E-10-(i)Book of Authorities
8 passages
4.2.1 Findings - [71] The Board understands that the targets for energy and demand savings are considered to be aggressive when compared to other jurisdictions; however, these targets and associated investments were established early in th...
AI summary The Board acknowledges the aggressive DSM targets set in the IRP and notes that NSPI exceeded them. ENSC, as the new administrator, finds the targets challenging but achievable. The Board supports including savings from non-program funded initiatives and approves the 2012 DSM investment of $43.7 million.
9.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS [153] The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation and verification, with the qualification made in the SVS for a 10% reduction for the Efficient Products-Direct Install program. [154] The Board understands...
AI summary The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation, approves the 2012 DSM investment, and sets conditions for ENSC, including data system improvements, quarterly progress reviews, and policy development. It also approves changes to the TRC test and requires studies on free ridership and spillover effects.
5.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS [138] E1 applied to the Board for approval of its 2016-2018 DSM Plan, pursuant to s. 79J(3) of the PUA , as it was unable to reach agreement with NSPI on the terms of the Supply Agreement. E1 sought approval f...
AI summary E1 applied for approval of its 2016-2018 DSM Plan with a budget of $121.5 million, but the Board approved a reduced amount of $102.15 million after considering past underspending and overachievement of savings targets. The Quantum Agreement was not approved, and instead, the Board set a lower spending cap with no inflation increases.
7) RESOLUTION PROCESS Year Report/ Process Filing Timeframe Inclusions 2017 Evaluation Reports End of February Impact evaluation (all programs; shortened version referencing 2016 evaluation for methodology unless it changed) Process evalua...
AI summary The document outlines the resolution process, including various reports and evaluations related to energy efficiency programs, financial statements, and meetings with the Demand-Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG). It details filing timelines and inclusions for different years and reports.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2019 in the amount of $34,050,000 with performance targets of 127.2 GWh in incremental annual net energy savings and 20.2 MW in incremental net annual peak demand savings. -...
AI summary The Board approves a 2019 DSM Plan with specific energy and demand savings targets, accepts a progress report, and directs updates to avoided costs and the RBIA. E1 is required to conduct a new DSM Potential Study and improve methodologies for GHG estimates and transparency in its processes. The Board also requests alternate DSM budget scenarios and compliance with filing frameworks.
1 2 3 4 5 6 of discontinue ail EECA under this Agreement and will only finish such portions the to and protect the EECA as may be necessary preserve EECA already in progress. termination not either any of their obligations Such does reliev...
AI summary The text discusses the termination of the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA) and outlines that upon termination, parties are relieved from their obligations under the agreement up to the date of termination. Any claims for payment by EfficiencyOne must be asserted within 30 days from the termination date.
4. & lt;sup>64 See PUA § 7-211(i)(1)(ii)-(iv), which directs the Commission to consider the impact on rates, jobs, and the environment. & lt;sup>65 PUA § 7-211(b)(2). & lt;sup>66 MEA Comments at 14-15; OPC Comments at 6; Efficiency First C...
AI summary The document discusses the inclusion of non-energy benefits (NEBs) in cost-effectiveness screening, emphasizing the need to consider quantified benefits such as air emissions, comfort, and reduced customer arrearages. These benefits are included in the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test and the Social Cost Test (SCT) to ensure parity in cost-effectiveness screening and to support statutory inquiries.
3. Limited-Income Energy Efficiency Goals Improving the energy efficiency of limited-income households remains a critical area of focus for the State. In recent orders we have established a framework of accountability to increase the reach...
AI summary The document discusses the need to set energy efficiency goals for limited-income households under the EmPOWER Maryland program, emphasizing the importance of accountability and the need for input from the current program implementer. A work group is directed to develop a post-2015 goal, considering factors like customer eligibility, historical performance, and bill impacts.