HomePrudency ReviewsM03632Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Prudency Reviews" in M03632

Matter: BRD-E-R-10 - Renewable Energy Community Feed-in Tariffs (COMFIT)see also M04523
4 passages 4 documents

Prudency Reviews across all matters →

B-4Redacted Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Paul Chernick - on behalf of CA 3/17/2011 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 22
o existing and two new nuclear power plants. Formulation of alternative policy. 34. FERC ER81-749-000 and ER82-325-000; Montaup Electric Rate Cases; Massachusetts Attorney General; April 27 1984. Prudence of Montaup and Boston Edison in de...

AI summary The text references several regulatory proceedings involving nuclear power plant decisions, including Montaup, Pilgrim 2, Seabrook 1 and 2, and Susquehanna 2. It discusses prudence reviews of utility decisions, cost analyses, and regulatory actions taken by various public utility commissions and attorneys general.

07604Compliance Filing 8/2/2011 1 passage
Page 2 Large Wind 8-2-11 no tax
Page 2 Large Wind 8-2-11 no tax Nov a S ia C OM FIT Mo del cot Ca sh Flo w W ork she Bot et: tom Syn e C aps lian om p ce Lar Win ge d n o ta x Occurrence 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AI summary The provided text appears to be a table from a regulatory proceeding document, with a heading indicating 'Page 2 Large Wind 8-2-11 no tax'. The table contains a mix of acronyms and terms, but the content appears to be largely empty or not fully visible, with only the header row containing relevant information.

20110406-1Hearing Transcript — 4/6/2011 (ANSS Panel, St. Francis Xavier Univ, Consumer Adv. Panel) 1 passage
1 Page 730 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 If the reopener includes material
1 Page 730 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 If the reopener includes material 2 discretion on the part of some party such as the Board, 3 that will not be an effective transfer of risk. It will 4 not be effective, therefore, in reducing the cost of 5 cap...

AI summary The text discusses the ineffectiveness of a reopener mechanism in transferring risk effectively, as it allows discretion by the decision maker, potentially leading to higher costs for investors. It also references incentives to control fuel costs and mentions a 13% cost of equity calculation that includes risk transfer.

20110407-1Hearing Transcript — 4/7/2011 (Consumer Adv. Panel, Cdn. Wind Energy Panel, EAC - T. Couture) 1 passage
- percent.
- percent. NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 1029 1 And of course, NSPI's revenue base 2 will be changing over time as well, so these numbers are 3 based on a snapshot as if the entire COMFIT came in 4 immediately. This increase would be spread out o...

AI summary The discussion revolves around NSPI's revenue base and the impact of the COMFIT program, with references to past project failures related to transmission studies. A cross-examination is taking place regarding failed RFP projects and transmission study constraints.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →