[65] In its Closing Submission of May 13, 2011, ENSC stated:
p. p. 0
ergy savings from actual DSM programs in future years. [ENSC Closing Submission, pp. 3-5] [66] ENSC acknowledged some of the concerns raised, and submitted that the proper question for the Board is: ... what evidence is on the record to su...
AI summary ENSC argues that the Board should evaluate evidence before approving increased DSM spending, citing concerns over rate impacts and over-achievement of IRP targets. The CA supports the 2012 budget, noting a 100% increase from 2010 and ENS's new operational status. Rate impacts from DSM spending are acknowledged but require careful analysis.