HomeRate BaseM03669Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Rate Base" in M03669

Matter: E-ENSC-R-10 - Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation - Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012A request by Efficiency Nova Scotia for approval of a $43.7 million Demand Side Management plan for the 2012 operating year.  (Also see Matter Nos. M04538 and M04539)
3 passages 3 documents

Rate Base across all matters →

E-7ENSC (Multeese) IR-1 to IR-31 3/29/2011 1 passage
ELECTRICITY DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT FUND p. p. 48
ELECTRICITY DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT FUND - 27 (1) There is hereby established the Electricity Demand-side Management Fund. - (2) The Fund consists of - (a) any electricity demand-side management transitional funds contributed from Nova Scot...

AI summary The Electricity Demand-side Management Fund is established with contributions from Nova Scotia Power, assessments on public utilities, and other contributions. It is managed by the Corporation, segregated from other assets, and used exclusively for demand-side management programs. Surpluses are retained for future use, and the Fund cannot be used for general provincial obligations.

07314Board Decision 6/30/2011 1 passage
[11 ] The relevant provisions of the ENSC Act are: p. p. 0
rporation all information necessary to enable the Board to fulfil its duties. - 38 The Public Utilities Act applies mutatis mutandis to the supervision of the Corporation under Section 37, except that - (a) the Corporation is not entitled...

AI summary The Public Utilities Act applies to the Corporation with modifications, restricting rate-of-return recovery and prioritizing this Act over conflicts. DSM charges are recoverable via rate base. A transition plan for DSM administration from NSPI to ENSe was approved by the Board with conditions.

06935NPB Final Submission 5/13/2011 1 passage
2. ASSESSMENT OF RATE IMPACTS AND MR. WHALEN'S ANALYSIS
gas purchased on a long term contract. The three Tufts Cove steam units and the two LM6000 combustion turbines were often on the margin for the purposes of pricing the ELI 2P-RTP tariff." (pages 8-9) Second, Mr. Whalen simply assumes that...

AI summary The analysis critiques Mr. Whalen's assumptions about energy savings from DSM programs, noting he overlooks cost allocation challenges for the ELI class, fails to account for non-fuel fixed costs, and ignores the ELI class's revenue/cost ratio. It highlights risks of overestimating savings and misallocating costs due to DSM's demand reduction impacts.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →