E-1Evidence - 2012 DSM Plan 2/28/2011
7 passages
1.1 ENSC Startup and Transition of DSM Administrator Responsibilities in 2010 On January 22, 2010, the Governor in Council proclaimed the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act 1 (ENSC Act) that established ENSC as the province's new elect...
AI summary In 2010, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) was established as the new DSM program administrator under the ENSC Act. ENSC transitioned responsibilities from NSPI, with a Transition Committee and plan approved by UARB. The transition, completed by December 31, 2010, ensured continuity in DSM program management and delivery.
1.3 Development of the 2012 DSM Plan To aid in the preparation of the 2012 DSM Plan, ENSC developed guiding principles, which are presented in Section 6. ENSC received the advice and assistance of Navigant Consulting Inc. (Navigant) and Du...
AI summary ENSC developed the 2012 DSM Plan with stakeholder input, consulting Navigant and Dunsky. Meetings with DSM experts and stakeholders were held in 2010-2011. A Board order (NSUARB 153) acknowledged the PDWG's role during the ENS transition. The plan's development emphasized stakeholder engagement and regulatory alignment.
3. 2011 DSM PLAN The UARB approved the 2011 DSM Plan on July 27, 2010. 10 The 2011 DSM programs are underway, and will grow and evolve during the year, providing momentum and insights that will guide detailed program development for 2012....
AI summary The UARB approved the 2011 DSM Plan on July 27, 2010, which includes three pilot programs: Fuel Substitution, Green Schools, and Eco Home. ENSC is implementing these programs, with ongoing development expected to inform 2012 initiatives.
5.4 Allocation of DSM Program Costs Among Rate Classes Appendix B contains a preliminary estimate of the proposed 2012 DSM program costs to 1 be allocated among rate classes. The preliminary allocation uses the methodology approved by the...
AI summary The document discusses the allocation of 2012 DSM program costs among rate classes, referencing the methodology approved by the UARB in its 2010 DSM Plan Decision.
10. PERFORMANCE-BASED APPROACH The creation of ENSC flows from the recommendations of a stakeholder consultation process facilitated by Dr. David Wheeler. 17 The final report resulting from this process envisioned a performance-driven over...
AI summary The document discusses the creation of ENSC based on a stakeholder consultation process led by Dr. David Wheeler, proposing a performance-based oversight mechanism for energy and demand savings. This model would shift regulatory focus from annual filings to multi-year frameworks, similar to those used in Vermont, with the UARB's role evolving to evaluate and verify performance.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE 2012 PLANNING PROCESS As DSM efforts are fully transferred from NSPI to ENSC, ENSC will also take on responsibility for preparing and filing its 2012 DSM Plan with the UARB. The plan must be filed by February 28th, 201...
AI summary As DSM efforts transition from NSPI to ENSC, ENSC will prepare and file its 2012 DSM Plan with the UARB by February 28th, 2010. The proposal suggests a 'business as usual' approach with minor changes to the planning framework and clarification of DSM savings targets, budgets, and attribution. A new performance framework for 2013 and beyond is also recommended.
POST-2012 FRAMEWORK CHANGES Within or in parallel with the 2012 DSM Plan filing, we suggest that ENSC petition the UARB to hold a broader discussion on a new framework for DSM planning post-2012. This would be an opportunity for ENSC, the...
AI summary The text suggests that ENSC should petition the UARB to initiate a broader discussion on a new framework for DSM planning post-2012. This would involve developing a multi-year, performance-based oversight process, streamlining oversight, and creating a long-term savings attribution and reporting framework. These discussions should be completed ahead of the 2013 regulatory proceeding.
E-7ENSC (Multeese) IR-1 to IR-31 3/29/2011
8 passages
Formal Investigation - The investigator(s) will interview the complainant, the respondent, and any witnesses, and will review relevant documentation. - The investigator(s) must complete their investigation and file a report of their findin...
AI summary The formal investigation process involves interviewing the complainant, respondent, and witnesses, and reviewing documentation. The investigator(s) must complete the investigation and submit a report to the CEO and Advisor within 30 working days, with possible extensions approved by the Board.
► Decision • Within 15 working days of receiving the investigator's report, the CEO determines on the basis of the investigator's report what action, if any, including appropriate disciplinary action, is to be taken. - The CEO may seek the...
AI summary The decision outlines the process for the CEO to take action based on an investigator's report, including disciplinary actions and workplace restoration measures. The CEO is required to consult with the Advisor and Head of Human Resources, and report findings to the Board.
▶ Employee A person who has an employment contract or letter of employment with Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Upon Board decision, an individual who does not have an employment contract or letter of employment may be considered an em...
AI summary An employee of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation is defined as someone with an employment contract or letter of employment. Under a Board decision, individuals without such contracts may also be considered employees for the purposes of this policy.
7.6 Voting 7.6.1 Unless otherwise provided herein, matters arising at any meeting of the Board shall be decided by a majority of votes. Only Board members present in person or by teleconference may vote and no Board member may vote or be r...
AI summary This section outlines the voting procedures for the Board, specifying that decisions are made by a majority vote, the use of ballots upon demand, and the Chair's role in breaking ties. It also states that the Chair's declaration of a resolution's passage is considered prima facie evidence.
13. NOTICE 13.1.1 Whenever written notice is required to be given to any person, it may be given to such person, either personally or by sending a copy thereof through the mail, by fax, or by email, charges prepaid, to his or her address a...
AI summary This section outlines the procedures for providing written notice to individuals, specifying that it can be delivered personally or via mail, fax, or email, with charges prepaid, to the address on file with the Corporation or provided by the individual.
14. AMENDMENTS 14.1.1 These bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed by Special Resolution of the Board.
AI summary This section outlines that the bylaws can be altered, amended, or repealed through a Special Resolution of the Board.
Telephone conversation with Colleen, OPA, November 8, 2010. 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 With respect to page 29, lines 20 – 21, 4 a) Please clarify what ENSC means by the phrase "further assess the options for 5 implementing such a model". Is the...
AI summary The text includes a request and response regarding the implementation of a model and engagement with the UARB. ENSC recommends assessing both the model and its implementation strategy, proposing a stakeholder forum or workshop in 2011 to consider performance-based approaches and multi-year frameworks.
1 Request IR-21: 2 3 With respect to Appendix A, page 17, lines 5 – 7, 4 5 a) Please provide examples of "new program titles" that are currently being 6 considered. 7 8 b) If transition to the new titles begins in 2011, why are they not be...
AI summary The document discusses responses to requests regarding program titles in the DSM Plan and the limitations of the current regulatory model. It explains that new program titles are being developed and will be adopted in the 2013 plan, and highlights how the current regulatory framework may hinder flexibility in program delivery.
E-19Proof of Advertising 4/18/2011
7 passages
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of this hearing be given, in a form to be approved by the Board, by publishing it in accordance with the following schedule: Halifax Chronicle-Herald November 10, 2010 November 2010 17, November 20,201...
AI summary The document outlines an order requiring the publication of notice for a hearing in Halifax and Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, on specific dates in November 2010, as approved by the Board.
Fence Diver meident who in River resident who invented the ElectroBraid and sold the rights to Bryson before setting up a competing company. That dispute concluded before the courts recently with E.B.F Manufacturing receiving permis-sion t...
AI summary ElectroBraid faces financial challenges, including a $452,000 debt dispute with White, layoffs due to surplus inventory, and a proposal to creditors for payment deferrals. The company seeks restructuring, including offshore manufacturing, and claims creditor support for its plan. Legal and financial proceedings involve the Nova Scotia Supreme Court.
er quality and improve water flow throughout the distribution system. The flushing program is conducted twice a year and also includes inspection and testing of hydrants. Water Utility thanks you for your patience NOVA SCOTIA'S ELECTRICITY...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is conducting a hearing for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2012 Electricity Demand Side Management Plan. The proceeding includes dates, location, and mentions a separate water utility flushing program.
rocess of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process of process o...
AI summary The document outlines procedural details for a regulatory proceeding, including deadlines for written comments (April 7, 2011) and an invitation for offers to purchase Schaffner Enterprises Limited's assets. It mentions evening sessions for presentations and stakeholder engagement processes.
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD NOVA SCOTIA POWER INC. REGULATION 3.6 – NET METERING Notice Is hereby given that Nova Scotia Power Incorporated Notice is hereby given that Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("PISPT) has more an Applicatio...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. has applied to amend Regulation 3.6 – Net Metering to enhance the service, comply with recent legislative changes, and provide for expanded customer capacity, aggregated metering, and payment for annual success generation. The Board will issue directions on the application and pre-filed evidence is available for review.
hat "wherever it's possible ... the support or growth is still the support to growth is still something which is absolutely necessary." NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board issues a notice of public hearing, indicating that support for growth remains absolutely necessary despite challenges.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOVA SCOTIA'S ELECTRICITY DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR 2012 otice is hereby given that the Nova Scotta Utility and Review Board ("the is increasy givent that one nova occura uturity and newtew bit owition of a h...
AI summary This document is a notice of a public hearing for Nova Scotia's Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012. The hearing will take place on April 15 and 18, 2011, with details provided on how individuals can participate, including filing notices, submitting evidence, and making written comments.
07314Board Decision 6/30/2011
6 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION ACT - and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION for Approval of its Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012 BEFORE: Peter W. Gurnham, a.c., C...
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding involving Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's application for approval of its 2012 Electricity Demand Side Management Plan. The proceeding includes counsel from the corporation, consumer advocates, the Ecology Action Centre, Nova Scotia Power Inc., and municipal representatives. The case is before a regulatory board chaired by Peter W. Gurnham.
NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NOVA SCOTIA ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVE NOVA SCOTIA Mark V. Rieksts, LL.B. Richard Penny Nancy Rondeaux NEWPAGE PORT HAWKESBURY CORP. and BOWATER MERSEY PAPER COMPANY LIMITED David MacDougall, LL.B. James Mac...
AI summary The Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding involved an application approved by the Board on June 30, 2011, following hearings on April 18-19, 2011, and final submissions on May 20, 2011. Board counsel and consultants provided input, with directions issued for future filings.
, by letter dated September 22, 2010, which provided: The Board has carefully reviewed the DSM Transition Plan and grants approval to proceed with implementation, subject to the following directives: - a) The DSM Transition Committee is to...
AI summary The Board approved the DSM Transition Plan with specific directives, noting ENSC's compliance and the evaluation of the 2010 DSM Report and SVS. The 2012 DSM Plan is under consideration, with stakeholders generally supportive of the transition and existing DSM efforts.
5.5.1 Findings [125] The Board understands that ENSC's mandate is being expanded to manage non-electricity efficiency programs. Some transition is already underway and formal negotiations are to be concluded in the near future. ENSC, at th...
AI summary The Board acknowledges ENSC's expansion into managing non-electricity efficiency programs and notes the lack of a formal policy to track time and costs. Intervenors are concerned about delays and potential cross-subsidization, prompting the Board to order ENSC to develop and file a policy by September 30, 2011.
5.6 Multi Year Performance Based Model ("PBM") [127] ENSC seeks Board approval to engage stakeholders to assess the use of a Performance Based Model ("PBM") for future submissions to the Board. ENSC stated that: Under such a multi-year, pe...
AI summary ENSC seeks Board approval to engage stakeholders in assessing a multi-year, performance-based model (PBM) for future submissions. The model would shift regulatory oversight from preapproving annual DSM plans to approving overall investments and savings targets, followed by performance review and validation.
[128] The Dunsky report noted that: The move to a performance-based model would provide ENSC with increased flexibility to adjust and adapt its plans as needed, as situations arise and as feedback comes in. Furthermore, an oversight model...
AI summary The Dunsky report supports moving to a performance-based model (PBM) for DSM programs, citing increased flexibility and reduced regulatory burden. ENSC seeks Board approval to consult stakeholders on this approach. The Province and EAC also support the PBM discussion, emphasizing benefits for low-income rate-payers and program outreach. Board Counsel questioned the need for Board approval before consultation.
06951ENSC Closing Submission 5/13/2011
4 passages
1 Hearing Transcript, April 19, 2011, Page 401, Line 9. 1 Evaluation and verification of the success of the 2010 DSM Plan has been positively 2 received and is not being challenged by any stakeholder. As part of the recognized cycle 3 of c...
AI summary The 2010 DSM Plan evaluation and verification have been positively received and are not being challenged. ENSC is committed to implementing recommendations for improvement and requests Board approval of the 2012 DSM Plan and acceptance of the evaluation reports.
19 See, for example, Exhibit [E-12], Supra Note 8, Page 3, Lines 5-6. 20 Exhibit [E-1], Supra Note 7, Page 29. 21 Exhibit [E-12], Supra Note 8, Page 2, Lines 26-28. 1 ENSC sees continued value and support in having the PDWG continue throug...
AI summary ENSC supports continuing the PDWG throughout 2011 and proposes a multi-year performance-driven regulatory model. ENSC seeks approval from the UARB and the Board to assess options for implementing this model. Board Counsel Mel Whalen shows tacit agreement, subject to legislative confirmation. The Board Chair raises questions about the Public Utilities Act's compatibility with performance-based regulation.
1 Rather, the intent and focus of ENSC to consider options for change to the existing 2 regulatory framework, which is focused on annual pre-approval of one-year DSM plans, 3 are the possible advantages and efficiencies available to all st...
AI summary ENSC is proposing a shift from the current annual pre-approval model for DSM plans to a multi-year, performance-driven regulatory framework. This change is supported by the ENSC Act, which allows the UARB to approve multi-year frameworks. ENSC argues that this approach would improve economic efficiencies and reduce administrative burdens.
9 8. CONCLUSION 10 The 2012 DSM Plan continues to build on Nova Scotia's achievements in energy 11 efficiency while setting a path for long-term success, and should be approved. 12 The 2012 DSM Plan addresses the directives and recommendat...
AI summary The 2012 DSM Plan is recommended for approval as it aligns with UARB directives, incorporates stakeholder feedback, and balances cost-effective energy savings. The Board is advised against increasing ENSC's budget for the plan at this time, emphasizing stakeholder support and financial responsibility.
07314Board Decision 6/30/2011
7 passages
, by letter dated September 22, 2010, which provided: The Board has carefully reviewed the DSM Transition Plan and grants approval to proceed with implementation, subject to the following directives: - a) The DSM Transition Committee is to...
AI summary The Board approved the DSM Transition Plan with directives including oversight by the DSM Transition Committee, quarterly financial reporting by ENSC, addressing deferred DSM initiatives, filing Transition Agreements, and submitting a 2012 DSM Plan workplan. ENSC complied with directives, and the Board reviewed the 2010 DSM Evaluation Report and 2010 SVS.
rvenor consultants that further increases to ENSC's budget are required at this time. [NPB Closing Submission, pp. 1,2,6] [70] In its Reply Submission, EAC supported increased levels of DSM savings: In the past, Nova Scotian stakeholders h...
AI summary ENSC requests increased budget funding, while EAC supports higher DSM savings, citing DSM's cost-effectiveness and system benefits. EAC recommends approving the increased DSM budget based on consultant proposals, emphasizing energy efficiency's role in reducing electricity system costs.
5.5.1 Findings [125] The Board understands that ENSC's mandate is being expanded to manage non-electricity efficiency programs. Some transition is already underway and formal negotiations are to be concluded in the near future. ENSC, at th...
AI summary The Board acknowledges ENSC's expansion of its mandate to manage non-electricity efficiency programs and notes the lack of a formal policy to track time and costs. Intervenors expressed concerns about delays and potential cross-subsidization, leading the Board to order ENSC to submit a policy by September 30, 2011.
5.6 Multi Year Performance Based Model ("PBM") [127] ENSC seeks Board approval to engage stakeholders to assess the use of a Performance Based Model ("PBM") for future submissions to the Board. ENSC stated that: Under such a multi-year, pe...
AI summary ENSC requests the Board's approval to engage stakeholders to evaluate the implementation of a multi-year, performance-based model for future submissions. This model would shift the UARB's oversight from preapproving individual DSM measures to approving overall investments and savings targets, followed by performance validation.
[128] The Dunsky report noted that: The move to a performance-based model would provide ENSC with increased flexibility to adjust and adapt its plans as needed, as situations arise and as feedback comes in. Furthermore, an oversight model...
AI summary The Dunsky report supports transitioning to a performance-based model for DSM programs, which would increase flexibility and reduce regulatory burdens. ENSC seeks Board approval for stakeholder consultation on this model, with support from the Province and EAC. The discussion highlights the need for regulatory alignment and stakeholder engagement.
5.6.1 Findings [134] ENSC suggests exploration of a PBM with stakeholders for future approval by the Board. The Board noted its concerns during the hearing and ENSC elaborated on the issue in its closing submission. [135] Based on this, th...
AI summary ENSC proposes exploring a Performance-Based Model (PBM) with stakeholders for future Board approval. The Board expressed concerns during the hearing, but has no objection to ENSC discussing the PBM with stakeholders.
8.0 ECOLOGY ACTION CENTRE REQUEST FOR COSTS [149] In its Final Submission, EAC stated: - 1. It is submitted that the EAC acted responsibly and prudently as an intervener in these hearings. The interventions have been novel and brought a di...
AI summary The Ecology Action Centre (EAC) requests reimbursement for costs incurred during its participation in the hearings related to the 2012 DSM plan. EAC argues it acted responsibly and prudently as an intervener, contributing to a better understanding of customer-related issues. ENSC has requested a proposed Bill of Costs, and the Board reserves jurisdiction to rule on costs if EAC and ENSC cannot agree.