010 savings exceed the evaluated savings for 2008 and 2009 combined (16,311 MWh and 2,403 kW), which shows significant growth for the C&I Custom program in 2010. Table 1: 2010 Program Energy and Deman...
AI summary The C&I Custom program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2010, exceeding the combined savings of 2008 and 2009. The program is well-run with robust data tracking and free-rider screening, though staff constraints and data entry errors impacted NMR's evaluation process.
(3) where, = Savings weighted average operating hours [h] = Lighting group i = Operating hours for lighting group i = Energy savings for lighting group i The peak coincidence factor was then determined by dividing (5,813 hours) by 8,760 ho...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings in a lighting project, using weighted average operating hours and a peak coincidence factor. It also mentions the use of Metrix software for M&V projects, due to challenges with existing spreadsheets and disorganized lighting panels at the hotel.
od. Equation 3 was applied to all retrofitted areas of the building served by HVAC systems (100% in this case). Savings from all areas were summed to arrive at interactive effects peak demand savings. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that annual energy savings were 82.9% of the tracking savings, with reductions partly due to removing double-counted savings and adjusting operating hours. Peak demand savings exceeded tracking projections by 1.9% due to higher coincidence factors used in the evaluation.
92.4 150 96.2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A68 Note that the motor efficiencies and sizes listed in Table 2 reflect changes made during the evaluation. With respect to motor size, only motor #6 was changed based on site c...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on motor efficiency changes and the calculation of tracking savings using a spreadsheet-based approach. It also notes errors in the tracking analysis and provides formulas for calculating the power factor of both preexisting and installed motors.
4,027 Total Connected Load (kW) 352.3 Total Connected Load (kW) 38.4 Note that the fixture quantities listed in Table 2 reflect changes made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Since the project was not comp...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit project using a spreadsheet-based approach. It outlines how energy consumption was determined for pre-existing and installed fixtures based on quantities, wattage, and operating schedules, and how savings were calculated by subtracting the installed case from the pre-existing case.
tage [W] = Incandescent fixture operating factor = LED fixture quantity = LED fixture wattage [W] = LED fixture operating factor 1009 = W to kW conversion factor The various operating schedule factors, and , used in the analysis were deriv...
AI summary The text provides detailed assumptions about the operating schedules of traffic signals, including incandescent and LED fixtures, and their respective operating factors. These factors are used in the M&V savings analysis to calculate energy consumption and efficiency improvements.
was then subtracted from the instantaneous peak demand of the incandescent case to calculate demand savings. Demand savings from each intersection were then summed to calculate project demand savings. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The evaluation...
AI summary The document outlines the on-site methodology used to evaluate the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It describes how demand savings were calculated by comparing LED and incandescent fixtures and includes a site visit to verify installations and fixture counts.
ues used in NSPI‘s M&V analysis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A82 Table 4: Summary of verified and M&V signal wattages Signal Type Verified Wattage M&V Wattage 12" Green Traffic Signal 12 12 12" Amber Traffic Signal 13 17...
AI summary The document provides a summary of verified and M&V signal wattages for various traffic signals and pedestrian signals under NSPI's 2010 C&I Custom Program. The table lists wattages for different signal types, with some discrepancies between verified and M&V wattages.
l 10 14 PED Walk/Don't Walk Signal 6 6 PED Countdown Unverified 9 Although the verified wattages were lower than the wattages used in the M&V analysis, the site contact noted that the light types used throughout the project have changed. A...
AI summary The document discusses discrepancies between verified wattages and M&V analysis wattages for LED lights in a 2010 C&I Custom Program project. The site contact noted changes in light types, and the M&V wattages may have been accurate for earlier installations. The evaluation used M&V data for consistency, and a spreadsheet provided by the site contact was used to verify the number of retrofitted intersections.
0 0 0 0 1 1 0 -4 Intersection 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection 10 0 1 1 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 Intersection 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In general, the discrepancies were relatively minor and were not all biased in the same direction. However, it...
AI summary The text discusses minor discrepancies in fixture counts at intersections, with 7 out of 11 verified intersections showing errors. The discrepancies were deemed trivial, so no further verification or scaling was applied. Energy savings calculations used updated operating factors in the M&V analysis, which previously failed to account for protected left turns at intersections.