Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Regulatory Approval Processes" in M03091

Matter: CI# 33942 - P-510 - NSPI WO - Coon Pond Pipeline Replacement - $2,075,549
3 passages 3 documents

Regulatory Approval Processes across all matters →

N-1Redacted Work Order 4/30/2010 1 passage
p. p. 1
An Emera Company UARB APPRO VAL SHEET ATO Project Number: H555

AI summary The document is a regulatory proceeding related to a project managed by an Emera Company and reviewed by the Utility and Rate Board (UARB). It includes an ATO (Assessment of Technical Options) and a project number H555, indicating a specific regulatory evaluation process.

N-3Responses to Second Set of Information Requests 7/28/2010 1 passage
COON POND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT Summary of Alternatives p. p. 3
COON POND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT Summary of Alternatives Rudge t Year : 2010 Date : 15. Jul-10

AI summary The document provides a summary of alternatives for the Coon Pond Pipeline Replacement project, including details from 2010. It outlines key considerations and options presented during the regulatory review process.

05269Board Decision Letter 9/16/2010 1 passage
Section 4 p. p. 0
Board staff issued Information Requests ("IRs"), on June 4, June 25, and July 20, 2010, to which responses were received by the Board on June 22, July 13, and August 4, 2010, respectively. The Board is concerned with the clarity and accura...

AI summary The Board issued multiple Information Requests to NSPI regarding pipeline replacement, expressing concerns about the clarity and accuracy of the initial information provided. The Board acknowledges the need for pipeline replacement due to deterioration from repeated dewatering and approves a cost increase of $1,445,612 for the project.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →