e the Board further raised concerns with NSPI's position that it did not assess the reliability impacts of individual projects because it treats asset risk profiles as the primary measure. 2 Furthermore, despite the Board's prior direction...
AI summary The Board has raised concerns with NSPI's approach to assessing the reliability impacts of individual projects, as it relies on asset risk profiles rather than directly evaluating reliability outcomes. The Board also expressed dissatisfaction with NSPI's lack of urgency in meeting reliability targets, particularly regarding the Five-Year Reliability Plan and its ability to achieve a 20% improvement in SAIDI by 2029.
Planned Outages and Reporting Transparency While NSPI has met its adverse weather response standards, planned outages remain a material source of interruption for customers. Industrial customers must curtail production, change schedules an...
AI summary The document discusses concerns raised by the Industrial Group regarding the increasing number of planned outages by NSPI and the lack of detailed reporting on their impact. While NSPI provides aggregate data, the Industrial Group argues that disaggregated data by feeder or substation would better inform the Board about the distribution and impact of planned outages on customers.
Conclusion In summary, the Industrial Group respectfully submits that: - 1. NSPI should file in its Annual Performance Standards Report, a program-level attribution analysis identifying the SAIDI improvement estimated to result from each c...
AI summary The Industrial Group submits several recommendations to NSPI and the Board regarding performance standards, including the need for detailed reporting on SAIDI improvements, transmission loss of supply analysis, and the inclusion of customer-level metrics in performance standards. They also suggest penalties under the PUA be credited to the FAM for customer benefit.