E-22024 DSM Programs Evaluation Reports
20 passages
1 Evaluation Scopes and Objectives The 2024 Portfolio Evaluation Plan was based on the Evaluation Schedule outlined in the Overall Strategic Evaluation Plan[4](#page-10-1) that provides the framework and approach to guide evaluation planni...
AI summary The 2024 Portfolio Evaluation Plan outlines the approach for evaluating demand-side management (DSM) activities from 2023-2025. It emphasizes prioritizing evaluations based on program savings, uncertainty, changes in design, regulatory requirements, and timely feedback. The plan includes impact, process, and market evaluations, with a focus on comprehensive or condensed impact evaluations.
› Among EAs, satisfaction is low with the audit reporting templates. The audit reporting templates generate lower satisfaction levels among EAs, particularly the one for the initial audit. EAs consider that the templates are lengthy and aw...
AI summary Energy Auditors (EAs) report low satisfaction with audit reporting templates, particularly the initial audit template, citing lengthiness and awkwardness. They prefer Excel-based templates over Word-based ones for greater data entry flexibility.
› Record keeping/reporting is time consuming. Having to use two platforms for filling out the required record keeping/reporting forms (CIS) and uploading documentation (SharePoint) is said to lead to repetitive data entry and unclear requi...
AI summary The use of two platforms (CIS and SharePoint) for record keeping/reporting creates inefficiencies through repetitive data entry and unclear requirements for DAs and heat pump contractors. While SharePoint is functional, CIS lacks effective project management. Uncommunicated changes to processes since training have caused ongoing issues with E1.
Table 15: 2024 Recommendations on Residential Program Components No. Recommendation AMH – R1 To further aid understanding, consider providing participants with case study examples of incentive calculations to show pre-tax costs and how inc...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving residential energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including providing case studies, support for participants, improving audit reporting, and tracking wait times and satisfaction levels to assess program performance.
OHPA). Recommendation #2: Provide participants with more information about ASFH to help them understand program options, eligible measures, and participation steps by implementing the following: - a) Investigate ways to inform participants...
AI summary The ASFH program requires improved participant communication, clearer application processes, and better post-installation support for heat pump maintenance. Key issues include inadequate information sharing, unclear program distinctions (e.g., OHPA vs. ASFH), and insufficient guidance on equipment operation.
3.2.3 Barriers to Participation and Program Completion For the dropped-out participants who started but did not complete the program component, financial barriers were cited most often as reasons for dropping out of AMH. Dropped-out partic...
AI summary The analysis identifies financial barriers, low incentives, lengthy payback periods, and affordability covenant issues as key reasons for AMH program dropout. Participants cited insufficient budgets, unexpected costs, and dissatisfaction with rental rates. Program ineligibility and external factors like property sales or illness also contributed. E1 staff and EAs highlighted ongoing challenges with affordability and upfront costs.
3.4 Participant and EA Suggestions for Improvements AMH participants were presented with a list of seven tools and supports that could be offered to help them navigate the program component. Two of the top three tools/supports mentioned as...
AI summary AMH participants emphasized affordability tools like co-funding and low-interest financing as critical. EAs suggested administrative improvements (e.g., delivery agent portals, streamlined reporting) and training enhancements. Additional recommendations included heat pump tutorials, window upgrades, and solar panel eligibility.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Record keeping/reporting is time consuming. Having to use two platforms for filling out the required record keeping/reporting forms (CIS) and uploading documentation (SharePoint) is said to lead to repetitive data entry...
AI summary The 2024 ASFH-Finding highlights that record keeping/reporting for Affordable Single-family Homes is time-consuming due to the use of two platforms (CIS and SharePoint), leading to repetitive data entry and unclear requirements. DAs and contractors face challenges with outdated training materials and lack of formal communication on process changes, necessitating streamlined procedures and updated training.
21.1 HEA Description HEA is a home energy evaluation-based program component that encourages homeowners to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their homes by providing them with related information and financial incentives in the...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program evaluates homes for energy efficiency, offering rebates and guidance for improvements. Administered with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), it includes pre- and post-retrofit assessments, with eligibility for rebates and the Moderate Income Rebate (MIR). The Canada Greener Homes (CGH) Grant, co-delivered via HEA, closed in 2024, removing certain measures. HEA aimed for 19.012 GWh energy savings and 4.799 MW peak demand reduction in 2024.
Table 1: Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type Telephone participant interview Estimated Time to Complete 25-30 min Target Audience Participants who completed the Affordable Multifamily Housing pro...
AI summary This document outlines the data collection activity for a telephone interview targeting participants of the Affordable Multifamily Housing program (AMH). The survey aims to verify program effectiveness, assess participant awareness, motivations, satisfaction, challenges, and recommendations for improvement. It is to be adapted by Econoler.
A. Verification - A1. Our records indicate that you received a rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia for installing upgrades. Is this correct? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [PROBE: Are you sure? According to our records, you would have received...
AI summary The verification process confirms rebate receipt for Energy Efficiency upgrades and classifies building types at specified addresses. It checks participation in the Affordable Multifamily Housing program and building categories for accurate program eligibility assessment.
B. Verification of Actions Taken The following questions concern "the energy efficiency upgrades" "the installation project" that you completed through your participation in in for the house located at - B1. "Were your energy efficiency up...
AI summary This document outlines a verification survey for energy efficiency upgrades and heat pump installations under Nova Scotia programs. It asks participants about renovations involving added floor area, heating previously unheated rooms, fireplace/wood stove usage changes, and heat pump installations, ensuring compliance with program requirements.
Table 1: Summary of 2024 Efficient Product Rebates Program Evaluation Program Component Evaluation Type Impact Process Market Methodology BER Comprehensive (Instant Rebates) Condensed (Application Rebates) X X › Instant Rebates participant...
AI summary This table summarizes the evaluation of the 2024 Efficient Product Rebates Program, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates (BER) component. It outlines the evaluation types, including impact, process, and market, and details the methodologies used, such as participant surveys, distributor interviews, tracking sheet audits, and GHG emission reduction calculations.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. 4.2 Aw areness and Motivations .27 4.3 Ва rriers to High-Efficiency Buildings and Program Participation .28 4.4 Pa rticipant Satisfaction .29 4.4 .1 Challenges...
AI summary The text defines key terms and outlines sections of an evaluation report, covering topics such as accuracy, participant motivations, barriers to high-efficiency buildings, market factors, decarbonization, and program logic models. It discusses the evaluation of new construction impact, gross savings, net savings, and free-ridership.
amiliar with New Construction service, including those that work on non-MURB projects. 2024 New Construction-Finding: Decarbonization is a motivator for participating in New Construction service. 2024 New Construction-Finding: Financial fa...
AI summary Barriers to energy-efficient new construction include financial costs, builder awareness gaps, and insufficient energy modeller participation. Recommendations include increasing modelling incentives, recruiting more modellers through outreach, and collaborating with educational institutions. Builders must adapt to NECB 2020 requirements, which demand higher upfront costs and efficiency technologies.
4.8.1 Program Objectives The program objectives stated in the Custom program manual that are most specific to the New Construction service are provided below. - 1) Influence electrical energy efficiency and system-peak demand reduction pro...
AI summary The New Construction service's program objectives include promoting energy efficiency, overcoming implementation barriers, and increasing awareness of high-efficiency design. The logic model inadequately addresses objectives related to barrier removal and awareness, and outcomes are not clearly tied to objectives. A revised logic model should align outcomes with program goals.
2024 Custom NC Process Highlights - › There is a relatively high level of participant satisfaction with Custom New Construction overall. - › The service has been more successful in reaching MURBs than non-MURBs inside the HRM. - › There ar...
AI summary The 2024 Custom NC Process shows high participant satisfaction but faces challenges in reaching non-MURBs due to eligibility rules and municipal codes. Builders cite financial risks and upfront costs as major barriers to decarbonization, with concerns about NECB 2020 compliance timelines. Key barriers include high modelling costs, limited modeller participation, and low developer awareness, though the service addresses some issues outside its logic model.
shift to NECB 2020 in Nova Scotia. Builders will need to adjust designs, plan for higher efficiency technologies and higher upfront costs, and work closely with energy modellers under the new code. Nova Scotia will phase in Tiers 1, 2, and...
AI summary Nova Scotia will phase in NECB 2020 tiers from 2025–2029, requiring builders to adopt higher efficiency technologies and upfront costs. Recommendations include enhancing outreach to builders, updating program guidelines to align with NECB 2020, and aligning incentives with code tiers. The logic model is deemed outdated and needs revision to reflect current program activities and barriers.
Baseline - 4. Does the baseline measurement match what the project says is the baseline, and is it aligned with program rules? - 9. Has anything changed between the baseline and reporting period? (Y/N) a.If #9 is Y, has a non-routine adjus...
AI summary The text outlines baseline measurement verification questions, focusing on alignment with program rules, changes between baseline and reporting periods, and equipment useful life. It emphasizes non-routine adjustments and existing equipment status as key considerations in regulatory evaluations.
Table 1: Participant Interview Questionnaire and Free-ridership Algorithm Question Answer Score A1 We hope to interview the key decision-makers that played a key role in the decision to build a better than-code building. Were you a key 1)...
AI summary This table outlines a participant interview questionnaire focused on identifying key decision-makers involved in building better-than-code buildings, with specific questions about their roles and other potential decision-makers.