M-1Notice of Appeal (redacted)
4 passages
PROVIDE DETAILS OF COMPLAINT: Nova Scotia Power (NSP) issued my power bill, with service from December 6th 2025 - February 9th 2026, due March 13th, for my residence of In total, the bill claims that my household consumed 9483 kWh in 65 da...
AI summary The complainant received a power bill from Nova Scotia Power for the period December 6th, 2025, to February 9th, 2026, with a total charge of $1,865.48 after HST, based on a consumption of 9,483 kWh over 65 days.
My complaint concerns the purported electrical usage at my residence as per NSP. Facts about energy consumption in my household: - I have an outdoor ducted heat pump and an indoor air handler and have had this heating system since August o...
AI summary The customer is disputing their electricity bill from NSP, citing an unusual increase in energy usage. They have a heat pump and other standard appliances, and claim that the increase in usage is not justified given their usage patterns and the shorter billing period with fewer cold days. They also provide calculations to estimate their energy costs.
d be $1,602. My bill claimed that my daily energy use averaged 145.9 kWh per day. Multiplying 145.9 kWh x 5 days x $0.185 would be an additional $135, for a total of $1,736 for the 65 day period. My estimated usage, based on maximal theore...
AI summary The customer disputes an energy bill from Nova Scotia Power (NSP) due to an unexplained increase in kWh usage. Despite meter testing confirming accuracy and a DRO ruling in favor of NSP, the customer believes there is no justification for the increase, given consistent energy use, proper heat pump function, and similar weather conditions to the previous year.
I disputed my bill to the DRO on February 17th, 2026. - 4. My meter was tested and deemed within aceptable accuracy limits on March 9th, 2026. - 5. The DRO ruled in favour of NSP on March 10th, 2026. I am dissatisfied with NSP's explanatio...
AI summary The customer disputes their energy bill and the DRO's ruling in favor of NSP, claiming they have provided evidence of lower energy usage and are dissatisfied with NSP's explanations and the decision made.