Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Public Utilities Act Nova Scotia" in M11927

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - CI 50518 – HYD Ruth Falls Main Dam Refurbishment – $15,445,508 (ATO)
7 passages 6 documents

Public Utilities Act Nova Scotia across all matters →

N-4NSPI (IG) RIR-1 to 10 - Redacted 1 passage
REDACTED
REDACTED 1 (b) Please refer to CA IR-13, part (c). 2 3 (c) In the original submission KMKNO Capacity Payments were budgeted and added to the 4 "Consulting" cost code in the amount of $ instead of a dedicated "Mi'kmaq 5 Engagement" cost cod...

AI summary The document discusses the budgeting of KMKNO Capacity Payments under the 'Consulting' cost code rather than a dedicated 'Mi'kmaq Engagement' code. It also addresses archaeological costs for the Ruth Falls Project and legislative requirements for the sale of hydro assets, including approvals from the Public Utilities Act and federal legislation.

N-6NSPI (NSUARB) RIR-1 to 13 - Redacted 2 passages
CI 50518 NSUARB IR-12 Attachment 10 Page 373 of 591 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 174
CI 50518 NSUARB IR-12 Attachment 10 Page 373 of 591 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) A B C D E 274 public maintained trails that intersect, adjoin, or are within 100 m of the AA (select one) is: <25%. 1 275 25-50%. 0 276 277 >50...

AI summary The document discusses the assessment of public access and usage within a specific area of assessment (AA), including trail proximity, physical accessibility, and the presence of interpretive facilities. It also evaluates the percentage of the AA that remains unvisited by humans during the growing season.

CI 50518 NSUIARB IR-12 Attachment 12 Page 380 of 576 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 179
CI 50518 NSUIARB IR-12 Attachment 12 Page 380 of 576 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) A B C D E 274 public maintained trails that intersect, adjoin, or are within 100 m of the AA (select one) is: <25%. 1 275 25-50%. 0 276 277 >5...

AI summary The table discusses the percentage of public maintained trails within 100 m of the Area of Assessment (AA) and the accessibility and recreational potential of the AA, including the presence of interpretive centers and trails. It also mentions access permissions and physical conditions for walking.

N-12Reply Evidence - Redacted 1 passage
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended

AI summary This document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act in Nova Scotia. It outlines the legal framework governing utility regulation in the province.

95670Hearing Order 1 passage
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF an application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of an Authorization to Overspend (ATO) in the amount of $8,201,086 on capital application project C...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval to overspend on a capital project related to the HYD Ruth Falls Main Dam Refurbishment, seeking an increase in the total project capital cost to $15,445,508.

96082Confidential Undertaking 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: M11927 An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NS Power") for approval of Capital Work O...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of a Capital Work Order related to the refurbishment of the HYD Ruth Falls Main Dam under the Public Utilities Act.

97079Closing Submission - IG 1 passage
Test for ATOs p. p. 2
d of care in its decision-making process? - The imprudency test should relate to the circumstances at the time in question and not to hindsight[.](#page-2-2) 6 More generally, the Board should consider whether any of these additional expen...

AI summary The text discusses the Board's evaluation of NSPI's imprudence in incurring additional expenses on the Ruth Falls refurbishment project, citing a lack of due diligence regarding Fisheries Act amendments and failure to update economic justifications. It references legal precedents and amendments to the Public Utilities Act.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →