Topic:"Regulatory Approval Processes" in M10473

NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO: The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("UARB" or "the Board") - 1. EfficiencyOne is the holder of the Franchise issued by the Minister of Energy on November 28, 2014, effective January 1, 2015, to provide elect...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks Board approval for a 2023–2025 Supply Agreement with NS Power to deliver electricity efficiency services, including a Demand Side Management (DSM) resource plan. The application cites compliance with the Public Utilities Act and asserts the proposal serves the public interest.

1.2 APPROVAL OF SUPPLY AGREEMENT WITH NS POWER - E1 requests the Board's approval of its form of Supply Agreement with NS Power. The operating terms - and conditions of the Supply Agreement are substantially consistent with the Supply Agre...

AI summary E1 seeks the Board's approval for a Supply Agreement with NS Power, noting that the terms align with those approved for prior DSM Plans (2016-2018, 2019, 2020-2022). This consistency is emphasized as a key rationale for approval.

7.1 AFFORDABILITY - Affordability is a critical factor in DSM planning. In its decision on the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, the Board - stated it is, " specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of - affordability....

AI summary Affordability is a critical factor in DSM planning, as highlighted by the Board's 2016-2018 DSM Plan decision. The Board is directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address affordability, though the legislation does not provide specific parameters for determining affordability. E1 considers various factors, including the best interests of ratepayers, alignment with the 2020 IRP, and the Settlement Plan's affordability and risk profile.

BALANCING SHORT- AND LONG-TERM AFFORDABILITY The Settlement Plan seeks to maximize value for ratepayers by balancing short- and long-term affordability. This is accomplished through a DSM Plan that incorporates the needs and best interests...

AI summary The Settlement Plan aims to balance short- and long-term affordability for ratepayers by emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of Demand Side Management (DSM) over fuel alternatives. DSM is shown to be significantly cheaper than fuel, leading to substantial fuel savings. The plan aligns with legislative requirements and considers the best interests of customers.

12.2 PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION The Board, in its decision in M09096, required E1 "to file terms of reference for the investigation of overestimation of costs by October 31, 2019, and to conclude the investigation and file...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board directed E1 to conduct a Performance Alignment Study following its decision in M09096. Synapse Energy Economics Inc. provided feedback, recommending improvements to budget reconciliation, jurisdictional review, reporting, and internal vetting processes. E1 responded by enhancing reporting practices and conducting a jurisdictional scan to inform the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

1.1.1 2020 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN RESULTS Since E1's 2020-2022 DSM Plan was developed and approved, NS Power conducted a new IRP which was used to inform the development of the Settlement Plan. NS Power's 2020 IRP reflected themes of dec...

AI summary The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) by NS Power included demand side management (DSM) and demand response (DR) strategies, with Scenario 2.0C selected as the reference plan. The plan outlines energy savings, capacity targets, and the need for an electrification strategy. E1 anticipates participating in future initiatives but notes uncertainty around funding and implications for DSM.

7.4.3.1 DSM PLAN DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING - DSM Plan development and reporting activities are an essential function of E1's Regulatory Affairs Team. - Through its Enabling Strategies, Regulatory Affairs manages all demand side management re...

AI summary The document outlines the development and reporting activities related to the DSM Plan by E1's Regulatory Affairs Team, including the creation of the 2026-2028 DSM Resource Plan, collaboration with NS Power and stakeholders, and submission of various reports and studies to the NSUARB.

8. EVALUATION - E1's measurement and evaluation activities are a crucial component of its Regulatory Affairs functions. - Through independent, third-party measurement and evaluation processes, E1 is able to stay accountable - to its tracke...

AI summary E1 emphasizes the importance of independent evaluation activities in its Regulatory Affairs functions to ensure accountability and improve the performance of EE and DR programs. It proposes a similar approach in the Settlement Plan as in the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, including annual impact evaluations to measure energy and demand savings and support continuous improvement.

9.1 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS - In the first quarter of each calendar year, E1 will file an APR with the NSUARB, which will include the - following information: - a summary of the context, activities and milestones achieved in the prior year...

AI summary E1 is required to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the NSUARB in the first quarter of each year, detailing prior year activities, performance indicators, discrepancies, expenditures, and savings. Significant plan changes, such as new programs or budget/savings target adjustments by more than 25%, must be communicated in the APR.

9.2 QUARTERLY REPORTS - E1 will file quarterly reports with the NSUARB for quarters one through three of each year[43](#page-41-2) . The reports - will provide quarterly status updates and service highlights and communicate course adjustme...

AI summary E1 is required to file quarterly reports with the NSUARB, providing updates on the DSM Resource Plan, including metrics such as savings targets, mid-course adjustments, investment by rate class, sector highlights, and year-end forecasts. The reports must be filed according to specific dates outlined in a 2018 letter from the NSUARB.

9.4 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - E1 will retain the services of an external financial auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements. - These will be filed with the NSUARB in the second quarter of the following year, no later tha...

AI summary E1 will engage an external financial auditor to prepare audited annual financial statements, which will be submitted to the NSUARB by April 28 of the following year, as per the Revised Filing Dates letter issued in January 2018.

Table 5 Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2030-2063 $/tonne $30 $40 $50 $65 $80 $95 $110 $125 $140 $155 $170 Extrapolated using 2% annual inflation Recent discussions have focused on the "Savings" and "Intensity"...

AI summary Recent discussions have centered on the 'Savings' and 'Intensity' variables, with two general approaches emerging after stakeholder feedback. Each approach satisfies only one of the UARB's directives, highlighting the complexity of addressing both simultaneously.

Context Since the development of EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2020-2022 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan, an emerging area of interest in Nova Scotia is demand response (DR). Recently, the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) directed E1...

AI summary The document discusses the development of a Demand Response (DR) Roadmap by EfficiencyOne (E1) in collaboration with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power), as directed by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The roadmap aims to guide the creation of DR programs that align with strategic objectives, improve customer options, and enhance customer satisfaction through cost-effective energy management.

Appendix B Attachment 8: E1 RBIA Model – Settlement Plan

AI summary This document is Attachment 8 of Appendix B, titled 'E1 RBIA Model – Settlement Plan,' which appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

- Q: Please state your name and professional affiliation. - 3 A: My name is David G. Hill. I am a Managing Consultant at Energy Futures Group. - Q: On whose behalf are you testifying? - A: I am testifying on behalf of EfficiencyOne. Effici...

AI summary David G. Hill, a Managing Consultant at Energy Futures Group, testifies on behalf of EfficiencyOne, which has an exclusive ten-year agreement with NS Power to provide energy efficiency and conservation activities. EFG is a clean-energy consulting firm with extensive experience in designing and evaluating energy efficiency programs, integrated resource planning, and policy work across North America and Europe.

3 II. Executive Summary - 4 Q: Please summarize your testimony, and primary findings. - 5 A: The purpose of my testimony is to assess the demand side management (DSM) avoided costs - 6 Nova Scotia Power (NSP) has provided to EOne based on...

AI summary The testimony critiques Nova Scotia Power's use of Scenario 2.0C for calculating DSM avoided costs, arguing it is misaligned with current legislative requirements and market trends. Scenario 3.1C is recommended as a more accurate basis for DSM planning, reflecting updated policy goals such as coal phase-out by 2030 and higher renewable energy targets.

19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION - 19.1 In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties...

AI summary The dispute resolution process outlined in the agreement involves initial discussions between senior representatives of EfficiencyOne and NSPI, with a 30-day resolution period. If unresolved, disputes are referred to the UARB. EfficiencyOne is required to continue fulfilling the EECA unless instructed otherwise by the UARB.

20. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION - 20.1 This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either Party, in whole or in part, upon the happening of one or more of the following events: - (a) EfficiencyOne's Franchise is terminated and the Agreemen...

AI summary This section outlines the conditions under which the Agreement may be terminated by either party, including the termination of EfficiencyOne's Franchise or approval by the UARB. Neither party is entitled to compensation or damages for consequential losses upon termination.

23. ASSIGNMENT 23.1 Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires.

AI summary The clause prohibits either party from assigning the agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister, depending on the situation.

24. SHARING OF DATA AND INFORMATION - 24.1 EfficiencyOne shall work co-operatively with NSPI to provide NSPI with information and data from time to time in order to assist NSPI with planning and load forecasting as may be reasonably requir...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to share data and information with NSPI for planning and load forecasting purposes, in line with past practices. If a dispute arises over such requests, NSPI may seek resolution from the UARB.

26. GENERAL - 26.1 This Agreement shall only be renewed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. - 26.2 This Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the...

AI summary This section outlines the general terms of the agreement between EfficiencyOne and NSPI, including renewal conditions, governing law, jurisdiction, and the enforceability of provisions. It also specifies that the agreement is binding on successors and assigns and must be approved by the UARB to be valid.

NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 37 5. EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms o...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to notify NSPI of Significant Changes simultaneously with applying to the UARB for approval. NSPI has the right to submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes.

13. FORCE MAJEURE - 13.1 Neither Party shall be in breach of its obligations under this Agreement where failure to perform or delay in performance of any obligation is due, wholly or in part, to a Force Majeure Event. - 13.2 Each Party sha...

AI summary This section outlines the Force Majeure clause of the agreement, stating that neither party is in breach of obligations if performance is delayed or prevented by a Force Majeure Event. Both parties are required to notify each other promptly and take steps to mitigate the impact and resume performance. The clause also clarifies that certain failures or omissions by EfficiencyOne do not constitute Force Majeure.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION 22 19. - In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties sh...

AI summary This section outlines the dispute resolution process under the Agreement, requiring senior representatives of EfficiencyOne and NSPI to meet and resolve disputes within 30 days (or 10 days for urgent matters). If unresolved, disputes are referred to the UARB. EfficiencyOne must continue fulfilling the EECA unless specifically authorized by the UARB to halt activities.

porary or permanent receiver, trustee or other officer having similar powers over either Party its business or assets, or the making of any assignment by either Party for the benefit of its creditors. 20.5 If a breach notified pursuant to...

AI summary This section outlines the procedures for default and termination under the agreement, specifying conditions under which a breach may be corrected and the process for termination by the non-defaulting party upon an Event of Default. It also details notification procedures, including addresses and methods for sending notices.

ASSIGNMENT 17 23. Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires. 18 23.1 19

AI summary The assignment clause in the agreement requires prior written approval from the UARB and/or the Minister before either party can assign all or any portion of the agreement.

26. GENERAL - 26.1 This Agreement shall only be renewed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. - 26.2 This Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the...

AI summary This section outlines the general terms of the agreement, including its renewal conditions, governing law, and jurisdiction. It emphasizes that EfficiencyOne acts as an independent contractor and that the agreement is subject to approval by the Utility and Review Board (URAB). The agreement is governed by Nova Scotia and Canadian laws, and any unenforceable provisions will not affect the rest of the agreement.

27. SURVIVAL 27.1 Subject to the provisions of the Act, all provisions of this Agreement which by their express terms or nature are continuing shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, without limitation, th...

AI summary This section outlines the survival of certain provisions in the agreement following its expiration or termination, including those related to the EECA Plan, confidentiality, indemnity, and intellectual property, among others.

1 EVALUATION SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES The 2021 Portfolio Evaluation Plan was based on the Evaluation Schedule outlined in the Overall Strategic Evaluation Plan, 2 which provides a framework and approach to guide evaluation planning and impleme...

AI summary The 2021 Portfolio Evaluation Plan outlines the approach to evaluating demand-side management (DSM) activities from 2020–2022. It emphasizes prioritizing evaluations based on factors such as program savings, uncertainty, changes in program design, regulatory requirements, and evaluation scheduling. The plan also considers the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on evaluation activities and categorizes evaluations into impact, process, and market evaluations.

3.1 Individual Impact Evaluation Results [Table](#page-27-0) 6 and [Table](#page-28-0) 7 below respectively list the evaluated energy and peak demand savings as well as the corresponding savings tracked by EOne for each program component o...

AI summary The section presents the results of individual impact evaluations for energy and peak demand savings from 2021 programs. Net savings are calculated using the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), and lifetime energy savings are based on the effective useful life (EUL) of efficiency measures. Line loss factors were submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) as part of a 2014 study.

APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References National Renewable Energy Laboratory, The Uniform Methods Project Chapter 23: Estimating Net Savings: Common Practices, September 2014, p. 3. Nova Scotia Utility and Revie...

AI summary This appendix lists bibliographic references for various programs and studies, including energy efficiency initiatives, load forecasting reports, and regulatory matters. It includes sources such as the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, Nova Scotia Power, and Emera Inc.

of the utility, which has a regulated objective of meeting two-thirds of its new demand through conservation by 2020. 24 This creates a strong incentive for BC Hydro to help advance all C&S. Other regulators are wary of MT programs. One of...

AI summary The utility has a regulatory objective of meeting two-thirds of new demand through conservation by 2020. Other regulators are cautious about Market Transformation (MT) programs due to concerns about subjective and imprecise savings measurement, delays in realizing benefits, and the need for a regulatory framework shift to support MT programs effectively.

Holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise

AI summary The document pertains to the regulatory proceeding concerning the holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise, focusing on the entity responsible for managing energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia.

Regulatory Affairs - engagement with regulatory stakeholders and the DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG) including: - o avoided Costs DSMAG session and request for written stakeholder comments; - o stakeholder written comments on the revised DSMAG...

AI summary The document outlines regulatory activities involving stakeholder engagement with the DSM Advisory Group, submission of various reports to the NSUARB, and implementation of evaluation and verification processes related to energy efficiency programs and NS Power's regulatory filings.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD NOTICE OF PAPER HEARING EfficiencyOne (E1) has made Application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities betw...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has applied for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, including the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The Board will consider this in a paper hearing, with intervenor and comment deadlines set for March 29, 2022, and May 27, 2022, respectively.

Questions: - (a) Please indicate whether E1 would be willing to specifically engage with the Berwick - Electric Commission, the Riverport Electric Light Commission, the Town of Antigonish, - and the Town of Mahone Bay with respect to the D...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) is open to engaging with public utilities and municipalities regarding DSM spending levels in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan. However, adjustments prior to January 1, 2023, would be limited by the approved Plan and NSUARB's Order. Mid-course adjustments may be made based on market conditions and third-party evaluations.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan between E1 and NS Power. The document outlines E1's non-confidential replies to regulatory information requests.

s between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) information requests regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan with Nova Scotia Power. The proceeding involves regulatory processes related to information disclosure and DSM planning.

een E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary E1 is responding to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document is part of a regulatory proceeding and contains non-confidential responses.

06 Page 1 of 3 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Bo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) has submitted an application for approval of a supply agreement with NS Power under the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's responses to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the proposed agreement.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan between E1 and NS Power. The document outlines E1's non-confidential replies to regulatory information requests.

NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 15 of 25

AI summary The text references a regulatory proceeding document from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), specifically IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 15 of 25. It appears to be part of a larger document related to regulatory processes and compliance in Nova Scotia.

rt of the 26 2023-2025 DSM Plan development process and has included additional detail on the 27 avoided costs used in the development of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan in its Application. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-13 Page 1 of 4 M...

AI summary The document outlines E1's responses to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding its Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities under the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

by stakeholders. Responses circulated to stakeholders. 24 • October 12, 2021: Meeting with E1, Synapse, and RII to discuss additional questions 25 and responses. 26 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-13 Page 2 of 4 M10473 – Efficien...

AI summary The document outlines E1's responses to information requests by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding an application for a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and NS Power under the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. The process involved stakeholder engagement and meetings with various parties.

e items will be examined through the 2022 IRP Evergreen process 23 with the expectation that there will be opportunity for fulsome stakeholder engagement 24 and review of these costs. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-13 Page 4 of...

AI summary The document outlines E1's response to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding low-income investment amounts and E1's involvement in low-income initiatives funded by NS Power’s shareholder. E1 refers to prior responses for detailed data and explanations.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 On p. 37 of 65, E1 stated that Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine are the...

AI summary E1 has responded to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. The response includes references to comparative jurisdictions such as Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine, and provides details on energy efficiency programs, funding sources, and legislative requirements related to renewable electricity.

Homepage - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2022). Available at: https://www.eia.gov/ 2 Maine Profile (2022). Available at: https://www.eia.gov/state/print.php?sid=ME Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-17 Page 3 of 9 M1...

AI summary This document is part of a regulatory proceeding involving EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power, covering the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. It includes E1's responses to information requests by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB).

(Electric Division), pursuant to G.L. c. 25, § 21, for approval by the Department of Public Utilities of its Three- Year Energy Efficiency Plan for 2022 through 2024. D.P.U. 21-128 Petition of Massachusetts Electric Company and Nantucket E...

AI summary The text outlines multiple petitions filed with the Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) for approval of Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans for 2022 through 2024 by various electric companies, including Massachusetts Electric Company, Nantucket Electric Company, and NSTAR Electric Company. Legal representatives for Berkshire Gas Company and EverSource Gas Company of Massachusetts are listed as appearing in the proceeding.

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. Limited Participant D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Courtney Feeley Karp, Esq. Jonathan S. Klavens, Esq. Klavens Law Group 20 Park Plaza, #402 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 FOR NORTHEAST CLEAN ENERGY COUNCI...

AI summary The document outlines the procedural history and background of a regulatory proceeding involving multiple docket numbers, including the development and review of three-year plans by the Department. It sets the stage for an overview of the proceeding and the development of these plans.

NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 11 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page xi

AI summary The text references multiple documents from a regulatory proceeding, including NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, and pages from D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129. These references suggest a detailed regulatory process involving multiple filings and documents.

NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 12 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page xii

AI summary The text references regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia, citing specific matter numbers (D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129) and mentions a page reference (Page xii) from a document attached to NSUARB IR-17.

lan, including proposed programs, program budgets, cost-recovery mechanisms and, with the exception of the Compact, a proposed performance incentive mechanism. Pursuant to the Energy Act of 2012, the Program Administrators also have incorp...

AI summary The document outlines the submission of Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans by Program Administrators, including proposed programs, budgets, and cost-recovery mechanisms. The Massachusetts Attorney General and various organizations have intervened in the proceedings, and the Department issued procedural guidelines and memoranda for the filings.

Page 4 Pursuant to notice duly issued,3 the Department held two joint public hearings on December 1 and 2, 2021.4 The Program Administrators sponsored the testimony of 3 On December 14, 2021, the Department received a motion for leave to f...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities held joint public hearings on December 1 and 2, 2021, for the Three-Year Plans. CPower Energy Management filed comments out of time, but the Department ruled them inadmissible due to not meeting the deadline and failing to show good cause for the delay.

il 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 18 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 5 39 internal witnesses.5,6 In addition, intervenors sponsored the testimony of six witnesses.7 The Department held four days of evidentiary he...

AI summary The NSUARB IR-17 proceeding includes multiple docket numbers (D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129) and involved internal and intervenor-sponsored witnesses. Evidentiary hearings were held over four days in December 2021.

echt of Raymond J. Albrecht, LLC; (2) Dr. Thomas Butcher of the National Oil Heat Research Alliance; (3) Matthew Herman of the National Biodiesel Board; and (4) Joseph Uglietto of Diversified Energy Specialists, Inc. 8 The Department held...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) conducted joint and Compact-specific evidentiary hearings in December 2021. Multiple parties, including Program Administrators, the Attorney General, and various organizations, filed briefs and reply briefs in multiple dockets between December 2021 and January 2022.

9 NEEC filed a letter in lieu of brief noting its “full support” for all arguments presented in the initial brief of NECEC (NEEC Brief at 1). Accordingly, the arguments of NECEC set forth herein also represent those of NEEC. 10 The combine...

AI summary NEEC supports NECEC's arguments in the proceeding. The Department strikes portions of responses to record requests as unresponsive and extra-record evidence, citing procedural guidelines and prior precedents.

ning, and lighting devices; (7) programs for planning and evaluation; (8) programs providing commercial, industrial, and institutional customers with greater flexibility and control over demand-side investments funded by the programs at th...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for Program Administrators to submit a Statewide Plan every three years and develop a Three-Year Plan based on it, which must be reviewed by the Council and submitted to the Department. A public hearing is required for the Three-Year Plans.

)(1). The Department is required to conduct a public hearing to allow interested persons to be heard on the Three-Year Plans. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(1). Within 90 days of the filing date, the Department must approve, modify, or reject and req...

AI summary The Department is required to hold a public hearing on the Three-Year Plans and approve, modify, or reject them within 90 days. The Council worked with Program Administrators to develop the Statewide Plan under the Green Communities Act and must approve it with a two-thirds majority vote. The Council conducted workshops and public comment sessions to aid in the development of the plan.

supported under the Green Communities Act. See, e.g., 2016-2018 Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans, D.P.U. 15-160 through D.P.U. 15-169, at 26 (2016) (“2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order”) (approving renter specific offering, enhanced incent...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) requires energy efficiency programs to align with GHG emissions reduction targets under the Green Communities Act. The 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans must be consistent with statutory goals and assess the impact on the distribution system to avoid reliability issues. Program Administrators are required to evaluate program effectiveness and GHG impacts.

ent of the Three-Year Plans and adjudicate all disputes related to the proposed programs within 90 days. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(2). Completing a full, fair, and thorough evaluation of every element of the Three-Year Plans in this short amount...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges faced by the Department of Public Utilities in evaluating Three-Year Plans within a 90-day statutory deadline. It emphasizes the need for complete and well-supported filings to streamline the review process and minimize the need for discovery. The Department has developed guidelines and has conducted investigations to refine its energy efficiency requirements.

the energy efficiency market, the Department issues a pre-filing memorandum to identify any additional information the Program Administrators must include in their filings to facilitate the Department’s review and reduce the need for disco...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation expresses disappointment with the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans submitted by Program Administrators, noting repeated issues despite prior guidance and the administrators' proven capability in energy efficiency planning.

, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 33 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 20 First, as noted above, in a Three-Year Plan filing (or any regulatory filing), it is imperative that the filing contain all required information,...

AI summary The text discusses issues with the submission of Three-Year Plan filings, highlighting missing information, incomplete testimony, and failure to follow directives from the Department. Multiple rounds of discovery were required to obtain necessary data, and service territory-specific information was not adequately provided.

data/information and the minimization of administrative costs. D.P.U. 20-150-A at 12 n.9. Not only did the Program Administrators not submit the formal process with this filing, they forward (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 50). Instead, the Pr...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities criticizes the Program Administrators for not submitting a formal process with their filing and for delaying the development of key proposals, such as those for low-income programs and renter energy savings packages. This delay has caused administrative inefficiencies and concerns about the accuracy and completeness of the filings.

partment’s Guidelines and directives. While stakeholders and the Council work with the Program Administrators for almost a year to develop the Three-Year Plan filings, the Department has 90 days to review the filing and adjudicate any issu...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) highlights concerns regarding the timing and transparency of changes made to the Three-Year Plan filings, particularly the last-minute adjustments to program designs and avoided cost assumptions, which may undermine the credibility of the plan.

t reject the Three-Year Plan filings based solely on the Program Administrators’ filing and procedural deficiencies. Unlike other filings, the energy efficiency plans are designed solely for the purpose of delivering energy saving measures...

AI summary The document discusses the rejection of Three-Year Plan filings due to procedural deficiencies but emphasizes that energy efficiency programs are essential for meeting GHG reduction goals. It also highlights the nation-leading status of Program Administrators and their ability to deliver energy efficiency services.

343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 29 the Three-Year Plans. While the draft Statewide Plan was submitted to the Council on April 30, 2021, the EEA Secretary, consistent with St. 2021, c. 8, § 106, established the GHG emissions re...

AI summary The document discusses the process for developing and reviewing the Statewide Plan, emphasizing the Council's statutory role in reviewing and providing comments on the draft plan submitted by the Program Administrators. The timing of the GHG emissions reduction goal and the Council's advisory role are highlighted as key considerations in the process.

ewide Plan to address the Council’s recommendations or provide a statement and justification of any unresolved issues. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(1). Accordingly, given that the EEA Secretary’s GHG emissions reduction goals were finalized approxi...

AI summary The document discusses the development of the Statewide Plan in response to the Council’s recommendations and highlights the need for additional coordination. It emphasizes the Program Administrators' responsibility to file complete and accurate Three-Year Plans by the statutory deadline, while noting that future GHG emissions goals will be set earlier to avoid timing challenges.

re that the Statewide Plan development process is sufficiently transparent to ensure that stakeholders are made aware of any significant revisions from the draft to final Statewide Plan. During prior three-year energy efficiency planning c...

AI summary The document discusses the development process of the Statewide Plan and highlights concerns about its transparency and timeliness. While collaboration with the Council and stakeholders is supported, the process has not resolved all issues in a timely manner, impacting the Program Administrators' ability to submit complete and accurate plans.

this collaboration, in relation to the filing deadline with the Department, negatively impacts the ability of the Program Administrators to develop and present a complete, accurate, and reviewable Three-Year Plan filing, including quality...

AI summary The document discusses challenges faced by Program Administrators in meeting filing deadlines due to ongoing collaboration with the Department, DOER, and the Council. Late discussions impact the ability to prepare a complete Three-Year Plan filing and stakeholder engagement. The Department requires a final written response to the Council’s recommendations within 45 days.

shall include a summary of each Council recommendation or comment, and specify whether and how the Program Administrators intend to address the issue in the Three-Year Plans. The Program Administrators also shall include a description of a...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for Program Administrators to address Council recommendations and comments in the Three-Year Plans, including program design changes and limitations on further modifications after submitting responses. It also highlights the Department's limited 90-day review period for these plans.

0-day review. As much as the Program Administrators require sufficient time to finalize the Three-Year Plans before they are filed with the Department, they also must be able to 33 The Department will also meet with the Council’s consultan...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) is coordinating with Program Administrators to finalize and file Three-Year Plans, while also managing the increased workload of reviewing these plans. The Program Administrators have filed multiple motions for extensions of time to respond to discovery and record requests.

Time to Respond to DPU-Comm 3-2, DPU-Comm 3-7, DPU-Comm 3-15, and DPU-Comm 3-16 (November 18, 2021); D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129, Program Administrators’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Department’s Third Set of Comm...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) is requesting that Program Administrators not use participation in Council meetings as a reason for delaying responses to discovery and record requests. The DPU emphasizes the need for timely responses to ensure an efficient adjudicatory process within the 90-day review period for the Three-Year Plans.

e of those costs. D.P.U. 15-120 through D.P.U. 15-122, at 181 (2018). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 131 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 118 Plans. Accordingly, prior to implementation, NSTAR El...

AI summary The Department requires electric Program Administrators to file proposed EV load management offerings for review and approval prior to implementation, citing discrepancies in the Compact's submissions. Other ADR offerings are approved.

lementation. After review, with the exception of the proposed EV load management measure, the Department approves the electric Program Administrators’ proposed ADR offerings. The Department addresses the proposed solar PV inverter measure...

AI summary The Department approves most ADR offerings from the Compact except for EV load management. Specific requirements are imposed on the Compact regarding distribution system coordination with NSTAR Electric, as the existing agreement has expired and no new agreement has been executed. The Compact is prohibited from conducting ADR offerings until a new agreement is in place.

tion Management Committee will provide oversight of the EM&V activities (Statewide Plan, Exh 1, at 177-178). The Program Administrators have demonstrated that their proposed EM&V framework is appropriate in terms of funding, scope, oversig...

AI summary The document discusses the oversight of EM&V activities by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, approval of an EM&V framework, and the requirement for potential studies aligned with the Climate Act and EEA Secretary’s Goal Letter. The Department finds the proposed framework consistent with guidelines and approves its implementation.

ng of beneficial data/information and the minimization of administrative costs. D.P.U. 20-150-A at 12 n.9. The Department further directed the Program Administrators to include testimony in the Three-Year Plan filings describing a formal,...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) directed Program Administrators to provide a formal process for handling Council data requests, but they submitted a draft proposal that had not been reviewed by the Council. The formal proposal was submitted over five weeks after the close of the record and only eleven days before the Department was required to issue an Order, preventing adequate review.

six Key Performance Indicators currently reported for the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 165 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 152 term and the equity-related Key Perfor...

AI summary The document discusses the requirement for Program Administrators to minimize administrative costs in their Three-Year Plans and Term Reports, referencing General Laws and the need for approval of the Council Data Request Process before recovering such costs.

3.4.4. Finally, the Department is concerned about the Program Administrators’ apparent disregard for the AESC Study group process, which resulted in a last-minute revision to the Statewide Plan mere weeks before the Three-Year Plans’ filin...

AI summary The Department is concerned that the Program Administrators and AESC Study group made last-minute changes to the Statewide Plan, bypassing a previously endorsed process that ensures accurate assumptions of avoided costs for GHG emissions reductions. This undermines the credibility of the findings in the Supplemental Study.

of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 175 Program Administrators provide recalculated BCR screening models using the AESC Study-derived $128 per short ton social value of GHG emissions reductions (Tr. 2, at 288-290). The data the...

AI summary The Department of Energy Resources (DOER) evaluates the Program Administrators' recalculated BCR models and social value of GHG emissions reductions. It finds that the revised social value, derived from a non-peer-reviewed literature review, does not justify increasing the Three-Year Plans' benefits from $9.2 billion to $12.9 billion without additional quantitative support.

02 Administrators claim that the exclusion of these benefits provides an incentive for them to pursue strategic electrification (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 26; Tr. 3, at 421-422). The Department is not persuaded by the Program Admin...

AI summary The Department rejects the Program Administrators' proposal to exclude marginal abatement cost benefits from the savings component, arguing that the current design avoids perverse incentives and aligns with the Green Communities Act. The standard component is seen as consistent across all programs and similar to previous three-year plans.

ty that could be reinvested into their systems between rate cases. Revenue decoupling removed the disincentive to reduce load. D.P.U. 07-50-A at 27-28, 32-33, 87. Full revenue decoupling separates a distribution company’s revenues from all...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy policy changes on revenue decoupling, noting that the Energy Act of 2018 has altered the premise behind its adoption. It references the Green Communities Act and the benefits of demand-reducing measures, citing past decisions and regulatory orders.

ril 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 249 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 236 X. RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION SERVICES A. Introduction The RCS statute, G.L. c. 164 App., §§ 2-1 to 2-10, was promulgated in 1980 and provi...

AI summary The document discusses the Residential Conservation Services (RCS) statute and the incorporation of RCS filings into Three-Year Plans under the Energy Act of 2012. It mentions the introduction of energy scorecards as part of residential in-home energy assessments starting in 2019, but notes that they were not included in the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans.

1-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 257 proposed enhancements to the Statewide Plan requires the Department to protect ratepayer interests. b. Cape and Vineyard Electrification Offering The Department received comments from several intervenor...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources (DOER) has rejected a proposed Cape and Vineyard Electrification Offering (CVEO) due to funding inconsistencies with state laws. The CVEO was previously rejected in D.P.U. 20-40-A and is now deemed inconsistent with G.L. c. 25, §§ 19 and 21, which require energy efficiency and demand reduction resources in the Statewide Plan.

lectric customers who have opted out of the Compact’s municipal aggregation program. G.L. c. 25, §§ 19(a), 21(b)-(d); G.L. c. 164, § 134(b); Cape Light Compact, D.T.E. 00-47-C (2001). 168 National Grid (gas) provides gas distribution servi...

AI summary The text discusses overlapping service areas between National Grid (gas) and the Cape Light Compact on Cape Cod, leading to challenges in serving mutual customers. The two entities have had unsuccessful negotiations on energy efficiency solutions, and the matter remains unresolved in D.P.U. 16-169.

keted as D.P.U. 16-169. That docket remains open and a final resolution of these issues will occur there. Below, the Department addresses the service of Mutual Customers by National Grid (gas) and the Compact during the interim period. 2....

AI summary The text discusses the administration of energy efficiency programs by the Compact and National Grid (gas) for Mutual Customers, highlighting concerns about potential subsidization of gas services using electric efficiency funds. An interim agreement was filed in December 2015 to address joint administration of these services.

continuing this practice, as proposed by the Compact for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan term, will result in customer choice and not confusion (Compact Supplemental Reply Brief at 2). 4. Analysis and Findings As the Department has previousl...

AI summary The text discusses the complexity of providing energy efficiency services to mutual customers under overlapping service territories of National Grid (gas) and the Compact. It references past orders emphasizing the need for consistency and coordination in energy service delivery, particularly in areas with overlapping service territories.

group [of] municipalities. This will not prevent said municipality or municipalities from applying to the Massachusetts clean energy technology center for additional funds. G.L. c. 164, § 134(b). 180 Pursuant to the Green Communities Act,...

AI summary The text discusses the requirement for a fully reconciling funding mechanism (EES) under the Green Communities Act and references ongoing regulatory matters related to the Compact's energy efficiency proposals and allocation methods for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan term. It also notes the need to resolve tensions between the Compact's view of its Governing Board's discretion and the Department's ratemaking principles.

method. The Department’s precedent regarding costs shared between or among related entities often involves the same costs at issue in the Compact’s filings: apportioning rent and insurance when operating out of a single facility, employees...

AI summary The text discusses the Department's precedent for allocating shared costs among related entities, citing examples such as rent, insurance, and overhead. It references past cases and rulings from the Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) and highlights the importance of cost-effective and nondiscriminatory allocation methods, as seen in cases involving Aquarion Water Company and Oxford Water Company.

to apportion shared costs under these circumstances, the Department must now consider whether 2021 is an appropriately representative period upon which to set allocation factors for the 186 In its 2022 EES filing, the Compact stated that t...

AI summary The Department is evaluating whether using 2021 as the representative year for cost allocation in the Compact's 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan is reasonable, given the rigorous process of preparing such filings and the potential for higher employee hours in development years.

015 Three-Year Plans, Order on Motions for Interim Continuation (2012); 2010-2012 Three-Year Plans, Order on Motions for Interim Continuation (2009). In order to ensure the continuity of energy efficiency programs in the future and to obvi...

AI summary The document discusses the continuation of energy efficiency and RCS programs by Program Administrators until the Department completes its review of the 2025-2027 Three-Year Plans. It references past orders and emphasizes the need for cost-effective resource acquisition in the Three-Year Plans.

/b/a Eversource Energy (“NSTAR Gas”), the Towns of Aquinnah, Barnstable, Bourne, Brewster, Chatham, Chilmark, Dennis, Eastham, Edgartown, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Oak Bluffs, Orleans, Provincetown, Sandwich, Tisbury, Truro, Wellfleet, W...

AI summary This text lists entities approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) in a regulatory proceeding, including various utility companies and towns forming the Cape Light Compact JPE. It includes references to multiple docket numbers (D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129) and mentions the filing date of April 29, 2022.

st Tisbury, and Yarmouth, and Dukes County, acting together as the Cape Light Compact JPE (“Compact”), Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company, d/b/a Unitil (Electric Division) (“Unitil (electric)”), Massachusetts Electric Company and Nan...

AI summary This document is a regulatory order issued by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) requiring several utility companies to comply with directives outlined in the order. The order includes signatures from the Chair and Commissioners of the NSUARB.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan between E1 and NS Power. The document outlines E1's non-confidential replies to regulatory information requests.

22 Page 3 of 3 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Bo...

AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding its application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

24 Page 2 of 2 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Bo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responded to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the methodology for calculating carbon savings intensities and the availability of data for IRP scenarios. E1 noted that required data from NS Power was not provided.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan between E1 and NS Power. The document outlines E1's non-confidential replies to regulatory information requests.

demand response. 23 Additionally, demand response will be subject to third-party evaluation with these results 24 included in E1’s annual evaluation results filed with the NSUARB. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-29 Page 3 of 3 M1...

AI summary The document outlines that demand response will be evaluated by third parties, with results included in E1’s annual evaluations submitted to the NSUARB. It references an application by E1 for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and NS Power for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

ly no natural gas efficiency programs in Alabama. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last Updated: June 2017 ","In Docket 31...

AI summary Alabama lacks natural gas efficiency programs and has no Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS). The APSC mandates integrated resource plans (IRP) every three years, with the last submission in 2013. Alabama Power's low-income pilot is not sustained, and no cost-effectiveness exceptions exist for low-income programs. Rate recovery is permitted for cost-effective energy efficiency initiatives.

state has one research center focused on energy efficiency. ","Financial Incentive information for Alaska is provided by the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE Alaska). Last Updated: July 2017 ","We were unab...

AI summary The text references Alaska's energy efficiency policies, including Senate Bill 220 requiring public building retrofits and ASHRAE compliance, DSIRE's role in providing financial incentives, and a statute mandating utility data disclosure for residential buildings. It also notes gaps in equity metrics and workforce development in energy plans.

dition, all state-funded buildings constructed after February 11, 2005 must achieve LEED Silver certification and meet the energy standards of ASHRAE 90.1-2004 as mandated by Executive Order 2005-05. Last Updated: September 2019 "," Baseli...

AI summary Arizona mandates LEED Silver certification and ASHRAE 90.1-2004 standards for state-funded buildings post-2005. Utilities are involved in code compliance, with credit for energy savings. CHP systems are eligible under EERS. The Arizona Corporation Commission initiated interconnection standards for distributed generation, with draft rules pending finalization.

ments for the quantity and quality of new jobs created. If approved, businesses may be eligible for income tax credits or property tax incentives. These incentives will be expire on December 31, 2019. Last Updated: August 2017 ",8.5 out of...

AI summary Arizona's energy efficiency programs, mandated by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), require investor-owned utilities to achieve specific savings targets. APS and TEP must meet 1.3% annual savings, while rural cooperatives aim for 75% of this standard. SRP, a public utility, also offers efficiency programs. The ACC approved modified IRPs in 2022, extending energy efficiency requirements.

: April 2022 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost test Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: utility cost test, participant cost test, ratepayer impact measure test The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy...

AI summary Arkansas evaluates energy efficiency programs using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) as the primary cost-effectiveness test, alongside the Utility Cost Test (UCT), Participant Cost Test (PCT), and Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM). The Arkansas Public Service Commission (APSC) mandates independent evaluations and compliance with the Arkansas Technical Reference Manual (TRM). The state also aligns its practices with the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM).

ergy benefits (NEBs) for low-income customers. Arkansas recently conducted a review of their current practices to assess its alignment with principles of the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM). Further information on cost-effectivene...

AI summary Arkansas has implemented the Arkansas Weatherization Program (AWP) following regulatory approvals in 2007 and subsequent extensions. The program was created after failed attempts in the early 2000s and was later standardized in 2014. There are no specific spending or savings requirements for low-income energy efficiency programs.

s Fund within their IRPs. Last Updated: August 2018 ","Summary: Cumulative electricity savings of 4,300 GWh by 2030 (equal to approximately 30% of forecast electricity sales, or 1.4% annual savings). Hawaii’s renewable portfolio standard (...

AI summary Hawaii's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates increasing renewable energy usage, with energy efficiency and combined heat and power contributing up to 50% until 2014. After 2015, energy efficiency savings will count toward the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS), aiming for 4,300 GWh in savings by 2030. The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) is responsible for setting interim goals and rules for the EEPS.

se utilities are using formula rates that adjust every year based on actual costs and actual sales in the previous years. The formula rate is in effect until December 31, 2022 per 220 ILCS 5/16-108.5. Illinois Public Act 99-0906 was passed...

AI summary The text discusses formula rates in Illinois that adjust annually based on actual costs and sales, with an expiration date of December 31, 2022. It also outlines the Illinois Public Act 99-0906, which introduced shareholder incentives for energy efficiency, effective January 1, 2018. The Commission has established guidelines for third-party access to energy data, referencing multiple dockets and sections of the Illinois Public Utilities Act.

Michigan Power Company (I&M), Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL), NIPSCO, and Vectren. While some of these utilities have had programs for over a decade, they have historically been relatively small. In 2007, the state’s regulators, utilit...

AI summary The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) mandated the expansion of energy efficiency programs by regulated electric utilities in 2007, leading to the creation of Energizing Indiana. This statewide program was implemented in 2012 and included both core and Core Plus programs, while many non-jurisdictional utilities opted not to participate.

3, 2016; NIPSCO Cause No. 44634 Final Order Dec. 30, 2015; Indiana Michigan Power Company Cause No. 43827 DSM 5 Order June 22, 2016; and Indianapolis Power and Light Co. Cause No. 44792 Dec. 28, 2016. Performance incentives may be approved...

AI summary The text discusses the approval of performance incentives in Indiana, noting that while the Commission may approve such incentives, none have been approved yet. It references a final order from IPL in Cause No. 44792, which outlines statutory provisions limiting the Commission's ability to enforce energy efficiency goals and the conditions under which performance incentives can be approved.

eneration from CHP (in terms of kWh production) that apply to all forms of CHP. Last Updated: July 2018 ","There are currently no state policies that provide additional incentives for CHP deployment. Last Updated: July 2018 ","In 2012 the...

AI summary Louisiana has no state-level incentives for CHP deployment, but House Resolution 167 encourages CHP in critical facilities. Energy efficiency programs, like Energy Smart by Entergy New Orleans, began in 2011, and the LPSC approved quick-start energy efficiency rules in 2013. Phase Two programs are being developed, with budgets and savings details available in State Spending and Savings Tables.

ber 2020 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost test Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: utility cost test, participant cost test, ratepayer impact measure test The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy eff...

AI summary Louisiana's energy efficiency programs are evaluated using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test as the primary cost-effectiveness measure, with the Utility Cost Test (UCT), Participant Cost Test (PCT), and Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM) as secondary tests. The Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC) requires these evaluations but does not have specific legal requirements for low-income programs.

d cumulative savings over the next decade. Last reviewed: April 2022 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: none The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency prog...

AI summary Massachusetts evaluates energy efficiency programs using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test, guided by legislative mandates like the Green Communities Act of 2008 and regulatory orders such as DPU 8-50-A. The state's approach includes assessing both energy and non-energy benefits, including health and economic impacts, and uses an electronic Technical Reference Manual for evaluation methods.

gy Efficiency: The First Fuel for a Clean Energy Future; Resources for Meeting Maryland's Electricity Needs. In 2017, ACEEE published a report on the benefits of Maryland's Energy Efficiency programs. Last Updated: July 2018 ","The EmPower...

AI summary The document discusses Maryland's Energy Efficiency programs, including the EmPower Maryland Energy Efficiency Act of 2008, which required utilities to achieve electricity use reduction and peak demand reduction goals. It outlines the regulatory process, including filings and approvals by the Maryland Public Service Commission, and the implementation of smart meters by various utilities.

rder No. 87082, issued in July 2015, directed the Limited-Income Work Group to consider and develop a recommended post-2015 goal for the EmPOWER limited-income programs no later than February 1, 2016. In February 2016, the Work Group relea...

AI summary Order No. 87082, issued in 2015, directed the Limited-Income Work Group to develop a post-2015 goal for EmPOWER limited-income programs. In 2016, the group released a report without consensus on a recommendation. Order No. 88964 from 2018 directed the group and DHCD to report on limited-income participation and savings in EmPOWER by 2019.

System Planning Committee, with recommnedations from that committee to the Public Utilities Commission as to whether non-wires alternatives are eligilbe. CHP is an eligible project to be considered. Last Updated: July 2019 ","There are som...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and combined heat and power (CHP) policies in Vermont, including tax exemptions and renewable energy standards. It also highlights Vermont's leadership in energy efficiency through the creation of an energy efficiency utility and the role of the PUC in setting budgets for energy efficiency programs.

incremental savings totaling 357,400 MWh over 2018-2020, or approximately 2.4% of annual sales. Natural gas - Three-year annual incremental savings of 192,599 Mcf spanning 2018-2020, or 0.5% of sales. Vermont does not have traditional EERS...

AI summary Vermont's energy efficiency programs focus on incremental savings in electricity and natural gas, with no traditional EERS legislation. Instead, the PUC sets budgets and goals every three years through a Demand Resource Plan proceeding, with compensation tied to performance. The EEU structure is reviewed every six years, and the administrator may be replaced if goals are not met.

r integration of forecasting (EEU Structure Docket 7466). Every 6 years there is a performance review for the three EEUs to determine if each appointment should be extended for an additional 6 years. In addition to the EEU Structure the st...

AI summary The document discusses the structure and performance review cycle of Energy Efficiency Utilities (EEUs) in Vermont, the Renewable Energy Standard (Act 56) requiring distribution utilities to reduce fossil fuel use, and the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs under legislative and regulatory frameworks.

ainties in how the pandemic would affect tax revenue led to statewide budget freezes. With no funding to support trainings or resource development there was no action taken on code education in 2020. Last reviewed: July 2021 ",,"The state...

AI summary Due to uncertainties in pandemic-related tax revenue, Michigan implemented budget freezes, halting code education efforts in 2020. The state has an interconnection standard for CHP systems, which are eligible under the renewable energy standard, but there are no state policies to acquire energy savings or provide incentives for CHP deployment.

U-16302, U-16303, U-16736, U-17281, U-17601). The Commission also approved a performance incentive for SEMCO Gas (U-17362) and Indiana Michigan Power Company (U-17353) for program years 2014 and 2015. PA 295 (2008) contained two provisions...

AI summary The Commission approved performance incentives for several utilities, including SEMCO Gas and Indiana Michigan Power Company, for program years 2014 and 2015. PA 295 (2008) allowed utilities to capitalize energy efficiency program costs and earn performance incentives for exceeding annual energy savings targets. The MPSC updated its administrative rules in 2017 regarding data privacy and accessibility.

and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Passage of the Missouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act in 2009 marked the beginning of a new era for customer energy efficiency programs in Missouri. MEEIA Cycle 1 programs ended December 3...

AI summary The Missouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act (MEEIA) of 2009 established a framework for electric utility investment in demand-side management. It mandates the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) to approve cost-effective demand-side programs and aligns with revised Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) rules that evaluate demand-side and supply-side measures equally. MEEIA Cycle 2 programs were implemented in 2016 and are set to terminate by 2019.

ed in the California Standard Practice Manual. These are the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and utility cost test (UCT). The benefit-cost tests are required for portfolio and total program level screening. According to the Database of State Eff...

AI summary The text discusses Missouri's use of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) as its primary benefit-cost test for energy efficiency programs, including non-energy benefits. It also mentions the approval of technical reference manuals for Ameren Missouri and KCP&L, and the development of a statewide TRM for gas and electric measures, which has not yet been approved by the Missouri Public Service Commission. Natural gas utilities use all five cost effectiveness tests as governed by specific regulations.

energy and/or demand savings for programs are determined through retrospective net-to-gross EM&V performed by each utility’s independent EM&V contractors and reviewed by the Commission’s EM&V auditor. In October 2017, the Commission promul...

AI summary The document outlines the process for determining energy and demand savings through retrospective net-to-gross EM&V conducted by utility contractors and reviewed by the Commission's auditor. It also references regulatory changes in October 2017, including the promulgation and revision of CSR regulations related to demand-side programs and investment mechanisms.

Bonneville Power Administration. Consequently, that part of the state is also included in the activities of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. The most recent budgets for energy effic...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency regulations and programs in Montana, referencing the repeal of a section of Montana Code Annotated and the requirement for utilities to file demand-side management reports. It also mentions the absence of an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard and the cost-effectiveness tests used for evaluating energy efficiency programs.

s goals in Docket Nos. 17-07011 and 17-08023. In 2013, the legislature voted to phase out this energy efficiency allowance in order to effectively increase the requirement for new renewable energy. In June 2017, SB 150 was signed into law...

AI summary Nevada's energy efficiency programs are governed by statute and regulatory orders, requiring measurable and verifiable evaluations (M&V) for program recovery. The legislature phased out an energy efficiency allowance in 2013, and SB 150 in 2017 directed the PUCN to set annual energy savings goals and performance-based incentives for NV Energy.

s, within five years of implementation of their energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs, and until such time as all cost-effective energy efficiency is achieved in each utility territory. Following many months of work by stakh...

AI summary The Board of Public Utilities (BPU) has set ambitious energy efficiency and peak demand reduction targets, transitioning utilities to a more central role in program delivery and establishing performance-based recovery mechanisms. These changes were outlined in a June 2020 Order, aiming to increase annual electric and gas savings beyond previous goals set by the Clean Energy Act.

% of 2005 total retail kWh sales by 2014 and 8% of 2005 total retail kWh sales by 2020. This was later updated in 2019 by HB 291 to call for 5% savings relative to 2020 retail sales between 2021-2025. Program costs are 3% of customer bills...

AI summary The Efficient Use of Energy Act (EUEA) mandates that public utilities develop cost-effective energy efficiency and load management resources. The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) updated its rules in 2014 to implement these requirements, with utilities required to file annual applications and reports. Program costs are limited to 3% of customer bills for electric utilities and 3% of total annual revenues for gas utilities.

ity territories to enhance achievement of its targets as well. The amount for which each utility is eligible is based on its proportional share of the utilities’ aggregate targets by the end of 2015. In 2014, New York initiated a proceedin...

AI summary New York's energy efficiency initiatives, including the 2014 REV proceeding (Case 14-M-0101), led to Energy Efficiency Transition Implementation Plans (ETIPs) and energy efficiency earning adjustment mechanisms (EAMs) developed during rate case proceedings. Third-party access to energy use data is not mandated, though Con Edison provides aggregated data to property owners and NYSERDA for program evaluation.

2424864, for details on DR and EE, respectively). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. For further reading, in May 2009, as pa...

AI summary Pennsylvania utilities have expanded energy efficiency and demand response programs since the enactment of Act 129 in 2008, which established the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (EERS). Utilities file energy efficiency plans with the PUC, which may approve, reject, or modify them. Cost-recovery mechanisms and voluntary programs exist for natural gas and electric customers, including low-income households.

stribution companies have submitted voluntary Energy Efficiency & Conservation (EE&C) plans. Last reviewed: June 2020 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost test The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficienc...

AI summary Pennsylvania uses the total resource cost test (TRC) as its primary method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs. The TRC includes non-energy benefits like water and fossil fuel savings but excludes other non-electric benefits such as health, economic development, and energy security. Evaluations are conducted by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission using a Technical Reference Manual.

urement mandate, National Grid is required to participate in strategic long-term planning and invest in all energy efficiency that is cost-effective and cheaper than supply on behalf of its customers. The act also established requirements...

AI summary Rhode Island's EERS policy mandates strategic long-term planning and energy efficiency procurement by utilities like National Grid. Utilities must submit 3-year and annual plans with spending and savings goals, reviewed annually by the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission. Energy efficiency cost-effectiveness is evaluated using state-specific tests, with deemed savings and technical reference materials provided by utilities.

grams produce through a shared savings mechanism. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last Updated: June 2020 ","South Caroli...

AI summary South Carolina's investor-owned utilities are required to file integrated resource plans with the S.C. Public Service Commission. Energy efficiency and demand-side management programs are available but not mandated. Act 62, passed in 2019, promotes consumer choice, renewable energy expansion, and greater transparency, while empowering the Public Service Commission and encouraging competition from small power producers.

g Practices (DSESP), a resource of the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP). Last Reviewed: January 2020 ","Requirements for State and Utility Support of Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs No specific required spending or saving...

AI summary South Dakota does not have specific spending or savings requirements for low-income energy efficiency programs, and coordination with WAP services is unclear. Lost revenue adjustments are used by utilities, with mechanisms approved by the Public Utilities Commission. Performance incentives are in place, using fixed percentages to cover lost revenues from energy efficiency programs. No policy mandates the release of energy use data to customers or third parties.

by December 31, 2009 (Texas House Bill 3693). The legislation also required utilities to submit energy savings goals. The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) approved these rules in March 2008. While the 2007 legislation required uti...

AI summary Texas legislation and regulatory actions, including Senate Bill 1125 and PUCT orders, establish energy savings goals and cost caps for utilities. The PUCT uses the utility cost test as the primary cost-effectiveness test for evaluating ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs.

requirements for annual reporting PacifiCorp are articulated in Docket No. 17-035-04. The PSC’s formal requirements for evaluation for Dominion are articulated in Docket Nos. 05-057-T01 and 07-057-05. Utah uses four of the five classic ben...

AI summary The document outlines the regulatory requirements for energy efficiency programs in Utah, including the use of benefit-cost tests and the support provided by Rocky Mountain Power for low-income weatherization services through partnerships with state agencies.

/load management programs and STEP programs approved by the PSC and managed by PacifiCorp. Charges for these programs appear on customer bills as a line item labeled Customer Energy Services and Step. On October 5, 2006, Questar Gas, now D...

AI summary The document discusses load management and STEP programs managed by PacifiCorp and approved by the PSC, as well as Dominion Energy Utah's Conservation Enabling Tariff (CET) and Demand-Side Management (DSM) Pilot Program. It includes details on rebate programs and legislative support for efficiency initiatives, such as 2009 HJR 9 and HB 307 from 2019.

d reduction are certified to utilities with future evaluation by the Commission to take place in a later proceeding. The method has not been specified. Approximately 20 large customers have opted out. Last Updated: October 2018 ","In Case...

AI summary The text outlines policies related to energy efficiency and demand response in West Virginia, noting the absence of requirements for utilities to release energy use data. It also discusses transit legislation from 2013, including the Complete Streets Act, and the lack of policies for transportation and land use integration or VMT targets.

was approved by the Joint Finance Committee of the state legislature, the state limited funding to Focus on Energy to 1.2% of revenues, which resulted in a major reduction in energy efficiency goals. The Commission in May 2018 set four-yea...

AI summary The Joint Finance Committee limited Focus on Energy's funding to 1.2% of revenues, reducing energy efficiency goals. The Commission set four-year savings targets for 2019-2022, using lifecycle terms. Wisconsin's evaluation of energy efficiency programs is guided by Act 141 and PSC Chapter 137, with an independent evaluator required for annual evaluations.

2023-2025. 11 12 Response IR-02: 13 14 (a) Please refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to NSUARB IR–18 part (a). 15 16 (b) Please refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to NSUARB IR-19 part (a). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (SBA) IR-02 Page 1 of...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) refers to prior responses in its application (M10473) for approval of a 2023-2025 DSM Plan supply agreement with NS Power, addressing Small Business Advocate (SBA) information requests IR-02(a) and IR-02(b).

on Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-09: 2 3 Please refer to the EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, Section 6.2....

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responded to the Small Business Advocate's (SBA) request regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, stating that carbon emission reductions were not a primary design objective, but avoided carbon emissions were considered in scenario modeling and cost-effectiveness testing at the direction of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB).

on Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 Please provide the answers to the following questions regarding individual...

AI summary E1 responds to the Small Business Advocate's request regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, explaining that the model includes program costs and cannot confirm if all measures pass TRC and PAC tests without reconfiguring the model. The Settlement Plan meets the NSUARB's requirement for TRC ratios above 1.0 at the program level.

that all 26 Programs with the DSM have TRC ratios greater than 1.0. The Settlement Plan exceeds this 27 minimum requirement. The use of individual measures with TRC ratios <1.0 in the Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (SBA) IR-16 Page 1 of 2 M...

AI summary The document discusses the development of Demand Side Management (DSM) programs with TRC ratios greater than 1.0, as approved by the NSUARB, providing E1 with greater program design flexibility for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan.

collaboratively on the launch of DR pilots, the Base DR investment and demand savings appear to be too aggressive and it would be challenging for E1 to ramp up to that level by 2025. (b) E1 used the 2020 IRP as the most recent IRP to infor...

AI summary E1 is concerned that the Base DR investment and demand savings targets in the DSM Plan are too aggressive to achieve by 2025. E1 used the 2020 IRP to inform the 2023-2025 DSM Plan but expects a more appropriate IRP scenario with NS Power's 2020 IRP update. E1 is involved in the 2022 IRP update and will develop an Electrification Plan based on NS Power's Electrification Strategy, with stakeholder engagement through the DSMAG.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary This document outlines an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, and the establishment of a final agreement and a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. The Board held a public hearing and issued a decision on August 12, 2015, followed by a compliance filing and comments from intervenors.

Between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne Effective Date - January 1, 2016

AI summary This document outlines a regulatory proceeding between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne, effective from January 1, 2016. It likely involves discussions around energy efficiency programs, regulatory oversight, and related matters.

5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...

AI summary EfficiencyOne must notify NSPI of Significant Changes simultaneously with applying to the UARB for approval. NSPI may then submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes under the Act.

19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION - 19.1 In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties...

AI summary The dispute resolution process under the Agreement outlines steps for resolving disputes between EfficiencyOne and NSPI, including initial discussions and referral to the UARB if unresolved. EfficiencyOne is required to continue fulfilling the EECA unless directed otherwise by the UARB.

- 20.2 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in the event this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 20.1(a), EfficiencyOne shall: - (a) Immediately return all monies paid on account of the Contract Price whic...

AI summary This section outlines the conditions for default and termination under the agreement, including the obligation of EfficiencyOne to return unspent funds and provide transition assistance upon termination. It also defines an Event of Default, including breaches, assignments, bankruptcies, and other legal proceedings.

23. ASSIGNMENT 23.1 Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires.

AI summary This section of the agreement outlines that neither party can assign all or any part of the agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister.

25. COORDINATION MEETINGS AND REPORTS - 25.1 During the Term of this Agreement, EfficiencyOne shall prepare and deliver to the UARB and NSPI a quarterly report (the "Quarterly Report") in a form acceptable to the UARB. - 25.2 EfficiencyOne...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to provide quarterly and annual reports to the UARB and NSPI, detailing the progress of the EECA, financial statements, and evaluation reports. Regular coordination meetings are mandated to ensure effective planning and alignment between EfficiencyOne and NSPI.

26. GENERAL - 26.1 This Agreement shall only be renewed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. - 26.2 This Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the...

AI summary This section outlines the general terms of the agreement, including its renewal conditions, binding nature, governance by Nova Scotia law, and the role of EfficiencyOne as an independent contractor. It also addresses the enforceability of the agreement, language requirements, and execution procedures.

(PAGE 1 OF 2) - I. UARB-APPROVED PERFORMANCE TARGETS. THRESHOLDS. AND INDICATORS- - a) Performance Targets and Thresholds: - i. Performance Targets are set over the three-year contract period, rather than annually. - ii. EfficiencyOne is d...

AI summary The document outlines performance targets, thresholds, and indicators established by the UARB for EfficiencyOne under a Consensus Agreement dated June 16, 2015. EfficiencyOne must achieve at least 90% of two performance targets—cumulative annual energy savings and cumulative annual peak demand savings—to be considered in substantial compliance. Failure to meet these targets triggers a regulatory process.

1. INTRODUCTION 1 2 3 4 5 The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan has been developed based on ENS's growing experience and history in delivering successful DSM programs and services to Nova Scotians. As part ofthe process,...

AI summary The 2016-2018 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan is developed by ENS with input from consulting firms, aiming to provide a comprehensive suite of programs and services for Nova Scotia electricity users. The Plan balances affordability, rate impacts, and long-term planning, and complies with the UARB's 2015 Decision. It outlines investment amounts and revised targets for achieving energy and demand savings.

7) Resolution Process a) if consensus is not achieved on any of the above items to be addressed within the DSM Advisory Group, such items will be presented to the UARB for determination not later than June 30th, 2016.

AI summary If consensus is not reached within the DSM Advisory Group on any items to be addressed, those items will be submitted to the UARB for determination by June 30th, 2016.

2023-2025 DSM IG IR-1 Attachment 2 has been filed electronically.

AI summary Attachment 2 of the 2023-2025 DSM IG IR-1 has been submitted electronically as part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding.

Response IR-3: (a) Please refer to the Attachment 1 for the rate increases with the inclusion of the NS Power assumed spending of $41 million for 2022 (reflected in the Company's recent General Rate Application (GRA) Plan) spending applied...

AI summary NS Power outlines assumed spending for 2022-2024, including EfficiencyOne's DSM costs, contingent on NSUARB approval of the GRA and DSM Supply Agreement. If approved DSM costs exceed revenue requirement figures, NS Power may seek adjustments.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OFAN APPLICATION BY EFFICIENCYONE (E1) TO THE NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD FOR APPROVAL OF A SUPPLY AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICITY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES BETWEEN E1 AND...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and approval of a 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. Brian Gifford provided direct evidence on behalf of the Affordable Energy Coalition during the proceeding.

22 Q. HOW SHOULD THIS UNDERCOUNTING OF BENEFITS BE ADDRESSED? 23 A. I support the recommendations of David Hill and further recommend that, if the Board 24 approves a plan, E1 should work with Nova Scotia Power to develop an updated set of...

AI summary The testimony recommends aligning avoided costs with current legislation and IRP assumptions, updating cost-effectiveness results, adopting a Settlement Plan, setting low-income savings targets, coordinating programs, and revising incentive structures. It emphasizes stakeholder engagement and regulatory alignment to address undercounted benefits in DSM initiatives.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT and IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by by EfficiencyOne ("E1") to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board') for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Ele...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. Evidence is submitted by Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, and towns of Antigonish and Mahone Bay, sponsored by Don Regan and Al Dominie.

1 Immediately prior to joining Daymark Energy Advisors, I worked as an independent 21 for the 2022 Annually Adjusted Rates (M10351). 22 • In the Matter of an Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for Approval of the 2022 1 Annual Capital E...

AI summary The testimony discusses concerns raised by the Small Business Advocate (SBA) regarding the impact of EfficiencyOne's 2023-2025 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and Supply Agreement on small businesses. The SBA has been involved in DSM Plan filings and participated in stakeholder discussions on the Plan's development.

LICENSES, TESTIMONY & PRESENTATIONS Licenses Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut

AI summary The document references a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut, indicating a requirement or qualification related to engineering licensure in that jurisdiction.

Expert Testimony FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTER Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Nova Scotia Small Business Advocate Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended Application by NS Power for approval of the 2023 Annual Capital Expe...

AI summary The text lists multiple regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board and other entities, including applications for capital expenditure plans, rate adjustments, and financing structures. These matters involve various stakeholders and legal frameworks, such as the Public Utilities Act.

Evidence of Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi On Behalf of Counsel to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board On the Topic of EfficiencyOne's 2023–2025 DSM Plan > May 20, 2022

AI summary Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi, on behalf of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, presented evidence regarding EfficiencyOne's 2023–2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The proceeding focuses on evaluating the plan's alignment with regulatory standards and energy efficiency goals.

- Agency on quantifying the benefits of clean energy resources and for the U.S. 1 Department of Energy (DOE) on strategic energy management. I have provided 13 M09096 regarding the 2015, 2019, and 2020–2022 DSM plans on behalf of 14 counse...

AI summary The witness provided evidence on behalf of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board regarding EfficiencyOne's 2023–2025 DSM Resource Plan, focusing on the Settlement Plan and offering recommendations to both EfficiencyOne and the Board.

Q. What are your recommendations? - A. We recommend the following: - The Settlement Plan should be approved, with modifications as described below. - The Board should either put more emphasis on the PAC, which should not account for partic...

AI summary The response recommends approving the Settlement Plan with modifications, emphasizing the PAC's neutrality, revising demand response programs, piloting behavioral DR, using EV load forecasts, creating low-income performance metrics, and requiring a research framework. Key entities include E1, NS Power, and NSUARB.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, Decision in M08888, April 15, 2020. 1 On the other hand, the Demand Response program is only marginally cost 2 effective based on the TRC (1.1) and not cost-effective under the PAC (0.7). We 3 discuss...

AI summary The discussion addresses concerns regarding the inclusion of non-electric fuel costs and reduced water costs in the cost-effectiveness analysis of the Demand Response program. It references a prior decision (M08888) which determined that the Board does not have jurisdiction to consider non-energy impacts in such analyses, marking the first application of this finding in the current DSM Plan matter.

TESTIMONY Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Docket No. M-2020-3020824) : Revised Direct Testimony of Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi regarding PPL Electric Utilities' proposed Act 129 Phase IV Energy Efficiency and Conservation. O...

AI summary Testimonies by Alice Napoleon and others in multiple regulatory proceedings across jurisdictions, focusing on energy efficiency, demand-side management (DSM), and infrastructure projects. Testimonies were provided on behalf of organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council and The Utility Reform Network, addressing proposals from utilities and regulatory bodies.

2. Municipal Utilities The MEU submission includes the following recommendation: Finally, with respect to the DSM spending levels proposed in the 2023- 2025 Plan, the MEUs support approval of the amounts requested and as initially and spec...

AI summary MEUs support DSM spending levels in the 2023-2025 Plan and propose allowing wholesale market participants to pay DSM costs directly to E1. NS Power opposes changes to current DSM program evaluation processes, citing legislative and regulatory considerations.

EfficiencyOne's("E1") Application for Approval of the 2023-2025 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities, including Evidence of E1 as holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise, was filed on March 11, 202...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) submitted an application for approval of the 2023-2025 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities, along with evidence of its franchise with Efficiency Nova Scotia. In response to information requests, Synapse Energy Economics and various intervenors, including the NSUARB, Small Business Advocate, and others, filed evidence. E1 is now responding to the evidence submitted by intervenors.

4.4 E1'S ROLE AND VALUE IN DEMAND RESPONSE Industrial Group In his testimony on behalf of the Industrial Group, Mark Drazen stated that while Demand Response is a worthwhile venture, it is essentially a rate design matter and should be han...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues Demand Response is a rate design matter for NS Power, citing limited peak reduction and uncertainty in battery control forecasts. E1 counters that as the independent DSM Administrator, it collaborates with NS Power on Demand Response pilots and that transferring responsibilities to NS Power would not benefit ratepayers, emphasizing legislative mandates under the Public Utilities Act.

1. INTRODUCTION - On March 11, 2022, EfficiencyOne ("E1") filed its Application for Approval of the 2023-2025 Supply - Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. - ("NS Power"), t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) submitted a 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan to the NSUARB, which approved it with adjustments. The plan aimed to expand DSM programs for low-income, Mi'kmaw, and diverse communities, receiving support from NS Power and most intervenors. The NSUARB found the plan reasonable and in customers' best interests.

2. DSM INVESTMENT AND SAVINGS - In its September 6, 2022 Decision[3](#page-3-4) , the NSUARB approved the investment and savings targets contained in - the Settlement Plan, which are presented below in Table 1. M09096, Exhibit 1 (E-1), App...

AI summary The NSUARB approved DSM investment and savings targets from the Settlement Plan, referencing a September 6, 2022 decision. It also cites matters M09096 and M10473, including a 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan application between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., and a 2019 NSUARB decision.

5. CONCLUSION - As part of its Compliance Filing, E1 has provided a redline and clean version of Appendix A inclusive of all - attachments for ease of future reference. Updates from the version filed on March 11, 2022 were made to - Append...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has submitted a Compliance Filing and Supply Agreement in response to the NSUARB's September 6, 2022 decision, including updated versions of Appendix A and its attachments. EfficiencyOne requests approval of the filing.

2 2.2.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES & STRATEGIC GOALS - 3 E1 developed guiding principles and strategic themes to support the development of the Settlement Plan. - 4 The guiding principles, as shown in [Figure 6,](#page-43-2) are related to vision...

AI summary E1 has developed guiding principles and strategic themes to support the development of the Settlement Plan. These principles focus on vision and values, providing a foundational framework that is less subject to change based on emerging issues or market circumstances.

STRATEGIC THEMES The 2020 IRP Reference Plan – demand side resources are planned in support of the successful implementation of a long-term electricity strategy for delivery of safe, reliable, affordable, and clean electricity that is in t...

AI summary The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) emphasizes demand-side management (DSM) as a key strategy for delivering safe, reliable, and clean electricity. It highlights the importance of E1's DSM portfolio in decarbonizing Nova Scotia's economy and outlines the evidence used to develop strategic themes, including past NSUARB decisions and stakeholder feedback. The Settlement Plan aims to reduce customer revenue requirements by leveraging DSM investments.

7.4.3.1 DSM PLAN DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING - DSM Plan development and reporting activities are an essential function of E1's Regulatory Affairs Team. - Through its Enabling Strategies, Regulatory Affairs manages all demand side management re...

AI summary The DSM Plan development and reporting activities are managed by E1's Regulatory Affairs Team, including the creation of the 2026-2028 DSM Resource Plan, coordination with stakeholders, and submission of various reports to the NSUARB, such as quarterly, annual, and financial statements.

8. EVALUATION E1's measurement and evaluation activities are a crucial component of its Regulatory Affairs functions. Through independent, third-party measurement and evaluation processes, E1 is able to stay accountable to its tracked perf...

AI summary E1 emphasizes the importance of evaluation activities in its Regulatory Affairs functions, using third-party processes to ensure accountability and improve EE and DR programs. Evaluation will be conducted annually for each program over three years, with a focus on accurately determining energy and demand savings, similar to the approach taken in the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan.

9.1 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS - In the first quarter of each calendar year, E1 will file an APR with the NSUARB, which will include the - following information: - a summary of the context, activities and milestones achieved in the prior year...

AI summary E1 is required to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the NSUARB each year, detailing achievements, discrepancies, expenditures, and forecasts. Significant changes to the plan, such as adding or terminating programs or altering budget and savings targets by more than 25%, must be reported in advance.

9.2 QUARTERLY REPORTS - E1 will file quarterly reports with the NSUARB for quarters one through three of each year[43](#page-167-4) . The reports - will provide quarterly status updates and service highlights and communicate course adjustm...

AI summary E1 is required to submit quarterly reports to the NSUARB, detailing program performance, mid-course adjustments, and updates on initiatives such as residential behavioral programs and demand response. Reports must align with filing dates and include metrics like energy savings, investment by rate class, and sector highlights.

9.7.2 PERFORMANCE TARGETS & THRESHOLDS - Performance Targets[46](#page-170-2) apply to the period of the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement with NS Power, rather than annually; and - E1 is deemed to be in substantial compliance with the NSUA...

AI summary Performance targets under the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement with NS Power are applied over the agreement period rather than annually. E1 is considered in substantial compliance if it achieves 90% or more of cumulative annual energy and system-peak demand savings targets. If below 90%, the NSUARB may take discretionary action.

8. EVALUATION E1's measurement and evaluation activities are a crucial component of its Regulatory Affairs functions. Through independent, third-party measurement and evaluation processes, E1 is able to stay accountable to its tracked perf...

AI summary E1 emphasizes the importance of independent evaluation in its Regulatory Affairs functions to ensure accountability and improve EE and DR program operations. It plans to use a similar approach to the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, with annual impact evaluations to determine net energy and demand savings and support continuous improvement.

9.7.2 PERFORMANCE TARGETS & THRESHOLDS - Performance Targets[46](#page-23-0) apply to the period of the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement with NS Power, rather than annually; and - E1 is deemed to be in substantial compliance with the NSUAR...

AI summary Performance Targets under the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement with NS Power apply over the agreement's period, not annually. E1 is considered in substantial compliance if it achieves 90% or more of cumulative annual energy and system-peak demand savings targets; otherwise, the NSUARB may take discretionary action.

5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to notify NSPI of Significant Changes at the same time as applying to the UARB for approval. NSPI has the right to submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes.

19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION - 19.1 In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties...

AI summary The dispute resolution clause outlines procedures for resolving conflicts between EfficiencyOne and NSPI, including a 30-day (or 10-day for urgent matters) resolution period, referral to the UARB if unresolved, and a requirement for EfficiencyOne to continue fulfilling the EECA unless directed otherwise by the UARB.

20. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION - 20.1 This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either Party, in whole or in part, upon the happening of one or more of the following events: - (a) EfficiencyOne's Franchise is terminated and the Agreemen...

AI summary Section 20 outlines the conditions under which the Agreement may be terminated by either party, including the termination of EfficiencyOne's franchise or approval by the UARB. Upon termination, neither party is entitled to compensation for consequential losses, and EfficiencyOne must discontinue its activities under the EECA, except for those necessary to preserve ongoing projects.

23. ASSIGNMENT 23.1 Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires.

AI summary This section outlines the conditions under which either party may assign their rights or obligations under the agreement, requiring the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister.

25. COORDINATION MEETINGS AND REPORTS - 25.1 During the Term of this Agreement, EfficiencyOne shall prepare and deliver to the UARB and NSPI a quarterly report (the " Quarterly Report ") in a form acceptable to the UARB. - 25.2 EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to provide quarterly and annual reports to the UARB and NSPI, detailing progress under the EECA, financial statements, and evaluations. The agreement emphasizes the importance of regular coordination meetings between EfficiencyOne and NSPI to ensure effective planning and alignment with the EECA.

5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to notify NSPI of Significant Changes simultaneously with applying to the UARB for approval. NSPI has the right to submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes.

19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION - 19.1 In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties...

AI summary This section outlines the dispute resolution process under the agreement, including initial discussions between senior representatives of EfficiencyOne and NSPI, referral to the UARB if unresolved, and the requirement for EfficiencyOne to continue fulfilling the EECA unless authorized by the UARB to suspend it.

20. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION - 20.1 This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either Party, in whole or in part, upon the happening of one or more of the following events: - (a) EfficiencyOne's Franchise is terminated and the Agreemen...

AI summary Section 20 outlines the conditions under which the Agreement may be terminated by either party, including the termination of EfficiencyOne's Franchise or approval by the UARB. Neither party is entitled to compensation or damages for consequential losses resulting from termination.

23. ASSIGNMENT 23.1 Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires.

AI summary The section outlines that neither party can assign the agreement without prior written approval from the UARB or the Minister, depending on the situation.

25. COORDINATION MEETINGS AND REPORTS - 25.1 During the Term of this Agreement, EfficiencyOne shall prepare and deliver to the UARB and NSPI a quarterly report (the " Quarterly Report ") in a form acceptable to the UARB. - 25.2 EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to provide quarterly and annual reports to the UARB and NSPI, detailing progress on the EECA, financial statements, and evaluation of savings and costs. Regular coordination meetings are mandated to ensure effective planning and alignment with the EECA Plan.

19 20 17 The Performance Targets will be achieved in accordance with the EECA Plan as set out 18 in Schedule E. \ \ \ For certainty, in accordance with the performance requirements set out in Schedule "C" attached hereto, EfficiencyOne sha...

AI summary The Performance Targets will be achieved according to the EECA Plan outlined in Schedule E. Substantial compliance is defined as achieving 90 percent of each Performance Target, with a regulatory process triggered if this threshold is not met.

- 14 Executed and delivered this day of 20__. EfficiencyOne Nova Scotia Power Incorporated By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: 1 2 3 4 SCHEDULE E EECA PLAN 5 6 [Subject to approval by the UARB] 7 8 9 10 - 1 -

AI summary This document contains a schedule related to the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA) plan, subject to approval by the Utility and Ratepayer Board (UARB). It includes signed agreements between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.

(w) " Release " or " Released " means a releasing, adding, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, migrating, dispersing, dispensing, disposing or dumping. (x) " Significant Chan...

AI summary The text defines key terms in a legal agreement involving EfficiencyOne and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), including 'Release,' 'Significant Changes,' and 'Subcontractor.' It references the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act (EECA) and the Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), emphasizing regulatory compliance and approval processes.

5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...

AI summary EfficiencyOne must notify NSPI of significant changes to the EECA Plan simultaneously with submitting an application to the UARB for approval. NSPI retains the right to submit written comments to the UARB on any proposed changes, subject to the Act and UARB's discretion.

10. SUBCONTRACTORS NSPI. 10.1 EfficiencyOne shall be permitted to subcontract the performance of any part of the EECA without the prior written approval of NSPI. - 10.2 Where EfficiencyOne subcontracts any part of the EECA, EfficiencyOne s...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is allowed to subcontract EECA tasks but requires NSPI's prior written approval. EfficiencyOne retains full responsibility for subcontractors' actions, and no direct contractual relationship exists between NSPI and subcontractors.

20. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION - 20.1 This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either Party, in whole or in part, upon the happening of one or more of the following events: - (a) EfficiencyOne's Franchise is terminated and the Agreemen...

AI summary The agreement can be terminated by either party if EfficiencyOne's franchise is terminated without assignment by the Minister or the UARB approves termination. Upon termination, neither party is entitled to compensation, and EfficiencyOne must discontinue EECA activities except those necessary to preserve ongoing projects.

23. ASSIGNMENT 23.1 Neither Party shall assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the UARB and/or the Minister as the situation requires.

AI summary The agreement prohibits either party from assigning it without prior written approval from the UARB and/or the Minister, ensuring regulatory oversight over such transfers.

24. SHARING OF DATA AND INFORMATION - 24.1 EfficiencyOne shall work co-operatively with NSPI to provide NSPI with information and data from time to time in order to assist NSPI with planning and load forecasting as may be reasonably requir...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to share information and data with NSPI to assist with planning and load forecasting, in line with past practices. If a dispute arises, NSPI may seek resolution through the UARB.

7.4.3.1 DSM PLAN DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING - DSM Plan development and reporting activities are an essential function of E1's Regulatory Affairs Team. - Through its Enabling Strategies, Regulatory Affairs manages all demand side management re...

AI summary The document outlines the development and reporting activities related to the DSM Plan by E1's Regulatory Affairs Team, including the creation of the 2026-2028 DSM Resource Plan, collaboration with NS Power and stakeholders, and the submission of various reports to the NSUARB such as quarterly, annual, and evaluation reports.

9.1 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS - In the first quarter of each calendar year, E1 will file an APR with the NSUARB, which will include the - following information: - a summary of the context, activities and milestones achieved in the prior year...

AI summary E1 is required to file an Annual Progress Report (APR) with the NSUARB each year, detailing program performance, expenditures, and savings. The report must include summaries of activities, discrepancies, and forecasts, and notify stakeholders of any significant changes to the plan.

9.2 QUARTERLY REPORTS - E1 will file quarterly reports with the NSUARB for quarters one through three of each year[43](#page-189-4) . The reports - will provide quarterly status updates and service highlights and communicate course adjustm...

AI summary E1 is required to submit quarterly reports to the NSUARB, including updates on DSM program performance, savings targets, mid-course adjustments, and collaboration with NS Power. Reports must be filed by specific dates and include metrics such as investment by rate class, sector highlights, and demand response progress.

9.7.2 PERFORMANCE TARGETS & THRESHOLDS - Performance Targets[46](#page-192-2) apply to the period of the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement with NS Power, rather than annually; and - E1 is deemed to be in substantial compliance with the NSUA...

AI summary Performance targets under the NSUARB-approved Supply Agreement apply over the agreement's period, not annually. E1 is considered substantially compliant if it achieves 90% or more of cumulative annual energy and system-peak demand savings targets. If below 90%, the NSUARB may take discretionary action.

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The following timetable will apply to this matter: Notices of Formal Intervention Tuesday, March 29, 2022 E1 2021 Annual Progress Report and 2021 Thursday, March 31, 2022 Evaluation Report

AI summary The regulatory proceeding outlines a timetable with key dates for Notices of Formal Intervention and the submission of E1's 2021 Annual Progress Report and Evaluation Report.

Information Requests to E1 and NS Power Thursday, April 14, 2022 Responses to IRs from E1 and Power NS April 2022 Friday, 29, of Verification Report Filing Friday, April 2022 29, Verification Report IRs on Friday, May 2022 6, Responses Ver...

AI summary The document outlines key dates and procedures related to information requests and regulatory rules for a proceeding involving E1 and NS Power. It specifies deadlines for submitting responses, verification reports, and evidence, and notes that the Board's Regulatory Rules, including Rule 7(3), apply to the filing process.

EfficiencyOne - DSM Plan 2023-2025 The Board understands that E1 has been developing its application for the upcoming 2023-2025 DSM Plan filing, which included active engagement with participants in the DSM Advisory Group. The Board also u...

AI summary The Board acknowledges EfficiencyOne's (E1) engagement with the DSM Advisory Group for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan and references Section 79J and 79L of the Public Utilities Act. It warns against repeating the delays of the 2016 DSM proceeding (M06733) and expects NS Power to file alternative plans if no joint agreement is reached. The Board anticipates E1's filing by February 28, 2022, and will set a hearing timeline.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] March 4, 2022 File No. 41736-149 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Crystal Henwood, Reg...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests an extension to March 14, 2022, to finalize updates to its 2023-2025 DSM Plan modelling, following alignment with stakeholders including NS Power. The Board previously approved an initial extension to March 4, 2022, after EOne sought to limit contentious issues in the application.

omplete this remodeling is one week. Accordingly, E1 is requesting that the filing date for the 2023 – 2025 DSM Plan Application be extended to March 14, 2022 to allow for the completion of this work. In light of the level of agreement rea...

AI summary EOne requests an extension to March 14, 2022, for filing the 2023–2025 DSM Plan Application, citing time needed for remodeling. They propose a paper process with potential oral hearing if requested, supported by NS Power, Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and Industrial Group representatives to reduce regulatory burden.

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The following timetable will apply to this matter: Notices of Formal Intervention Tuesday, March 29, 2022 E1 2021 Annual Progress Report and 2021 Thursday, March 31, 2022 Evaluation Report

AI summary The document outlines a timetable for the proceeding, specifying deadlines for Notices of Formal Intervention and the submission of E1's 2021 Annual Progress Report and Evaluation Report.

Information Requests to E1 and NS Power Thursday, April 14, 2022 Responses to IRs from E1 and Power NS April 2022 Friday, 29, of Verification Report Filing Friday, April 2022 29, Verification Report IRs on Friday, May 2022 6, Responses Ver...

AI summary This document outlines key dates and procedures related to information requests and regulatory rules for the proceeding involving E1 and NS Power. It emphasizes the application of the Board's Regulatory Rules, particularly Rule 7(3), which sets a deadline for filing documents by 2:00 p.m. on due dates.

- 3. E1 must publish the attached Notice of Hearing in the Halifax Chronicle Herald and the Cape Breton Post in accordance with the following schedule: - Wednesday, March 23, 2022 - Saturday, March 26, 2022 - 4. E1 must post a copy of the...

AI summary E1 is required to publish a Notice of Hearing in two local newspapers and post the Application on its website. The Clerk of the Board will also distribute the Notice of Hearing and publish it on the Board's social media and website.

- Within their closing submissions, NS Power 1 , the Consumer Advocate 2 , the Affordable Energy Coalition 3 , - 3 the Municipal Electric Utilities 4 , and the Small Business Advocate 5 have all confirmed and/or reiterated - 4 their genera...

AI summary The document outlines submissions from various stakeholders regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Settlement Plan, with general support from NS Power, the Consumer Advocate, and others. The Industrial Group has made specific requests to the Board regarding E1's compliance filing, including payback information, justification for measures failing the TRC test, and the use of current Statistics Canada data. E1 opposes these requests.