August 24, 2026 Briar Lee Mitchell Dear Ms. Mitchell: M12767 – Nova Scotia Power Incorporated – Appeal by Briar Lee Mitchell of a Decision of the Dispute Resolution Officer I am writing to you in response to your appeal on March 24, 2026,...
AI summary Briar Lee Mitchell appeals a decision by the Dispute Resolution Officer regarding her NS Power electricity bill, alleging that incorrect billing occurred by using fictional usage numbers. She requests an apology and a guarantee of accurate billing based on meter data. The appeal is being reviewed by the Nova Scotia Energy Board, which is independent of NS Power.
lates most of the province's energy sector. The Board has carefully reviewed your submissions, the information filed by NS Power, the DRO record, and the responses provided during the appeal process. I would note at the outset of this lett...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board acknowledges an error in the DRO's statement regarding estimated usage and recognizes the frustration caused by discrepancies in billing. It explains that residential bills include a base charge and energy usage charges based on meter readings, and notes that reconciliation bills can be stressful for customers.
NS Power Bills – Briar Mitchell, Account Shown on Printed Bills Last Meter Read New Meter Read kWh Used kWh Price Energy Charge 1 April 3/2025 (March to April) 107,654.58 112,500.38 4,846 18.561 899.47 2 June 4/2025 (April to June) 112,500...
AI summary This table shows the electricity usage and charges for Briar Mitchell's account with NS Power from April 2025 to March 2026, including meter readings, kWh used, pricing, and energy charges, with a note about a revised estimate reversing base charges.
ailable. The Board found no evidence that the actual meter readings were inaccurate; the billing calculations were incorrect; or you were charged for electricity that was not consumed at the property. Ultimately, while the Board accepts th...
AI summary The Board found that estimated electricity usage was lower than actual consumption but that the charges were valid as the electricity was consumed at the premises. The Board acknowledges the significant outstanding balance and the potential financial hardship, and has decided the debt should be repaid over a three-year period.