Topic:"Rate Smoothing Adjustment" in M12780

4.5 RATE AND BILL CONSIDERATIONS & RATE AND BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS (RBIA) FOR 2027–2031 E1's RBIA for the Preferred Plan demonstrates that participants in DSM benefit from bill savings. The reductions in energy use and demand achieved by par...

AI summary E1's Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for the Preferred Plan shows that DSM participants benefit from bill savings, with energy efficiency and demand response having positive effects on rates, and solar-PV having minimal impact. These findings are consistent with historical data from 2011 to 2026.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS Term Definition Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test Primary cost-effectiveness screen at the portfolio level, discount using NS Power's WACC. Strategic electrification is assessed using a modified PAC that includes the...

AI summary The document defines key terms related to energy programs and regulatory processes in Nova Scotia. It outlines the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test, Program Cost Recovery (PCR), Program Spending and Targets, Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA), and Rate Class actual spending.

1 4.7 RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS 2 E1 has committed to improve the accuracy of the estimates used for the rate class allocation of 3 expenditures in the DSM Plan. For the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan, E1 largely followed its approach 4 taken f...

AI summary E1 has committed to improving the accuracy of rate class allocation estimates for expenditures in the DSM Plan. For the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan, E1 used historical data from 2022 to 2024, reviewed customer commitments, and incorporated assumptions for program changes affecting specific rate classes.

ayers (forward looking) are shown below in [Figure 1.](#page-234-0) DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 3 of 23 9 2 PAC net lifetime benefits of the DSM Portfolio. Discounted using WACC. 1 Key highlights of the 2026 historical RBIA include: -...

AI summary The 2026 historical Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) highlights the impact of Demand Side Management (DSM) programs on electricity bills in Nova Scotia. Participants in DSM programs experienced average annual bill reductions ranging from 2.8% to 12.7%, while non-participants saw bill increases of 0.5% to 2.9%. Overall, ratepayers will save over $3.2 billion between 2011 and 2041 due to energy and demand reductions from DSM programs.

4 [Table 1](#page-243-1) highlights results in more detail by individual rate class for the 2027–2031 forward looking RBIA. 6 Table 1: Rate and Bill Impacts by Rate Class as a Result of 2027-2031 DSM Preferred Plan Activities Preferred Pla...

AI summary Table 1 presents the rate and bill impacts by rate class resulting from the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan activities. The data shows the average rate impact, average bill impact for participants and non-participants, and total class average bill impact across various rate classes.

5 8. CONCLUSION - 6 Highlights from the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan RBIA analysis include: - Over the 20 years of the study period, participants in DSM programs see average annual bill 8 reductions ranging from a low of 0.04 percent (aver...

AI summary The RBIA analysis for the 2027–2031 DSM Preferred Plan highlights that Nova Scotian ratepayers will save $0.4 billion over 20 years due to energy and demand reductions. The analysis shows varying bill impacts for participants and non-participants, with maximizing customer participation helping to mitigate rate impacts. The RBIA excludes non-rate-related benefits such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and local economic investment.

DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 8 of 8 Attachment 4: Results by Rate Class 2026 Historical Line# Rate and Bill Impacts of DSM on the Residential Class 1 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2...

AI summary The document presents historical data on the rate and bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) on the residential class from 2011 to 2055. It includes metrics such as net incremental energy savings, total annual energy savings, DSM expenditures, and participant activity over time.

This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participants' represents a customer with average energy use and average DSM savings . 'Non-Participants' represents a c...

AI summary The text discusses the bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, comparing participants and non-participants, and presents graphs showing annual and active participation rates for different DSM resources. The figures illustrate how DSM affects customer bills and participation levels across various resources.

DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 1 of 8 Line# Rate and Bill Impacts of DSM on the Small General Class 1 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2...

AI summary The document presents a table analyzing the rate and bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) on the Small General Class from 2011 to 2055. It details energy savings, expenditures, participant numbers, and energy savings per participant over time, highlighting trends and changes in DSM effectiveness and participation.

This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participants' represents a customer with average energy use and average DSM savings . 'Non-Participants' represents a c...

AI summary The text discusses the bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources compared to a no-DSM scenario, showing participation rates for different DSM resources. It also explains how participation is measured, distinguishing between 'Annual' and 'Active' participation, and highlights potential overlaps in participant counts across resources.

DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 2 of 8 Line# Rate and Bill Impacts of DSM on the General Class 1 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 20...

AI summary The table presents the rate and bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) on the General Class over time, including energy savings, expenditures, and participant numbers. It highlights trends in energy savings and participant engagement from 2011 to 2055.

This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participants' represents a customer with average energy use and average DSM savings . 'Non-Participants' represents a c...

AI summary The text includes figures analyzing the bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, participation rates across different DSM programs, and related metrics. The figures compare participants, non-participants, and total customers, and show annual and active participation rates by DSM resource.

fter removing double-counting of participants from multiple resources. DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 3 of 8 This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participa...

AI summary The text discusses the bill and rate impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, illustrating participation rates and double-counting adjustments. It includes graphical representations of annual and active participation, differentiated by DSM resources and customer classes, with a focus on hypothetical scenarios and participation metrics.

DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 4 of 8 Line# Rate and Bill Impacts of DSM on the Small Industrial Class 1 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 203...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table showing the rate and bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) on the small industrial class over several years, including energy savings, expenditures, number of participants, and average energy savings per participant. The data spans from 2011 to 2055 and includes metrics such as net incremental and total annual energy savings in gigawatt-hours, DSM expenditures in millions of dollars, and participant numbers.

This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participants' represents a customer with average energy use and average DSM savings . 'Non-Participants' represents a c...

AI summary The document presents graphical data on the bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, comparing participants and non-participants, and showing annual and active participation rates across different DSM resources. The figures illustrate how DSM affects customer energy use and rates, with a focus on participation metrics and rate impacts.

fter removing double-counting of participants from multiple resources. DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 5 of 8 This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participa...

AI summary The document includes graphs analyzing the bill and rate impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, as well as participation rates across different customer classes. It distinguishes between 'Participants' and 'Non-Participants' and accounts for double-counting of participants across multiple resources.

fter removing double-counting of participants from multiple resources. DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 6 of 8 This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participa...

AI summary The text discusses the bill and rate impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, including participation rates for different customer classes. It highlights the distinction between 'Participants' and 'Non-Participants' and provides visual representations of participation and impact data, with adjustments for double-counting across resources.

fter removing double-counting of participants from multiple resources. DATE FILED: March 31, 2026 Page 7 of 8 This graph shows bill impacts of all DSM resources combined,as percentage differences relative to the no-DSM scenario. 'Participa...

AI summary The document presents graphical data on the bill impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) resources, comparing participants and non-participants, and illustrates participation rates across different DSM resources. It also references an attachment containing assumptions for the 2027-2031 DSM Plan and historical data from 2026.

Table 13: 2025 Adjustment Ratios (ARs) Scenario Tracked Evaluated A participant who registered with a heat pump 1.24 No change A participant who registered without a heat pump and who did not have one installed 0.58 No change A participant...

AI summary Table 13 outlines 2025 Adjustment Ratios (ARs) for participants in a heat pump program. It shows different ARs based on whether participants registered with or without a heat pump and whether they had one installed. Participants with non-electrical space heating are eligible for the program, and their electrical energy savings are calculated based on the proportion of space heating covered by electrical systems.

11.2.7 Evaluated Gross Savings [Table](#page-195-0) 22 and [Table](#page 1-53) 23 below present the annual gross savings results per product category and dwelling for the main EPI offerings. [Table](#page 1-54) 24 further below presents th...

AI summary The document presents annual gross savings results for EPI offerings, showing total electrical energy and peak demand savings at the generator level. Line loss factors, updated in 2019, were used in the calculations and submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.

Request IR-16: Reference: Exhibit E-1, Application, Appendix A, Section 4.7, pages 40–42/112; Exhibit E- 1, Appendix B, Attachment 2. Preamble: E1 states that the rate-class allocation of expenditures was developed using three years of his...

AI summary The request seeks detailed information on the rate-class allocation methodology used by E1, including its full methodology, historical data, reconciliation with the 2027–2031 Preferred Plan, and confirmation of programs requiring bespoke assumptions. It also asks for confirmation on mid-course adjustments affecting spending allocations.

ova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator's (NSIESO) 2026 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The referenced statement reflects E1's expectations that there will be an update to the 2026 DSM Potential Study to inform the 2032–2036 DSM Plan...

AI summary E1 outlines its expectations for updating the 2026 DSM Potential Study to inform the 2032–2036 DSM Plan and the IRP process led by the NSIESO. The primary objective of the study is to project technically achievable and cost-effective DSM potential, not to assess rate or bill impacts. Rate and bill impacts are evaluated separately through the RBIA.

- Attachment 3 from the 2026 DSM Plan) on the custom program components: 2026 Proposed 2027 Preferred Plan 2028 Preferred Plan Measure Name First Year Savings (MWh) Per Unit Incentive Participation Units Total Incentive PAC Ratio First Yea...

AI summary Attachment 3 from the 2026 DSM Plan outlines the proposed and preferred plans for custom program components, including Pay for Performance, New Construction, Industrial Retrofit, Commercial Retrofit, Building Optimization, and Equity Deserving Retrofits, with details on savings, incentives, participation units, and PAC ratios for each year from 2026 to 2028.

age - 2 incentives when excluding these lower cost projects (e.g., compressed air leak audits) and - 3 increased future incentives to those amounts. DATE FILED: May 28, 2026 E1 (IG) IR-19 Page 8 of 8 Request IR-20: Reference: Exhibit E-1,...

AI summary The request seeks analysis of rate and bill impacts for an alternate scenario, assumptions behind lower bill impacts for industrial customers, and whether a 4% average bill impact is considered sufficient for participation in energy efficiency programs.

any benchmarks, customer feedback, or prior program experience relied on to support that conclusion. i) Does E1 view this level of participant payback as a barrier for participation? Please explain. - 1 (d) For the Medium Industrial and La...

AI summary The text requests information on participant payback barriers, load profiles, bill impacts, and customer participation rates for Medium and Large Industrial rate classes. It also asks for explanations on anticipated bill savings for non-participants. A reference is made to Table 1 in the IR response.

3. Savings opportunities are concentrated in ancillary systems Energy efficiency programs can achieve savings through non-process and support systems (e.g., compressed air, pumping, refrigeration). However, these systems typically represen...

AI summary Energy efficiency programs can achieve savings through non-process systems, but these systems represent a smaller share of total energy use in industrial facilities. E1 concludes that lower percentage bill impacts for Medium and Large Industrial customers are consistent with their energy use profile. The RBIA confirms that energy savings offset rate impacts associated with DSM for these customers.

DATE FILED: May 28, 2026 E1 (IG) IR-24 Page 2 of 4 1 Response IR-24: 2 3 (a) The Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) estimates a Large Industrial rate impact of 6.26 4 percent in 2027 and 6.02 percent in 2028. 5 i) The following context h...

AI summary The Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) estimates a Large Industrial rate impact of 6.26% in 2027 and 6.02% in 2028. These impacts are relative to a No DSM scenario and reflect combined effects of program cost recovery, lost revenue, and avoided costs. The RBIA assumes these effects are fully incorporated into rates each year, though this may not hold outside of a General Rate Application (GRA).

of costs classified as energy-related. The Large Industrial class receives a higher - allocation of energy-related costs than demand-related costs. DATE FILED: May 28, 2026 E1 (IG) IR-24 Page 4 of 4 Request IR-25: Reference: Exhibit E-1(i)...

AI summary The document discusses the allocation of energy-related costs among different classes, particularly highlighting the higher allocation for the Large Industrial class. It also addresses a request regarding line loss factors used in modeling and their application in the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA).

Date Filed: May 28, 2026 2025 Results - BNI Demand Response (Smart Synergy) Available Capacity (MW) Available capacity achieved by event (MW) Non-participation rate by event (%) Expenditures Participation (#) Enrolled Achieved Event 1 Even...

AI summary The table presents the 2025 results for the BNI Demand Response (Smart Synergy) program, showing participation rates, available capacity, and expenditures across different customer segments. It highlights low participation and achievement rates in residential and small industrial categories, while general and large general categories show higher participation but still below enrolled capacity.

1 M09096, Document No. 84486, DSMAG Revised Terms of Reference, September 20, 2021, page 7 1 Request IR-16: 16 "DSM is a low-risk energy investment as there is: Certainty with respect to the level in 17 investment; No unexpected costs asso...

AI summary The document discusses the risk assessment of the 2027-2031 DSM Plan and requests clarification on the rate and bill impact analysis for all NS Power customers, not just DSM participants. It also asks for revised figures showing the average rate and bill impacts for non-DSM participants.

- 12 This attachment provides a summary of the rate and bill impacts results as taken from the 13 E1 RBIA models filed as Appendix B, Attachments 9 and 10. It is meant to be assistive in 14 the access and review of the RBIA results. - 15 A...

AI summary This text discusses the submission of Rate Base Impact Assessment (RBIA) models by EfficiencyOne (E1) as part of a regulatory proceeding. It notes that Attachments 7 and 8 were re-filed with macros removed to improve accessibility for intervenors, while Attachments 9 and 10 remain unchanged.

3.4.1.2 DR Load flexibility The DR load flexibility pilot will launch in Q1 of 2025 and will focus on leveraging existing DR technologies/participants in new use cases beyond system peak curtailment. The new use cases may include cold load...

AI summary The DR load flexibility pilot will launch in Q1 2025, aiming to expand DR use cases beyond system peak curtailment, such as cold load pickup and renewable following, to improve program cost-effectiveness. The pilot seeks to increase DR value for ratepayers and enhance grid stability, with evaluation planned after the first DR season.

Table 1: STANDARDIZED FILING FRAMEWORK ITEM DESCRIPTION - Forward-Looking RBIA: This will consist of a detailed description of the forward-looking rate and bill impact analysis of the proposed DSM Resource pPlan.12 This will include a deta...

AI summary The document outlines the standardized filing framework for DSM Resource Plans, including forward-looking and historical Rate and Bill Impact Analyses (RBIA). The forward-looking RBIA details the rate and bill impact of proposed DSM activities, while the historical RBIA estimates the long-term impact of past DSM activities on rates and bills.

ITEM DESCRIPTION Portfolio-level metrics will be provided as follows: - in aggregate (i.e., the aggregate of all DSM resources proposed for the upcoming Plan period); and - by DSM resource (e.g., by each individual DSM resource as proposed...

AI summary The document outlines the provision of portfolio-level metrics for DSM resources, including aggregate and individual resource breakdowns. It specifies the inclusion of forward-looking and historical RBIA in the DSM Resource Plan. The Board directed the use of WACC as the discount rate and a modified PAC for assessing strategic electrification, emphasizing the need for GHG emission and cost reductions.

4.6.6 RATE AND BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS E1 will file its historical Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) as part of each DSM Resource Plan. [43](#page-156-0) The historical RBIA estimates the high-level, long-term impact to rates and bills of...

AI summary E1 will file both historical and forward-looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) as part of each DSM Resource Plan. The historical RBIA assesses the impact of past DSM activities on rates and bills, while the forward-looking RBIA estimates the impact of proposed DSM activities.

- NSEB should direct E1 to pursue an amount of electrification in its Proposed Plan that does not increase electricity costs at the portfolio level. This could take the form of the strategic electrification resources that E1 included in it...

AI summary The NSEB provides guidance to E1 on electrification strategies, demand response program improvements, and budget adjustments. It emphasizes cost control, performance evaluation, and the need for mid-cycle adjustments if program budgets change significantly.

- Assisted an electric utility in developing a residential pricing pilot program that tests incliningblock rate (IBR) structure. More specifically, designed several revenue neutral IBR alternatives and quantified load reduction and bill im...

AI summary The text outlines various projects related to rate design and impact evaluation, including the development of inclining block rate structures, dynamic rate design for different customer classes, and simulations of demand response under various pricing scenarios. These efforts aim to assess the impact of different pricing models on energy use, demand, and customer bills.

customers for their excess generation are transferred to the remainder of the customer base, including non-fuel and rider costs (including the DSM Cost Recovery Rider). Solar generation from participants in E1's proposed solar PV program w...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of solar PV programs on cost recovery and the potential for double compensation. It notes that solar generation reduces NS Power's energy supply needs but does not offset capacity costs, increasing the burden on residential customers. Net metering credits are not fully considered in cost-effectiveness calculations, and Brattle's concern about double compensation applies to future program expansions.

Response to Request IR-4: Refer to M12780, Exhibit E-24, SNS Evidence, Section 4.1, New Controllable Load is a Demand Response Resource, page 10 of 16, 2nd paragraph of this section. (a) Please provide the support for the statement "…at th...

AI summary The response to Request IR-4 discusses the growth of controllable residential load and the capacity value of devices like heat pumps and water heaters. It highlights that while these devices are being deployed through efficiency programs, their capacity value is not secured due to limited demand response enrollment, potentially leading to higher costs for ratepayers.

Request IR-2: 2 Reference: E-23, Pages 11-13. 3 Preamble: Synapse concludes E1's Preferred Plan will deliver approximately 215 GWh 4 less in annual energy efficiency savings than the IRP assumes by 2031, and approximately 5 9 MW less in pe...

AI summary The document requests clarification from Synapse regarding the assumptions in the IRP's DSM savings, whether a RBIA was conducted to close the energy efficiency savings gap, and the methodology for allocating incremental investment. It also asks why NSPI's EE contributions were excluded from the comparison in Table 1.

(e) Where an updated IRP is currently underway by IESO-NS, please explain how Synapse proposes that any changes to the IRP's DSM savings assumptions during the 2027–2031 Plan period should be addressed, including whether those changes woul...

AI summary The response discusses the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and Demand Side Management (DSM) savings assumptions, noting that the IRP's DSM savings are not binding targets. The response highlights concerns about potential gaps in energy efficiency savings and mentions that no Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) was conducted for closing these gaps. It also notes the absence of NS Power-administered energy efficiency programs.

M12780 - In the Matter of EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2027–2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Application 1 Request IR-3: 2 Reference: E-23, Page 17, lines 18-20. 3 4 5 Over time, lower spending on DSM will increase electricity costs...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of reducing Demand Side Management (DSM) investment on electricity costs for ratepayers, highlighting that lower spending on DSM could lead to higher electricity costs. It requests confirmation of Synapse's recommended annual DSM investment level, whether Synapse has quantified the impact on electricity costs, and provides estimates of the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for different investment levels.

- 12 (i) Addition of SE Round 2 Modelling to E1's Preferred Plan: 13 E1 estimated the RBIA to each rate class of the $12.2 million 14 for SE in the Round 2 modelling. Please see my response 1 to IG IR-5 for these results. 2 (ii) Addition o...

AI summary The text discusses the addition of SE Round 2 Modelling to E1's Preferred Plan, focusing on the estimation of RBIA for a $12.2 million investment in SE. It also mentions the exclusion of SE for low-income oil-heating customers due to lack of investment level estimates.

Response IR-5: (a) Synapse did not conduct a RBIA for the Round 2 SE results. However, E1 conducted a RBIA for the Round 2 SE results and provided this RBIA in response to Synapse IR-02 as Attachment 2, Appendix K: RBIA Round 2 – Scenario...

AI summary Synapse did not conduct a Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for the Round 2 SE results, but E1 did and provided it as Attachment 2, Appendix K. A snapshot of the disaggregated average rate impacts by rate class is presented in the table and figure.

1 2 I provide a snapshot of the disaggregated customer average bill impacts by rate 3 class from this workbook in the table and figure below.

AI summary The text references a snapshot of disaggregated customer average bill impacts by rate class, presented in a table and figure from a workbook.

- 1 The concern has been moderated, in part, by the Board's approval in NSPI's General Rate - 2 Application, Matter M12451, 2026 NSEB 8, to align the DSM Plan adjustment recovery period - 3 with the accrual period, thereby smoothing out cu...

AI summary The document discusses adjustments to the DSM Plan, including alignment of the adjustment recovery period with the accrual period, and proposed changes to the MCA process. It also highlights concerns regarding the clarity of mid-term check-ins and several issues requiring further examination, such as cost-effectiveness testing, program eligibility, and alignment with the Integrated Resource Plan.

3 In all instances, the inclusion of the IRP DR scenario actual decreases bill impacts for non-4 participants. This is due to the RBIA analysis for the High DR component - and Preferred Plan DR 5 component - showing a reduction to non-part...

AI summary The inclusion of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Demand Response (DR) scenario reduces bill impacts for non-participants. This is based on the RBIA analysis for the High DR and Preferred Plan DR components. However, the methodology used to estimate the effect has limitations, as it does not fully capture the complexity of the IRP DR scenario.

measures such as building envelope upgrades, heat pump installations, and 1 i. Does E1 agree that there are risks associated with the proposed 2027-2031 2 DSM Plan related to the plan not achieving its forecast benefits? 3 • If not, please...

AI summary The text discusses risks associated with the proposed 2027-2031 DSM Plan and requests clarification on whether the RBIA for the plan applies only to DSM participants or all NS Power customers. It also asks for revised tables and figures showing rate and bill impacts for different customer groups.

- 29 (a) Please provide: 1 (i) The complete rate-class allocation methodology, step by 2 step, including all allocators, weighting factors, and 3 normalization steps applied to derive the percentage share 4 of total annual spending allocat...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on the rate-class allocation methodology, historical datasets, reconciliation of spending percentages, and confirmation of bespoke assumptions in the 2027–2031 Preferred Plan. It also asks about the impact of mid-course adjustments on non-eligible rate classes.

21 1 (g) Please break down Table 36 and Exhibit E-1-(ii) custom programs 2 (including Strategic Energy Management) split by all rate classes included 3 in the BNI programming. 4 (h) Please explain how the incentive levels were established...

AI summary The document requests a breakdown of custom programs, including Strategic Energy Management, by rate class within the BNI programming. It also asks for an explanation of how incentive levels were established for Medium and Large Industrial customers, noting that their lower bill impact benefits are attributed to consumption tied to complex industrial processes.

1 2 Request IR-9: 3 6 4 What are the risks for ratepayers arising from the absence of any thresholds that would require 5 mid-cycle adjustments from the Proposed Plan? Date Filed: July 6, 2026 CA (BCC) Page 4 of 4

AI summary The request asks about the risks to ratepayers from the absence of mid-cycle adjustment thresholds in the Proposed Plan, focusing on potential financial impacts and rate stability.

- 26 (a) Does Synapse consider the IRP's DSM savings assumptions to be a 27 binding target or a directional planning assumption for the purposes of 28 evaluating E1's Preferred Plan? Please explain. 1 (b) Please confirm whether Synapse con...

AI summary The document includes questions about Synapse's evaluation of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) DSM savings assumptions, whether they are binding targets or directional planning assumptions, and requests for a Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for scenarios closing the energy efficiency savings gap. It also asks about the impact of lower DSM spending on electricity affordability and the recommended annual DSM investment level for the 2027–2031 Plan.

7 Request IR-10: 8 Reference: E-23, Page 47. 9 I recommend that the NSEB establish several thresholds that would trigger 10 a requirement for E1 to propose and file a mid-cycle adjustment: - 11 If spending is anticipated to decrease or inc...

AI summary The text discusses a recommendation for the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) to establish thresholds that would require EfficiencyOne (E1) to propose and file a mid-cycle adjustment under certain conditions. It also includes questions posed to Synapse regarding the definition and application of these adjustments.