Conclusion
Conclusion The original work was extensively scoped. A quotation was issued. The quoted customer contribution was accepted and paid. The work was completed during a period of unprecedented disruption and chaos at NSP, after its well-docume...
AI summary The document discusses a dispute over an invoice issued by NSP following a cyber-attack. NSP issued an additional invoice without substantial evidence, later providing limited 'actuals' that included a questionable backhoe charge. The DRO approved the original bill, but the Appellant argues that without credible evidence, the additional charge must be disallowed and a credit issued.