Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Procurement Practices" in M11764

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 10-Year System Outlook Report - 2024
12 passages 8 documents

Procurement Practices across all matters →

N-1Report 1 passage
Section 132
1 A fifth and sixth option were subsequently added in 2021 and 2022 respectively to assess 2 bypassing the existing 69 kV infrastructure with either a single 138 kV circuit, or 138 kV double 3 circuit construction. 4 5 • Option #5 ‐ Bypass...

AI summary The document discusses the addition of two new infrastructure options in 2021 and 2022 for bypassing existing 69 kV lines with 138 kV circuits, as well as the expansion of a study to include electrification impacts. The study was paused due to other procurement studies but is expected to resume in Q4 2024. Additionally, hydrogen facilities are following interconnection procedures for connecting to the Nova Scotia transmission system, with significant renewable generation requests.

N-2NSPI (CA) RIR-1 to RIR-6 - Redacted 1 passage
Section 14
Reliability Tie sited route. 28 Date Filed: September 19, 2024 NSPI (CA) IR-3 Page 1 of 2 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764) NSPI Responses to CA Information Requests CONFIDENTIAL...

AI summary NSPI outlines risk mitigation strategies for the Reliability Tie Project, including site assessments, structural foundation development, and collaboration with experts. Purchase orders for high-voltage equipment for the Onslow substation were issued in spring 2024, with confirmed delivery dates aligned to the project schedule.

N-3NSPI (NSUARB) RIR-1 - RIR-18 2 passages
Section 27
2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764) NSPI Responses to NSUARB Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-9: 2 3 On page 21, NS Power stated that one of the five Rate Base Procurement projects awarded 4 a PPA withdrew...

AI summary NSPI responded to NSUARB's IR-9 request regarding a withdrawn RBP wind project, stating that its capacity and energy would be added to the Green Choice Program, increasing the maximum nameplate capacity from 350 MW to 416 MW. NSPI cited the RBP's 1100 GWh energy target and project attrition considerations as justification.

Section 28
the awarded portfolio size took 16 into account the potential for project attrition. 1 As such the RBP remains on track to achieve the 0F 17 target energy volumes. 18 19 The Green Choice Program RFP, administered by COHO Climate Advisors (...

AI summary The Rate Base Procurement (RBP) and Green Choice Program (GCP) RFPs both account for project attrition, with RBP targeting 1,650–2,000 GWh of renewable energy. The GCP RFP allows flexibility in portfolio size, considering a 10% attrition rate and potential project size variability. Installed capacity calculations for wind farms are provided based on energy targets.

N-4NSPI (SBA) RIR-1 to RIR-6 1 passage
Section 7
One (1) of five (5) projects awarded a PPA withdrew from the program and will not proceed under the Rate Rate Base 373 2025 306 2026/2027 Base Procurement Procurement Program, reducing the capacity of the RBP wind projects from 373 MW to 3...

AI summary A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for one of five projects under the Rate Base Procurement Program was withdrawn, reducing the RBP wind projects' capacity from 373 MW to 306 MW. The text references filings under M11017 and the 2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764).

N-5NSPI (SWEB) RIR-1 to RIR-5 4 passages
Section 1
2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764) NSPI Responses to SWEB Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Based on publicly available sources, at least two (initially and subsequently) awarded 4 Projects dropped o...

AI summary NSPI responded to SWEB's inquiry about two projects (Clydesdale Ridge and Ellershouse 3) dropping out of the Rate Base Procurement. NSPI stated it is not the procurement administrator and lacks details on the dropouts, directing questions to the program administrator and referencing NSUARB IR-9.

Section 2
2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764) NSPI Responses to SWEB Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-2: 2 3 Based on publicly available sources, several awarded RBP projects will achieve commercial 4 operation later...

AI summary NSPI attributes delays in RBP project interconnections to global supply chain issues. To address this, NSPI highlights the use of Engineering & Procurement (E&P) agreements under the GIP, allowing early procurement of long-lead equipment for Green Choice projects to avoid similar delays.

Section 4
2024 10-Year System Outlook Report (NSUARB M11764) NSPI Responses to SWEB Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-3: 2 3 Based on the publicly available Green Choice RFP documents, the procurement anticipates 4 that the awarded...

AI summary NSPI responds to SWEB's IR-3 request, stating Green Choice projects are expected to achieve commercial operation by late 2028, aligning with procurement timelines. The CPI Adjustment Period ends in 2027 to incentivize early delivery. NSPI confirms projects can interconnect in 2027 if desired, based on procurement administrator timelines.

Section 5
urement RFP timelines (established 19 by the Green Choice procurement administrator) 1 and therefore be available for Winter 2028/2029, 0F 20 demonstrating alignment between the 2024 10-Year System Outlook and the Green Choice RFP. 21 At t...

AI summary NSPI confirms alignment between the 2024 10-Year System Outlook and Green Choice RFP timelines, with no anticipated delays in Commercial Operation Dates (COD). Project CODs depend on interconnection design and Network Upgrade requirements per NSUARB-approved Generator Interconnection Procedures (GIP). General connection timelines cannot be guaranteed due to GIP compliance requirements.

N-6Rebuttal Evidence - NSPI 1 passage
Section 25
1 regional system operator, NS Power suggests a pause until the NSIESO is operating 2 successfully as an independent entity and then encourage that organization to 3 engage with neighbouring utilities. 16 4 5 It is appropriate to address t...

AI summary NS Power recommends pausing engagement with neighboring utilities until the NSIESO operates independently. The CA highlights a discrepancy between NS Power's Path to 2030 submission and its BESS project positioning, questioning whether merging ECEI and Section 4D projects into a single 150 MW application reduces anticipated energy storage capacity through 2029. NS Power awaits Board feedback on its August 2024 letter.

95171NSUARB (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-18 1 passage
Section 9
Document: 305605 Date Filed: Aug. 27, 2024 NSUARB (NS Power) Page 3 of 6 1 2 Request IR-7: 3 On page 28 of 67, Figure 11 presents forecasted sustaining capital investments by unit in 4 graphical form. Please provide this investment informa...

AI summary The document outlines five regulatory requests (IR-7 to IR-11) directed at NS Power, seeking details on capital investments, project timelines, withdrawn PPA documentation, utilization factor usage by other utilities, and transmission study requirements. Requests focus on transparency in procurement, project approvals, and technical methodologies for system integration.

95186SWEB (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-5 1 passage
Section 2
a Power transmission system. Is there a plan in place to ensure that similar issues will not occur during the ongoing Green Choice procurement and if so, what are the details of such plan? 3. Based on the publicly available Green Choice RF...

AI summary The text includes questions about the Green Choice procurement's planning, in-service dates, interconnection capacity, and hydrogen production's impact on clean energy targets. It also asks about NSP's ability to guarantee interconnection in 2027 and whether NSP shared information with the Green Choice Program Administrator.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →