HomePrudency ReviewM03632Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Prudency Review" in M03632

Matter: BRD-E-R-10 - Renewable Energy Community Feed-in Tariffs (COMFIT)see also M04523
2 passages 2 documents

Prudency Review across all matters →

B-4Redacted Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Paul Chernick - on behalf of CA 3/17/2011 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 22
998. Critique of proposed restructuring plan filed to satisfy requirements of the electricutility restructuring act of 1997. Failure of the plan to foster competition and promote the public interest. 152. NH PUC Docket DR 97-241, Connectic...

AI summary The text lists various regulatory proceedings and critiques of restructuring plans in different states, focusing on issues like prudence of power purchases, stranded costs, rate design, and compliance with public interest and competition requirements.

20110406-1Hearing Transcript — 4/6/2011 (ANSS Panel, St. Francis Xavier Univ, Consumer Adv. Panel) 1 passage
Section 228
- approach of doing that sort of thing, but I doubt that the - efficiencies are so great that it's going to run away with - the system. - And again, if some CEDIF or - municipality or other eligible party applies for a large - number of th...

AI summary The discussion addresses concerns about the efficiency of a system and the potential for government intervention if certain parties apply for limited slots. It also touches on the tidal tariff and the suggested changes by E3 Analytics to shorten its duration for prudency, with a response indicating concern about higher rates if the project life is assumed to be shorter.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →