Topic:"Prudence Reviews" in M12661

Testimony and Regulatory Litigation Support Mr. Fitzhenry has provided expert testimony in utility regulatory proceedings before state commissions in connection with rate cases and various other utility matters. In addition, Mr. Fitzhenry...

AI summary Mr. Fitzhenry has testified in utility regulatory proceedings on topics including capital expenditure prudency, net power cost, multi-year rate plans, and service reliability. He has collaborated with outside counsel on litigation strategies for rate proceedings, including testimony development and legal brief preparation.

s of January 1, 2026; and/or (c) PHP determines the PHP ADC and tariff processes outcome is not satisfactory." Further, in its Reply to Closing in M12451, NS Power explained the situation is follows: "The CA notes the significant uncertain...

AI summary NS Power defends a $18M deferral account tied to PHP's status as an above-the-line (ATL) customer, arguing it avoids higher rates for FAM customers if PHP remained below-the-line. The Board approved the deferral, citing uncertainty around PHP's successor tariff, while acknowledging potential revenue variances.

Response IR-8: - (a) Yes, to the extent the question's reference to "Operating Procedures" is referring to IG-NSPI-IR-12 Attachment 1. - (b) Yes. (c) We have not proposed such a mechanism, nor is it our conclusion that a verification mecha...

AI summary The response confirms reference to a specific operating procedure attachment but denies proposing a verification mechanism for the DR Credit. It outlines requirements for any such mechanism, including full discovery of NSPI's model inputs and stakeholder testimony, with the onus on NSPI to demonstrate the reasonableness of the DR Credit calculation.