Topic:"Prudence Reviews" in M12550

[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Lana Myatt Manager, Regulatory Capital Nova Scotia Power Inc. PO Box 910 1223 Lower Water Street Halifax, NS B3J 3S8 Dear Ms. Myatt: M12550 – To obtain a cost reasonableness review of N...

AI summary This document is a request for a cost reasonableness review of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, as outlined in Section 2.1 of the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan decision (M12012), with a total cost of $5,959,515.

Please refer to: David Roberts Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Assistant: Alissa Whalen Assistant's email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) November 20, 2025 Via Email: Crystal.Henwoo...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate, represented by David Roberts of Pink Larkin, seeks to participate in a proceeding related to a cost reasonableness review of NS Power's RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, referencing the 2025 ACE Plan Decision (M12012).

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD To obtain a cost reasonableness review of NS Power - CI C0051815 – $5,959,515 - RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, as outlined in Section 2.1 of the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan decision (M12012)

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is seeking a cost reasonableness review for NS Power's RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, with a total cost of $5,959,515, as outlined in Section 2.1 of the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan decision (M12012).

M12550 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act – and – IN THE MATTER OF: To obtain a cost reasonableness review of NS Power - CI C0051815 – $5,959,515 - RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, as outline...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate has requested information regarding NS Power's RTU Replacements Program, specifically about the execution strategy and whether it optimizes work crew efficiency. Midgard Consulting is being asked to provide details on the installation sequence and its impact on productivity and program costs.

1 Request IR-2: - 2 Preamble : It appears that Midgard assessed "Overall Project Prudence & Ratepayer - 3 Interest" under three categories: Project Execution Strategy (page 21), Project Controls & - 4 Governance (page 27) and Assessment of...

AI summary Midgard assessed 'Overall Project Prudence & Ratepayer Interest' under three categories, including Project Execution Strategy, Project Controls & Governance, and Assessment of Cost Reasonableness. The request asks which of these findings may not align with regulatory expectations for prudent utility investment.

VIA WEB PORTAL VIA EMAIL Crystal Henwood, Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12550 - To obtain a cost reasonableness review of N...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate submits materials related to a cost reasonableness review of NS Power's RTU Replacements Program, with a total cost of $5,959,515, under matter M12550.