2.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis summarized in this report, InterGroup makes the following recommendations to the Board: - Recommendation 1: InterGroup recommends that the Board reject PHP's proposed modifications for t...
AI summary InterGroup recommends rejecting PHP's modifications, assessing DR savings reasonableness, requiring Board approval for Operating Procedures, approving ELID Tariff's Interruptible Service component for 2026-2027 with a 2028 review, and reviewing the ELID Tariff post-implementation. These actions aim to ensure transparency, fairness, and alignment with regulatory standards.
se to Information Request Synapse-7. Exhibit N-10. transmission and generation costs allocated to PHP in accordance with the Cost of Service (as is the case with other ATL customers).[26](#page-11-0) Note however that the ELIADC Tariff, in...
AI summary The text discusses the proposed ELID Tariff, contrasting it with the ELIADC Tariff, particularly the absence of a Variable Capital Charge (VCC) component. It highlights concerns that PHP's DR credit ratio change may not adequately account for VCC payments, which could exceed 20-30% of DR benefits. InterGroup argues the proposal's complexity warrants further reasonableness testing.
Recommendation: The Board should consider reasonableness of the DR savings to be fully credited to PHP. Further, NSP states that consistent with the ELIADC Tariff, PHP operations under the DR will be governed by Operating Procedures develo...
AI summary The Board is urged to assess the reasonableness of DR savings credits to PHP. NSP argues Operating Procedures for PHP under DR should not require NSEB approval, as benefits/costs flow solely to PHP. However, stakeholders recommend Board approval to ensure transparency and protect other ATL customers from potential revisions favoring PHP.