Topic:"Rates And Money" in M03097

Consistent with this directive, NSPI has sought to compile the necessary cost information and economic analysis support to allow the Board to approve the enclosed ATO. The Company respectfully suggests the Board seek written input from the...

AI summary NSPI is requesting the Board's approval for an Authority to Overspend (ATO) based on compiled cost information and economic analysis. The application suggests seeking input from original participants in CI 28098 and outlines specific project modifications and associated costs.

Tue 6 ATO - Summary of Results: NPV Benefit TUe 6 without Duct-Firing vs No TUe 6 (Strategist) $M NPV Benefit TUe 6 with Duct-Firing vs TUe 6 without DF $M Total Project NPV Benefit $M May 2008 Filing 43.84 31.60 75.44 2010 Revision 37.70...

AI summary The document presents a summary of results from a regulatory proceeding, showing NPV benefits for different scenarios of the TUC 6 project, including with and without duct-firing, across two filings in 2008 and 2010.

Cumulative NPV Costs 2006-2029 Year Operating Costs TUC 6 No Duct Firing In-Service June/2010 (K$) Operating Costs No TUC 6 (K$) Operating Costs Nominal $ (K$) Operating Cumulative PV Costs (K$) Year Capital Costs TUC 6 No Duct Firing In-S...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table of cumulative net present value (NPV) costs from 2006 to 2029, comparing operating and capital costs for two scenarios: TUC 6 No Duct Firing and No TUC 6. The table includes yearly operating and capital costs, cumulative present value costs, and total benefits in present value terms. The discount rate used is 6.62%.

Incremental NPV Benefit of TUC 6 Duct Fired - Operating Cost Benefits from Hatch Analysis Year Operating Benefits Hatch Analysis Operating Cumulative PV Costs Year Capital Costs TUC 6 Duct Fired In-Service June/2010 Capital Costs TUC 6 No...

AI summary The document presents a table analyzing the incremental net present value (NPV) benefits of the TUC 6 Duct Fired project, comparing operating cost benefits from Hatch Analysis with capital costs over time. The analysis spans from 2006 to 2029 and includes cumulative PV costs, nominal benefits, and total benefits in both nominal and present value terms.

NPV (Jan. '06 K$) 48,679 Cumulative NPV Costs 2006-2029 29.49 M$ 2029 Notes Operating Cost Benefits - Hatch Analysis (difference in system operating costs with TUC 6 at 125MW and 150MW) 43.498 (Discount Rate is 6.62%) - Hatch benefits calc...

AI summary The text presents a net present value (NPV) analysis from January 2006, with cumulative NPV costs from 2006 to 2029 amounting to 29.49 million dollars. It references operating cost benefits from a Hatch analysis, which compares system operating costs under different TUC 6 capacities and accounts for a discount rate of 6.62%.

TUC6 UNFIRED_$78(Dec)_Apr16-10.SAV NPV = $12,483.585 M POVEI An Emera Company Y UARB APPRO VAL SHEET Project Title: TUC 6 V Vaste Heat Recove ry CI Number: 28098

AI summary This document outlines a project titled 'TUC 6 V' related to waste heat recovery, with a Net Present Value (NPV) of $12,483.585 M. The project is associated with a case number (CI 28098) and involves the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB).

1 Request IR-7: 2 3 Reference Page 3 of the May 3, 2010 ATO , last paragraph on the page. 4 5 a) Please confirm that NSPl's reference to the "original filing" is to the May 2008 filing. 7 9 10 6 8 b) Please provide a breakdown of the impac...

AI summary The document references a request for clarification regarding NSPI's original filing and a breakdown of the impact on NPV for three items related to the Tufts Cove 6 Waste Heat Recovery Project. The response confirms that the original filing refers to the May 2008 UARB-approved project and provides tables detailing the NPV impact.

Refer to Section 1020 clause 1.8.2 Item Con duct or S ize & Typ e Sup ply P rice Inst all P rice Tota l Pri ce Sup ply P rice Inst all P rice Tota l Pri ce Sup ply P rice Inst all P rice Tota l Pri ce Sup ply P rice Inst all P rice Tota l...

AI summary The text presents a table with pricing details for various items, including conductor size, type, supply price, installation price, and total price. The table contains multiple rows with different values and is referenced under Section 1020 clause 1.8.2.

Note: 10-Nov-09 Price is per metre for plus or minus change in length Refer to Section 1020 clause 1.8.2 T4 Canalantan Cira & Tana Company Day's a Landall Daile Tadal Dai C In the II Dute T-4-1 D-2- Committee Design In at all Dad Takal Dad...

AI summary The text presents a table with pricing details for various copper wire configurations from TECK, including costs for different gauges and quantities, with references to standards and incomplete entries.

TUC 6 ATO - Summary of Results: NPV Benefit TUC 6 without Duct-Firing vs No TUC 6 (Strategist) $M NPV Benefit TUC 6 with Duct-Firing vs TUC 6 without DF $M Total Project NPV Benefit $M May 2008 Filing 43.84 31.60 75.44 2010 Revision 37.70...

AI summary The document presents a summary of results for TUC 6 ATO, including NPV benefits and costs associated with the project. It compares scenarios with and without duct-firing, showing changes in capital and operating costs over time, with the total project NPV benefit calculated at $75.44M for the May 2008 filing.

NOTE: Operating Costs include fuel, variable O&M, net transaction costs and fixed thermal and hydro O&M costs Capital Charges are the annual charges for the combination of alternatives added. Assumptions: - 5%DSM & Rnew Plan - No TUC 6 5%D...

AI summary The text discusses operating costs, including fuel and O&M expenses, and capital charges related to a 5% DSM & Rnew Plan. Two scenarios are outlined: one without TUC6 and another with TUC6 but no duct firing, each with associated NPV figures and capital costs.

[1 ] On May 3, 2010, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI", the "Utility") submitted a request for Approval to Overspend ("ATO") to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the "Board") for the Tufts Cove 6 ("TUC6") Waste Heat Recovery P...

AI summary On May 3, 2010, NSPI requested an ATO from the Board for the TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project, which involves recovering waste heat from two combustion turbines to generate additional electricity. The request amount is $8,699,864, bringing the total project cost to $92,996,628.

which the Board approved. Written submissions were received from NPB, Avon and NSDOE on July 22, 2010. NSPl's reply submission was received on August 6, 2010. - [11] On August 20, 2010, NSPI requested an opportunity to make oral submission...

AI summary The document outlines the procedural steps taken by the Board in response to NSPI's application for an Authority to Overspend (ATO) for the TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project. Written submissions were received from multiple parties, and NSPI requested an oral hearing, which the Board agreed to. Additional information was requested from NSPI, and MEUNSC opted to file a brief written submission instead of appearing at the hearing.