Topic:"Regulatory Approval Processes" in M08929

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-92 August 14, 2019 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs O...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits its 2019 DSM Potential Study Report to the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board, complying with Order M08604. The report includes appendices on methodology, baseline studies, demand response, energy efficiency, and 8760 data, with electronic filing of Excel tools.

1 2 Unless stated otherwise, all sustaining costs are estimated based on the requirement to 3 keep hydro systems operating as they presently do in 2018 dollars. Annual spend 4 estimates represent project costs allocated to the in-service y...

AI summary The text outlines sustaining costs for hydro systems, estimated in 2018 dollars, including administrative overheads and AFUDC. A 40-year horizon is used for cost extraction, not decommissioning. Specific systems like Annapolis and Mersey are noted as subjects of regulatory filings.

ŝƚĞ͕ĂƐƉĞƌƐŝƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůŝnjĞĚĚĞĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚĞĐŽƐƚƐĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĂƌĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŽĨĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƐƐĞƚƐĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŵĂĐŚŝŶĞƌLJ ĂŶĚ ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů...

AI summary The document discusses the financial and operational challenges of managing energy resources, including cost recovery, regulatory processes, and the impact of various programs and policies. It highlights the need for effective accounting policies, cost deferral, and regulatory oversight to ensure equitable and efficient service delivery.

ŝƉŵĞŶƚŵŝŐŚƚďĞĂƚƚŚĞĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌƐ͛ĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘/ƚŝƐƚŚĞ ŝŶƚĞŶƚ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞ ŵĞĚŝĂŶ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĐŽƐƚ ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐ ĨŽƌ ĞĂĐŚ ƐŝƚĞ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŬŶŽǁŶĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐĂŶĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŚŝĐ...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the evaluation of a hydro asset study and the implications of various financial and operational considerations in the context of energy management and regulatory compliance.

Ğ&ĂůůƐEŽ͘ϭĂŶĚϮĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ǀŝŝ͘ DĂůĂLJ&ĂůůƐEŽƐ͘ϭ͕ϮĂŶĚϯĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ  //͘ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͗ x ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJʹďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚďƌŝĐŬĂŶĚŵŽƌƚĂƌ͕ƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚĞĞůƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝƚŚ ƌĞŝŶ...

AI summary The text includes references to various regulatory proceedings and documents, including Hydro Asset Study Appendix C, and mentions multiple filings and processes related to utility regulation and asset management in Nova Scotia.

ƵĚLJŚĂƐƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĨŽƌƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶͬĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƌĂƚĞƐĨŽƌ ŵĞŶĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŽǀĞƌŚĞĂĚĐŽƐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽĨŝƚ;ƉůƵƐ,^dͿ͗ ůůŝŽƚ džĐĂǀĂƚŽƌƐ>ƚĚ͘ x ŽďĐĂƚ ϴϱDŝŶŝͲ džĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ƌ ƉůƵƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ...

AI summary The text appears to be a redacted portion of a regulatory proceeding document, containing references to various matters and proceedings related to energy and utility regulation in Nova Scotia. It includes case numbers and references to studies, but key details are confidential and removed.

ĞůĂŶĚŵĂƐŽŶƌLJ͖ x KƵƚůĞƚ;ƌĂĨƚͲƚƵďĞͿůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶʹĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ƚŚĞĚƌĂĨƚƚƵďĞĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞƐĨůŽǁĂůŵŽƐƚĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJƚŽ&ĂůůƐĂŵ ƐƉŝůůǁĂLJĐŚĂŶŶĞů͕ƚŚĞǀŽŶZŝǀĞƌĂŶĚƚŚĞDĂĐŽŶĂůĚĂŵŚĞĂĚƉŽŶĚ͘    ϭϵ     REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL I...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its implications, highlighting concerns about base rates lagging actual costs and the impact on incentive structures. It also references a hydro asset study and various technical terms related to energy management and regulatory processes.

ůĂƚĞĚ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ ƐƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĨŽƌ ĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘ x ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƐŚŵĂŝŶĨůŽŽƌƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ ^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͘dŚŝƐƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞŽƵƚ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of utility regulation, including accounting policies, cost recovery, and the management of asset retirement obligations. It also touches on energy efficiency programs, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory processes such as prudence reviews and compliance with legislation.

 ZĞͲĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƌŝǀĞƌŽƵƚůĞƚĨƌŽŵ>ĂŬĞZŽƐƐŝŐŶŽůĂƐĂŶĚǁŚĞƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ĐůĞĂŶ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞ ĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵ͘dŚĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵĐĂŶƌĞŵĂŝŶŽŶĐĞŐƌĂĚĞĚƚŽ...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges related to the regulatory process, including the need for accurate fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, issues with rate structures, and the importance of proper asset management and compliance with regulatory standards. It also touches upon the need for effective program evaluations and stakeholder engagement.

Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   x ŝƐƉŽƐĂůŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶĚĞďƌŝƐʹƚƌƵĐŬƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŽĂĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͕ǁŚŝůĞƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŽƚŚĞƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕...

AI summary The text discusses issues related to the management of energy resources, including the need for effective fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the importance of accurate forecasting and planning, and the impact of regulatory processes on energy efficiency programs. It also touches on the challenges faced by utility companies in managing costs and ensuring reliable service.

ŵŽƌĞ ůĂLJĚŽǁŶĂƌĞĂŝƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ͕ƐƵĐŚƐƉĂĐĞĐĂŶďĞĐůĞĂƌĞĚŽĨǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ͘ &ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƉƉůLJƚŽƚŚĞ&ŽƵƌƚŚ>ĂŬĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͗ x /ŶƚĂŬĞůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ͕ďƵƌŝĞĚƉĞŶƐƚŽĐŬ͖ x ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding document, including topics related to asset retirement obligations, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory processes. It outlines various aspects of the proceedings and provides context on the topics being discussed.

/E' ^d/Dd ^hDDZz&KZ^^ dZ d/Z D EdK>/'d/KE^;ZKͿ^dhz;LJ^LJƐƚĞŵͿ   x /ŶĨŝůů ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĚĞďƌŝƐƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŽĨĨĞƌĚĂŵƐ...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges and considerations in the regulatory process, including the need for accurate fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the impact of rate proceedings, and the importance of program evaluations and stakeholder engagement. It highlights the need for transparency and effective communication in managing energy resources and customer programs.

ŚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂŵƉůĞůĂLJĚŽǁŶĂƌĞĂĂƚƚŚŝƐƐŝƚĞ͕ĚƵĞƚŽĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚĐůŽƐĞƉƌŽdžŝŵŝƚLJŽĨďĞĚƌŽĐŬƚŽ ƚŚĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŵĂLJďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽĚŝƐƉŽƐĞŽĨĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐďLJ ďƵƌLJŝŶŐ͘ &ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽ...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and various aspects of energy efficiency, including program design, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory considerations. It outlines key themes such as energy efficiency programs, regulatory processes, and affordability.

ŝĚĞƐĂŵĞĂŶƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŶŐĨůŽǁƉĂƐƚĞĂĐŚŽĨƚŚĞƚƵƌďŝŶĞƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ƚŚƌŽĂƚͲƌŝŶŐƐƚŽƚŚĞĚƌĂĨƚƚƵďĞĂŶĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƚĂŝůƌĂĐĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘ dŚĞƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞĐĂŶďĞĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚǀŝĂƚŚĞƉĂǀĞĚZĂLJŶĂƌĚƚŽŶZŽĂĚ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJƚǁŽ ŵŝůĞƐŶŽƌƚ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on rate structures, referencing specific programs and regulatory proceedings. It mentions the ZĂLJŶĂƌĚƚŽŶ ZŽĂĚ and related regulatory actions involving asset retirement obligations and stakeholder engagement.

ƚ͕ĂǁĂLJĨƌŽŵ'ŝƐďŽƌŶĞ ĂŶĚtƌĞĐŬŽǀĞ&ůŽǁĂŐĞ͘ dŚĞ ƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌͬƚƵƌďŝŶĞ ĨůŽŽƌ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂů ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ŽƵƚůĞƚ ĚƌĂĨƚƚƵďĞĂŶĚƉŽǁĞƌŚŽƵƐĞƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ ĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŝůů...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory process involving the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its implications on incentives and cost management. It references a hydro asset study and mentions the importance of stakeholder engagement in the proceedings.

4/7) t. 902.863.1465 (24/7) t. 1.855.770.5560 (24/7) t. 1.855.770.5560 (24/7) f. 902.835.5574 f. 902.863.1389 f. 902.835.5574 f. 902.835.5574 www.strum.com [email protected] REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Hydro Asset Study Append...

AI summary This document discusses the potential costs associated with permitting wetland alterations due to the decommissioning of hydro-systems in Nova Scotia. It highlights the environmental regulations in place, such as the Environment Act and Wetland Conservation Policy, which require compensation for wetland habitat loss.

$4,500.00 for small hydro-systems to $10,500.00 for large hydro-systems. The total cost to study all 16 hydro-systems and prepare reports with compensation options would be approximately $114,000.00. Discussion and Recommendations It shoul...

AI summary The report outlines the costs for studying 16 hydro-systems in Nova Scotia, estimating $114,000 for assessments and compensation options. It notes that environmental assessments may be required for decommissioning projects due to wetland disruption, and recommends consulting with NS Environment. The report acknowledges potential inaccuracies in wetland area and cost estimates.

133.6 Total Capacity 2400 1 2 3.1.1 Maximum Unit Capacity Rating Adjustments 3 As a member of the Maritimes Area of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council 4 (NPCC), NS Power meets the requirement for generator capacity verification as ou...

AI summary NS Power discusses compliance with NPCC and NERC generator capacity verification standards, the rejection and resubmission of the Tusket CT Generator Replacement project, and assumptions about wind project capacity contributions. The UARB previously declined approval, and NS Power seeks reinstatement of the asset's capacity.

Total Firm Supply MW Change Projected 49 Over Planning Period 1 2 3.2.1 Tusket Combustion Turbine 3 On May 31, 2017, NS Power filed CI 51526 – Combustion Turbine (CT) Tusket 4 Generator Replacement with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review B...

AI summary NS Power sought approval to replace the Tusket CT generator, facing repeated rejections by the UARB due to insufficient justification. After re-filing with additional analysis and addressing system security concerns, the Board again denied approval in 2019, prompting a reconsideration request.

2019 Ten-Year System Outlook NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 7.0 RESOURCE ADEQUACY 2 3 7.1 Operating Reserve Criteria 4 5 Operating Reserves are generating resources which can be called upon by system 6 operators on short notice to respond to the unpla...

AI summary The 2019 Ten-Year System Outlook discusses resource adequacy, focusing on operating reserve criteria. NS Power must meet reserve requirements as outlined by NPCC and approved by the UARB. NS Power and New Brunswick Power share reserve responsibilities based on a load-ratio share, with specific allocations for ten-minute and thirty-minute reserves.

2019 Page 52 of 67 2019 Ten-Year System Outlook NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 8.2.1 Bulk Power System (BPS) 2 3 The NS Power bulk transmission system is planned, designed and operated in accordance 4 with North American Electric Reliability Corporati...

AI summary The document discusses the planning, design, and operation of NS Power’s bulk transmission system in accordance with NERC standards and NPCC criteria. It outlines the adoption of the NERC BES definition and the NS Exception Procedure, which were approved by a Board order in April 2017.

uivalent to Appendix 5C 24 of the NERC Rules of Procedure. 25 26 The BES Definition and NS Exception Procedure were approved by Order of the Board 27 dated April 6, 2017. 28 DATE FILED: July 2, 2019 Page 53 of 67 2019 Ten-Year System Outlo...

AI summary The document references the BES Definition and NS Exception Procedure, approved by the Board on April 6, 2017, and mentions the 2019 Ten-Year System Outlook, a non-confidential document filed on July 2, 2019.

1 • Visual inspection of every line once per year via helicopter, or via ground patrol 2 in locations not practical for helicopter patrols. 3 • Foot patrol of each non-BPS (Bulk Power System) line on a three year cycle. 4 Where a Lidar sur...

AI summary The text outlines inspection protocols for power lines, including annual helicopter or ground patrols, three-year foot patrols for non-BPS lines, and biennial Lidar surveys for BPS lines. It also discusses the transmission project approval process, emphasizing the need for system reliability, compliance with standards, and potential changes due to technical studies or regulatory approvals.

PO Box 910 ● Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Canada ● B3J 2W5 December 16, 2019 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear M...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) reports completion of the Pre-IRP phase, submission of the Pre-IRP Final Report, and development of the 2020 Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Draft Terms of Reference (TOR) with consultants Synapse Energy Economics and Bates White Economic Consulting. Stakeholder feedback was solicited on the draft TOR.

of 14 IRP TERMS OF REFERENCE – STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS Stakeholder Issue Stakeholder Comments NS Power Response Category SWEB Miscellaneous Also, is NSPI considering any other The IRP will assess further renewable Development [Legislation] re...

AI summary Stakeholders provided feedback on the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Terms of Reference, emphasizing the need for transparency, long-term planning, and stakeholder engagement. NS Power responded by agreeing to incorporate recommendations and ensure collaboration throughout the process.

CA Schedule The TOR proposes the following NS Power acknowledges comments schedule for Comments on modeling about the report being “final” before results: stakeholder comment and has adjusted the language. NS Power has revised the • Final...

AI summary The text discusses a proposed schedule for comments on modeling results, with concerns raised about the timing and usefulness of stakeholder feedback if the modeling is labeled 'final' before review. NS Power revised the schedule to allow more time for stakeholder input and comments on early results.

esults. 4. The ToR should be modified to indicate that NS Power will select a Preferred Resource Plan and on what basis that decision will be made (i.e. interaction between objective 1 IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix D Page 2...

AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for modifying the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including the need for NS Power to select a Preferred Resource Plan based on specific criteria, the development of performance indicators, and the inclusion of transmission and distribution system considerations. It also emphasizes the importance of regulatory compliance in modeled scenarios and suggests scheduling the IRP kickoff stakeholder workshop as soon as possible.

es A. MacDuff Direct +1 (902) 444 8619 [email protected] Purdy's Wharf Tower II 1300-1969 Upper Water Street PO Box 730 Halifax NS Canada B3J 2V1 Tel +1 (902) 425 6500 Fax +1 (902) 425 6350 Our File: 179164 December 6, 2019 M...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper LP (PHP) supports the draft Terms of Reference for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2020 but suggests adding an opportunity for stakeholder comments after the March 2020 Interim Modeling Progress workshop.

ts: Final Modeling results circulated to stakeholders June 4 2020 Final Modeling & Analysis stakeholder workshop June 2020 Stakeholder comments on Modeling & Analysis June 18 2020 If the modeling is really final, it is not clear how useful...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about the timing and usefulness of stakeholder feedback on final modeling results for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It highlights the potential lack of value in providing feedback after final results are circulated, suggesting earlier sharing of interim results could yield more meaningful input. The text also references a draft IRP Terms of Reference and a request for comments from stakeholders.

possible. If there are questions or you want to discuss, please let me know. Brian IRP Terms of Reference Consultation Appendix H Page 1 of 1 From: Stephen Thomas Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:17 PM To: Godbout, Nicole Cc: Lefler, L...

AI summary The email discusses feedback on the draft Terms of Reference for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), expressing general support but raising concerns about the lack of formal participant status and stakeholder funding, which limits engagement from smaller stakeholders.

om established stakeholders with significant independent resources. For us, this is an issue to be discussed with UARB as well as yourselves, but it’s a major barrier in involvement from stakeholders. The overall level of transparency and...

AI summary The letter discusses concerns about stakeholder engagement and transparency in the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process. It highlights barriers to meaningful participation and requests discussion with the UARB. AREA provides feedback on the draft Terms of Reference for the IRP and emphasizes the need for a more reasonable timeline for stakeholder input.

PO Box 910 ● Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Canada ● B3J 2W5 January 17, 2020 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M08...

AI summary NS Power submitted draft Terms of Reference (TOR) for its 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The filing incorporated feedback from stakeholders, including the Small Business Advocate (SBA) and Envigour Policy Consulting Inc. (on behalf of Natural Forces, QUEST, and Marine Renewables Canada). The SBA and Envigour expressed general support for the TOR, with no further comments from the SBA.

d Energy Resources such as EV’s, Demand Management and Storage. We recognize that the Strategy, Roadmap and Action Plan are to include Page 3 of 4 January 17, 2020 D. Friis “consideration of “signposts” to monitor, future decision gates, a...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's response to stakeholder feedback on incorporating economic models for EVs, demand management, and storage into their Strategy. NS Power agrees with the need for 'signposts' to monitor technology costs but does not support amending the TOR. They emphasize ongoing stakeholder engagement during the IRP process and confirm minimal, uncontroversial feedback from parties.

May 22, 2020 Via Email Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis, Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power’s Integrated Resource Plan On...

AI summary NS Power is providing a progress report on the Integrated Resource Plan project to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, detailing completed work, stakeholder engagement, and upcoming steps to finalize the report by September 30, 2020.

th a progress report on work completed and stakeholder engagement to date, as well as a view of the steps to come to achieve completion of the Final Report for filing with the Board in September 2020. As the Board is aware, NS Power initia...

AI summary NS Power provided a progress report on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, including pre-IRP analyses and stakeholder engagement. A Final Pre-IRP Report was circulated in November 2019, and the Terms of Reference for the core IRP process were approved. Stakeholder feedback informed the Assumptions and Scenarios and Modeling Plan, finalized in March 2020.

m NS Power showing how stakeholder feedback was addressed. These are both also available on the IRP website, and a copy of these documents are attached as Appendix B and C. May 22, 2020 D. Friis Since finalization of the Assumptions and Sc...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) has been working on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and has updated stakeholders on the progress of the Modeling phase. A virtual workshop was held, and feedback has been addressed. The release of Modeling Results has been delayed from June 5 to June 26, with a stakeholder workshop planned for early July.

Attachment 19 Pre-IRP Deliverables Page 7 of 70 ability to export excess power to neighboring systems via the existing ties and to survive in an islanded mode following the loss of the AC ties. This study looks into the possibility of incr...

AI summary This study examines the feasibility of increasing renewable energy generation, particularly wind, in Nova Scotia while addressing challenges related to grid stability and system reliability. It highlights the need for careful consideration of system transient stability, regulation reserve, frequency control, and export market expansion. The study is driven by a directive from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NS-UARB).

AL ASSUMPTIONS SET 28 IRP Update Appendix C Page 30 of 136 RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY REGULATIONS • Provincial regulations that require 40% renewable energy by 2020. • NS Power has not assumed future specific renewable energy standards (RES) ot...

AI summary The document outlines assumptions related to renewable electricity regulations, including a provincial target of 40% renewable energy by 2020, and discusses NS Power's approach to evaluating renewable energy outcomes under carbon caps and net-zero policies. It also covers updated assumptions for new supply-side options based on recent data sources.

e Transmission & Distribution system as additional Initiate a Thermal Plant Retirement, Redevelopment, and Replacement Plan , including: a. affected employees and communities. process; this coal retirement plan will include significant eng...

AI summary The document outlines the need to initiate a Thermal Plant Retirement, Redevelopment, and Replacement Plan, including engagement with affected employees and communities, decommissioning studies for coal assets, and identifying replacement capacity. It references a report on beneficial electrification by the Regulatory Assistance Project.

2.3 Process for the IRP Prior to initiating the core IRP process, Nova Scotia Power undertook a number of pre-IRP studies per the recommendations of the Generation Utilization and Optimization Report10 (completed by the Nova Scotia Utility...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power conducted pre-IRP studies, including a PRM and Capacity Study, Resource Options Study, and Demand Response Options Study, based on recommendations from prior reports. Stakeholder engagement was carried out in 2019, and a Final Pre-IRP Report was issued in October 2019. The IRP modeling process followed a detailed Terms of Reference with stakeholder workshops between modeling stages.

........................................................................ 47 4 Conclusions .......................................................................................................49 4.1 Key Findings and Implications for NSPI...

AI summary The document outlines the conclusions and key findings of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Final Report, including recommendations for further analysis. Appendices include mitigation scenario results, additional scenarios, and biofuels tables. The report is part of a regulatory proceeding involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB).

blished policy goal to phase out all coal- fired electricity generation across Canada by 2030, as a key emissions reduction pillar of the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. The Federal Government finalized its amend...

AI summary The text discusses the federal policy to phase out coal-fired electricity generation in Canada by 2030, highlighting its environmental and health benefits. It also covers the renewal of the Canada-Nova Scotia Equivalency Agreement on greenhouse gas emissions from electricity producers, which was finalized in 2019 and includes analysis of emissions pathways up to 2040.

cause reductions to come from trajectories more stringent than current regulatory Assumptions electricity sector requirements.

AI summary The text discusses the need for more stringent electricity sector trajectories to achieve reductions, going beyond current regulatory assumptions and requirements.

nt of regulation reserves required. Overall, the PSC analysis included a reasonable analysis of historical net load variability to develop a regulation requirement, but there are a couple limitations. First, PSC utilized a 3-sigma standard...

AI summary The PSC analysis of regulation reserves used a 3-sigma standard deviation, which may be overly conservative. A 95% confidence interval could reduce required reserves. Additionally, the analysis assumed proportional variability with wind additions, but increased diversity may occur. These factors have a minimal impact on the IRP modeling and stability analysis.

and in 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) required new utility-scale wind and solar PV plants to have frequency-responsive capabilities9. The net result of such an obligation could 6 Australian Energy Market Operator, Fa...

AI summary In 2018, FERC required new utility-scale wind and solar PV plants to have frequency-responsive capabilities. This could reduce the need for synchronous generating units under certain conditions, allowing more wind generation and lowering customer costs, while also enhancing decarbonization.

tel. 902.429.2202 2705 Fern Lane, fax. 902.405.3716 Halifax, NS, B3K 4L3 The Roadmap for our Future We are not continuing the long-term planning process from 2007 and 2017. There are many external influences that are occurring right now in...

AI summary The document outlines a new integrated resource plan (IRP) for Nova Scotia, emphasizing the need to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets and external factors like the pandemic. It recommends modeling scenarios for zero GHG emissions and suggests an extended timeline for stakeholder consultation.

ntil later Scotia market based information for wind, which will in the study period. inform future wind procurement. Under the assumption that operational restraints are used, Future procurement for the Reliability tieline, with the and lo...

AI summary The text discusses the need for future wind procurement in the Nova Scotia market, considering operational restraints and low wind costs. It raises questions about the timing of wind development beyond operational constraints, the reliability tie, and the need for studies to assess the performance and cost-effectiveness of operational constraints in addressing high wind/high import issues.

odeled as having in dispatch to be held in reserve at peak, or does the system sufficient pondage to cover any duration of peak simply produce less energy in the hours that tend to have event due to storage at Lake Rossignol. high loads? R...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the timing of the Regional Interconnection project, which is contingent on climate policy choices and the level of electrification. The project is planned for 2030 under aggressive climate policies but may be delayed until 2038–2045 otherwise. The need for cooperation with New Brunswick and Quebec is highlighted, as well as the significance of the decision to proceed with planning.

July 2020 Category Comment # Comment NS Power Response

AI summary The text presents a table from a regulatory proceeding in July 2020, listing categories, comment numbers, comments, and responses from NS Power. It reflects a structured exchange of information and responses in a regulatory context.

July 2020 Category Comment # Comment NS Power Response

AI summary The document provides a table format with categories, comment numbers, comments, and responses from NS Power. It lacks detailed content but indicates a regulatory proceeding context involving stakeholder feedback and responses.

enabling technologies and policy and legislative frameworks become better defined. of electrification. In addition, near-future regulatory benchmarks will dictate provincial November 6, 2020 Results / Roadmap / Action Plan Stakeholder Comm...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of enabling technologies and policy frameworks for electrification, as well as the influence of future regulatory benchmarks on provincial initiatives. It references the Nova Scotia Power IRP Final Report and mentions a stakeholder comments matrix from November 6, 2020.

scenario for all coal units is needed. executing a coal retirement plan including associated regulatory approval processes.

AI summary The text highlights the need for a scenario involving all coal units and the execution of a coal retirement plan, including the necessary regulatory approval processes.

Development Goals Act (“SDGA”). Significant investment in T&D is also expected to arise electrification from the current “Base” level. An observed transition will trigger additional work to from the large potential increases in peak energy...

AI summary The text discusses the need for significant investment in transmission and distribution (T&D) infrastructure due to increased peak energy demand from electrification. It also highlights ongoing efforts to determine avoided T&D costs from demand-side management (DSM) and mentions the role of electrification in reducing carbon emissions, although it notes that electrification alone may not be sufficient to meet the SDGA net-zero 2050 target.

5,714 $ 5,415 $ 11,782 $ 2,519 2030 $ 7,835 $ - $ 6,297 $ 6,297 $ 3,241 $ 7,412 $ 7,487 $ 6,520 $ 6,203 $ 4,975 $ 6,472 $ 5,453 November 6, 2020 Results / Roadmap / Action Plan Stakeholder Comments Matrix Page 29 of 29 Nova Scotia Power IR...

AI summary CanREA submitted comments on Nova Scotia Power’s 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Draft Report, acknowledging the effort but expressing concerns that some stakeholder input was not adequately considered, potentially affecting the accuracy and reliability of the IRP for future planning.

sions intensity, or decreased usage of the plants. Please clarify this statement. Introduction The 2020 IRP process represents a significant investment of time and resources for NS Power, the IRP Working Group, and stakeholders participati...

AI summary The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process required significant time and resources from NS Power and stakeholders, adding complexity compared to previous IRP processes in Nova Scotia. NS Power has engaged stakeholders extensively, including through nine public workshops and six rounds of formal submissions.

Category Participant Comment NS Power Response the avoided cost values to structure EE programs? How will the parties consider the dynamic nature of the impact of EE savings on avoided cost levels? How will the electrification progress be...

AI summary The SBA is asking how avoided cost values will be used to structure energy efficiency programs and how electrification progress will be incorporated into ongoing analysis. The SBA also raises questions about the regulatory review framework for coal retirements, including whether additional economic analyses will be conducted and what decision metrics will be used for retirement timing.

ACTION PLAN ITEM STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER COMMENT REFERENCE 1. Develop a Regional Integration Strategy to provide CA See comments above re Finding 2a access to firm capacity and low carbon energy while CanREA Supportive: See comments on Fin...

AI summary The document outlines an action plan to develop a Regional Integration Strategy aimed at enhancing Nova Scotia’s energy reliability and access to low carbon energy. It includes developing a Reliability Tie and Regional Interconnection by 2025-2035, as well as conducting studies on firm import options. Stakeholders have provided varied comments, ranging from supportive to concerned about risks.

Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment of IRP Compliance with FAM Audit Recommendations ......................... 4 A. Recommendatio...

AI summary The document assesses compliance with FAM audit recommendations on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), emphasizing regular planning, reserve margin determination, transparent peak load forecasting, and stakeholder input. It highlights the need to evaluate natural gas infrastructure, biomass plant value, and combustion turbine analysis, alongside addressing cost-benefit assessments and load effects.

g combustion turbines differ substantially from new combustion turbines. ................................................................................................................. 15 3. Battery storage is not limited from providing...

AI summary The document discusses combustion turbine differences, battery storage capacity, and IRP results highlighting reliance on firm imports and regional transmission. It addresses electrification uncertainties, sensitivity to resource costs, and NSPI's Action Plan evaluation, emphasizing the need for competitive procurement and substantiating investment decisions.

nd. 9. Allow for Board and Stakeholder Review and Input Our recommendation concluded by addressing the involvement of the Board and stakeholders in the IRP process. We stated: Allow for Board and stakeholder review and input. IRPs are only...

AI summary The text highlights NSPI's compliance with recommendations for stakeholder and Board review of the IRP process, including workshops, document access, and written comments. It also references proceeding M08929 for Board review of the 2020 IRP Report.

low. Synapse’s suggestions are based on the findings we describe above, and on the analyses discussed in earlier sections of this report. i. Regional Integration Strategy • Synapse recommends initial prioritization be given to NSPI’s item...

AI summary Synapse recommends prioritizing the development of a Reliability Tie by NSPI, as it supports economic wind development and regional interconnection with New Brunswick. The recommendation includes initiating a regulatory proceeding in 2021 and reporting on right-of-way progress.

6. DEMAND RESPONSE - NS Power's IRP Report provides the following action item relating to Demand Response in Nova - Scotia: - Create a Demand Response Strategy targeting 75 MW of capacity, for deployment by 2025. - Available resource cost,...

AI summary NS Power's IRP Report proposes a 75 MW demand response strategy by 2025, with E1's expertise critical to its development. The NSUARB's 2019 decision confirmed E1's mandate to pursue cost-effective demand response, emphasizing integration with DSM programs. This strategy could inform future DSM Resource Plans.

B. Potential for competitive procurement As with almost all electric utility IRP processes, the NSPI IRP did not study the option of any of the proposed new resources being developed, operated, and owned by an entity other than NSPI. As su...

AI summary The NSPI IRP did not evaluate third-party ownership of resources, potentially missing cost benefits from different ownership structures. Competitive procurements for resources like renewables and transmission are recommended, with the SBA suggesting a report on ownership alternatives for Board review and stakeholder input.

B. Detailed Board review The SBA comments are being provided as part of an informal Board review process and not a full Board paper hearing. It is important for NSPI to keep in mind that general approval of the IRP by the Board is not appr...

AI summary The SBA emphasizes that informal Board review of the IRP does not equate to approval for capital expenditures. It stresses the need for specific resource economic evaluations and formal Board applications, alongside stakeholder engagement, for any IRP-related expenditures. Clear understanding of required regulatory approvals is urged before submitting applications.

missions intensity, and dispatch flexibility. This work will proceed in parallel with the wind procurement strategy (Action Item 3d, below) and will include supporting transmission planning studies. The SBA finds the action item surroundin...

AI summary The SBA criticizes the premature focus on the regional integration strategy without prior regulatory approval, warning of high costs and uncertainty about energy availability. Electrification is highlighted as a key IRP component, with NS Power proposing related action items to support decarbonization and rate stability.

Regional Intertie/Integration The IRP Report identified the need for further study on the Intertie to provide firm capacity and ancillary services: "Nova Scotia Power notes that any resource plans which go beyond the findings of the pre-IR...

AI summary The IRP Report highlights the need for further study on the Intertie for firm capacity and ancillary services. NSPI notes that resources beyond pre-IRP studies require analysis for reliability. Heritage Gas criticizes NSPI for lacking details on imported energy sourcing and carbon intensity. Quebec's growing demand may reduce surplus electricity, while climate change risks and grid reliability concerns are raised.

February 16, 2021 Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, 2020 Integrated Resource Plan De...

AI summary This document outlines the submission of Nova Scotia Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan Report and the subsequent comments filed by various stakeholders, including the Board's consultants and interested parties, as part of the regulatory process.

g electrification a central part of its IRP. The IRP provides appropriate policy, business, and analytic support for its Action Plan for electrification. 9 Ibid. 10 Exhibit N-14, pages 1-2. 11 Exhibit N-9(i), Appendix A,Deep Decarbonizatio...

AI summary NS Power's IRP emphasizes electrification as a core strategy, supported by robust scenarios and 'no regrets' options. Investments in full electrification and T&D infrastructure are anticipated. The SBA acknowledges NS Power's stakeholder engagement, while RII recommends recognizing electrification's benefits. NS Power agrees with these recommendations.

2. Determine Optimal Planning Reserve Determine the optimal planning reserve margin, not just reconsider whether a 20% planning reserve margin adequately meets NPCC or NERC standards. This will ensure that NSPI will be regularly determinin...

AI summary The text argues for determining the optimal planning reserve margin rather than merely verifying compliance with a 20% standard. It supports NSPI's approach, noting modest 2045 excess capacity, and emphasizes ongoing IRP monitoring. References a 2018/2019 FAM audit proceeding (M09548) where a 9% UCAP and 20% ICAP were accepted as appropriate.

9. Allow for Board and Stakeholder Review and Input Allow for Board and stakeholder review and input. IRPs are only as useful as the assumptions that drive them, so it is important that NSPI's IRP methodology and assumptions be vetted by t...

AI summary NSPI ensured stakeholder and Board review of its IRP by engaging third parties, hosting workshops, and allowing written comments. The Board will review the 2020 IRP Report in proceeding M08929, with public comments considered.

IRP Final Report Comments – Bates White No. Topic / Reference Bates White Comment NS Power Response

AI summary The document presents comments from Bates White on the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Final Report, along with responses from Nova Scotia Power Incorporated. The discussion centers on the analysis and evaluation of the IRP, including energy resource planning and related regulatory considerations.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J3S3 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Office 3rd Floor, 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3P6 1 855 442-4448 (...

AI summary A letter from Judith Ferguson, Executive Vice-President of Nova Scotia Power Inc., to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. The correspondence initiates a regulatory proceeding, though specific claims or arguments are not detailed in the provided text.

Stakeholder Review & Comment Period #2 – Potential Study Assumptions and Modelling Plan Stakeholder Comment How Comment was Addressed Consider an enhanced consultation process. E1 revised the final Scope of Work by providing a stakeholder...

AI summary Stakeholders requested enhanced consultation processes and model transparency. In response, E1 revised the Scope of Work to include extended comment periods, technical conferences, and greater model transparency, including disclosure of limitations and availability of model data for review by E1, stakeholders, and the UARB.

M08929 - Integrated Resource Planning - (P-884) This is further to your letter of December 16, 2019, requesting approval of draft Terms of Reference. The panel considering this matter is Peter W. Gurnham, Q.C., Chair, Roland A. Deveau, Q.C...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NSP) seeks approval for draft Terms of Reference for Integrated Resource Planning (IRP). The Board agrees with NSP's description but requests additional comments on the Terms of Reference by January 9, 2020, with NSP responding by January 17. The Board emphasizes maintaining the IRP timetable.

January 9, 2020 VIA EMAIL Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M08929 - Comments on Draft Terms of Reference for IR...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) confirms no further comments on Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) Draft Terms of Reference for an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), acknowledging prior feedback was addressed in NSPI's filing.

M08929 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Integrated Resource Planning and Generation Utilization and Optimization (P-884) On December 16, 2019, Nova Scotia Power submitted draft Terms of Reference for NS Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan and...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power submitted draft Terms of Reference for its 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in December 2019, seeking Board approval. The Board set a timeline for stakeholder comments and responses, noting NSP's collaboration with consultants and stakeholder consultations. The Board generally agreed with the Terms of Reference description.

Envigour stated: Envigour Policy Consulting Inc. has been retained by QUEST and Marine Renewables Canada as their consultant in this matter. We have reviewed the Draft Terms of Reference Document and are generally satisfied with the wordin...

AI summary Envigour suggests including detailed uncertainty analysis on technology price declines in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). NS Power agrees but asserts this is addressed via 'signposts' in the Strategy. The Board approves the Terms of Reference (TOR) but urges NS Power to consider Envigour's feedback during the IRP process.

July 28, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Resour...

AI summary NS Power updates the NSUARB on progress with its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), including modeling results, stakeholder feedback, and a request for additional time to address comments. The company emphasizes transparency and ongoing engagement with the Board and stakeholders, aiming to finalize the IRP by September 30, 2020.

ome further analysis in relation to key issues raised by the parties, and to allow for the appropriate engagement on the final milestones for the project leading to the completion of the final report. To that end, NS Power is seeking Board...

AI summary NS Power requests an extension to file its Final Report from September 30, 2020, to October 30, 2020, citing the need for additional analysis and stakeholder engagement. Adjusted milestones for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process are outlined, with the final report submission shifting to October 30, 2020.

M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated July 28th and received by the Board on July 29, 2020, requesting an extension of the date to file the Final Report from September 30, 2020 to O...

AI summary The Board approved NS Power's request to extend the deadline for submitting the Final Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Report from September 30 to October 30, 2020, with adjusted milestone dates for stakeholder consultations and document circulation.

August 10, 2020 VIA E-MAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: P-884 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI...

AI summary NSPI requested an extension to file its final report, with stakeholder comment periods approved. Halifax's HalifACT 2050 climate plan emphasizes electrification (EVs, heat pumps, solar) and grid modernization, requiring collaboration with NSPI to meet 2050 decarbonization targets.

a significant issue, as is the continued collaboration between HRM and NSPI to ensure the electrical distribution system in HRM can accommodate the changes that are needed to achieve our 2050 targets. Considering the above, HRM wants to gi...

AI summary HRM requests an extension of deadlines for reviewing the Draft Findings and Action Plan and Draft IRP Report, citing the need for a thorough review to align with climate goals. They emphasize the importance of sufficient time to ensure the IRP accommodates HRM's Climate Action Plan.

M08929 - Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) (P-884) Thank you for your letter of August 10, 2020, regarding the IRP timeline. Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) is requesting that the Board extend the response times f...

AI summary Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) requested an extension for submitting the Draft IRP Report, citing the need to assess integration of the HalifACT 2050 report. The Board declined, stating stakeholders have ample opportunity to engage through existing processes, including a September 2020 workshop.

August 25, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Reso...

AI summary NS Power updated the timeline for its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) submission, extending the Final Report deadline to October 30, 2020. Stakeholder engagement and feedback periods were adjusted, with the Draft Findings, Roadmap & Action Plan now set for September 2, 2020, and stakeholder comments until September 18, 2020. Remaining IRP milestones remain unchanged.

October 30, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: Re: P-884 - M08929, NS Power's Integrated Res...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) requests an extension until November 27, 2020, to file its Final Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) report with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), citing the need to address stakeholder feedback on the draft IRP. The Board previously extended the deadline from September 30 to October 30, 2020.

M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 30, 2020, requesting a further extension of the date to file the Final Report from October 30, 2020 to November 27, 2020, regarding the...

AI summary The Board approves NS Power's request to extend the deadline for submitting the Final Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Report from October 30, 2020, to November 27, 2020, with adjusted milestone dates for stakeholder engagement and report submission.

M08929 - NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan (P-884) NS Power filed its Integrated Resource Plan on November 27, 2020. The Board understands that there has been extensive consultation with Interested Parties in connection with the preparat...

AI summary NS Power submitted its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) on November 27, 2020. The Board will not formally approve the plan but seeks stakeholder input to create a complete record, with comment deadlines set for December 23, 2020, January 20, 2021, and February 16, 2021. The Board panel includes Peter W. Gurnham, Roland A. Deveau, and Steven M. Murphy.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] January 20, 2021 File No. 41736-105 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3 rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, NS B3J 3P6 Attention: Crystal Henwood, Regulato...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits comments on Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (P-884) as part of regulatory proceeding M08929. The filing adheres to COVID-19 temporary administrative measures, with paper copies provided only upon request.

M08929 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. -Integrated Resource Planning and Generation Utilization and Optimization (P-884) In its letter of October 25, 2018 in matter M08059, the Board directed Nova Scotia Power to undertake certain studies conside...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NSP) was directed by the Board to complete pre-IRP studies addressing Synapse and Bates White reports. The Final Pre-IRP Report included studies on reserve margins, resource options, renewable integration stability, and demand response. The IRP aims to identify the lowest-cost 25-year plan balancing supply-demand options, reliability, and legislative requirements. NSP sought approval for its 2020 IRP Terms of Reference, which the Board granted in January 2020.