The EAC advocates that this includes:
p. pp. 4-5
. In Plan A, biomass was presented as largely being employed for co-firing within NSPI plants, in the near-term, and considered for PPA (15MW by 2030) over the long-term. NSPI's current pre-occupation with biomass within IRP Plan A, is att...
AI summary The EAC criticizes the IRP and REP for insufficient consideration of carbon life-cycles and greenhouse gas reduction targets. It questions the prudency of biomass investments without scientific backing and suggests that biomass utilization is a distraction from more effective greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. The EAC recommends that NSPI explain how biomass investments align with greenhouse gas reduction goals.