Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Programs And Customers" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
5 passages 5 documents

Programs And Customers across all matters →

E-1Application 1 passage
Table 8: Labor Rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia 31 p. p. 87
Table 8: Labor Rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia 31 Position Description Average Hourly (CAD) Difference in Labor Position Description Massachusetts Nova Scotia Rates Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand $19.35 Other...

AI summary Table 8 compares labor rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia, showing higher rates in Nova Scotia. Fuel costs are significantly higher in Nova Scotia, but this difference was not adjusted in the NEBs from the MA TRM due to its minimal impact on total NEBs for Commercial and Industrial programs.

E-6E1 (NSPI) RIR-1 to RIR-43 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 41-48
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-07: 2 3 Ref: Attachment 4, page 4 of 64, paragraph 1. 4 5 Please provide a list of all Canadian jurisdictions that have "statutes and regulations 6 requiring that electricity efficiency is the least cost energ...

AI summary The response to Request IR-07 explains that while no Canadian jurisdictions explicitly require electricity efficiency to be the least cost energy procurement option, many require efficiency programs to be cost-effective, considering factors like affordability. In the U.S., 85% of ratepayer-funded efficiency programs are subject to cost-effectiveness testing.

E-9E1 (Synapse) RIR-1 to RIR-9 1 passage
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Synapse) Information Requests p. p. 18
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Synapse) Information Requests 1 Request IR-04: 2 3 Please refer to Page 20 of the Study. 4 a. How are low-income customers defined? 5 b. By program, what percentage of customers eligibl...

AI summary The document responds to information requests regarding how low-income customers are defined and their participation in market-rate programs offered by EfficiencyOne. EfficiencyOne uses low-income prevalence data from Statistics Canada based on before-tax low-income cutoffs to estimate incidental participation.

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 1 passage
22 16. INSURANCE p. p. 408
22 16. INSURANCE - 23 24 25 16.1 EfficiencyOne shall obtain, maintain and pay for, during the entire Term of this Agreement, the following minimum insurance coverage as follows, such insurance as it relates to this Agreement shall be in a...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to maintain specific insurance coverage during the term of the agreement, including general liability, environmental impairment, and automobile liability insurance, with specified limits and requirements. NSPI must be named as an additional insured, and the insurance must be in a form acceptable to NSPI.

75683Synapse-BCC (E1) IR-1 to IR-9 1 passage
___________________________________ Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Office Clerk
___________________________________ Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Office Clerk 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 4 Please refer to Table 1 on Pages 4 and 5 of Vermont Energy Investment Corporation's (VEIC) June 14, 2018 Final Measure-Level Non-Energy...

AI summary The text contains regulatory requests related to non-energy benefits (NEBs) studies and cost-effectiveness testing. It asks why a study lists only specific NEBs from Massachusetts and whether EfficiencyOne plans to include data from NSPI in future analyses. It also inquires about the calculation of water and wastewater NEBs in Nova Scotia prior to a VEIC analysis.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →