Topic:"Rates And Money" in M10473

7.1 AFFORDABILITY - Affordability is a critical factor in DSM planning. In its decision on the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, the Board - stated it is, " specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of - affordability....

AI summary Affordability is a critical factor in DSM planning, as highlighted by the Board's 2016-2018 DSM Plan decision. The Board is directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address affordability, though the legislation does not provide specific parameters for determining affordability. E1 considers various factors, including the best interests of ratepayers, alignment with the 2020 IRP, and the Settlement Plan's affordability and risk profile.

BALANCING SHORT- AND LONG-TERM AFFORDABILITY The Settlement Plan seeks to maximize value for ratepayers by balancing short- and long-term affordability. This is accomplished through a DSM Plan that incorporates the needs and best interests...

AI summary The Settlement Plan aims to balance short- and long-term affordability for ratepayers by emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of Demand Side Management (DSM) over fuel alternatives. DSM is shown to be significantly cheaper than fuel, leading to substantial fuel savings. The plan aligns with legislative requirements and considers the best interests of customers.

Table 7: Carbon Savings Intensity (tonnes per MWh) and Avoided Cost ($/MWh) Year Carbon Savings Intensity (tonne/MWh) Avoided Cost of Carbon ($/MWh) 2023 0.861 55.94 2024 0.898 71.83 Year Carbon Savings Intensity (tonne/MWh) Avoided Cost o...

AI summary Table 7 presents carbon savings intensity and avoided cost of carbon for various years from 2023 to 2046. These metrics are crucial for understanding the environmental and economic impacts of energy efficiency initiatives. The data shows fluctuations over time, with a notable extrapolation for 2046-2063. Section 8.3 discusses rate and bill considerations and the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) for the years 2023-2025.

3 Table 2: DSMAG Stakeholder Engagement Timelines in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development First Quarter of 2021 • Attachment K: Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) Scenario Summary DSMAG Session: Updated DSM Portfolio Scenarios & Rou...

AI summary This table outlines the timeline for stakeholder engagement by the DSMAG in the development of the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan. It includes sessions, comment periods, and meetings with various stakeholders such as NS Power, the Consumer Advocate, and Synapse Energy Economics.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES Transparency – E1 will provide stakeholders and customers with information and insight into the analyses supporting plan development and results and demonstrate how received comments were considered. Accessibility & Equi...

AI summary The document outlines guiding principles for E1, emphasizing transparency, accessibility, equity, and affordability. These principles are supported by tools such as the Integrated Resource Plan, Rate and Bill Impact Analysis, and cost effectiveness testing. Strategic themes, which inform the portfolio design and initiatives for the next plan cycle, are also highlighted.

2.4 COST-EFFECTIVENESS - Cost effectiveness testing is used to quantitatively assess and evaluate demand side resources through a - comparison of benefits and costs expressed as both the dollar value of the net benefit (or cost) and as a -...

AI summary The document discusses the use of cost-effectiveness testing to evaluate demand side management (DSM) resources, specifically the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests. Both tests incorporate avoided costs of carbon as per a 2011 directive, using NS Power's Weighted-Average Cost of Capital (WACC) as the discount rate.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity and annual avoided CO 2 e emissions were provided by NS Power, from the 2020 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2021. Cos...

AI summary NS Power provided annual avoided costs of energy, capacity, and CO2e emissions from the 2020 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Cost-effectiveness ratios are calculated using 2023 present values. DR investment includes E1's required investment, with collaboration and additional investment from NS Power required for full benefits. TRC and PAC ratios are defined, with exclusions for carbon in some cases.

3.2 SETTLEMENT PLAN – RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS Planned rate class expenditures for the Settlement Plan are provided in [Table 13,](#page-141-1) below, by year and by Plan period.

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines planned rate class expenditures, organized by year and Plan period, as detailed in Table 13.

9.5 RATE & BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS - E1 will file its historical Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) and forward-looking RBIA as part of each DSM - Resource Plan. The historical RBIA estimates the high-level, long-term impact to rates and bi...

AI summary E1 is required to file both historical and forward-looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) as part of each Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The historical RBIA assesses the impact of past DSM activities, while the forward-looking RBIA estimates the impact of future DSM investments approved by the NSUARB.

Figure 3: General Rate Class – Settlement Plan Payback

AI summary Figure 3 presents a visual representation of the General Rate Class – Settlement Plan Payback, likely illustrating financial or cost recovery aspects related to a rate settlement plan.

1 Figure 8: Municipal Rate Class – Settlement Plan Payback

AI summary The document presents Figure 8, which illustrates the Municipal Rate Class – Settlement Plan Payback. The figure likely outlines the financial implications or payback periods associated with a settlement plan for municipal rate classes.

Table 1 Year Equivalent Escalating Series – AVC-Energy ($/MWh) 2023 $70 2024 $71 2025 $72 2026 $74 2027 $75 2028 $77 2029 $78 2030 $80 2031 $82 2032 $83 2033 $85 2034 $87 2035 $88 2036 $90 2037 $92 2038 $94 2039 $96 2040 $97 2041 $99 2042...

AI summary Table 1 presents the projected equivalent escalating series for AVC-Energy from 2023 to 2045, showing a steady increase in costs per MWh. The section 'B. Demand Response DRSim Model' introduces a model related to demand response, indicating a focus on managing energy demand.

Appendix B Rate and Bill Impact Analysis of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan

AI summary This document provides a rate and bill impact analysis of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, focusing on how the plan will affect customer rates and bills over the specified period.

2. INTRODUCTION E1 files an historical RBIA to provide insight into the rate and bill impacts resulting from DSM activities that have been carried out since 2011, as well as those that have been approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Revi...

AI summary E1 files a historical RBIA to analyze the rate and bill impacts of DSM activities from 2011 to 2022, comparing a no-DSM scenario with one that includes program investments. A forward-looking RBIA is also filed with the DSM Resource Plan Applications to assess the impacts of proposed DSM investments on rates and bills, aiding in cost-effectiveness evaluations.

4.7 CALCULATING BILL IMPACTS This section describes key elements of the bill impact calculations.

AI summary This section outlines the key elements involved in calculating bill impacts, which is essential for understanding how various factors affect customer bills in the regulatory proceeding.

5.1 OVERALL RATE IMPACTS - DSM can lower rates by avoiding different types of electricity system costs (avoided energy, capacity, - transmission and distribution, and carbon costs). DSM may also increase rates, a result of recovering - pro...

AI summary Demand Side Management (DSM) can lower rates by avoiding system costs but may also increase rates due to program costs and lost revenues. The 2023-2025 DSM Plan RBIA analyzes long-term rate impacts, showing average rate changes ranging from -0.1% to +1.0% over 2023-2039, with significant upward impacts during program cost recovery (2023-2025) and smaller impacts afterward.

14 [Figure 4](#page-171-1) puts rate impacts from 2023-2025 DSM in context with other assumed rate impacts over the study 15 period. Using the assumption that rates escalate by two percent per year for years when they are not 16 explicitly...

AI summary Figure 4 illustrates the impact of demand-side management (DSM) on rates from 2023 to 2025, showing a 37% increase in residential rates due to factors other than DSM. The figure compares DSM and no-DSM rates for three classes: Residential, General, and Large Industrial, with similar patterns observed in other classes.

5.4 RESULTS BY RATE CLASS This section highlights results in more detail, by individual rate class for the Settlement Plan.

AI summary This section provides a detailed breakdown of results by individual rate class for the Settlement Plan, offering insights into how different rate classes are affected.

5.4.1 RESIDENTIAL - • As modelled, the Residential class includes Rate Codes 2, 3, 6, 9 and 16 (Domestic), as well as 4 and 5 (Charitable). - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 0.8 percent, or 0.14 cents/kWh.

AI summary The Residential class in the rate model includes specific rate codes, and the average rate impact over the study period is projected to increase by 0.8 percent, or 0.14 cents per kWh.

Residential - ↑ 0.8% Rates - ↓ 1.7% Participant Bills - ↑ 0.6% Non-Participant Bills - ↓ 1.0% Total Customer Bills - Participants in the Residential class see an average bill decrease of 1.7 percent over the study period. - Non-Participant...

AI summary Residential class participants experienced a 1.7% decrease in average bills, while non-participants saw a 0.6% increase. Overall, the class saw a 1.0% decrease in average bills over the study period.

5.4.2 SMALL GENERAL - As modelled, the Small General class includes Rate Code 10 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 1.0 percent, or 0.16 cents/kWh.

AI summary The Small General class, which includes Rate Code 10, is projected to experience an average rate increase of 1.0 percent, or 0.16 cents per kWh, over the study period.

Small General - ↑ 1.0% Rates - ↓ 7.9% Participant Bills - ↑ 0.8% Non-Participant Bills - ↓ 3.6% Total Customer Bills DATE FILED: 11 March 2022 Page 31 of 40 • Participants in the Small General class see an average bill decrease of 7.9 perc...

AI summary The Small General class participants experienced a 7.9% average bill decrease, while non-participants saw a 0.8% increase, leading to a 3.6% overall average bill decrease for the class during the study period.

5.4.3 GENERAL - As modelled, the General class includes Rate Code 11 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 0.5 percent, or 0.06 cents/kWh. General ↑ 0.5% Rates - Participants in the General class see an av...

AI summary The General class, which includes Rate Code 11, experiences an average rate increase of 0.5 percent. However, participants in this class see an average bill decrease of 4.2 percent, while non-participants see a 0.4 percent increase. Overall, the class sees a 3.7 percent decrease in average bills.

5.4.4 LARGE GENERAL - As modelled, the Large General class includes Rate Code 12 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 0.3 percent, or 0.03 cents/kWh. - Participants in the Large General class see an avera...

AI summary The Large General rate class includes Rate Code 12 and shows an average rate increase of 0.3 percent, but participants experience a 4.0 percent average bill decrease. Non-participants see a 0.2 percent bill increase, while the overall class sees a 4.0 percent bill decrease. All customers are assumed to participate in BER-IR annually, leading to 100% participation by 2023.

5.4.5 SMALL INDUSTRIAL - • As modelled, the Small Industrial class includes Rate Code 21 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 1.0 percent, or 0.15 cents/kWh. - Participants in the Small Industrial class s...

AI summary The Small Industrial class, represented by Rate Code 21, experiences an average rate increase of 1.0 percent, but participants see an average bill decrease of 6.1 percent, while non-participants face a 0.9 percent increase. Overall, the class sees a 3.8 percent average bill decrease over the study period.

5.4.6 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL - As modelled, the Medium Industrial class includes Rate Code 22 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 0.1 percent, or 0.01 cents/kWh. - Participants in the Medium Industrial class...

AI summary The Medium Industrial rate class (Rate Code 22) experiences a 0.1 percent rate increase and a 1.2 percent average bill decrease for participants. All customers are assumed to participate in BER-IR, leading to 100% participation by 2023. Non-participants see a 0.1 percent bill increase, though they may not exist in this class.

5.4.7 LARGE INDUSTRIAL rate class. - As modelled, the Large Industrial class includes Rate Code 23 (Large Industrial), Rate Code 25 (Large Industrial, interruptible service), and the one-part high voltage real time pricing tariff. - The av...

AI summary The Large Industrial rate class includes specific rate codes and a high voltage real time pricing tariff. The average rate impact over the study period is a decrease of 0.1 percent, or 0.01 cents/kWh.

Large Industrial Medium Industrial ↑ 0.1% Rates ↓ 1.2% Participant Bills ↑ 0.1% Non-Participant Bills ↓ 1.2% Avg. Total Cust. Bills - ↓ 0.1% Rates - ↓ 1.8% Participant Bills - ↓ 0.1% Non-Participant Bills - ↓ 1.8% Total Customer Bills DATE...

AI summary The Large Industrial rate class shows an average bill decrease of 1.8% for participants and 0.1% for non-participants over the study period. All customers in this class are assumed to participate in BER-IR annually, leading to 100% participation by 2023. The non-participant line is shown for completeness, though no non-participants may exist in this class.

5.4.8 MUNICIPAL - As modelled, the Municipal class includes Rate Code 24 only. - The average rate impact over the study period is an increase of 1.0 percent, or 0.14 cents/kWh. Municipal • Municipal utilities see an average bill decrease o...

AI summary The Municipal class includes Rate Code 24, with an average rate increase of 1.0% and a 2.7% decrease in average bills. All municipal electric utilities participated in E1 programs, leading to identical bill impacts for participants and total customers, though individual participation is not modelled.

updated avoided costs and incorporation of transfer tables and cost allocation summary tables in the NS Power Rate Model in the 2021 RBIA, and the integration of demand response in the 2023-2025 RBIA. The RBIA for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan es...

AI summary The 2023-2025 RBIA estimates that DSM programs will save customers $0.4 billion on electricity bills over the lifetime of the measures, after accounting for program costs and avoided utility costs. The analysis highlights net benefits of $368.8M and acknowledges that the RBIA does not capture all societal benefits, such as reduced emissions and energy poverty. The RBIA also examines the impact of DSM on different rate classes, including participants and non-participants.

3. RATE CLASSES INCLUDED - Synapse has indicated that providing results for a few representative rate classes is sufficient to meet the - intent of the rate and bill impact analysis. E1 has gone beyond this minimum to provide impacts for t...

AI summary The document outlines the rate classes included in the rate and bill impact analysis, noting that Synapse considers a few representative classes sufficient, while E1 provided results for additional classes. Certain rate classes, such as GRLF, Shore Power, and ELIADC, are excluded as E1 does not offer programs for them.

6. ENERGY AND DEMAND RATES - NS Power provided estimates for 2011-2022 of rates by class (including energy, demand, and customer - charges). Beyond 2022, energy and demand charges are assumed to escalate at 2.0% per year, while - customer...

AI summary NS Power has updated its rate model to include a blended energy and demand rate, assuming equal savings in both energy and demand. This differs from the previous RBIA model, which only included energy rate impacts. The new model simplifies calculations but may slightly affect individual bill impacts, though total customer bill impacts remain unchanged.

2.0. Background The regulated base cost rate setting process involves the following three sequential analytical steps: - Determination of total annual revenue requirement; - COSS concerned with apportionment of total costs among rate class...

AI summary The document outlines the three sequential steps in the regulated base cost rate setting process: determining total annual revenue requirement, apportioning total costs among rate classes (COSS), and determining class rates and class revenue responsibilities.

Revenue Requirement Ordinarily, the base cost rate setting process used in rate case applications requires a great amount of detailed cost inputs to determine revenue requirement. Annual rate base data needs to be collected on a variety of...

AI summary The document explains that for the Rate Base Impact Assessment (RBIA), a detailed revenue requirement analysis is not necessary because it focuses on directional and relative changes in rates and bills due to the DSM Program, keeping other costs constant.

Rates and Revenues There is little that can be inferred about the cost causation process from the rate structures used by the utility to generate customers' bills. The rates are bundled and therefore do not allow tracking of cost recovery...

AI summary The document discusses the limitations of NS Power's rate structures, noting that bundled rates make it difficult to track cost recovery by functional areas. It highlights that residential and small general classes recover demand-related costs through energy charges, while other rate classes use a combination of demand and energy charges. There is a lack of alignment between revenues and costs for certain rate classes.

Overview of Spreadsheet Calculations DATE FILED: 11 March 2022 Page 11 of 16 ____________________________________

AI summary This section provides an overview of spreadsheet calculations filed on 11 March 2022. It outlines key financial and regulatory considerations relevant to the proceeding.

1 1.2 ALTERNATE SCENARIO – RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS - 2 Planned rate class expenditures for the Alternate Scenario are provided in [Table 6,](#page-71-0) below, by year and by - 3 Plan period. 4

AI summary This section outlines planned rate class expenditures for the Alternate Scenario, organized by year and plan period, as detailed in Table 6.

5 Table 6: Rate Class Expenditures by Year Alternate Scenario Expenditures ($ million) by Rate Class Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 2023-2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 25.5 27.1 28.6 81.2 Small General (10) 2.8 2.9 3.0 8.8 General Demand (...

AI summary Table 6 presents rate class expenditures by year from 2023 to 2025, showing increasing costs across various categories, including residential, industrial, and municipal sectors, with total expenditures reaching $160.1 million over the three-year period. The table includes expenditures related to energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), and enabling strategies.

4. PRICE & PAYMENT - 4.1 NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for EECA as set out in Schedule "B" Compensation (the " Contract Price "). - 4.2 The Contract Price shall constitute full compensation for the EECA, and no additional compensation s...

AI summary NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for EECA as outlined in Schedule 'B' Compensation, which constitutes full compensation. Monthly payments are to be made on the first business day of each month, subject to HST and applicable withholdings. The agreement outlines tax obligations and withholding procedures.

14. INDEMNITY - 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or representatives, and agrees not to make or...

AI summary Section 14 outlines mutual indemnity obligations between EfficiencyOne and NSPI. EfficiencyOne assumes liability for losses caused by its actions, while NSPI indemnifies EfficiencyOne for losses caused by its breaches. Both parties agree to defend and indemnify each other against third-party intellectual property claims related to the EECA or EfficiencyOne's obligations.

39 II. Payments In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred to following are exclusive of required...

AI summary The document outlines the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne under Section 4.3 of the Agreement, excluding HST, which will be remitted separately.

proceeding or claim; and (iii) any costs, liabilities or damages arising out of a settlement of a claim by the indemnified party, with or without the consent of the indemnifying party. (q) " Law " means the common law, the law of equity an...

AI summary The text defines key legal terms and provisions related to liability, indemnification, and legal frameworks affecting NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including definitions of 'Law,' 'Liens Indemnities,' 'Liens and Claims,' 'Party,' 'Minister,' and 'Personal Information.'

14. INDEMNITY - 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or representatives, and agrees not to make or...

AI summary Section 14 outlines mutual indemnity obligations between EfficiencyOne and NSPI, where EfficiencyOne assumes liability for losses caused by its actions, and NSPI indemnifies EfficiencyOne for losses caused by its breaches. Both parties are protected from claims arising from breaches of the Agreement, except when caused by the negligence or wilful misconduct of the other party.

15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with or related t...

AI summary This section outlines the limits of liability for both EfficiencyOne and NSPI under the agreement. It specifies that neither party's liability is limited to $2 million, except for certain exceptions such as indemnification, wilful misconduct, fraud, and obligations related to refunding the contract price.

16. INSURANCE - 16.1 EfficiencyOne shall obtain, maintain and pay for, during the entire Term of this Agreement, the following minimum insurance coverage as follows, such insurance as it relates to this Agreement shall be in a form and fro...

AI summary This section outlines the insurance requirements that EfficiencyOne must obtain and maintain during the term of the agreement with NSPI. It specifies the types and minimum limits of insurance coverage, including general liability, environmental impairment, automobile liability, property insurance, professional liability, and workers' compensation. NSPI may also arrange insurance on behalf of EfficiencyOne if required.

41 II. Payments In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred to following are exclusive of required...

AI summary NSPI is required to make monthly payments to EfficiencyOne under Section 4.3 of the Agreement, excluding HST, which must be remitted separately.

RECORD ($): [PROBE: Please think of your most popular standard model. What is this model and what is its current selling price? ] - B7. To confirm, the average price differential between a standard efficiency MSHP and a highperforming cold...

AI summary The discussion centers on the price differential between standard efficiency and high-performing cold climate mini-split heat pumps (MSHP). The 2019 estimate was a differential of $590, but current estimates suggest a different figure, prompting an inquiry into whether prices have evolved or if the earlier estimate was inaccurate.

G2. Approximately how many full-time equivalent workers does your organization employ at all locations within Nova Scotia? Number of Full-time Employees 2017 2018 2019 2021 Sample Size 70 70 70 42 Fewer than 5 40% 30% 24% 31% 5 to 9 10% 11...

AI summary The text presents data on the number of full-time equivalent workers employed by organizations in Nova Scotia across different years and employee size categories. It also includes information on the independence of organizations and whether they own or rent their space.

E1 Responses to Industrial Group (IG) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL by changes in NS Power rates since they use the rates as a direct input to the incentive calculation. Each time EfficiencyOne (E1) becomes aware of new NS Power (o...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) uses NS Power rates as a direct input in incentive calculations. However, proposed rate changes in NS Power's General Rate Application are not yet considered as the matter remains open before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). If rate changes occur, they will be incorporated into future incentive calculations.

1 Request IR-32: 2 - 3 In M10431 NSPI filed an Application for approval of Certain Revisions to its Rates, Charges and - 4 Regulations (filed January 27, 2022). Proposed Rate percentage increases for 2022-2024 are

AI summary The document references a regulatory proceeding (M10431) where NSPI submitted an application for approval of revisions to its rates, charges, and regulations, with proposed percentage increases for the years 2022-2024.

- 2 investment level. 1 Request IR-08: 2 3 Reference: Appendix A, Attachment 4 4 5 Reference: Appendix A, Attachment 6 6 7 Reference: Appendix C, Attachment 1 8 9 Question: 10 11 Please provide a copy of these three electronic spreadsheets...

AI summary The document outlines a request (IR-08) for electronic spreadsheets with formulas and references, and provides a response directing to previous responses by EfficiencyOne to similar requests from Municipal Electric Utilities (MEU).

unds; (2) whether past programs have lowered the cost of electricity to consumers; and Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 223 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 210 (3) the effect of any rate increases...

AI summary The text discusses the legal requirements for gas Program Administrators to include a fully reconciling funding mechanism, such as the Energy Efficiency Surcharge (EES), in their Three-Year Plans. It also outlines how electric Program Administrators project revenues from non-EES sources, including the System Benefits Charge (SBC) and Federal Clean Energy Program (FCM) revenues.

public funds. G.L. c. 25, § 19(a)(3)(ii). Although the Green Communities Act does not contain a similar requirement for gas Program Administrators, the Guidelines require gas three-year plans to include a description of all other sources o...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that outside funding sources for energy efficiency programs are scarce, but the Attorney General and DOER have committed to helping identify such sources. They must detail their efforts to pursue outside funding in filings and reports to offset program costs for ratepayers.

tribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) and 14 percent of residential electric distribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) (see, e.g., Exh. NG-Gas-6, at 12). $60 million of the $2.1 billion total electric budget)...

AI summary The text discusses the distribution rates and budget allocations, referencing specific exhibits and regulatory filings. It highlights the need to consider energy bill impacts on customers, especially during the pandemic and rising energy costs, while acknowledging the long-term benefits of efficiency programs, including GHG reductions.

owing why the proposed program budget modification should be approved. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 239 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 226 the Commonwealth’s critical energy policy goals. Ini...

AI summary The text discusses the need to balance energy policy goals with the impact on customer bills, noting that initiatives like net metering and grid modernization are funded through reconciling mechanisms that recover costs from ratepayers, contributing to approximately 25% of residential electric distribution rates.

through its EES. IX. FUTURE OF REVENUE DECOUPLING A. Introduction In Section IV.D.3.b., above, the Department approved the Program Administrators’ expansion of strategic electrification to drive energy and GHG emissions reductions. For the...

AI summary The Department has allowed revenue decoupling for electric and gas distribution companies since the Green Communities Act of 2008. However, the Department now finds that the Program Administrators’ strategy of strategic electrification in the Three-Year Plans eliminates the need for continued revenue decoupling by electric distribution companies.

29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 246 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 233 policy change now will shift the risk associated with changes in lost revenues from customers to electric distribution company shareholders,...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities has broad ratemaking authority under G.L. c. 164, § 94, and is considering policy changes that shift revenue risk from customers to electric distribution company shareholders while promoting electrification. The Department must balance this with existing structures like performance-based ratemaking and settlement agreements.

precedent to energy efficiency filings under its purview.182 The Compact’s assertion of complete discretion is not a “method,” let alone an acceptable method under established ratemaking principles and precedent.183 The Compact and its Gov...

AI summary The text discusses the Compact's assertion of complete discretion in energy efficiency filings and argues that this is not an acceptable method under established ratemaking principles. It emphasizes that while the Compact and its Governing Board may recommend cost allocations, the Department has the authority to determine if these costs are appropriately recoverable in rates.

25 and Forward-Looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Reports are provided as support for E1’s 26 application. For customers participating in an E1 program, bill savings can more than offset any Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-30...

AI summary E1 submitted a supply agreement application for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and NS Power as part of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. Supporting documents include forward-looking rate and bill impact analysis reports. E1 responded to information requests from the NSUARB.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-41: 2 3 Appendix B – Attachment 6 – NS Power Rate Model (Settlement Plan):...

AI summary E1 responded to an NSUARB information request regarding the calculation of 'Cost of Carbon ($/MWh)' in the NS Power Rate Model. E1 explained that the calculation was performed outside the Rate Model and provided a reference to their earlier response to IR-25 for detailed methodology.

27 of 154 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 SBA IR-20, Attachment 1, Page 128 of 154 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 SBA IR-20, Attachment 1, Page 129 of 154 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 SBA IR-20, Attachment 1, Page 130 of 154 Date Filed: April 29, 202...

AI summary The document contains pages from a regulatory proceeding related to EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement, filed on April 29, 2022. The specific matter number is M10473.

WHEREAS: - A. EfficiencyOne and NSPI are both public utilities pursuant to the Act; and - B. Pursuant to the Act, EfficiencyOne has the exclusive right to supply NSPI with reasonably available, cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Con...

AI summary This document outlines the legal obligations of EfficiencyOne and NSPI under the Act, emphasizing EfficiencyOne's exclusive right to supply cost-effective Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities to NSPI, which is required to meet its obligations through an agreement with the Franchise Holder.

investigation, proceeding or claim; and - (iii) any costs, liabilities or damages arising out of a settlement of a claim by the indemnified party, with or without the consent of the indemnifying party. - (q) "Law" means the common law, the...

AI summary The text defines key legal terms and obligations related to a proceeding involving NSPI and EfficiencyOne, including indemnification, laws affecting them, and definitions of terms such as 'Liens Indemnities,' 'Liens and Claims,' and 'Personal Information.'

4. PRICE & PAYMENT - 4.1 NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for EECA as set out in Schedule "B" Compensation (the "Contract Price"). - 4.2 The Contract Price shall constitute full compensation for the EECA, and no additional compensation sha...

AI summary NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Agreement (EECA) as outlined in Schedule 'B', with monthly payments made on the first business day of each month. Payments are subject to HST, and NSPI may withhold taxes as required by law, with cooperation from both parties to ensure proper withholdings.

14. INDEMNITY 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or representatives, and agrees not to make or br...

AI summary Section 14 outlines mutual indemnity obligations between EfficiencyOne and NSPI. EfficiencyOne assumes liability for risks caused by its personnel and indemnifies NSPI against losses arising from breaches of the Agreement, except for those caused by NSPI's negligence. NSPI similarly indemnifies EfficiencyOne for breaches by NSPI. Both parties agree to defend each other against third-party claims related to intellectual property infringement.

15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY - 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with or related...

AI summary This section outlines the limits of liability for both parties under the agreement. EfficiencyOne's liability is capped at $2 million, excluding indemnification, wilful misconduct, and refund obligations. NSPI's liability is also capped at $2 million, excluding wilful misconduct and payment of the Contract Price.

1 The term "Balance Adjustment" refers to the 2014 surplus of DSM funds in the amount of $8,518,030 that is to be returned by EfficiencyOne in accordance with the UARB-approved cost-allocation methodology. The return of the Balance Adjustm...

AI summary The text discusses the 'Balance Adjustment' of $8,518,030, which is a surplus from DSM funds in 2014 that EfficiencyOne must return to NSPI. This adjustment reduces the 2016 portion of the Contract Price and the total amount NSPI will pay over the term of the agreement.

II. Payments . In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term, accounting for the Balance Adjustment, shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred...

AI summary The document outlines monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne, excluding HST, which will be remitted separately. The payments are determined under Section 4.3 of the Agreement and account for the Balance Adjustment.

Transmission ($/kW-yr) Distribution ($/kW-yr) Total ($/kW-yr) 2022 23.66 20.60 44.27 2023 24.14 21.02 45.15 2024 24.62 21.44 46.06 12

AI summary The table presents the Transmission and Distribution costs per kW-yr for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024, showing a steady increase in both categories over time.

1 Table 1: Rate Class Expenditures by Year (2023-2025 Settlement Plan) Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 2023-2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 28.2 31.7 34.5 94.3 Small General (10) 2.7 2.8 3.0 8.5 General Demand (11) 13.8 14.3 15.4 43.4 Large...

AI summary The table outlines rate class expenditures for the years 2023-2025 under the Settlement Plan. It details the distribution of costs across different rate classes, including residential, general, industrial, and municipal categories, highlighting the increasing trend in expenditures over the three-year period.

11 Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 2023-2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 25.5 27.1 28.6 81.2 Small General (10) 2.8 2.9 3.0 8.8 General Demand (11) 14.1 14.5 15.0 43.7 Large General (12) 2.3 2.2 2.5 7.1 Small Industrial (21) 1.8 1.9 1.9 5.6 M...

AI summary The table presents rate class data for various categories from 2023 to 2025, showing increases in rates across residential, commercial, and industrial classes. The data includes specific line items such as energy efficiency, demand response, and enabling strategies investments.

1 Request IR-3: 2 6 3 In M10431 NSPI filed an Application for approval of Certain Revisions to its Rates, Charges 4 and Regulations (filed January 27, 2022). Proposed Rate percentage increases for 2022-2024

AI summary The document references a regulatory proceeding (M10431) where NSPI applied for approval of rate revisions for 2022-2024, including proposed percentage increases.

(b) If NSPI's proposed increases are accepted as proposed, what are the implications for E1's proposed 2023-2025 DSM Plan? If there are implications, please provide revised Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario in tabulated format.

AI summary The text asks about the implications of accepting NSPI's proposed rate increases on E1's 2023-2025 DSM Plan, requesting revised Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario in tabulated format if implications exist.

Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSPI (IG) IR-3 Page 3 of 3 Customer Class 2022 2023 2024 Domestic Service Tariff 3.3% 4.4% 4.7% Small General Tariff 3.6% 6.1% 6.2% General Tariff 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% Large General Tariff 5.2% 5.9% 5.9% Small Industri...

AI summary The document presents a table comparing tariff rates and revenue figures across various customer classes for the years 2022 to 2024, highlighting changes in both fuel and non-fuel revenue, as well as application rate increases, which include DSM considerations.

Section III–Analysis of Incentives 1 Basis For Analysis 2 Q HOW DO YOU RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD EVALUATE THIS PROPOSAL? 3 A This is viewed as a proposed supply contract, so the Board should ask the same question 4 as when NS Power is consi...

AI summary The analysis discusses how the Board should evaluate a DSM proposal, emphasizing the need to ensure that E1 minimizes the cost of DSM measures. It notes that NS Power currently has the highest rates among Canadian integrated utilities and that this may continue due to upcoming rate increases. The evaluation must consider the affordability of DSM activities for customers.

- Q. What is your name and business address? - A. My name is John G. Athas, and I work as a Principal Consultant for Daymark Energy - Advisors, Inc. 370 Main St, Worcester, MA 01608. Daymark Energy Advisors, Inc. is a - consultancy that ha...

AI summary John G. Athas, a Principal Consultant for Daymark Energy Advisors, Inc., testifies on behalf of the Nova Scotia Small Business Advocate. He has over 35 years of experience in the electric utility industry, specializing in strategic planning, integrated resource planning, energy efficiency, and rates and pricing.

Consulting practice includes: - Electric resource evaluations including integrated resource planning - Utility ratemaking and regulation - Contracts and transactions - Utility demand side management program review - Renewable energy econom...

AI summary The consulting practice encompasses electric resource evaluations, utility ratemaking, contract reviews, demand-side management program assessments, and renewable energy policy analysis. These services focus on integrated resource planning, regulatory compliance, and energy economics.

Expert Testimony FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTER Arkansas Public Service Commission Arkansas Public Service Commission General Staff Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation's request for approval of the acquisition of the Hot Spring Generating...

AI summary The document presents expert testimony related to multiple regulatory proceedings. It includes matters involving the acquisition of a generating facility in Arkansas and several regulatory applications in Nova Scotia, including load retention rates, tariff amendments, and a computer centre upgrade.

8 Table 10. Settlement Plan vs. 2020 IRP cost per MWh, DSM and other energy resources $/MWh 2023 2024 2025 Settlement Plan $ 51 $ 53 $ 55 Onshore Wind $ 55 $ 54 $ 53 Solar PV $ 86 $ 85 $ 83 Offshore Wind $ 108 $ 105 $ 103 Gas CC Average $...

AI summary Table 10 compares the cost per MWh for the Settlement Plan and various energy resources (Onshore Wind, Solar PV, Offshore Wind, Gas CC Average) across the years 2023 to 2025. The data highlights the projected costs for different energy sources, with the Settlement Plan showing increasing costs over time.

3.2 SETTLEMENT PLAN – RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS Planned rate class expenditures for the Settlement Plan are provided in [Table 13,](#page-67-2) below, by year and by Plan period.

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines planned rate class expenditures, organized by year and plan period, as detailed in Table 13.

Table 13: Rate Class Expenditures by Year Rate Class Settlement Plan Expenditures ($ million) by Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 2023-2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 28.2 31.7 34.5 94.3 Small General (10) 2.7 2.8 3.0 8.5 General Demand (11)...

AI summary Table 13 presents rate class expenditures by year from 2023 to 2025, including costs related to energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), and Enabling Strategies investments. Expenditures are categorized by rate class and show a general increase over the years.

C. Rate and Bill Impact Analysis E1 will use the same system wide avoided costs of T&D (provided above in Table 4) for the E1 RBIA.

AI summary E1 will use the system-wide avoided costs of transmission and distribution (T&D) provided in Table 4 for the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA).

Table 4. DR Business Functions and Assumed Responsibilities Business Function Responsit sible Party Business Function E1 NS Power Define Program Parameters and Initiate DR Events Support Perform lation Provision of DRMS/DERMS Perform Found...

AI summary Table 4 outlines the business functions and responsibilities related to Demand Response (DR) programs, including defining program parameters, provision of DRMS/DERMS, marketing, customer recruitment, technology installation, program administration, billing, EM&V, customer service, and coordination with Energy Efficiency (EE) programs. NS Power is identified as the responsible party for several functions.

2. Demand Response Analysis Approach DR assessment establishes the foundation for DR portfolio development. Therefore, a specific task under the portfolio development exercise was to assess peak load reduction estimates from different DR o...

AI summary The document outlines the approach for assessing demand response (DR) peak load reduction estimates as part of E1's three-year portfolio plan development. This assessment forms the foundation for DR portfolio development and is a specific task under the portfolio development exercise.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES 7 9 13 15 Transparency – E1 will provide stakeholders and customers with information and insight into the analyses supporting plan development and results and demonstrate how received comments were considered. Accessibil...

AI summary The text outlines guiding principles for E1, emphasizing transparency, accessibility, equity, and affordability. It mentions the use of the Integrated Resource Plan and cost-effectiveness testing to ensure long-term affordability for ratepayers. Strategic themes from Figure 7 inform the portfolio design and initiatives for the next plan cycle.

3.2 SETTLEMENT PLAN – RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS Planned rate class expenditures for the Settlement Plan are provided in [Table 13,](#page-120-2) below, by year and by Plan period.

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines planned rate class expenditures by year and plan period, as detailed in Table 13.

Table 13: Rate Class Expenditures by Year Rate Class Settlement Plan Expenditures ($ million) by Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 2023-2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 28.2 31.7 34.5 94.3 Small General (10) 2.7 2.8 3.0 8.5 General Demand (11)...

AI summary Table 13 outlines rate class expenditures from 2023 to 2025, showing increasing costs across various categories, with the Residential/Charitable rate class having the highest expenditures. The table includes expenses related to energy efficiency, demand response, and enabling strategies.

9.5 RATE & BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS - E1 will file its historical Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) and forward-looking RBIA as part of each DSM - Resource Plan. The historical RBIA estimates the high-level, long-term impact to rates and bi...

AI summary E1 will submit historical and forward-looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) as part of each Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, detailing the impact of DSM activities on rates and bills, including future investments approved by the NSUARB.

14. INDEMNITY - 4 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person 5 or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or 6 representatives, and agrees not to ma...

AI summary Section 14 outlines mutual indemnity obligations between EfficiencyOne and NSPI, specifying that each party must protect the other from liabilities arising from their respective breaches of the agreement, except in cases of negligence or wilful misconduct. EfficiencyOne is also required to defend NSPI against third-party claims related to intellectual property infringement.

15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY - 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with or related...

AI summary This section outlines the limits of liability for both parties under the agreement. EfficiencyOne's liability is capped at $2 million, except for indemnification, wilful misconduct, or refund obligations. NSPI's liability is also capped at $2 million, except for wilful misconduct or payment of the contract price.

46 II. Payments In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred to following are exclusive of required...

AI summary The document outlines monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne under the Agreement, excluding HST, which will be remitted separately.

ntal investigation, proceeding or claim; and (iii) any costs, liabilities or damages arising out of a settlement of a claim by the indemnified party, with or without the consent of the indemnifying party. (q) " Law " means the common law,...

AI summary The text defines legal terms and responsibilities in the context of a regulatory proceeding, including definitions of law, liabilities, indemnities, and personal information, specifically as they pertain to NSPI and EfficiencyOne under the Act.

4. PRICE & PAYMENT - 4.1 NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for EECA as set out in Schedule "B" Compensation (the " Contract Price "). - 4.2 The Contract Price shall constitute full compensation for the EECA, and no additional compensation s...

AI summary NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Agreement (EECA) as outlined in Schedule 'B' at the Contract Price. Payments are to be made monthly, including applicable HST, and are subject to tax withholdings as required by Canadian laws and treaties.

14. INDEMNITY - 4 14.1 EfficiencyOne shall assume all risk of loss, damage or injury, including death, to person 5 or property, caused by its directors, officers, employees, Subcontractors, agents or 6 representatives, and agrees not to ma...

AI summary Section 14 outlines mutual indemnity obligations between EfficiencyOne and NSPI. EfficiencyOne assumes liability for losses caused by its personnel, except those caused by NSPI's negligence. Both parties agree to indemnify each other against liabilities arising from breaches of the Agreement, with specific provisions for intellectual property claims.

15. LIMIT OF LIABILITY 15.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for any Consequential Losses with respect to the performance or non-performance under this Agreement or for any actions undertaken in connection with or related t...

AI summary This section outlines the Limit of Liability for both parties in the agreement, specifying that neither party is liable for Consequential Losses. EfficiencyOne's liability is capped at $2 million, except for indemnification, wilful misconduct, or refund obligations. Similarly, NSPI's liability is capped at $2 million, except for wilful misconduct or payment obligations.

Compensation I. Net Contract Price

AI summary The section titled 'Compensation' begins with a subsection on 'Net Contract Price,' indicating that the document will discuss compensation-related terms and pricing structures in the context of the regulatory proceeding.

46 II. Payments In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Agreement, the monthly payments to be made by NSPI to EfficiencyOne over the Term shall be as set out below. The monthly payment amounts referred to following are exclusive of required...

AI summary The text outlines the monthly payments NSPI must make to EfficiencyOne under Section 4.3 of the Agreement, noting that these payments exclude HST, which must be remitted separately.

Term 8. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date of the Supply Agreement unless superceded by another form of writing, and notwithstanding the return of any Confidential Information or any other event, shall continue...

AI summary This section outlines the term of the agreement, which begins on the effective date of the Supply Agreement and lasts for five years, unless superseded by another form of writing.

7 Governing Law 8 14. This Agreement is governed and shall be construed in accordance with the laws 9 of the Province of Nova Scotia.

AI summary The agreement is governed by the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia, as stated in section 14.

7 Governing Law - This Agreement is governed and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia. - 10 General Provisions - 12 15. This Agreement is binding on the Parties, their administrators, successors, ex...

AI summary The agreement is governed by the laws of Nova Scotia and is binding on the parties involved, including their administrators, successors, executors, and assigns.

3.2 SETTLEMENT PLAN – RATE CLASS ALLOCATIONS Planned rate class expenditures for the Settlement Plan are provided in [Table 13,](#page-89-2) below, by year and by Plan period.

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines planned rate class expenditures, organized by year and plan period, as detailed in Table 13.

9.5 RATE & BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS - E1 will file its historical Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) and forward-looking RBIA as part of each DSM - Resource Plan. The historical RBIA estimates the high-level, long-term impact to rates and bi...

AI summary E1 will submit both historical and forward-looking Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) as part of its DSM Resource Plan, estimating the long-term impact of DSM activities on rates and bills, including past activities and future investments approved by the NSUARB.

With a DSM investment of approximately $58 million per year, E1 expects the Settlement Plan to generate lifetime benefits for ratepayers of $543 million. - [17] NS Power's 2020 IRP is the key planning document upon which E1 relies in its D...

AI summary E1 proposes a Settlement Plan with a DSM investment of approximately $58 million per year, aiming to generate $543 million in lifetime benefits for ratepayers and 1,742 kt of CO2e savings. The plan aligns with NS Power's 2020 IRP, includes new demand response initiatives, and targets underserved markets. Rate impacts are expected to range between -0.1% and 1.0%.

Request IR-41: - Appendix B Attachment 6 NS Power Rate Model (Settlement Plan): Please provide an updated - electronic version of the Attachment with all formulae intact to show how the calculation of "Cost - of Carbon ($/MWh)" in Tab "E1...

AI summary The document requests an updated electronic version of Appendix B Attachment 6 from the NS Power Rate Model (Settlement Plan), specifically to clarify the calculation of 'Cost of Carbon (\/MWh)' in the 'E1 Data Inputs' tab.

5 Request IR-3: - 6 In M10431 NSPI filed an Application for approval of Certain Revisions to its Rates, Charges and - 7 Regulations (filed January 27, 2022). Proposed Rate percentage increases for 2022-2024 are

AI summary The document references an application by NSPI for approval of rate revisions for 2022-2024, filed under matter number M10431.

30 1 2 (a) Please restate the 2023-2025 Plan, using the most current Statistics Canada data for Low-Income classification, i.e. 12.1%? 2 3 Reference: Evidence Appendix A, Attachment 2L Avoided Costs Brief, Page 3, Table 2 (Page 260/584 of...

AI summary The document contains requests for information related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, including the use of updated Statistics Canada data for Low-Income classification, explanations for changes in avoided energy costs, and clarification on incentive calculations. It also references a rate application (M10431) filed by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) for rate revisions.

- 4 (b) If NSPI's proposed increases are accepted as proposed, what are the 5 implications for E1's proposed 2023-2025 DSM Plan? If there are 6 implications, please provide revised Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario 7 in tabulated forma...

AI summary The document outlines several questions regarding the implications of NSPI's proposed rate increases on E1's DSM Plan, the consideration of enhanced program offerings for industrial categories, and requests for detailed information on program changes in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

With a DSM investment of approximately $58 million per year, E1 expects the Settlement Plan to generate lifetime benefits for ratepayers of $543 million. - [17] NS Power's 2020 IRP is the key planning document upon which E1 relies in its D...

AI summary E1 proposes a Settlement Plan with a DSM investment of approximately $58 million per year, aiming to generate $543 million in lifetime benefits for ratepayers and significant CO2e savings. The Plan aligns with NS Power's 2020 IRP and includes new initiatives, demand response offerings, and expanded programs targeting underserved markets.