HomeProgram EvaluationM12784Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Program Evaluation" in M12784

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report
9 passages 6 documents

Program Evaluation across all matters →

N-12025 Report 1 passage
Section 49
Page 26 of 115 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report Non-Confidential 1 NS Power’s Customer Care Centre received over one million calls from customers in 2025. 2 NS Power customer care representatives supported over 200,000 more custome...

AI summary NS Power's 2025 customer service handled over 1 million calls, a 200,000 increase from 2024, leading to longer call durations. Additional staff and third-party resources were deployed to manage volume, with service levels recovering by December through outreach and resource allocation.

N-4NSPI (NSEB) RIRs 1-33 1 passage
Section 3
NSPI (NSEB) IR-2 Page 1 of 1 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report (NSEB M12784 NSPI Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-3: 2 3 Has the utility conducted any statistical analysis over...

AI summary NSPI responded to NSEB's IR-3 request, stating no statistical analysis links investments to customer satisfaction, operating costs, or reliability. NSPI argues customer satisfaction's complexity and focuses on direct reliability metrics (SAIDI, SAIFI) instead of formal statistical methods.

101891IG (NSPI) IR 1 to 10 2 passages
Section 1
1 2026 M12784 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 5 IN THE MATTER OF: A Review of NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED’s 2025 6 Annual Performance Standards Report 7 8 INFORMATION REQUESTS To: Nova Scotia Po...

AI summary The Industrial Group requests clarification from Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) regarding its 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report, specifically questioning how improved feeder performance standards may paradoxically increase stringency as performance improves, potentially impacting outage reduction metrics.

Section 7
proposed customer-level reliability standards. 5 (a) Does NSPI view CEMI/CELID as informational only, or precursors to 6 enforceable standards? Please explain. 7 (b) Does NSPI oppose eventual inclusion of these metrics in its performance 8...

AI summary The document contains regulatory questions directed at NSPI regarding customer-level reliability standards, data reporting practices for CKAIFI/CKAIDI metrics, and the inclusion of reliability metrics in performance standards. It requests clarification on NSPI's stance on enforceable standards, data exclusions in Appendices I and K, and timelines for finalizing reliability metrics.

102600Closing Arguments - IG 2 passages
Reliability Investment Review and Reporting p. pp. 1-2
up>1 2024 NSUARB 115, para. 64. M11627, Decision Letter, September 9, 2024, page 15. & lt;sup>3 See M11627 Decision, p 15. & lt;sup>4 M12185 Decision Letter, pages 14-15. Crystal Henwood July 3, 2026 Page 3 established[.](#page-2-0) 5 With...

AI summary The Board emphasized the need for NSPI to develop quantitative tools to assess the effectiveness of reliability investments under the Five-Year Reliability Plan. Despite previous directions, NSPI has not yet established such tools, and it acknowledges the difficulty of separating the impact of reliability investments from other factors like weather.

Conclusion p. p. 4
Conclusion In summary, the Industrial Group respectfully submits that: - 1. NSPI should file in its Annual Performance Standards Report, a program-level attribution analysis identifying the SAIDI improvement estimated to result from each c...

AI summary The Industrial Group submits several recommendations to NSPI and the Board regarding performance standards, including the need for detailed reporting on SAIDI improvements, transmission loss of supply analysis, and the inclusion of customer-level metrics in performance standards. They also suggest penalties under the PUA be credited to the FAM for customer benefit.

102605Closing Arguments - CA 1 passage
1 M12784
1 interruption frequency index (CKAIFI): 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report, Exhibit N-2 1, page 23. 3 4 2025 was the first year of Nova Scotia Power's Five Year Reliability Plan and the Company claims 5 it made progress in reducing...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power's 2025 Annual Performance Standards Report highlights progress in reducing outage frequency and duration under its Five Year Reliability Plan. However, it failed to meet customer service targets due to a 2025 cyber attack, which impacted call answer rates and estimated bill percentages. The report also notes apparent improvements from vegetation management and tree trimming efforts.

102819Written Reply Argument - NSPI 2 passages
DATE FILED: July 17, 2026 Page 3 of 15 p. pp. 2-4
DATE FILED: July 17, 2026 Page 3 of 15 1 2.0 CONSUMER ADVOCATE'S COMMENTS 2 3 The CA acknowledged that there has been an improvement in the indices of reliability (page 1, 4 line 20) and that the increased vegetation management and tree tr...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate (CA) acknowledges improvements in reliability due to vegetation management and tree trimming under the Five-Year Reliability Plan but emphasizes that customer concerns about outage frequency and duration remain unmet. The CA also attributes NS Power's failure to meet customer service standards in 2025 to a cyber incident and suggests flexibility in outage reporting thresholds for 2026.

4.0 INDUSTRIAL GROUP'S COMMENTS The IG provided comments in five areas: reliability investment, transmission supply, customer level metrics, planned outages, and administrative penalty. 4.1 Reliability Investment Review and Reporting The IG started by acknowledging that NS Power's 2025 performance demonstrates meaningful improvement in outage frequency. The IG made the following comments about measurement of reliability improvements (at page 3): In response to IG IR-6, NSPI acknowledged that it did not use a quantitative model or statistical test to determine whether its 2025 SAIDI and SAIFI results were associated with specific projects or programs under the Five-Year Reliability Plan. NSPI intends to continue to spend within the "approved categories as approved in previous regulatory filings." … The Industrial Group recognizes that precise, project-by-project attribution may not always be possible. The difficulty, however, is that the present record still provides no reliable basis to determine how much of the observed improvement is attributable to the Reliability Plan and how much reflects a milder weather year. This evaluation is necessary to ensure the proper efforts are being made for the reportedly growing concerns in relation to inclement weather anticipated. The Industrial Group respectfully submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, with its next Annual Performance Standards Report, a program-level attribution analysis identifying the SAIDI improvement estimated to result from each completed Reliability Plan program or investment category in 2025, together with an updated trajectory analysis showing whether Year 1 results place it on track to achieve the targeted 20% SAIDI improvement by 2029. With respect to the request to file program-level analysis, NS Power identifies program-level p. pp. 9-10
s and upgraded line hardware) when submitting projects for approval. Attributing a discrete reliability benefit to each project which can be cumulatively added to a projected benefit is more complex

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) acknowledges NS Power's 2025 reliability improvements but notes that the lack of a quantitative model to attribute improvements to specific projects or programs under the Five-Year Reliability Plan limits the ability to assess effectiveness. The IG requests a program-level attribution analysis and trajectory analysis to be included in the next Annual Performance Standards Report.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →