E-1-1Application
54 passages
s they are in the nature of Excel Models: - Appendix A, Technical Tables; - Appendix B, rate impact models for both Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario - Appendix F, HST refund by rate class values EfficiencyOne's Annual Progress Report...
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's Annual Progress Report and Evaluation Reports, to be filed by March 31, 2019. It also discusses the DSM Supply Agreement between EfficiencyOne and NS Power, governed by the Public Utilities Act and the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act, with updated terms for the 2020-2022 term.
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Con...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) involving Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECA) and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The proceeding is under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended.
NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO: The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("UARB" or "the Board") - 1. EfficiencyOne is the holder of the Franchise issued by the Minister of Energy on November 28, 2014 effective January 1, 2015, to provide electr...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for a three-year Supply Agreement with NS Power (2020–2022), including a Demand Side Management plan and a Lifetime Energy Savings Performance Target. The application references the Public Utilities Act and asserts the Order is in the public interest.
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2020-2022 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a 2020-2022 supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) under the Public Utilities Act, including establishment of a final agreement and approval of a Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan for electricity efficiency and conservation activities.
6 Public Utilities Act 7 8 EfficiencyOne is the current holder of Nova Scotia's electricity efficiency and conservation franchise, making it a public utility in relation to its franchise activities.[1](#page-14-2) 9 10 11 As the franchise...
AI summary EfficiencyOne holds Nova Scotia's electricity efficiency and conservation franchise under the Public Utilities Act (PUA), requiring it to supply NS Power with cost-effective activities. The PUA mandates a three-year agreement between EfficiencyOne and NS Power, with the Board authorized to intervene if an agreement cannot be reached.
6 4.1.2 What Role did the 2014 IRP Play in establishing the appropriate level of energy 7 savings in the Preferred Plan? 8 9 The level of energy savings identified in the IRP Preferred Resource Plan establishes 10 an objective DSM target w...
AI summary The 2014 IRP established a long-term DSM target of 141 GWh/year in the Preferred Plan, aligning with Mid-Level DSM to maximize ratepayer benefits. Flat or declining targets risk uneconomic decisions, as noted by the Board during the 2014 IRP process. The Preferred Plan's energy savings are deemed optimal for Nova Scotians.
1 IRP Preferred Resource Plan Trend 2
AI summary The document discusses the IRP Preferred Resource Plan Trend, focusing on Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s integrated resource planning. Key considerations include regulatory tests and program administration costs under the Public Utilities Act.
the IRP levels before 23 additional energy savings benefits are lost to Nova Scotians. Unless the energy savings 24 targets in the next 3-year DSM Plan begin to move toward the 2014 IRP levels, there 1 is little opportunity for Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text highlights that failing to adjust DSM Plan targets toward 2014 IRP levels will result in lost energy savings for Nova Scotians. It emphasizes industry trends, including diversification beyond lighting savings and increasing energy savings as a percentage of electricity generation, which support the Preferred Plan's approach despite higher costs.
13 Diversifying Savings Beyond Lighting 14
AI summary The section titled 'Diversifying Savings Beyond Lighting' introduces a discussion on expanding energy efficiency measures beyond traditional lighting initiatives. The context includes regulatory acronyms and references to Nova Scotia's energy policies, though the specific content of the proceeding is not detailed in the provided text.
1 Improving and Providing Accessibility to all Market Sectors and Rate Classes 2
AI summary The document focuses on improving accessibility across all market sectors and rate classes in Nova Scotia. Key considerations include ensuring equitable access to services, though specific details or proposals are not elaborated in the provided text.
9 Residential 10 11 Demand reduction in the Residential sector focuses on installing electric thermal 12 storage (ETS) units and electric storage domestic water heater timers in the Green Heat 13 and Home Energy Assessment program componen...
AI summary The Residential and BNI sectors focus on demand reduction via electric thermal storage (ETS) and water heater timers. These technologies enable passive peak demand savings, reduce customer inconvenience, and align with the Preferred Plan's goal of achieving 120.1 MW demand reduction by 2022 through increased investment in DSM initiatives.
2 Table 8: DSM investment as a percentage of annual electric revenues Total Electric Revenues (NS Power Audited Financial Statements) $ million 2015 $ 1,389 2016 1,327 2017 1,309 2018 1,412 Total $ 5,437 Approved DSM Investment 2015 $ 39 2...
AI summary Table 8 shows NSP's DSM investment as a percentage of annual electric revenues from 2015-2018 (2.6%) and projects 3.0% for 2020-2022. The Preferred Plan's negligible impact on residential rates is noted, referencing Table 9.
12 Is the Preferred Plan Affordable? 13 14 Affordability is recognized as a key factor in DSM planning. In its decision on the 15 2016-2018 DSM Plan, the Board stated it is "specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to addres...
AI summary The document discusses the affordability of the Preferred Plan under Nova Scotia's DSM framework. The Board emphasized balancing short-term and long-term affordability, citing its 2015 decision (M06733) that exclusive focus on short-term costs harms ratepayers. The Preferred Plan is deemed affordable as it aligns with the Board's guidance on long-term benefits.
ing to sustain the achievement 13 of lower unit cost energy savings. While implementing more comprehensive upgrades 14 includes increased cost, it also promotes deeper energy savings to customers. 15 16 Since 2015, the level of DSM investm...
AI summary The Preferred Plan underinvests in DSM compared to the IRP, leading to lost benefits for ratepayers. Since 2015, DSM investments have fallen short of IRP targets, creating a growing gap in energy savings. By 2020, ratepayers must achieve 181 GWh annual savings until 2040, but the Preferred Plan does not meet IRP-optimal levels, risking uneconomical supply-side investments.
1 7.2.2 Threshold 2 3 EfficiencyOne proposes the Lifetime Energy Savings performance target be established 4 with a threshold of 75 percent, as opposed to the 90 percent threshold established for 5 shorter term cumulative annual energy and...
AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes a 75% threshold for Lifetime Energy Savings, citing volatility in the metric compared to established targets. The 2017 third-party evaluation found a 25% decrease in savings due to methodological changes, particularly for LED lighting. Lower thresholds reflect the need for refined methodologies as the process matures.
1 Methodology Used to Allocate HST Refund by Rate Class 2 3 To enable the appropriate rate class allocation of funds associated with HST amounts 4 paid by ratepayers from 2010 through 2014, EfficiencyOne has developed a cost 5 allocation m...
AI summary EfficiencyOne developed a cost allocation model to distribute HST refunds by rate class (2010-2014), using prior balance adjustments and financial reporting data. Discontinued rate classes had their HST amounts redistributed proportionally. The methodology claims accuracy in reflecting original HST payments, while also estimating reinvestment benefits via present value calculations.
Appendix A 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan
AI summary The document outlines the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory considerations under Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSP) oversight.
1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 3 EfficiencyOne developed the 2020-2022 Preferred Demand Side Management (DSM) 4 Resource Plan (Preferred Plan) to acquire cost-effective energy efficiency and system 5 coincidence peak demand reduction resources that p...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan proposes a $129.1 million investment to reduce energy costs and emissions while building on Nova Scotia's successful energy efficiency programs. The plan emphasizes cost-effective resources, stakeholder collaboration, and historical achievements, including annual savings of $188 million and 800,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas reductions.
Figure 1: Development Process for the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan 10 11 The Preferred Plan was developed with an emphasis on producing achievable costeffective results that balance long-term requirements for energy and system-peak demand s...
AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan's Preferred Plan prioritizes achievable, cost-effective outcomes balancing long-term energy and system-peak demand savings through a balanced portfolio approach. Emphasis is placed on harmonizing energy efficiency, conservation, and demand-side management strategies within regulatory frameworks.
12 Vetting Process 13 14 The final stage of model design is the vetting process. This step is crucial, as it allows 1 for the alignment of EfficiencyOne's qualitative and quantitative design efforts. The 2 vetting process involves analysis...
AI summary The vetting process is the final stage of model design, involving internal and external teams to analyze model outputs for validity. An example highlighted concerns over a program component's energy savings dropping to 0 GWh in 2020, prompting model refinements. This iterative process ensured alignment of qualitative and quantitative efforts, addressing impacts on delivery costs, industry capacity, and market presence.
1 4. RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES 2 3 The Preferred Plan will allow EfficiencyOne to continue delivering cost-effective 4 energy savings benefits for Nova Scotia's residential customers. The Preferred Plan 5 pursues enhanced approache...
AI summary The Preferred Plan emphasizes EfficiencyOne's continued delivery of cost-effective residential energy savings in Nova Scotia, leveraging customer insights and evolving technologies. It highlights high household prioritization of energy reduction (87% in 2018) and shifts toward non-lighting measures, system-peak demand reduction, and expanded program accessibility. The plan includes three residential programs with eight components.
6 4.1.1 Overview 7 The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program provides residential customers 3 access to financial incentives for consumer products through retail channels and to retire and/or replace old inefficient appliances. The...
AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program includes Appliance Retirement (retiring inefficient appliances with financial incentives) and Instant Savings (point-of-sale rebates for energy-efficient products). Appliance Retirement also offers free replacements for low-income customers via the HomeWarming program, while Instant Savings collaborates with retailers for in-store engagement.
4.2 Existing Residential: Program Description 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14
AI summary The section outlines the Program Description for Existing Residential initiatives under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework, though no detailed content is provided in the excerpt. Key terms and acronyms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and program administration are referenced.
Deeper Energy Savings Support for Home Energy Assessment Participants Home upgrades such as increasing insulation and, energy efficient space and water heating systems are an important part of the residential sector portfolio. Achieving de...
AI summary The document highlights the importance of home energy upgrades and the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in achieving long-term energy savings. With 17% market penetration in 2018, the program aims for growth through two enhancements to increase participation in residential energy efficiency initiatives.
4.2.5 Program Design
AI summary The section discusses program design within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, involving entities like Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with focus on demand-side management (DSM), cost tests (TRC, PAC), and energy efficiency initiatives. Key topics include program administration, resource cost analysis, and regulatory compliance.
4.3.5 Implementation Strategy
AI summary The section outlines the implementation strategy for demand-side management and efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, involving key stakeholders and regulatory considerations. It references acronyms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and cost analysis frameworks.
4.3.8 Program Alternatives 2324 25 26 27 28 EfficiencyOne considered the same key principles in both the development of the 2020-2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan and alternate scenario. The significant difference between the Alternate scen...
AI summary EfficiencyOne compared its 2020-2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan with an alternate scenario showing reduced participation due to lower energy savings and investment. Table 14 highlights differences for the New Residential program, with footnotes explaining metrics like TRC, PAC, and WACC. Key differences include reduced household upgrades and cost calculations.
5. BUSINESS, NON-PROFIT AND INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAMS AND The Preferred Plan maintains a focus on delivering energy savings benefits to Nova Scotia business customers through a variety of effective programs. Over the 2016-2018 period, market...
AI summary The Preferred Plan focuses on expanding energy savings for Nova Scotia businesses by reducing reliance on lighting upgrades, increasing program accessibility, and promoting system-peak demand reduction. It addresses barriers like cost and complexity through enhanced support and expertise, building on 2019 changes that phased out lighting incentives.
5.1.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022
AI summary This section outlines enhancements implemented between 2020-2022, focusing on regulatory and programmatic developments in Nova Scotia's energy sector, including updates to demand-side management, efficiency programs, and regulatory frameworks.
5.2 Custom Incentives: Program Description
AI summary The section outlines the Custom Incentives program under Demand Side Management (DSM), managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP). Key entities include regulatory bodies, programs, and legislation relevant to energy efficiency and utility regulation in Nova Scotia.
Program History The Custom Incentives program began with a single component, Custom Retrofit, in May 2008. When Efficiency Nova Scotia began administering the program in 2010, it added a New Construction program component to help streamlin...
AI summary The Custom Incentives program, initiated in 2008, expanded under Efficiency Nova Scotia from 2010, adding New Construction and Building Optimization components. Pilots like compressed air optimization (2013) and Building Optimization (2014) broadened offerings. EMIS (2013) and SEM (2014) evolved to support energy efficiency. The program provides tailored financial and technical assistance for retrofits, new construction, and energy management.
Marketing Strategy The marketing strategy for Custom Incentives is to segment, profile, and launch integrated marketing campaigns (e.g. mass media, print, direct mail, digital and social media, events, outreach) by vertical (e.g., large co...
AI summary The marketing strategy for Custom Incentives involves segmenting customers by verticals (e.g., commercial, industrial) and using integrated campaigns. BNI strategies emphasize operational efficiency and non-energy benefits. EfficiencyOne will collaborate with the Efficiency Trade Network, design agencies, and industry partners through tactics like trade shows, case studies, and training programs.
5.3.6 Implementation Strategy
AI summary The document outlines an implementation strategy for demand-side management (DSM) and electricity efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It references regulatory entities like NSUARB and NSP, along with acronyms related to energy policies, cost tests, and utility regulations. The strategy likely involves coordination between program administrators, utilities, and regulatory bodies.
e current level of DSM. Figure 1: Average Rate and Bill Impacts (2020-2035) as a Result of DSM Activities in 2020-2022 (Preferred Plan) The results in [Figure 1](#page-185-0) show that over the 16 years of the study period, rates will be a...
AI summary The analysis evaluates DSM impacts (2020-2022) on electricity rates and bills over 16 years, projecting 0.8-1.7% higher rates with DSM compared to without. The Preferred Plan offsets 5.9 GWh, reduces bills by 11% for residential customers, and saves $475M for NS Power. Model improvements include annual avoided fuel costs and line loss factors, informed by DSMAG input and the 2014 IRP's inflation assumptions.
4 3.1 PREFERRED AND ALTERNATE 2020-2022 DSM RESOURCE PLANS 5 The 2020-2022 DSM Plan includes both a Preferred Plan and an Alternate scenario, 6 which contain different investment levels and savings over the three years of DSM 7 delivery. A...
AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Plan includes a Preferred Plan and an Alternate scenario with differing investment levels and savings. A full RBIA was conducted using identical Excel models for both plans, with differences limited to DSM costs, savings, and participation estimates for 2020-2022.
12 3.2 SCENARIOS 13 The models each compare two scenarios: a DSM scenario and a no-DSM scenario. 14 The DSM scenario includes the estimated administrative costs and resulting energy 15 and system-peak demand reductions of DSM programs that...
AI summary The analysis compares DSM and no-DSM scenarios (2020-2022), evaluating administrative costs, energy reductions, and system-peak demand. Rate and bill impacts are presented as differences between scenarios to isolate DSM effects. Results are detailed in Sections 4 (Preferred Plan) and 5 (Preferred vs. Alternate Plans).
9 4.1 OVERALL RATE IMPACTS 10 The general trend in rates, visible in all classes, is that the avoided costs and lost 11 revenues are approximately in balance throughout the life of DSM measures; this 12 means that DSM program cost recovery...
AI summary DSM program cost recovery drives rate impacts, with small (<1.7%) average rate increases across classes from 2020-2022. Avoided costs and lost revenues balance over DSM measures' lifetimes, but annual rate effects peak during 2020-2022 before nearing zero post-2022. Figures 2-4 illustrate average impacts, annual trends, and expenditure comparisons.
1 5. COMPARISON OF PREFERRED AND ALTERNATE PLANS 2 Full results by class for both the Preferred Plan and Alternate scenario for 2020-2022 3 are provided in Attachments 1 and 2. This section compares key outputs between the 4 two Plans. 5 6...
AI summary The document compares the Preferred Plan and Alternate scenario for 2020-2022, noting similar rate impacts (0.1% difference due to DSM costs) and minor variations in participant bill savings. The Preferred Plan allows more customers to participate, while program scaling differences in the Alternate scenario create minor savings discrepancies.
Appendix B – Attachment 2: Results by Rate Class (Alternate Scenario) Long-Term Rate and Bill Impact Analysis of the 2020-2022 DSM Plan This graph shows estimated rate impacts of DSM, relative to the no-DSM scenario. Blue bars show the imp...
AI summary This document presents a long-term rate and bill impact analysis of Nova Scotia's 2020-2022 DSM Plan. Graphs compare rate impacts (cost recovery, lost revenues, avoided costs) and bill impacts for participants vs. non-participants. Visuals also show cumulative program participation rates across customer classes, distinguishing tracked vs. untracked programs.
to the no-DSM scenario in absolute terms, for the same groups of customers as the graph shown above it. Line# This graph shows cumulative program participation for the class, as a percentage of eligible participants for each program. Each...
AI summary The text discusses visual representations of program participation metrics, including cumulative and annual participation rates for customer classes. It distinguishes between 'tracked' (data-collecting) and 'untracked' (estimated) programs, highlighting participation percentages relative to eligible customers and total class members.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and -
AI summary The proceeding is under the Public Utilities Act (PUA), with no further details provided in the text. Key entities and acronyms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and demand-side management are contextually referenced.
22 II. Introduction and Summary
AI summary The document's 'Introduction and Summary' section outlines key acronyms and terms related to Nova Scotia's energy regulation, including demand-side management, efficiency programs, and regulatory frameworks. It sets the stage for a proceeding involving utility planning, cost tests, and stakeholder engagement.
21 Q: Do the rebalanced / post-lighting transition portfolios remain cost effective? 33 Proposal Evaluation & Proposal Management Application (PEPMA), 2019. "Public Events" and other listings. [https://www.pepma-ca.com/public/PublicEvents....
AI summary The answer confirms that rebalanced/post-lighting transition portfolios remain cost-effective despite higher per-unit costs, citing Efficiency Vermont's benefit-to-cost ratios of 3.94 to 1 (2018–2020) and 2.78 to 1 (2018–2037). Table 4 provides metrics on cost effectiveness and performance.
Professional Experience
AI summary The 'Professional Experience' section lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory proceedings, including organizations, programs, and legislative terms. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY EFFICIENCYONE Direct Testimony of Glenn Reed Energy Futures Group On Behalf of EFFICIENCYONE February 27, 2019
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act involving EfficiencyOne's application. Glenn Reed of Energy Futures Group provides testimony on behalf of EfficiencyOne during the hearing on February 27, 2019, related to energy efficiency initiatives.
filed EfficiencyOne 2020-2022 Plan? Direct Testimony of Dr. David Hill, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation. In the Matter of the Public Utilities Act and in the Matter of an Application by EfficiencyOne. February 28, 2019.
AI summary Testimony by Dr. David Hill of Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) regarding EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding involves an application by EfficiencyOne, with testimony dated February 28, 2019.
IV. Rate and Bill Impacts - Q: What are the expected rate and bill impacts of EfficiencyOne's proposed 2020-2022 DSM - expenditures? - A: I will only summarize the high-level takeaways from the comprehensive and detailed Long- - Term Rate...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM plan results in minimal rate increases (0.8%-1.7%) but significant bill savings for participants (1%-11%) and overall savings of $475 million. Non-participants see slight bill increases (0.5%-1.1%). The analysis emphasizes bill impacts over rate changes for customers.
1 20 21 22 C. Pursuant to the Act, NSPI is obligated to undertake cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities that are reasonably available in an effort to reduce costs for its customers; and 23 24 25 D. Pursuant to t...
AI summary The text outlines a legal agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne under the Public Utilities Act, requiring NSPI to undertake cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities to reduce costs for its customers.
5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...
AI summary EfficiencyOne must notify NSPI when applying to the UARB for approval of significant changes to the EECA Plan. NSPI may submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes, subject to the Public Utilities Act and UARB's discretion.
12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's performance under the agreement is evaluated based on the UARB's performance requirements outlined in Schedule 'C' and Section 79M of the Public Utilities Act (PUA).
15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY - 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with or related...
AI summary The section outlines liability limits for EfficiencyOne and NSPI under the agreement. Neither party is liable for consequential losses. EfficiencyOne's liability is capped at $2 million, excluding indemnification, wilful misconduct, or refund obligations. NSPI's liability is similarly capped at $2 million, excluding wilful misconduct or Contract Price payments.
Permitted Scope of Use 2. The Recipient may use the Confidential Information solely for the purposes of providing or receiving EECA, as the case may be, in accordance with the Legislation and the Supply Agreement and for no other reason or...
AI summary The Recipient is restricted to using Confidential Information solely for EECA activities under the Supply Agreement and Legislation (PUA), with no other permitted uses.
DDSM
AI summary The document discusses Demand-Side Management (DDSM) in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory considerations, program evaluations, and stakeholder input. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power, the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB), and various efficiency programs. Topics focus on energy conservation, cost-benefit analysis, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.
DDSM
AI summary The document discusses Demand-Side Management (DDSM) in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory considerations, program evaluations, and stakeholder input. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power, the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB), and various efficiency programs. Topics focus on energy conservation, cost-benefit analysis, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.