HomeRates And MoneyM08888Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Rates And Money" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
22 passages 7 documents

Rates And Money across all matters →

E-1Application 1 passage
Table 8: Labor Rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia 31 p. p. 87
Table 8: Labor Rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia 31 Position Description Average Hourly (CAD) Difference in Labor Position Description Massachusetts Nova Scotia Rates Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand $19.35 Other...

AI summary Table 8 compares labor rates in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia, showing higher rates in Nova Scotia. Fuel costs are significantly higher in Nova Scotia, but this difference was not adjusted in the NEBs from the MA TRM due to its minimal impact on total NEBs for Commercial and Industrial programs.

E-4E1 (IG) RIR-1 to RIR-14 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 4
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 Please provide the source or derivation of the $2.729/m3 figure in cell AC3. 4 5 Response IR-14: 6 7 The following response has been provided by Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC). 8 9 The so...

AI summary The response to IR-14 explains that the figure of $2.729/m3 in cell AC3 is derived from Halifax water and wastewater rates as of Q3 2017. The calculation sums the water rate ($0.976/m3) and wastewater discharge rate ($1.753/m3) to arrive at the total.

E-6E1 (NSPI) RIR-1 to RIR-43 2 passages
Quantified Health Benefits of Reduced Fossil Fuel Generation p. p. 24
Quantified Health Benefits of Reduced Fossil Fuel Generation Estimated Cost of Health Impacts Fuel Type 2012 PJM Marginal Generation Machol and Rizk 2013 National Research Council (2010) Epstein et al. 2011 Coal 58% 32¢/kWh 3.2¢/kWh 14¢/kW...

AI summary The text presents a table quantifying the estimated cost of health impacts associated with different fuel types in electricity generation, including coal, natural gas, and oil, with mid-range values provided for comparison.

Section 153 p. pp. 100-102
Date Filed: November 14, 2018 E1 (NSPI) IR-33 Page 1 of 2 Labor rate data was captured by the U.S. Labor Rates are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and reference Massachusetts specific data from May 2017 [(https://www.bls.gov/OES/curren...

AI summary The document references labor rate data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statistics Canada, specifically from May 2017, and mentions responses to information requests by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.

E-7E1 (NSUARB) RIR-1 to RIR-9 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 12
NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-01: - Please provide the cost of engaging Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) as - EOne's consultant regarding Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs). Response IR-01: - The total cost to engage VEIC to date is $51,...

AI summary The response to Request IR-01 provides the total cost of engaging Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) as EOne's consultant regarding Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs), which is $51,586. This does not include future costs related to the ongoing regulatory process.

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 14 passages
3.5.3 Affordability p. p. 82
$1.1 million. Both of these amounts are further offsets currently available within existing rates since the revenue related to these fully amortized deferrals continues to be collected during 2015. [87] As noted earlier, in 2014 approximat...

AI summary The document discusses the diversion of funds from the DSM rider in 2015 to cover excess fuel costs, with the Board agreeing that these funds were intended for DSM purposes and remain in rates despite the deferral. The amounts involved are approximately $53 million and $1.1 million.

3.5.3.1 Findings p. pp. 82-86
3.5.3.1 Findings [88] The Board notes that the DSM amount of $33,210,000, as set by the Board for 2016, is below DSM spending in each of the last four years. It is also an amount significantly below that recommended in the IRP, and the Boa...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that the DSM amount of $33.2 million for 2016 is below recent spending levels but considers it affordable under the PUA. The Board also notes that NSPI should be able to offset any potential revenue shortfall without a rate increase.

3.13 Costs p. p. 96
3.13 Costs [128] The EAC seeks costs in this proceeding in the amount of $27,500. The EAC is a non-profit organization and would qualify for costs under the Board's Costs Rules . The Board did find the evidence provided by the EAC's witnes...

AI summary The EAC is seeking costs of $27,500 in this proceeding. The Board found the EAC's witness helpful and directed E1 and the EAC to discuss the issue. The Board may award costs but is unlikely to reimburse employee salaries of the EAC.

7) RESOLUTION PROCESS p. p. 112
7) RESOLUTION PROCESS Year Report/ Process Filing Timeframe Inclusions 2017 2017 Q2 Report July/Aug See 2015 Q2 report for details Historical- looking rate and bill impact analysis End of October Results by rate class in graphical form Ove...

AI summary This section outlines the resolution process, including various reports, filings, and meetings related to rate and bill impact analysis, as well as the 2019-2021 DSM Plan Filing. Key activities include quarterly reports, meetings with the DSMAG, and standardized filings.

[171] Mr. Bradley explained the parameters of the PwC opinion: p. p. 157
reports. The Board's Decision, para. 826, summarized and accepted PwC eventual amounts for "past losses": lost profit – Antigonish retail: $5,301,499 lost profit – distribution centre: $2,112,504 lost profit – vendor discounts: $1,086,279...

AI summary The Board's decision outlines the calculation of past losses for Central, including lost profits and adjustments for financing costs and incremental operating expenses. It also notes concerns about Mr. Thompson's influence on the Wintrip Report and his credibility as a witness.

(The table of contents is not part of the statute) p. p. 312
(The table of contents is not part of the statute) Section Domestic rate or charge in certain cases 73 Approval for issue of certain securities 74 75 Location of office and books 76 Use of equipment by another utility 77 Consent for erecti...

AI summary The text outlines various sections and regulations related to public utilities, including domestic rate regulations, franchise agreements, board supervision, and procedures for complaints and hearings. It includes sections on electricity efficiency, demand-side management, and the process for handling disputes and regulatory actions.

Board's authority when approving agreements p. p. 312
Board's authority when approving agreements - 79M (1) In making an order approving an agreement pursuant to Section 79L, the Board shall establish such performance requirements for the franchise holder as the Board considers appropriate. -...

AI summary The Board has authority to set performance requirements, determine costs, and attach modifications to agreements approved under Section 79L. It may also defer cost recovery up to $100 million, considering benefit alignment and rate stability.

Supply Agreement p. p. 403
Supply Agreement 1 2 (b) provide sufficient resources to enable EfficiencyOne to perform its obligations on time and in accordance with this Agreement; 20 21 22 23 4.3 accord due, to NSPI shall make monthly payments on the first Business D...

AI summary The Supply Agreement outlines the obligations of NSPI to provide timely payments to EfficiencyOne based on the Contract Price, with payments made monthly on the first Business Day of each month, in accordance with Schedule 'B', and including applicable HST. EfficiencyOne is required to submit invoices in advance of the payment dates.

4 14. INDEMNITY p. p. 405
4 14. INDEMNITY - 5 6 7 8 9 10 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or representatives, and agrees...

AI summary This section outlines the indemnity provisions between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), specifying that EfficiencyOne assumes all risk of loss, damage, or injury caused by its personnel, except for cases involving the negligence or wilful misconduct of NSPI. Both parties agree to indemnify each other against liabilities arising from breaches of the agreement, with exceptions for negligence or wilful misconduct by the other party.

15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY p. pp. 405-408
15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY 40 41 42 43 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with...

AI summary This section outlines the limit of liability for both parties under the agreement. EfficiencyOne's liability is capped at $2 million, excluding certain scenarios like indemnification, wilful misconduct, and refund obligations. Similarly, NSPI's liability is also capped at $2 million, excluding wilful misconduct and payment of the Contract Price.

Supply Agreement p. p. 408
Supply Agreement - insurance covering licensed vehicles owned or operated by or on behalf of EfficiencyOne. - (d) Property Insurance covering all loss of or damage to EfficiencyOne's property and equipment of EfficiencyOne or for which Eff...

AI summary The Supply Agreement outlines insurance requirements for EfficiencyOne, including property, professional liability, and workers' compensation coverage. NSPI may enforce these requirements and recover costs if EfficiencyOne fails to maintain the required insurance. EfficiencyOne is also responsible for deductibles and ensuring compliance by subcontractors.

30 17. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY p. pp. 408-410
30 17. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 - 31 17.1 NSPI acknowledges that all branding, trade and business marks of EfficiencyOne used 32 in the course of provision of EECA pursuant to this Agreement, (the "EfficiencyOne 33 Brands"...

AI summary This section outlines the intellectual property rights related to branding and trademarks between NSPI and EfficiencyOne. It specifies that EfficiencyOne's brands remain their sole property and cannot be used by NSPI without consent, and vice versa. Both parties must return or destroy each other's brands upon termination of the agreement.

II. Payments p. p. 414
II. Payments In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred to following are exclusive of required HST...

AI summary The document outlines monthly payments by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to EfficiencyOne under Section 4.3 of the Agreement, excluding required HST, which is to be remitted separately.

indemnity p. p. 414
indemnity 8 13. The Recipient shall indemnity and hold the Disclosing Party harmless from any and all loss, liability, cost or expense (including, without limitation, solicitor's costs on a solicitor and client basis and all other costs of...

AI summary The Recipient is required to indemnify the Disclosing Party against any loss, liability, cost, or expense resulting from the Recipient's breach of the Agreement, including legal costs. This obligation remains in effect even after the Agreement is terminated.

E-13Submission - NSPI 2 passages
Section 11 p. pp. 6-7
ally, the Board's intended mandate or function under the PUA is the dual role of ensuring that rates are just and reasonable and that safe and adequate service, including service quality standards, is maintained. DATE FILED: March 9, 2020...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) is tasked with ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable while maintaining safe and adequate service, including adherence to service quality standards under the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

1 In Decision 2006 NSUARB 85, the Board explained as follows: p. p. 7
DATE FILED: March 9, 2020 Page 9 of 21 1 In Decision 2006 NSUARB 85, the Board explained as follows: 2 3 4 The role of the Board is to provide rates which permit the Utility to meet its obligation to provide reasonably safe and adequate se...

AI summary The document references a 2006 decision by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), explaining the Board's role in ensuring that utility rates are just, reasonable, and sufficient while providing safe and adequate services to the public, as outlined in the Public Utilities Act (PUA).

75684NSPI (E1) IR-1 to IR-43 1 passage
1
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 31 E1 states that: 1 2 3 4 "Water savings values were adjusted by using Halifax Water and Wastewater rates, as opposed to those found in Massachusetts." 5 (a) Why did VEIC assume that Halifax's water rates are sufficient...

AI summary The document contains questions raised about the use of Halifax Water rates in a study, including concerns about their applicability to all of Nova Scotia, the accuracy of using average provincial rates, and the treatment of households with private water supplies. It also requests information on the percentage of Massachusetts households with private water supplies and the water utility rate used in the Massachusetts TRM.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →