Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Rate Smoothing Adjustment" in M03632

Matter: BRD-E-R-10 - Renewable Energy Community Feed-in Tariffs (COMFIT)see also M04523
6 passages 4 documents

Rate Smoothing Adjustment across all matters →

06887Consumer Advocate Reply Submission 5/6/2011 1 passage
ANSSSTEAM-ONLYARGUMENT
ANSSSTEAM-ONLYARGUMENT In its submission at paragraphs 47 - 52, ANSS disputes Synapse's inclusion in the biomass rate of only the additional costs of a cogeneration system, above the cost of a steam-only system to meet the sawmill's heat r...

AI summary ANSS disputes Synapse's biomass rate model, arguing that it incorrectly allocates steam generation costs. ANSS claims that Synapse only allocates 55% of steam costs to the steam host, not 100% as misrepresented. ANSS also argues that the proposed biomass COMFIT rate is based on an inconsistent hypothetical scenario that violates COMFIT regulations.

20110405-1Hearing Transcript — 4/5/2011 (Synapse Panel, ANSS Panel) 3 passages
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS So if someone has a field of four 12
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS So if someone has a field of four 12 1 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 449 and a half kilowatts is that or let's say a field of 1 this, but I'm not going to get you back, so I was going to 2 ask you t...

AI summary The discussion revolves around rate-setting for different technologies, considering the implications of full tariff differentiation and linear interpolation, which could lead to a large number of specific rates. The participants also address the interpretation of regulations and potential policy solutions to limit arbitrage after the rate-setting process.

- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS it's costing everybody to be here, including you guys.
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS it's costing everybody to be here, including you guys. 1 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 481 MR. BIEWALD: Understood. And there's 2 also the cost, I think, in terms of market certainty that 3 it's if...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the need for periodic reviews of rate-setting to reduce uncertainty in the market and ensure that the province is not overpaying or underpaying for energy projects. A review within one to two years is suggested as a way to provide reassurance and avoid windfall profits.

- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS set by the Board; is that possible the way you see it?
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS set by the Board; is that possible the way you see it? 1 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 549 MR. TRAVIS: Well, no. I mean, we 14 That all by itself does not benefit ratepayers. It only 15 benefits rat...

AI summary The discussion highlights the importance of cost-based rates for ratepayer benefits from energy efficiency, and mentions the exemption of certain sectors from COMFIT rules, with the forestry industry and related companies being specifically referenced.

20110406-1Hearing Transcript — 4/6/2011 (ANSS Panel, St. Francis Xavier Univ, Consumer Adv. Panel) 1 passage
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS They basically walked away from their
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS They basically walked away from their 1 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 663 original PPA, which they did sign with OPA, or they agreed 2 to with OPA. 3 THE CHAIR: But what you're telling me 4 is these...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the challenges of building power plants, with the argument that governments in certain jurisdictions are incentivizing projects outside of ratepayer cost considerations. A specific example is given of a 70-megawatt CHP plant in British Columbia with an adjustment mechanism to ensure ratepayers pay a flat rate.

20110408-1Hearing Transcript — 4/8/2011 (Black River Panel, Jonathan Barry, Daniel Roscoe, Paul Pynn & J. Barry) 1 passage
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS The projects have yet to be financed,
- DICTUM DIGITAL INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS The projects have yet to be financed, 1 NSUARB-BRD-E-R.10 Page 1291 so, generally it involves some form of scenario of a group 2 providing close to 100 percent of the equity financing 3 requi...

AI summary The discussion revolves around equity financing for projects, with the company providing close to 100% of the required equity in exchange for a percentage of the funds. There is a range of potential rates of return, from unleveraged at 5% to leveraged at 20-25%, depending on various financial scenarios and debt/equity ratios.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →