Topic:"Public Utilities Act Nova Scotia" in M12780

1 1. INTRODUCTION

AI summary The introduction section of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document outlines the context, with known acronyms related to energy management, utilities, and regulatory bodies. No substantive content is provided in the text beyond the heading and acronym definitions.

2 1.1 APPROVAL OF 2027–2031 DSM RESOURCE PLAN - 3 EfficiencyOne ("E1") requests approval by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (the "Energy Board" or "NSEB") - 4 of its Demand Side Management ("DSM") Resource Plan ("DSM Plan") for the term 2027...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for its 2027–2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, aiming to reduce electricity costs for customers. The plan aligns with NSEB's 2025 decision on DSM's statutory purpose, emphasizing affordability, energy savings, and climate goals through programs and cost-benefit analysis.

holder is deemed a public - utility for the purposes of the following sections of the PUA : 15 to 19, 21, 22, 25, 27 to 29, 34, 46, 47, 49 - to 51, 63, 76, 79, 80, 83 to 85, 88 to 106 and 111 to 118. - E1 is the holder of the Franchise iss...

AI summary The document outlines that E1 (EfficiencyOne) is a public utility under the PUA, governed by specific sections. It details requirements for a demand-side purchase agreement between NS Power and E1, including a five-year term, DSM program descriptions, payment terms, and Energy Board approval. It also revisits the definition of electricity efficiency activities under PUA section 79A(b).

2.1.4 PROVINCIAL CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY The statutory considerations outlined in ERBA's section 6(2), as well as the goals of DSM as set out in section 79A of PUA, establish the primary mandate for DSM. While the Province's climate and ener...

AI summary Nova Scotia's Provincial Climate Change Policy emphasizes demand-side management (DSM) under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) to reduce electricity costs while aligning with climate goals. The Clean Power Plan outlines transitioning to renewable energy, grid modernization, and affordability, guided by legislative acts like the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) balances regulatory mandates with environmental objectives.

e franchise holder respecting the integrated resource planning to develop avoided cost calculations for demand-side management resources and undertake reasonable cost-effective demand-side management; In response to the directive to provid...

AI summary E1 (EfficiencyOne) responds to directives regarding cost-effectiveness of demand-side management (DSM) measures in the 2027–2031 DSM Plan. Only nine of 341 measures failed cost-effectiveness testing, with justifications provided in Appendix A, Attachment 3. Payback information for measures with ≤3-year payback periods is also included. Residential demand response measures (e.g., smart thermostats) are addressed in Section 3.3.

4 Figure 3: 2026 DSM Plan Expenditures

AI summary Figure 3 outlines 2026 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan expenditures, part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. It references entities like NS Power, NSEB, and E1, with context on energy planning and regulatory frameworks under the Public Utilities Act and Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

4 9. ALTERNATE SCENARIO

AI summary The document introduces an 'Alternate Scenario' section within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though no specific content or analysis is provided in the given text. Key acronyms and entities related to energy regulation and utility management are referenced.

E1 submits that the Application satisfies both prongs of the mandatory approval test under section 79L(4) of the PUA . First, the Application satisfies all requirements of section 79I of the PUA : - (a) The Purchase Agreement is for a term...

AI summary E1 argues the Application meets both prongs of the mandatory approval test under section 79L(4) of the PUA. It satisfies section 79I requirements, including a five-year Purchase Agreement and a detailed DSM plan. The Preferred Plan is deemed beneficial due to cost-effective DSM with a 2.4 benefit-cost ratio and affordability measures during cost-of-living challenges.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS Term Definition DSM Demand Side Management DSMAG Demand Side Management Advisory Group DR Demand Response E1 EfficiencyOne EV Electric Vehicle GHG Greenhouse Gas HVAC Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning IRP Integrated...

AI summary This section provides a glossary of terms and acronyms relevant to energy regulation and management in Nova Scotia. It defines key terms such as Demand Side Management, Integrated Resource Plan, and Public Utilities Act, along with their corresponding acronyms and organizations.

1 3. PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN APPROACH 2 E1 developed the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan through a multi-phase process to establish a cost- 3 effective DSM portfolio. This process defined the DSM resources to be offered, the level of savi...

AI summary E1 developed the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan through a multi-phase process involving stakeholder engagement, scenario modeling, and regulatory considerations. The plan incorporates updated avoided costs, aligns with climate targets, and reflects NSEB decisions on BCA and DSM extensions. Development was paused briefly due to PUA amendments and resumed after filing the 2026 DSM Extension.

10 3.4 COST-EFFECTIVENESS - 11 In the Energy Board's Decision regarding E1's Application for approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test - for Evaluating Demand Side Management Plans (M12282), the Energy Board directed E1 to:[9](#page-107...

AI summary E1 must use the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test for evaluating its 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, with NS Power's WACC (6.65%) as the discount rate. The Energy Board directed this under the Public Utilities Act (PUA), requiring portfolio-level cost-effectiveness screening. E1 achieved a PAC result of 2.4 (above the 1.0 threshold) and provided justifications for measures failing cost-effectiveness tests.

10 6.3 NEW RESIDENTIAL 4 9 13

AI summary Section 6.3 of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding discusses new residential energy initiatives, likely involving Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, cost recovery mechanisms (DCRR), and regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). Key entities include NS Power, E1, and the NSEB, with focus on energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), and program cost testing (PAC).

HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER PILOT

AI summary A pilot program for heat pump water heaters under the Public Utilities Act, managed by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), involving Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) and EfficiencyOne (E1) to evaluate energy efficiency measures and demand-side management (DSM) initiatives.

4.2 Pilot Lifecycle The pilot lifecycle for developing new initiatives and launching them as programs is shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2: Pilot lifecycle process flow The pilot lifecycle begins with evaluating ideas for feasibility, valu...

AI summary The pilot lifecycle outlines stages for developing initiatives into programs, including feasibility evaluation, concept refinement, planning with stakeholder input, execution with testing and iteration, and concluding with a recommendation package for full-scale launch. Metrics from Innovation Goals (1.1) are used throughout.

3.4 COMPARISON OF 2027-2031 PREFERRED PLAN AND ALTERNATE

AI summary The section compares the preferred plan and alternate for 2027-2031, though no specific details are provided in the text. Key regulatory and energy-related terms are referenced, including demand-side management, energy efficiency, and utility regulations.

1 THIS AGREEMENT made as of the _____ day of ______, 2022 2026 and effective as of the 1st 2 day of January, 2023 2027 (the "Effective Date"). 3 BETWEEN: 4 NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED, 5 a body corporate, organized under the laws 6 of t...

AI summary Agreement between NSPI and EfficiencyOne under the Public Utilities Act for demand-side management activities, effective from 2023 to 2027, with obligations to provide cost-effective electricity efficiency programs.

9 26. GENERAL - 10 26.1 This Agreement shall only be renewed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. - 11 26.2 This Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respective 12 successors and permitted ass...

AI summary The agreement outlines renewal conditions under the Public Utilities Act, specifies EfficiencyOne's role as an independent contractor, and governs by Nova Scotia and Canadian laws. Modifications require UARBNSEB approval, and the agreement is binding on successors. Legal jurisdiction is assigned to Nova Scotia's Supreme Court.

rogram participation, expenditures, and savings through a variety of methods, including estimation based on geographic 118 Actual Program Administrator Cost test results. census information 119 120 SCHEDULE D CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOS...

AI summary The document outlines a confidentiality agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) under a Supply Purchase Agreement for EECA DSM activities. It references relevant legislation and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Energy Board, emphasizing the handling of confidential information.

THIS AGREEMENT made as of the _____ day of ______, 2026 and effective as of the 1st day 2 of January, 2027 (the " Effective Date "). 3 BETWEEN: NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED , 5 a body corporate, organized under the laws 6 of the Province...

AI summary This agreement is between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne under the Public Utilities Act, establishing a demand-side management purchase agreement for the supply of cost-effective demand-side management activities. The agreement outlines the obligations of both parties and references the Act as a legal basis.

11. CONFIDENTIAL AND PERSONAL INFORMATION - 6 11.1 The Parties have executed or agree to execute the confidentiality agreement attached 7 hereto as Schedule "D" - Confidentiality (" Confidentiality Agreement "). - 8 11.2 EfficiencyOne shal...

AI summary The document outlines a confidentiality agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), requiring EfficiencyOne to secure personal information and indemnify NSPI against liabilities from misuse or disclosure, in compliance with the Public Utilities Act and CASL.

26. GENERAL 26.1 This Agreement shall only be renewed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 19 of 33 - 1 26.2 This Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respectiv...

AI summary The agreement outlines terms for renewal under the Public Utilities Act, specifies EfficiencyOne's role as an independent contractor, governs by Nova Scotia law, and requires NSEB approval for amendments. It emphasizes jurisdiction, enforceability, and language requirements.

4 DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

AI summary This section outlines Demand-Side Management (DSM) activities in Nova Scotia, referencing regulatory frameworks, utility programs, and energy efficiency initiatives. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power, the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), and the Public Utilities Act (PUA), with acronyms covering DSM, rate design, and distributed energy resources.

4.2 DSM Resource Plan Research

AI summary Section 4.2 discusses research related to Demand Side Management (DSM) resource planning in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory bodies, programs, and analyses of energy efficiency, demand response, and cost recovery mechanisms.

4.3.2 Cost-Effectiveness Testing - 5 E1 will apply the Board-approved cost-effectiveness test at the portfolio level under the Public - Utilities Act . - 7 As directed under M12282, the PAC test is the primary screening test, using NS Powe...

AI summary E1 will apply the Board-approved cost-effectiveness test at the portfolio level under the Public Utilities Act, using the PAC test with NS Power's WACC as the discount rate. Strategic electrification must reduce GHG emissions and electricity costs. E1 will provide results at multiple levels and justify failed measures individually.

18 5. CONSOLIDATED ENDNOTES AND SOURCES - 1. M06733 E1 2016–2018 DSM Resource Plan, NSUARB Order, October 7, 2015. The Order approved the 2016–2018 DSM Plan and the Consensus Agreement. (Parties agreed to establish the Standardized Filing...

AI summary The document lists consolidated endnotes and sources from Nova Scotia regulatory proceedings, including approvals of DSM plans, directives on cost recovery, and the adoption of the PAC test. Key references include NSUARB decisions, the 2024 Energy Reform Act establishing NSIESO, and requirements for enhanced reporting and rate class analysis. Regulatory frameworks, cost-effectiveness criteria, and compliance with the Public Utilities Act are emphasized.

1 Board (NSEB) decisions and the Public Utilities Act . The NSEB confirmed in its 2025 Benefit 2 Cost Analysis (BCA) Test Decision that "the purpose of the demand-side management provisions in the Public Utilities Act is to reduce electric...

AI summary The NSEB confirmed that the purpose of demand-side management provisions in the Public Utilities Act is to reduce electricity costs for customers. EfficiencyOne (E1) has relied on NSEB decisions and legislation to determine that the 2027–2031 DSM Plan investment of $63.75 million per year is affordable. The 2023–2025 DSM Plan was approved and extended for 2026 with a modest 2% increase due to inflation.

E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Potential study conducted over the 2027–2031 period. E1 is undertaking a DSM 5 Regarding Section 3.2 "Energy Efficiency: Setting Appropriate Level of E...

AI summary E1 is responding to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) regarding a potential study from 2027–2031 and the alignment of an increased incentive percentage with demand-side management definitions under the Public Utilities Act. E1 refers to a jurisdictional scan by APEX and explains the statutory definition of demand-side management.

Efficiency Nova Scotia – Policy, Performance and Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) commenced operations in 2010 after the enactment of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act in 2009. Revisions to the Public Utilities A...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) was established in 2010 under the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act. Following structural changes in 2015, ENS ceased operations as the DSM provider, and the ENS franchise was awarded to EfficiencyOne, a new public utility incorporated in 2014.

E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 E1 explored strategic electrification through the development of the 2027–2031 DSM Plan. 2 E1 applied the modified Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tes...

AI summary E1 evaluated strategic electrification initiatives under the 2027–2031 DSM Plan using a modified Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test and GHG emissions impact assessments. No strategic electrification scenarios were included in the plan as none met both GHG reduction and electricity cost reduction requirements under section 79A of the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

tions for homeowners and businesses transitioning away from non-electric heating. The work also aims to identify and address market and technical barriers to adoption of hybrid heating in Nova Scotia. (f) E1 has not proposed the inclusion...

AI summary The text discusses the lack of inclusion of strategic electrification as a DSM resource in the 2027–2031 Preferred DSM Plan by E1. It also outlines the possibility of modifying the plan if strategic electrification meets legislative requirements under the Public Utilities Act.

1. BACKGROUND Beginning in late 2023, EfficiencyOne (E1) initiated the development process for the 2026-2030 DSM Plan with the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG). Following two rounds of modelling, E1 pivoted to focus on the dev...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) developed the 2026-2030 DSM Plan and later pivoted to the 2027-2031 DSM Plan following legislative changes to the Public Utilities Act in 2025. Feedback from the DSMAG on the 2026-2030 plan influenced the 2027-2031 modelling process, with key themes addressed in the report.

Scenario 1SE-Base - Residential strategic electrification is being delivered through the Instant Savings program component. - BNI strategic electrification is being delivered through both the BER and Custom program components. - The measur...

AI summary Residential and BNI strategic electrification is being delivered through various programs, primarily involving heat pumps. E1 conducted a Rate Impact Measure (RIM) analysis to assess the impact of electrification on electricity costs as defined in the Public Utilities Act, evaluating both benefits and costs associated with the program.

Strategic Electrification The priority consideration for Strategic Electrification (SE) was to ensure alignment with the definition of strategic electrification as outlined in the Public Utilities Act , ("in a manner that reduces overall g...

AI summary The Strategic Electrification (SE) initiative must align with the Public Utilities Act , requiring reductions in both electricity costs and GHG emissions to be included in a DSM Plan. E1 is leveraging existing programs and partnerships, including input from the DSMAG, to model SE measures with a cautious approach to timelines and performance targets.

Table 17: Update on Board Directives Relating to the 2027-2031 Plan Board Directives E1 Update • E1 is directed to use the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test as its primary test for screening the cost-effectiveness of its proposed DSM P...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) has directed E1 to use the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test as the primary method for assessing the cost-effectiveness of its proposed DSM Plan for the 2027-2031 term, using NS Power's Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) as the discount rate. E1 has already provided PAC results for Round 2 of the DSM Plan, incorporating new avoided costs from NS Power.

Standardized Filing Framework 11 (2) Prior to, or as part of, conducting an integrated resource planning exercise and subsequent competitive procurements of energy resources, the [NS]IESO shall: - (a) work with the holder of the franchise...

AI summary The NSIESO is required to collaborate with franchise holders to develop avoided cost calculations for demand-side management resources under the Public Utilities Act and to file the results of its integrated resource planning (IRP) exercises with the Energy Board once completed.

4.5 DSM RESOURCE PLANS (35-YEAR CYCLE) EfficiencyOne E1 will prepare DSM Resource Plans as required by the Public Utilities Act Board, on a threefive-year cycle unless directed otherwise by the Boardlegislation. 39

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) is required by the Public Utilities Act Board to prepare DSM Resource Plans on a three-five-year cycle, unless otherwise directed by the Board.

4.5 DSM RESOURCE PLANS (5-YEAR CYCLE) E1 will prepare DSM Resource Plans as required by the Public Utilities Act , on a five-year cycle unless directed otherwise by the legislation. [37](#page-153-0)

AI summary E1 is required to prepare DSM Resource Plans on a five-year cycle as mandated by the Public Utilities Act, unless otherwise directed by legislation.

the demand response scenarios because, at this stage of market development in Nova Scotia, these pathways could not be demonstrated to meet E1's achievability and cost-effectiveness design objectives. Request IR-07: Page 3 of the Evidence...

AI summary The response to IR-07 confirms that E1 interprets section 79A(iv) of the Public Utilities Act as requiring strategic electrification to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and electricity costs independently of other demand-side management resources. E1's interpretation is based on the language of the Act and does not seek clarification for its 2027-2031 DSM Plan.

er to E1's response to part (c) of this IR response. 6 7 (f) 8 i) Please refer to E1's response to part (a) of this IR response. 9 ii) Please refer to E1's response to part (a) of this IR response. DATE FILED: May 28, 2026 E1 (Synapse) IR-...

AI summary The text references two bills related to the Public Utilities Act in Nova Scotia. Bill No. 228, enacted in 2022, amends Chapter 380 of the Revised Statutes, 1989, concerning Efficiency Nova Scotia. Bill 6, passed in 2025, includes amendments to the Public Utilities Act under Chapter 4 of the Acts of 2025.

1 2 E1's affordability argument amounts to arguing that a cost-effective, benefit-positive 3 investment should be rejected because it increases near-term rates. This is inconsistent 4 with the purpose of DSM under the Public Utilities Act....

AI summary E1 argues that rejecting a cost-effective DSM investment due to near-term rate increases is inconsistent with the Public Utilities Act's purpose of reducing electricity costs. Historical DSM activities have saved customers $3.2 billion in net present value, and the IRP scenario would increase these savings. The incremental cost of the IRP scenario is $29M per year, delivering 247.7 GWh of annual energy savings.

Representation of Strategic Electrification in E1's Preferred Plan SE is now expressly recognized within Nova Scotia's statutory DSM framework. The Public Utilities Act, which was amended in 2022, defines DSM to include "strategic electrif...

AI summary Strategic electrification (SE) is now part of Nova Scotia's statutory DSM framework, as amended by the Public Utilities Act in 2022. SE must reduce both greenhouse-gas emissions and electricity costs for customers to be approved. E1's DSM application includes SE to align with Nova Scotia's climate and energy goals, as highlighted in NS Power's 2022 Evergreen IRP and the Clean Power Plan.

On the other hand, Québec is the only Canadian Province that uses only a TRC test as the primary cost-effectiveness test for electric programs.[46](#page-29-0) Newfoundland and Labrador, and Saskatchewan use both the TRC and Program Admini...

AI summary The text discusses the use of cost-effectiveness tests for electric programs in Canadian provinces, noting that Nova Scotia's Public Utilities Act limits the ability to incorporate broader electrification measures. It highlights how traditional demand-side management frameworks can create 'fuel silos' and how Ontario's approach to beneficial electrification considers overall emissions and system impacts. The Nova Scotia Energy Board acknowledges the NSPM as a useful framework but is constrained by current legislation.

A. E1's Inclusion of Rooftop Solar PV Programs in the Preferred Plan E1 reports that customer-sited Solar PV falls within the statutory definition of DSM under section 79A(b)(v) of the Public Utilities Act, which includes activities relati...

AI summary E1 argues that rooftop solar PV programs fall under DSM under the Public Utilities Act and are designed to reduce customer demand. The program is limited to Mi'kmaw communities and aligns with environmental and reconciliation objectives. The proposed program includes 200 installations over five years with a PAC test ratio of 1.1, indicating marginal cost-effectiveness.

B. Brattle's Assessment of Inclusion of Rooftop Solar PV's in E1's Preferred Plan E1's proposed Solar PV offering raises two distinct questions that should be analyzed separately. The first is whether customer-sited Solar PV can be interpr...

AI summary Brattle Group assesses whether rooftop solar PV should be included in EfficiencyOne's preferred plan, focusing on whether it fits the statutory definition of DSM under the Public Utilities Act and whether it should be considered an appropriate DSM resource in Nova Scotia's current system context.

- A. E1 cites the Board Decision in Matter No. 12282 (regarding E1's May 16, 2025, E1 Application for approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating DSM Plans) as its reason for not including electrification in the proposed 20...

AI summary E1 cites a Board Decision in Matter No. 12282 to explain its exclusion of strategic electrification from its 2027–2031 DSM Plan, citing statutory requirements under the PUA that require strategic electrification to reduce both GHG emissions and electricity costs.

1 appears that E1 either assessed the BCA of strategic electrification by itself, or E1 2 looked at the change in the portfolio-level BCA (including energy efficiency, 3 demand response, PV) when strategic electrification is added.28 4 How...

AI summary The text discusses E1's assessment of the benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of strategic electrification and how it was interpreted in light of the NSEB's Decision in Matter M12282. The Board required E1 to use the PAC test and consider increased revenues from strategic electrification, which must reduce both GHG emissions and electricity costs for customers. The Public Utilities Act defines strategic electrification and outlines its requirements.

34 Response IR-11: 35 36 By way of introduction, it is noted that IR-11 does not refer to the Evidence filed by Mr. Love. 37 Nonetheless, the following response is provided. - 39 (a) The Smart Synergy eligibility rules are set out in E1's...

AI summary The response to IR-11 discusses the regulatory framework governing Smart Synergy eligibility, emphasizing that it is not arbitrary but must adhere to statutory and regulatory requirements under the Public Utilities Act and the Energy Board's supervision of demand-side management activities.

Request IR-3: Reference: Brattle Evidence, Section IV: Representation of Demand Response in E1's Preferred Plan, page 14, footnote 25: "In October 2022, IESO received a ministerial directive that increased the CDM budget by $342 million, f...

AI summary The response confirms that Peak Perks was launched under an Ontario Ministerial Directive with a budget expansion, and highlights differences between Ontario's regulatory context and Nova Scotia's statutory framework, where E1 operates under the Public Utilities Act and must meet the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test. It also references E1's Eco Shift program and its expected cost-effectiveness under the PAC test.

(b) An alteration to the modified PAC test used to assess strategic electrification could include the benefits related to reduction in other fuels and a monetization of overall emissions benefits. However, depending on the inclusion of one...

AI summary The text discusses the limitations of the Public Acceptability Criterion (PAC) test in assessing strategic electrification, noting that including non-electricity-related benefits may shift the test toward Total Resource Cost (TRC) or Societal Cost Test (SCT). The Board's decision in M12282 indicates it cannot use a proposed BCA test that includes non-utility impacts for screening DSM plans. The Brattle Group responds that a phased strategic electrification pathway may be achievable, though data quality and modified PAC constraints present challenges.

Request IR-02: 1 Reference: Napoleon Evidence, page 27–29 (Low and Moderate Income [LMI] Oil-Heat 2 Electrification Alternative) 3 4 (a) Please provide the NB Power 2024/25–2026/27 DSM filing materials cited at footnote 41 5 and identify t...

AI summary The response to Request IR-02 provides details on NB Power's cost-effectiveness methodology for its LMI electrification component, including the All Fuels and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests. It also acknowledges that NB Power's statutory framework for demand-side management (DSM) differs from s. 79A(b)(iv) of the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

Request IR-4: 2 Reference: E-23, Pages 23–26. 3 Preamble: Synapse provides its proposed interpretation of the Board decision in Matter 4 M12282, and suggests that the inclusion of strategic electrification programming within 5 the 2027-203...

AI summary The document references Synapse's interpretation of a Board decision in Matter M12282, suggesting that strategic electrification programming in the 2027-2031 DSM Plan complies with the Public Utilities Act. It requests clarification on whether the statute requires strategic electrification to reduce both GHG emissions and electricity costs, not merely avoid increasing costs at the portfolio level.

EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended -and- IN THE MATTER OF An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between Effici...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a Demand Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., along with the establishment of a final agreement and the approval of a DSM Resource Plan for the period 2027–2031.

E1 Rebuttal Evidence E1 agrees that these noted measures may support emissions reductions, improve utilization of the existing grid, and provide broader societal benefits, particularly given Nova Scotia's reliance on heating oil. However,...

AI summary E1 acknowledges the potential benefits of strategic electrification but argues that these measures fail to meet the modified PAC test under the Public Utilities Act, which requires both greenhouse gas and electricity cost reductions. E1 will continue researching and engaging stakeholders on strategic electrification.

EfficiencyOne's demand-side management responsibilities and the differing interpretations of applicable statutory language, the work of interpreting and opining on the changes introduced by the Energy Reform (2024) Act , SNS 2024, c 2, wil...

AI summary The document discusses the ongoing challenges related to EfficiencyOne's demand-side management responsibilities and the interpretation of the Energy Reform (2024) Act . It notes that new issues will continue to arise before the Board. East Coast Environmental Law has participated in this matter, which is under the Public Utilities Act.

1 M12780 2 3 4 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 5 6 IN THE MATTER OF Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended 7 8 – and – 9 10 11 12 13 14 IN THE MATTER OF an APPLICATION by EFFICIENYONE for approval of the 2027-2031 D...

AI summary This document outlines an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a 2027-2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement and Resource Plan with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, as part of a proceeding under Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act.

government changed the legislated definition of DSM to include "strategic electrification of energy end uses currently powered by fossil fuels in a manner that reduces overall greenhouse gas emissions and electricity costs" [in the Public...

AI summary The Ecology Action Centre argues that the revised definition of DSM in the Public Utilities Act lacks clarity on electricity cost reductions and opposes a flat-rate cut to EfficiencyOne spending, citing energy poverty concerns. They emphasize the need for strategic electrification and demand-side management to reduce energy costs and achieve net-zero goals.

1 M12780 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 6 7 -and 8 9 IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's 2027-2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) 10 Plan Application 11 12 OPENING STATEMENT O...

AI summary This document is an opening statement from Nova Scotia Power in a regulatory proceeding concerning EfficiencyOne's 2027-2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application under the Public Utilities Act.

ing may not have access to relevant information should be even more exceptional. Additionally, consistency across Board proceedings is important. In recent cases involving both NS Power and Eastward Energy, similar information as set out i...

AI summary The document discusses the disclosure of executive compensation in regulatory proceedings, referencing the Public Utilities Act and the Board's authority to request such information. It highlights that while section 64B of the Act relates specifically to rate applications, other sections like 18 and 34 provide the Board with general supervisory and financial information authority.

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act – and – IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of the 2027- 2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Sco...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a 2027-2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, including the establishment of a final agreement and DSM Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

ng horizon, and will inform the development of Candidate Resource Plans for the IRP." Please describe any work E1 and the NSIESO have completed to date related to commissioning of a DSM Potential study. - iii. Page 7 of 13 of Appendix F (p...

AI summary The document contains several requests related to demand-side management (DSM) studies, avoided cost calculations, and energy efficiency incentives. It asks for updates on work completed by E1 and the NSIESO, a jurisdictional scan from APEX, and clarification on the alignment of increased incentive percentages with legal requirements and affordability considerations.

Background This decision letter contains the Board's findings about a motion by various Intervenors challenging the confidentiality claimed by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power, Company, Utility) over certain portions of its general rate ap...

AI summary This decision letter addresses a motion by intervenors challenging NS Power's confidentiality claims over parts of its GRA. The Board panel reviewed objections to the redacted information, with NS Power justifying some claims based on privacy laws and the Public Utilities Act. Some claims were abandoned, while others were upheld, particularly those related to cyber security measures.

b) Executive Compensation An important aspect of the discussion in this matter relates to the provisions capping NS Power's recovery of its executive compensation in customers' electricity rates. Section 64B of the Public Utilities Act pro...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the provisions limiting NS Power's recovery of executive compensation through electricity rates, referencing Section 64B of the Public Utilities Act.

3. The Regulatory Compact - [46] Under the regulatory compact, NSPI is given a monopoly; that is, the exclusive right to supply power and energy to almost all of the consumers of electricity in Nova Scotia. In exchange for that right it ha...

AI summary NSPI holds a monopoly to supply electricity in Nova Scotia under the regulatory compact, in exchange for serving customers at rates approved by the Board. The Board ensures that NSPI's costs are prudently incurred and emphasizes the open courts principle through Rule 12 of the Board Regulatory Rules, referencing court decisions that balance public interest with party interests.

(b) Absence of Legislative Concern Second, significant legislation weighing in favour of disclosing executive compensation information in the M10431 Decision does not apply in the present case. In the M10431 Decision, the Board's finding t...

AI summary The text argues that statutory obligations requiring NS Power to disclose executive compensation under the Public Utilities Act do not apply to E1, the DSM franchise holder. Key differences include E1's partial regulation and the exclusion of DSM cost recovery riders from 'general rate increases,' which triggers disclosure requirements. E1's compensation is only partially recoverable from ratepayers, unlike NS Power's fully regulated monopoly.

ing may not have access to relevant information should be even more exceptional. Additionally, consistency across Board proceedings is important. In recent cases involving both NS Power and Eastward Energy, similar information as set out i...

AI summary The Board emphasizes the importance of consistency across proceedings and notes that similar information from the Mercer Report was accessible to intervenors in previous cases. E1 argues that there is no legislative requirement for disclosing executive compensation in the approval of a demand-side management plan, but the Board clarifies that its authority to request such information is based on other provisions of the Public Utilities Act.

1 M12780 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 5 6 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, as amended. 7 8 9 10 11 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2027–2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by EfficiencyOne for the approval of a 2027–2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, as well as the establishment of a final agreement and approval of a DSM Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

M12780 - In the Matter of EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM...

AI summary This document outlines a regulatory proceeding related to EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application under the Public Utilities Act.

M12780 - In the Matter of EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM...

AI summary This proceeding involves EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for a 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The matter is being reviewed by the regulatory body.

M12780 - In the Matter of EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM...

AI summary This document outlines a regulatory proceeding related to EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application under the Public Utilities Act.

2026 M12780 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of the 2027-2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova...

AI summary The document outlines an information request related to EfficiencyOne's application for a 2027-2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement and Resource Plan. It references the Nova Scotia Energy Board's (NSEB) Order on E1's Application for Approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test and section 79A(iv) of the Public Utilities Act. Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. provides alternative interpretations of the Board's decision.

9 Request IR-4: 10 Reference: E-23, Pages 23–26. - 11 Preamble: Synapse provides its proposed interpretation of the Board decision in Matter - 12 M12282, and suggests that the inclusion of strategic electrification programming within - 13...

AI summary The document requests clarification on whether strategic electrification programming in the 2027-2031 DSM Plan complies with the Public Utilities Act, specifically section 79A(b)(iv), which requires that strategic electrification reduces both GHG emissions and electricity costs. Synapse's interpretation is challenged regarding the equivalence of 'not increasing costs' and 'reducing costs,' and whether the conjunctive requirement applies at the resource level.

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of the 2027- 2031 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Powe...

AI summary This proceeding involves an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a DSM Purchase Agreement and DSM Resource Plan with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated under the Public Utilities Act, covering the period from 2027 to 2031.

CLOSING SUBMISSION OF SOLAR NOVA SCOTIA IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c. 380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of the 2027–2031 Demand Side Management Purchase Agreem...

AI summary This document is the closing submission by Solar Nova Scotia regarding an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a 2027–2031 Demand Side Management Purchase Agreement and Resource Plan between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, under the Public Utilities Act.

t does not now have. And a growing share of Nova Scotia's remaining decarbonization opportunity lies in replacing fossil fuel use with clean electricity, not in reducing electricity consumption alone. - 3. E1 describes itself as Canada's f...

AI summary The text discusses E1's role as an energy efficiency utility and its proposed transformation into a demand side management utility. It highlights the need for the Board to address legal, accountability, and planning framework issues to enable strategic electrification and broader demand-side opportunities.

B. The interpretation question - 11. E1's exclusion of strategic electrification rests on its reading of the Public Utilities Act : that a strategic electrification resource must satisfy the two statutory conditions "in isolation and witho...

AI summary The interpretation question centers on E1's exclusion of strategic electrification based on its reading of the Public Utilities Act, which requires strategic electrification resources to meet statutory conditions in isolation. SNS argues that this interpretation is not the better reading and that the Board should resolve the issue. The phrase 'in isolation and without regard to other DSM resources' is E1's interpretation, not part of the original statute or decision.

D. Why completing the analysis matters - 26. Strategic electrification is within E1's mandate, and E1 says so. The 2023 amendment to the Public Utilities Act brought strategic electrification within the statutory definition of demand-side...

AI summary Strategic electrification is now part of E1's mandate under the 2023 amendment to the Public Utilities Act. E1 lacks data for hourly analysis, but NS Power holds the necessary data and has recommended prioritizing demand reduction. Deferring program design would impose costs on ratepayers.

PART VI: CONCLUSION - 99. The Board is not asked to choose between affordability and demand side management, or between this Plan and no plan. It is asked to approve a Plan that E1 has built with care within the constraints it set for itse...

AI summary The conclusion emphasizes that the Board is not choosing between affordability and demand-side management but approving a Plan developed by E1 within its constraints. It highlights the need for a demand-side management utility to address evolving resources and customer needs, and notes the role of the Public Utilities Act in defining this transition. Solar Nova Scotia thanks the Board for its consideration.

Strategic Electrification The Chair raised the issue of how E1 would intend to address strategic electrification if the Board determined that it could be addressed at the portfolio level rather than the measure level.[xiv](#page-4-11) Ms....

AI summary The discussion centers on strategic electrification and its classification under the Public Utilities Act. E1 would comply with any Board decision on portfolio-level strategic electrification, but Eastward questions the Board's legislative authority to address it at that level. Strategic electrification must reduce both greenhouse gases and electricity costs to qualify as demand-side management under the Act.

Nova Scotia Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended

AI summary The document is a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended, involving the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

- available DR capacity by 2031. [1](#page-3-1) E1 also proposes the introduction of a solar photovoltaic (PV) - program with an associated performance target of 1.7 GWh of net solar PV generation. [2](#page-3-2) While the - targets propos...

AI summary The text discusses E1's proposal for a solar PV program with a 1.7 GWh target by 2031, but argues that better system benefits can be achieved with the same funding if resources are allocated differently. NS Power is obligated under the Public Utilities Act to implement cost-effective demand side management to reduce customer costs.

This closing statement also takes the opportunity to address a recommendation made by the Brattle Group ("Brattle") in the expert report that Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI") filed in this matter: specifically, the recommendation th...

AI summary This closing statement challenges a recommendation by the Brattle Group against approving E1's Solar PV Program as part of the 2027-2031 DSM Plan, arguing that the interpretation of the Public Utilities Act would negatively impact future low-income and equity measures in DSM plans.

, page 65 of 71. Efficiencyone (Re) [, 2025 NSEB 18 (CanLII),](https://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nserbt/doc/2025/2025nseb18/2025nseb18.html) paras 163 and 218 ["M12282 Decision"]. Ibid at paras 74-77. harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, th...

AI summary The document discusses the interpretation of strategic electrification under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) in relation to demand-side management (DSM), referencing a court decision and emphasizing the need for interpretations consistent with legislative intent and purpose.

ns/nsuarb/doc/2015/2015nsuarb204/2015nsuarb204.html) the Board discussed the concept of affordability in s. 78L(9) of the Act in the context of balancing short-term rate impacts and long-term costs: [77] Traditionally in determining a capi...

AI summary The Board discusses the importance of balancing short-term affordability with long-term cost considerations in determining capital expenditures and DSM programs. While the PUA now emphasizes short-term rate impacts, the Board stresses the need to also consider long-term benefits for ratepayers.

e. Strategic Electrification The CA acknowledges that this Application raises an important question regarding the future of strategic electrification in Nova Scotia. Specifically, E1 has not proposed to include any measures specific to str...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate (CA) recognizes the importance of strategic electrification in Nova Scotia but notes that E1 has not included specific measures for it since the Board's decision in EfficiencyOne (Re) , 2025 NSEB 18. The Board previously supported a BCA test for strategic electrification but ultimately ruled in favor of the PAC test, with modifications to include additional revenues received by NSP as a benefit.

EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended -and- IN THE MATTER OF An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between Effici...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has submitted closing arguments in the matter of approving a 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc., and establishing a final agreement and DSM Resource Plan.

2.1 INTRODUCTION E1 submits that the proposed 2027–2031 DSM Plan satisfies all statutory requirements under the Public

AI summary E1 submits that the proposed 2027–2031 DSM Plan meets all statutory requirements under the Public Utilities Act.

Utilities Act (the " PUA ") . The key statutory provisions are set out below, followed by E1's submission that 1 (1) On and after the Implementation Date, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated shall 2 undertake cost-effective demand-side manageme...

AI summary The text discusses provisions under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) that require Nova Scotia Power Incorporated to engage in cost-effective demand-side management (DSM) through agreements with franchise holders, with the Energy Board overseeing the terms and conditions of these agreements and approving DSM plans that serve the best interests of customers.

4.1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Affordability is a foundational feature of E1's proposed DSM Plan. The question before the Board is not whether additional DSM investment could, in the abstract, produce additional savings. It is whether E1's...

AI summary E1's proposed DSM Plan prioritizes affordability while maintaining cost-effectiveness. The investment level is set at a flat $63.75 million annually, totaling $318.75 million over five years, based on stakeholder feedback and considerations of achievability, rate class equity, and customer value. E1 asserts that the plan is reasonable, evidence-based, and aligns with the Public Utilities Act.

4.2 AFFORDABILITY WITHIN THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - E1 submits affordability is a central consideration for DSM plans under the PUA . The Board's responsibility - in considering this DSM Plan Application is defined by ss. 79A–79W of the PU...

AI summary The text discusses affordability considerations under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) in relation to Demand Side Management (DSM) plans. It highlights key sections of the PUA, including cost-effectiveness tests, the franchise holder's role, and rate stability provisions. The focus is on ensuring that DSM plans are cost-effective and in the best interests of customers.

out what weight [is] to be put to it, not that it should be ignored," and confirmed he was "not 53 E-58, Revised Opening Statement of the Affordable Energy Coalition, p 1. E-51, Opening Statement of the Ecology Action Centre, p 3, s. 3. E-...

AI summary The document discusses stakeholder perspectives on the Preferred Plan, highlighting concerns that it may be inconsistent with the purpose of Demand Side Management (DSM) under the Public Utilities Act. It also references a range of views on budget levels and emphasizes that the Preferred Plan falls within a range of reasonable outcomes.

andalone Solar PV should be treated as an appropriate DSM resource in Nova Scotia's current system context. In our view, the latter question is the more important one for the Board to consider. With respect, the Board does not have the abi...

AI summary The document discusses whether standalone solar PV should be considered a Demand Side Management (DSM) resource under the Public Utilities Act (PUA). E1 argues that subsection 79A(b)(v) of the PUA provides a statutory basis for this classification, and NS Power's expert witness acknowledges this. The discussion focuses on legal definitions and statutory interpretation.

10.3.1.2 REDUCTION IN CAPACITY NOT REQUIRED With respect to the second consideration under section 79A(b)(v), E1 submits that under that section of PUA , and based on the modern approach to statutory interpretation, reduction in the amount...

AI summary E1 argues that under the Public Utilities Act, a reduction in the amount of electrical energy supplied to customers is sufficient to qualify as Demand Side Management (DSM), and that demonstrated reduction in capacity is not an additional requirement. This interpretation is based on the modern principle of statutory interpretation, which considers the context, grammatical meaning, and legislative intent.

10.4 CONCLUSION As a threshold matter, E1 has the legislated mandate to carry out solar-PV activities as part of DSM, pursuant to section 79A(b) of the PUA . Falling within the definition of DSM does not, on its own, entitle the program to...

AI summary E1 argues that the solar-PV program should be included in the DSM Plan as it meets the requirements of the PUA and ERBA, is cost-effective, and aligns with equity-seeking group provisions and balanced plan principles.

11.1 INTRODUCTION There is broad consensus on the record before the Board that SE can play an important role in Nova Scotia's energy transition, a role that E1 recognizes. E1 did not exclude SE in the proposed 2027–2031 DSM Plan as a polic...

AI summary The document discusses the role of Smart Energy (SE) in Nova Scotia's energy transition and its inclusion in the 2027–2031 DSM Plan. E1 excluded SE from the plan because the measures evaluated did not meet the statutory requirements outlined in the Public Utilities Act (PUA) and as clarified by the Board in M12282.

September 11, 2026 Page 5 Crystal Henwood that, given the history of E1 's targets, the plan is achievable. Therefore, the Board approves the spending levels contained in the Settlement Plan. Later in 2022, Bill 228 amended the DSM provisi...

AI summary The document outlines the historical context for DSM planning, including legislative changes such as Bill 228 amending the Public Utilities Act to enhance cost-effective DSM requirements. It also references the 2025 BCA decision and the broader regulatory reforms in Nova Scotia.

5. M ID -T ERM R EVIEW The IG supports the general refinements to the Mid-Term Check-In process set out in Schedule "A", including the identification of both events-based and calendar-based triggers. The IG submits, however, that the Appli...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) supports refinements to the Mid-Term Check-In process but argues that the Application and Schedule 'A' lack clarity on triggers and outcomes. The IG requests the Board to direct E1 to engage with stakeholders via the DSMAG to define key aspects of the process before the end of 2026 to ensure effectiveness and alignment with the PUA amendments.

electricity costs for customers. Based on the current modelling, it has not met the requirement to reduce electricity costs for customers and SE programs should not yet be included in the Plan budget. There has been no request in this proc...

AI summary The document discusses the Strategic Electrification (SE) programs and their inclusion in the Plan budget, noting that current modelling has not met the requirement to reduce electricity costs for customers. The Industrial Group (IG) argues that the modified Presumptive Affordability Criterion (PAC) test should be applied at the program level, and that the cost-effectiveness test at the portfolio level is separate from SE-specific tests.

EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended -and- IN THE MATTER OF An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Purchase Agreement between Effici...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a DSM Purchase Agreement and Resource Plan with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended.

ent. [4](#page-3-0) Four considerations support approval of the Preferred Plan level. First, while the IRP is a highly significant reference point, it is not a binding target that displaces the other factors the Public Utilities Act (" PUA...

AI summary The document discusses the approval of the Preferred Plan level, emphasizing that the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is not a binding target. Affordability is a relevant consideration, and the energy savings level chosen by E1 aligns with expert recommendations. The Board's mandate is to prioritize the best interests of customers.

9 3. STRATEGIC ELECTRIFICATION SNS, ECEL, the EAC and NS Power urge the Board to permit strategic electrification ("SE") that does not individually satisfy the modified-PAC test to be justified at the portfolio level; SNS frames this as it...

AI summary The document discusses strategic electrification (SE) and its qualification under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) in Nova Scotia. SNS, ECEL, EAC, and NS Power urge the Board to allow SE measures not meeting the modified-PAC test to be justified at the portfolio level. However, E1 and others argue that SE must reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and electricity costs to qualify as demand-side management (DSM), and that a portfolio-level pass cannot substitute for this definitional test.

REPLY SUBMISSION OF SOLAR NOVA SCOTIA IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c. 380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of the 2027-2031 Demand Side Management Purchase Agreemen...

AI summary This document is a reply submission related to an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a 2027-2031 Demand Side Management Purchase Agreement and Resource Plan between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, under the Public Utilities Act.