HomePrudency ReviewsM12588Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Prudency Reviews" in M12588

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - CI C0053699 – Renewable to Retail Implementation - $5,644,468
2 passages 2 documents

Prudency Reviews across all matters →

N-2NSPI (CA) RIR 1 to 4 1 passage
1 Request IR-1: p. p. 17
1 Request IR-1: 5 ratepayers. 6 7 (a) Has the licensee provided any financial security to guarantee recovery of any portion 8 of project costs? 9 10 (b) Please provide a forecast of cost recovery for project costs assuming Renewall's 11 cu...

AI summary The proceeding addresses cost recovery for project costs related to the RtR implementation, including financial security, forecast recovery, potential shortfalls, and cost distribution among customer classes. It also considers the implications if the RtR market fails to launch.

101449NS Power's Reply to Intervenor Submissions 1 passage
Prudence and Support for Delay Related Costs p. p. 3
onciliation. REI recommends that the Board reduce or disallow delay related labour, consulting, and overhead costs on the basis that prudence, causation, and incrementality have not been established. There is a clear relationship between t...

AI summary REI recommends the Board reduce or disallow delay-related costs due to unproven prudence, causation, and incrementality. The delay costs are linked to extended LRS COD and scope changes, leading to increased labour, consulting, and overhead costs. NS Power provided detailed cost breakdowns and responses to information requests.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →