Topic:"Prudency Reviews" in M03669

8.0 ECOLOGY ACTION CENTRE REQUEST FOR COSTS [149] In its Final Submission, EAC stated: - 1. It is submitted that the EAC acted responsibly and prudently as an intervener in these hearings. The interventions have been novel and brought a di...

AI summary The Ecology Action Centre (EAC) requested reimbursement for costs incurred during its participation in the hearings related to the 2012 DSM plan. EAC emphasized its responsible and prudent behavior as an intervener and highlighted the contribution of its arguments to the understanding of customer issues. ENSC requested a Bill of Costs after the hearing, and the Board reserved jurisdiction to determine costs if EAC and ENSC cannot agree.

9.0 SUMMARY OF BOARD FINDINGS [153] The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation and verification, with the qualification made in the SVS for a 10% reduction for the Efficient Products-Direct Install program. [154] The Board understands...

AI summary The Board accepts the 2010 DSM Plan evaluation, approves the 2012 DSM investment, and sets conditions for ENSC, including quarterly meetings and a free ridership study. It also approves changes to the TRC test and allows exploration of a PBM. The Board reserves jurisdiction to rule on costs if EAC and ENSC cannot agree.