Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Procurement Practices" in M07544

Matter: E-ENS-R-16 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology Review and RecommendationsGroup with M06733
10 passages 6 documents

Procurement Practices across all matters →

E-1Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan 2 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement fo...

AI summary The proceeding involves an application under the Public Utilities Act for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities.

Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 197
Cost Effectiveness Testing As per the 2016-2018 plan, there are three key elements to cost effectiveness: - 1. Each program is supposed to be screened for cost effectiveness. For Massachusetts, the TRC test is used for screening. There is...

AI summary The 2016-2018 plan outlines three cost effectiveness criteria: screening programs using the TRC test (used in Massachusetts), minimizing program administration costs, and employing competitive procurement. Justification is required for non-cost-effective elements, and future cost-effectiveness must be addressed.

E-3REVISED Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Clean Version 1 passage
Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 210
Cost Effectiveness Testing As per the 2016-2018 plan, there are three key elements to cost effectiveness: - 1. Each program is supposed to be screened for cost effectiveness. For Massachusetts, the TRC test is used for screening. There is...

AI summary The 2016-2018 plan outlines three cost-effectiveness criteria: screening programs using the TRC test (Massachusetts), minimizing program administration costs, and employing competitive procurement. Non-cost-effective program elements require justification for future cost-effectiveness.

E-3-(i)REVISED Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & Efficinecy One Implementation Report - Redline Version 2 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement fo...

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, involving an application for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The proceeding addresses the legal framework governing utility regulations in Nova Scotia.

Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 218
Cost Effectiveness Testing As per the 2016-2018 plan, there are three key elements to cost effectiveness: - 1. Each program is supposed to be screened for cost effectiveness. For Massachusetts, the TRC test is used for screening. There is...

AI summary The 2016-2018 plan outlines three cost effectiveness criteria: screening programs using the TRC test (specifically in Massachusetts), minimizing program administration costs, and employing competitive procurement processes.

66479Letter from E1 enclosing documents 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 June 30, 2016 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Off...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits documents including CLEAResult's Incentive Setting Methodology report and an Implementation Plan in response to the Board's Order in M06733, requesting exemption from providing a paper copy of an electronic incentive-setting tool. The filing relates to approval of a supply agreement and DSM resource plan.

69772Incentive Setting Methodology and CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Second Revision - Clean Version 2 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement fo...

AI summary The document pertains to an application under Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities. The proceeding involves regulatory review under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended.

Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 210
Cost Effectiveness Testing As per the 2016-2018 plan, there are three key elements to cost effectiveness: - 1. Each program is supposed to be screened for cost effectiveness. For Massachusetts, the TRC test is used for screening. There is...

AI summary The 2016-2018 plan outlines three cost effectiveness criteria: screening programs using the TRC test, minimizing program administration costs, and employing competitive procurement. Massachusetts uses the TRC test for screening, while administration costs and procurement methods are emphasized for efficiency.

69773Incentive Setting Methodology and CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Second Revision - Redline Version 2 passages
EfficiencyOne p. p. 0
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement fo...

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, concerning an application for approval of a 2016-2018 supply agreement focused on electricity efficiency and conservation activities.

Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 216
Cost Effectiveness Testing As per the 2016-2018 plan, there are three key elements to cost effectiveness: - 1. Each program is supposed to be screened for cost effectiveness. For Massachusetts, the TRC test is used for screening. There is...

AI summary The 2016-2018 plan outlines three cost effectiveness criteria: screening programs using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test in Massachusetts, minimizing program administration costs, and employing competitive procurement. Non-cost-effective program elements require justification for future cost-effectiveness.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →