Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Program Requirements" in M12282

Matter: EfficiencyOne - New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans Application for Approval of New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans
13 passages 4 documents

Program Requirements across all matters →

E-1Notice of Application and Evidence 10 passages
Section 318
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 47 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +,-#+."ÿ/012ÿ345...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis, including the application of standards, evaluation methods, and considerations for different types of projects and programs.

Section 430
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 80 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$"!"%&'ÿ()ÿ %ÿ++,%ÿ-+ÿ./...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and the use of the ./01 method for evaluating programs. It outlines the importance of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings and highlights considerations for evaluating efficiency programs and their impact on utility operations.

Section 520
,$" &.!ÿ%,ÿ"#! &$!:ÿ/0ÿ$+!ÿ+",$ÿ'(,$"9! ÿ# %9& %-0ÿ$"ÿ !:('!ÿ/% ,ÿ%ÿ !,#",!ÿ$"ÿ!! .0</&,!:ÿ8 tÿ &$!,gÿA+%-!ÿ$+!ÿl Iÿ,$" &.!ÿ%,ÿ"#! &$!:ÿ# %9& %-0ÿ$"ÿ !:('!ÿ.!! &$%"ÿ&:ÿ8u>ÿ#!&;ÿ#! %":ÿ'",$,Dÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ7...

AI summary The text appears to be a section from a regulatory proceeding document discussing the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis and procedures related to energy efficiency programs.

Section 560
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 119 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ$%&ÿ'(#)# +)ÿ+,#ÿ'-+#...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures and standards related to benefit-cost analysis, including practices for evaluating efficiency programs and their impacts.

Section 623
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 138 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ !ÿ"#$%&"'#$ÿ() ÿ+,-)'. ,...

AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, including considerations for testing and evaluation methods.

Section 692
v}KÿbQYcRÿ~ÿbPQRcdNÿ mgÿ ifmÿ ifjÿ zkÿ ilhkÿ NqXLVÿPqNÿ NOXVNLPXcYÿbPQRcdNÿ egÿ hiÿ isÿ zjÿ flesÿ \NPNRÿ NOXVNLPXcYÿbPQRcdNÿ _XOocPnqNVÿ̀ZÿWPXYXPZÿ zlzgÿ smÿ i{sÿ jsÿ {lejÿ ]YPNRLcPXMNÿ€NnqLQYQdZÿ ilzgÿ {kÿ ezÿ izÿ jlffÿ NdaYcPXQLÿNOQa...

AI summary The text references an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and an Attachment 2 from the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes a date filed (May 16, 2025) and a page number (Page 158 of 302), indicating the context of a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency programs.

Section 731
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 168 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ %&'('&!ÿ)! &#+ÿ /#0#1...

AI summary This document is part of an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and includes an attachment referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses topics related to energy efficiency, cost analysis, and regulatory procedures.

Section 986
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 244 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'ÿ() +ÿ,)&-".&."!$ÿ...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of efficiency programs, particularly focusing on the application of benefit-cost analysis in determining the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives. The text also touches on the role of regulatory processes and the importance of proper evaluation methods in energy efficiency planning.

Section 1008
ÿ ÿ ÿfg! ÿ2!#&'(ÿ.-( ÿ"-5ÿ!"71&.(ÿ1((1!6(.ÿ7- 5ÿ-2ÿ7 , 7!54ÿ2-'ÿ(1(75'!2!7 5!-"ÿ)89 ÿ_(7 & (ÿ5g( (ÿ'( -&'7( ÿ54,!7 114ÿ.-ÿ"-5ÿ (ÿ 7 , 7!54$ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 252 of 302...

AI summary The text references an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and an Attachment 2 from the National Standard Practice Manual, suggesting a regulatory or compliance-related context involving energy efficiency programs.

Section 1088
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 276 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#"$%ÿ&'"ÿ$"() +&$,ÿ-"$.-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in regulatory proceedings, focusing on the evaluation of energy efficiency programs and their economic impacts.

E-6E1 (SBA) RIR 1-20 1 passage
(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 27
(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing Province Primary Test Additional Tests Used Non-Energy Benefits Ontario • In accordance with the IESO's Cost-Effectiveness Guide, the IESO only implements Conservation and Demand Mana...

AI summary The summary table outlines cost-effectiveness testing practices in Ontario for conservation and demand management programs. It highlights the use of the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test and Levelized Unit Energy Cost (LUEC) as primary metrics, along with the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test for internal reporting. Non-energy benefits are now evaluated on a sector level, replacing a 15% benefit adder.

E-15Letters of Comment 1 passage
p. p. 2
Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator PAC Previously reported TRC for info purposes with non-energy benefits based on a 2021 study, which replaced a 15% adder. Enbridge Gas TRC-Plus 15% adder to account for non-energy benefits ef...

AI summary The text discusses various approaches and tests used in energy regulation, including the Program Administrator Cost test (PAC), Total Resource Cost (TRC), and Prescriptive Cost Test (PCT), with examples from different organizations and regulatory decisions.

E-28Opening Statement - Patrick Bowman - IG 1 passage
Section 7
a DSM measure, the only way to assess impacts on NS Power's customers is to include the benefits of the added revenue that will be received, as part of the PAC test. Absent including this revenue, there is basically no benefit to the remai...

AI summary The text argues that assessing the impact of DSM measures on NS Power's customers must include the benefits of added revenue, which E1's BCA proposals ignore. It also criticizes E1's approach for not providing guidance on incentive levels and suggests that DSM should be assessed at a more granular level than just the portfolio level.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →