Topic:"Regulatory Approval Processes" in M12619

bility. These targeted reliability projects include vegetation 26 management, storm hardening and reliability upgrades, targeted device replacements, and 27 grid modernization. 28 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 8 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CO...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan focuses on safety compliance, environmental compliance, and aligning with the coal phase-out and renewable energy goals. It includes projects such as hydro dam safety upgrades, PCB remediation, and grid modernization, and addresses directives from the 2025 ACE Plan Decision.

ed tasks, as suggested by the 22 SBA and IG, would significantly increase the number of regulatory filings (potentially before cost 23 impacts are fully understood) and create unnecessary complexity. Under such an approach, any 24 design r...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about increasing regulatory filings and complexity if certain tasks are implemented, as suggested by the SBA and IG. NS Power argues that this would create unnecessary burden and recommends using existing processes instead.

l Expenditure Plan, Board Order, April 4, 2017. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 67 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The text references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and a Board Order dated April 4, 2017. It appears to be part of a confidential document related to regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia, possibly involving capital expenditures and regulatory oversight.

Not Applicable (NA) NR NR E. Technology Selection Process Technology Not Applicable (NA) F. Strategy Contracting/Sourcing Preliminary (P) NR P Escalation Not Applicable (NA) NR G. Planning Logistics Plan Preliminary (P) P P P Integrated Pr...

AI summary The document outlines various project planning and management components, including logistics, integrated project plans, project codes of accounts, schedules, regulatory approvals, risk registers, stakeholder management plans, work breakdown structures, and start-up plans. Environmental impact assessments are noted as not applicable.

m Not Applicable (NA) NR/P LEED Certification Level Not Applicable (NA) NR/P Codes and/or Standards Not Applicable (NA) NR Communication Systems Not Applicable (NA) NR Exterior Closure Description Not Applicable (NA) NR Finishes Descriptio...

AI summary The document outlines preliminary and defined stages for various project components, including contracting, project scheduling, and regulatory approvals. Certain aspects such as LEED certification, communication systems, and environmental monitoring are marked as not applicable. The project code of accounts and project schedule are defined, while logistics and integrated project plans are not applicable.

D D Project Schedule Preliminary (P) NR P Regulatory Approval & Permitting Defined (D) NR P D D D Risk Register Preliminary (P) NR P Stakeholder Consultation/Engagement/Management Plan Not Applicable (NA) NR Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)...

AI summary The document outlines project schedules, regulatory approvals, and technical deliverables for a project, including the status of various plans and studies. Some items are marked as complete, while others are in preliminary or not applicable stages.

Preliminary (P) NR P Project Code of Accounts Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Schedule Preliminary (P) NR P Regulatory Approval & Permitting Preliminary (P) NR P Risk Register Preliminary (P) NR P Stakeholder Consultation/Engagement/Managem...

AI summary The text outlines various project management and regulatory documents related to a project, including the Code of Accounts, Schedule, Risk Register, and Stakeholder Management Plan. It also mentions studies such as Routing Options, Environmental Impact Assessment, and Topography, with some sections marked as preliminary or not applicable.

P P Integrated Project Plan Preliminary (P) NR P Project Code of Accounts Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Schedule Preliminary (P) NR P Regulatory Approval & Permitting Defined (D) NR P D D D Risk Register Preliminary (P) NR P Stakeholder C...

AI summary The text outlines various project planning and regulatory components for an initiative, including the Integrated Project Plan, Project Code of Accounts, Project Schedule, Regulatory Approval & Permitting, Risk Register, and Stakeholder Consultation/Management Plan. It also references studies such as Routing Options, Topography & Bathymetry, and Environment/Existing Conditions, with varying levels of definition and applicability.

Defined (D) P P P D D Integrated Project Plan Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Code of Accounts Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Schedule Defined (D) NR P D D D Regulatory Approval & Permitting Preliminary (P) NR P Risk Register Preliminary (P...

AI summary The text outlines various project management and regulatory planning documents, including the Integrated Project Plan, Project Code of Accounts, and Work Breakdown Structure. It also mentions preliminary stages of regulatory approval and permitting, risk registers, and stakeholder engagement plans. Some studies, such as routing options and environmental assessments, are defined or not applicable.

Defined (D) P P P D D Integrated Project Plan Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Code of Accounts Defined (D) NR P D D D Project Schedule Defined (D) NR P D D D Regulatory Approval & Permitting Defined (D) NR P D D D Risk Register Defined (D)...

AI summary The document outlines various project management components and studies related to a regulatory process. It includes items such as the Integrated Project Plan, Project Code of Accounts, and Environmental Impact/Sustainability Assessment, with some sections marked as Not Applicable or Defined.

capital projects that may be included in the ACE Plan. This requires coordina on between the genera on, transmission, distribu on and corporate groups, Asset Management, Finance and Regulatory Affairs. In Genera on, Transmission, Distribu o...

AI summary The document outlines the process for compiling and reviewing capital projects for inclusion in the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It involves coordination between various departments and the use of PowerPlan to input project details, including justification and cost profiles. Projects are ranked based on health and safety, environmental compliance, and business sustainability criteria.

separate, or revised capital applica on). • Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) capital projects. These projects are not included in the ACE Plan and are filed separately for Board approval. • Planned and Advanced (P&A) capital projects. These...

AI summary This document outlines the requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to obtain approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for various types of capital projects, including Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U), Planned and Advanced (P&A), Authority to Overspend (ATO), Scope Change, and Final Cost (FIN) applications.

provisions of the Public UƟliƟes Act (the Act). NS Power is subject to general supervisory oversight of the NSEB. Sec on 35 and Sec on 35AA (effec ve October 30, 2019) of the Act provide the following: 35 No public u lity shall proceed with...

AI summary The Public Utilities Act provisions outline capital expenditure thresholds requiring Board approval for NS Power. Section 35 mandates Board approval for projects exceeding $250,000, while Section 35AA exempts large-scale utilities (annual revenue ≥ $100M) from this requirement for projects ≤ $1M. The Board may approve, modify, or reject applications through various review processes, with NS Power retaining discretion to defer/cancel projects based on reassessment.

.......................... 25 6.9 Capital Budge ng................................................................................................. 25 6.10 ACE Plan Projects ....................................................................

AI summary The document outlines capital budgeting processes, ACE Plan projects, financial criteria for capital planning, economic analysis of alternatives, and requirements for NSEB approval, focusing on capital application procedures and authorization to overspend policies.

REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 80 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Technically jus fied IT projects are broadly ranked usi...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. evaluates IT projects using criteria including customer impact, financial implications, compliance with regulations (e.g., NERC/CIP), and operational sustainability. Capital programs prioritize health/safety, regulatory compliance, service delivery, and risk mitigation, with economic initiatives assessed via performance metrics (SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI). Constraints include resource availability, maintenance cycles, and cash flow. Executive approval involves reviewing the ACE Plan.

Execu ve approval process involves a detailed review of the consolidated ACE Plan. Division management work with the execu ve team to address any comments or concerns which may arise from this review. Following this review and approval, fi...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's capital planning process, including executive approval of the ACE Plan, project revisions, and ranking criteria for Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and IT projects. Projects not ready for NSEB submission are deferred to later in the year.

separate, or revised capital applica on). • Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) capital projects. These projects are not included in the ACE Plan and are filed separately for Board approval. • Planned and Advanced (P&A) capital projects. These...

AI summary The document outlines categories of capital expenditure applications requiring Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) approval, including Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U), Planned and Advanced (P&A), Authority to Overspend (ATO), Scope Change, and Final Cost (FIN) applications. Each type has specific filing requirements and thresholds for NSEB oversight under the Public Utilities Act.

to the provisions of the Public UƟliƟes Act (the Act). NS Power is subject to general supervisory oversight of the NSEB. Sec on 35 and Sec on 35AA (October 30, 2019) of the Act provide the following: 35 No public u lity shall proceed with...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements under the Public Utilities Act for NS Power's capital projects. Section 35 mandates Board approval for projects over $250,000, while Section 35AA exempts large-scale utilities (annual revenue ≥ $100M) from this requirement for projects ≤ $1M. The Board may approve, adjust, or disallow projects, and NS Power retains discretion to defer or cancel approved projects based on reassessments.

wherein single con ngencies can poten ally adversely affect the interconnected NPCC system, are designed and operated in accordance with NPCC Directory 1, Design and Opera on of the Bulk Power System. NS Power is required to follow the stan...

AI summary NS Power adheres to NERC and NPCC standards for its Bulk Electric System, ensuring compliance through regulatory approval processes. System design criteria, including transmission and clearance times, are updated to meet evolving standards and are documented in report NS Power-TPR-003-6.

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NS Power owns and operates the Mersey Hydro System (MHS), a series of six hydroelectric 4 stations and a lake storage diversion along a 21km reach of the Mersey River. The 2026 ACE Plan 5 focuses on sustaining capita...

AI summary NS Power is updating the 2026 ACE Plan to address sustaining investments for the Mersey Hydro System (MHS) while evaluating long-term options via the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The Board directed NS Power to include NPV analyses comparing decommissioning, partial decommissioning, and redevelopment options, along with assumptions, in the ACE Plan application following the next depreciation study.

icity planning landscape in 24 Nova Scotia including several changes to the Project Accountability Matrix. 25 26 • As described in Section 5.0 and Section 6.2.2, any future Battery Storage projects will be 27 scoped and procured by the IES...

AI summary The document outlines changes in project accountability for Battery Storage and Fast-Acting Generation projects, to be managed by IESO-NS. NS Power supports this transition, aligning with the 2030 Clean Power Plan updates in the 10 Year System Outlook (10YSO) report. Key references include the 2023 ACE Plan (M11017) and updated resource timelines.

: 30 31 • The 2030 Decarbonization Goals 32 • The Province of Nova Scotia’s 2030 Clean Power Plan 33 • Creation of the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) Page 8 of 55 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 661 of 782 REDACTE...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia's 2030 Clean Power Plan, the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Action Plan, and the creation of the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO-NS). It details resource development, project management, and timelines for meeting decarbonization goals.

1 5.0 NOVA SCOTIA INDEPENDENT ENERGY SYSTEM OPERATOR 2 3 In February 2024, the Clean Electricity Solutions Task Force, a task force commissioned by the 4 Nova Scotia provincial government, submitted its final report titled, “Modernizing En...

AI summary The document outlines the establishment of the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) under the More Access to Energy Act (MAEA), following the Energy Reform Act (Bill 404). It details the transfer of responsibilities from NS Power to IESO-NS, including battery storage and fast-acting generation procurement, and references a revenue/expenditure application (M12412) filed with the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

support the transition of accountabilities to the IESO-NS. 8 M12303, 2024 Annual DDA Report, Board letter, October 17, 2025. 9 IESO-Nova-Scotia-REOI-for-Capacity.pdf Page 15 of 55 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 668 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (...

AI summary The document references the transition of accountabilities to the IESO-NS, citing the 2024 Annual DDA Report and a Board letter dated October 17, 2025. It also mentions the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix F and 'The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update,' highlighting regulatory and planning processes related to decarbonization and capacity management.

1 6.1.3 Prescribed Generation Facilities 2 3 In August 2024, the Province amended the Prescribed Energy-Storage Projects Regulations to 4 include prescribed generation facilities, creating the Prescribed Generation Facilities and Energy- 5...

AI summary Nova Scotia amended regulations in 2024 and 2025 to include prescribed generation facilities, capping total output at 1,140 MW. Seven wind projects, including three in The Path to 2030, are prescribed. The Port Hawkesbury Paper Wind project (168 MW) is under development, with construction progressing since 2024 and expected commercial operation by Q4 2026.

bases, pouring the foundation for the substation, and installing poles for the collection system.19 24 PHP Wind continues to forecast commercial operation to start in the fourth quarter of 2026. 25 15 Prescribed Generation Facilities and E...

AI summary PHP Wind's project progress includes site preparation and infrastructure development, with a forecasted commercial operation in Q4 2026. Regulatory references include the Prescribed Generation Facilities and Energy-Storage Projects Regulations and Bill 149, Powering the Offshore Act. The text also cites meeting minutes related to the project.

1 contain 148.5 MW of new wind generation proposed to supply RtR customers (IRs 597 and 675) 2 with first commercial operation anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2026. 3 4 On October 27, 2021, the Board approved an application by Renewal...

AI summary Renewall Energy Inc. seeks extensions to its deadline for selling renewable low-impact electricity under its Retail Supplier license. The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) has repeatedly approved extensions, with the latest deadline set to March 31, 2027. A conditional Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) was issued for the Mersey River Wind project, backed by the Minister of Energy.

1 • A 4.8 MW community solar garden in Brooklyn, Annapolis County 24 2 • A 1.7 MW community solar garden in Sydney 25 3 • A 2.2 MW community solar garden in West Petpeswick 26 4 5 The forecast commercial operation date for these three proj...

AI summary The text outlines three community solar projects in Nova Scotia with a combined capacity of 8.7 MW, slated for Q3 2027. NS Power has completed 31 preliminary assessments under the Community Solar Program, managed by the Provincial DOE. Projects require a PPA and DSIS studies. NS Power will file its first program report with the NSEB by January 31, 2027, per regulatory requirements and a Board Order.

n orchestrating diverse DER assets to provide 25 measurable system benefits. Following the Board’s October 2024 decision on the SGNS Final 26 Report (M11621), NS Power initiated the Distributed Energy Resource Integration Roadmap 27 (DERIR...

AI summary NS Power initiated the Distributed Energy Resource Integration Roadmap (DERIR) following the Board’s October 2024 decision on the SGNS Final Report, engaging Dunsky Energy + Climate Advisors for jurisdictional scans, framework development, and stakeholder engagement.

1 project delays. Talent shortages have the potential to affect NS Power, its partners 2 across the province, and its contractors and suppliers. 3 4 4. Project Approvals 5 • 2025 Trend: No Change 6 • The 2030 Clean Power Plan requires the...

AI summary The text highlights project delays due to talent shortages impacting NS Power and partners, the need for approvals under the 2030 Clean Power Plan, risks in transitioning to fast-acting generation by 2027-28, and the publication of the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) aligning with Nova Scotia policy. Key issues include environmental and regulatory approvals, procurement challenges, and renewable energy targets.

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) has made an application to the Board for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which total...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, totaling $702.1 million, with a request for $284.0 million. A public hearing is scheduled for April 21, 2026, with options for participation including live listening, speaking, written comments, and intervenor status.

Halifax eager for Dartmouth Cove response Property owner prepares to start work GEORGE MYRER While visions of sugar plums danced in the heads of HRM residents, the mayor and Nova Scotia's minister of municipal affairs settled in for a long...

AI summary Halifax is seeking a response from Dartmouth Cove regarding proposed amendments to the Special Area. A property owner plans to begin work on a water lot in early 2026, prompting concerns. The municipality is preparing for judicial review if the matter is not resolved promptly. The province has identified three issues with the amendments that need addressing.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is under review by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of the proceeding M12619.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the plan. This document is part of a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is under review by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of proceeding M12619.

2026 ACE Plan CA IR-17 Attachment 2 has been removed due to confidentiality 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) has had its Attachment 2 removed due to confidentiality. This document contains NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate under NSEB Matter 12619.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests 1 Request IR-27: 1 (b) NS Power will incorporate the Board's direction into the evaluation of FLISR. The team is 2 currently...

AI summary NSPI is responding to information requests regarding the 2026 ACE Plan. The company will incorporate the Board's direction into FLISR evaluations and track performance metrics for scheme validation. The Capital Program Manager is responsible for reviewing PDM documentation for all capital projects submitted for approval.

acceptable lower-cost connection standard, phasing mechanism, or prioritization criteria that would lower the investment required and still meet the technical requirements. (f) As discussed in part (e), the least cost alternative is select...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's approach to managing customer connection and upgrade costs, emphasizing the use of least-cost alternatives and regulatory oversight through the Authorization to Overspend (ATO) process. Regulations limit the scope of utility-funded investments, and ATO applications have been approved by the NSEB to justify increased spending.

1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 7, lines 19-29 4 5 In 2024, the creation of a new Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova 6 Scotia (IESO-NS) changed the electricity planning landscape in Nova Scotia, 7 8 and...

AI summary The creation of the Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) in 2024 has led to changes in project accountability for NS Power. NS Power aligns its decarbonization initiatives with the Province's Clean Power Plan and the Evergreen IRP, ensuring cost-effectiveness through competitive RFP processes and regulatory approvals.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (d) The overall coordination of the transition is being supported by the project management 22 (e) Please describe steps taken to coordinate work and avoid duplication of costs for 23 ratepayers between NSPI and IESO NS,...

AI summary The response discusses coordination between NS Power and IESO-NS during the transition, noting no duplication of costs in NS Power's capital planning process. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan and mentions the exclusion of external funding considerations in the 2027–2030 capital forecast.

ering a scope change application. Based on NS Power's experience managing these projects, the likelihood of these quantities changing is very high and considers the estimate of 70-80 to be reasonable. (b) NS Power assessed this increase in...

AI summary NS Power argues that an increase in scope change applications would create a significant regulatory burden, requiring more resources and potentially delaying or reducing the quality of filings. They suggest that existing processes like FIN and ATO provide adequate oversight without unnecessary additional filings.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2 (c) Yes, NS Power did consider mitigating approaches but found that any potential approaches 9 discussed. This updated language is not in the current proposed CEJC updates as it was not 10 canvassed with all intervenors...

AI summary NS Power acknowledges that updated CEJC criteria for 'scope' and 'scope change' differ from previous uses of the term, which historically included asset quantity. The updated definitions aim to reduce the number of scope change applications required, though they represent a departure from past practices.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a page from a technical document, likely related to infrastructure or engineering, but key details have been removed due to confidentiality.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 1 Request IR-72: 2 the preparation of the regulatory documentation as needed. 3 4 (b) No. NS Power is in the process of preparing the regu...

AI summary NSPI is preparing regulatory submissions for the 2026 ACE Plan, including an Environmental Effects Evaluation and FAA application, with responses expected from Transport Canada and DFO. The contingency estimate covers additional precautions based on feedback from governing authorities, such as the Department of Fisheries and Transport Canada.

4.1.1/

AI summary The section 4.1.1/ of the document outlines the context and background for the proceeding, including relevant regulatory frameworks and key stakeholders involved in the matter.

4.1.1/

AI summary The section 4.1.1/ of the document outlines the context and background for the proceeding, including relevant regulatory frameworks and key stakeholders involved in the matter.

4.1.2/

AI summary The section discusses the regulatory process and related topics, including energy efficiency programs, demand-side management, and the integration of renewable energy resources into the grid. It addresses compliance with legislation and the role of various stakeholders in the proceedings.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

AI summary This section outlines the recommendations made by the Nova Scotia Energy Board following the analysis and review of various proceedings, including considerations related to energy efficiency, infrastructure planning, and regulatory compliance.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (c) To date, the most current information available is the Energy Minister's public 2 announcement of the Department's intent to reissue a call for new renewable energy projects.[1](#page-49-0) 3 Please also refer to NSE...

AI summary The document references the Energy Minister's public announcement regarding the Department's intent to reissue a call for new renewable energy projects, citing a source from CBC News. It also mentions a regulatory reference (NSEB IR-171) and the date of filing (February 13, 2026).

December 22, 2025 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 RE: Wasoqonatl Transmission Incorporated's Confirmation of Decision Gate Three Milestone Dear Ms. Henwood:...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. confirms that all conditions for Decision Gate 3 have been met, allowing the NS-NB Reliability Intertie Project to begin major construction in 2026 as planned.

Date Filed: February 13, 2026 NSPI (NSEB) IR-193 Page 2 of 2

AI summary The document is a regulatory proceeding filing from February 13, 2026, submitted by NSPI to the NSEB. It includes an information request (IR-193) and is part of a broader regulatory process involving Nova Scotia Power and the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

22 Transformer Location Region Activity Justification 91H-T11 Dartmouth Metro Replacement Please refer to CI C0031048 in 2025 ACE Plan. 10H-T1 Halifax Metro Replacement Please refer to CI C0055539 in 2023 ACE Plan. 10H-T2 Halifax Metro Rep...

AI summary The text provides a table detailing transformer replacement projects in Nova Scotia, referencing the 2025 and 2023 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans. It includes transformer locations, regions, activities, and justifications, with references to specific CI numbers and regulatory approvals by the NSEB.

(b) "Regular" refers to Regular Administrative Overhead, also known as Labour AO. NS Power has three types of AO Rates, which are calculated in accordance with Board- 1 approved Accounting Policy 6230 – Application of Administrative and Ve...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's Administrative Overhead (AO) rates, referencing Accounting Policy 6230, and includes several inquiries regarding the increase in Steam projects in 2026, the DLR Deployment project, and the Dynamic Line Rating upgrade. Responses and requests are outlined, with some references to external events and presentations.

Natural Resources and Renewables Office of the Minister PO Box 698, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2T9 • Telephone 902-424-4037 • Fax 902-424-0594 • novascotia.ca January 16, 2024 Judith Ferguson Nova Scotia Power 1223 Lower Water Street...

AI summary The Minister of Natural Resources and Renewables directs Nova Scotia Power Inc. to provide equipment and systems to supply inertia response for wind energy conversion systems (WECS) procured under specific sections of the Electricity Act. This is to ensure the stability, reliability, and power quality of the transmission system.

Chris Milligan ([email protected]) 1 Request IR-24: 2 3 Please refer to the Application Page 683 of 782, Lines 24 – 26. 4 5 (a) What is the current status with respect to the Decision Gate 3 governance milestone? 6 7 Response IR-24...

AI summary The text contains several requests and responses related to regulatory proceedings, including the status of a governance milestone, a certificate of determination for an environmental impact assessment, and the definition of 'Adverse Environment' in the context of outage events.

Q: Could a smaller contingency budget increase the number of ATO proceedings? A: Yes, a possible consequence of the Board adopting my recommendation is that there could be slightly more ATO proceedings. From a cost minimization perspective...

AI summary A smaller contingency budget may lead to more ATO proceedings, as they can identify risks that lead to overspending in capital projects. Examples include the L6549 transmission line project and the 76V-T1 Transformer Replacement, where unexpected costs led to increased ATO budgets. Improved planning and risk management could help mitigate these issues.

A. Scope Change Definition - Q: How does NS Power describe the purpose of its proposed definition of "scope change"? - A: NS Power states, - The purpose of this proposed definition is to find the proper balance in what should require an up...

AI summary NS Power proposes a definition for 'scope change' to determine when an updated project application to the NSEB is required, aiming to balance the need for updates with avoiding excessive filings for minor variances during project completion.

Q: Does NS Power's proposed addition resolve the ambiguity? A: No, it merely shifts the ambiguity from a change in "stated intent" to a change in the "alternative defended." For example, in response to a hypothetical presented in an inform...

AI summary NS Power's proposed addition does not resolve ambiguity but shifts it from a change in 'stated intent' to a change in the 'alternative defended.' The response highlights that additional work on a project may trigger an ATO application and regulatory review. Examples of projects with overlooked alternatives are discussed.

Q: What concerns do you have with this remaining ambiguity? A: In my opinion, this ambiguity has the potential to undermine the intent of Section 35 of the Public Utilities Act . The Act requires each capital item in excess of $1 million t...

AI summary The ambiguity in the capital project approval process may undermine Section 35 of the Public Utilities Act, which requires approval for capital items over $1 million. The process aims to reduce the need for retrospective reviews but shifts oversight from proactive to retrospective proceedings, raising concerns about regulatory risk and stakeholder input.

Q: Do you have a recommendation for the Board to refine NS Power's proposed definition of scope change? A: Yes. I recommend that NS Power's clarification be accepted and that the CEJC be further revised to include a two-step process that f...

AI summary The responder recommends refining NS Power's definition of scope change by introducing a two-step process. The first step involves NS Power filing a brief letter with the Board when a potential budget increase is identified. The second step allows the Board to request a more formal evaluation of alternatives if needed, avoiding unnecessary regulatory burdens.

Q: Do you have any further proposed revisions to the CEJC? A: Yes, I recommend two further revisions to the CEJC not directly related to any proposals from NS Power. First, I recommend that the introduction be revised to reflect the Board'...

AI summary The respondent recommends revising the CEJC to reflect the Board's decision in M12012, which requires NS Power to submit capital expenditures over $1 million for approval, regardless of funding source. This revision aims to align the CEJC with the Public Utilities Act and the oversight role of the NSEB.

Q: What are your general views on NS Power's updated Path to 2030 Report? A: I have recently expressed concerns regarding key milestones not being met towards achieving the 2030 targets for coal retirements, carbon reductions, and RES comp...

AI summary The respondent expressed concerns about NS Power's updated Path to 2030 Report, noting that key milestones for coal retirements, carbon reductions, and RES compliance have not been met. The report does not provide reassurance, and the respondent urges the Board to expedite implementation of necessary actions.

Q: Why is the status of the synchronous condenser project concerning? A: In contrast to, for example, the NS-NB Reliability Intertie Project, there has been no stakeholder presentation explaining why synchronous condensers have been select...

AI summary The status of the synchronous condenser project is concerning due to the lack of stakeholder presentation explaining why this technology was chosen for wind integration. The Board may face a dilemma between delaying 2030 compliance milestones or approving a potentially flawed project if the application does not provide a strong case for the selected technology.

- "Building the Energy Efficiency Resource for the TVA Region," presentation on behalf of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy to the Tennessee Valley Authority Integrated Resource Planning Stakeholder Review Group, December 10, 2009. - "Flo...

AI summary The document lists various presentations and testimonies related to energy efficiency, renewable energy, and regulatory proceedings in the Southeastern United States, including Florida and the Tennessee Valley Authority region. These presentations cover topics such as energy efficiency as a resource, integrated resource planning, and the implementation of the Clean Power Plan.

Note 2: This report has been amended to reflect the new Board approval threshold of $1,000,000, effective October 30, 2019. T

AI summary This note indicates that the report has been updated to reflect a new Board approval threshold of $1,000,000, which became effective on October 30, 2019.

27 (b) Mr. Wilson is unaware of any other category of projects where material risks 28 have been identified by NS Power (e.g., in ATO filings) and yet NS Power has 29 a policy of not filing a risk matrix. If other such categories exist, Mr...

AI summary Mr. Wilson states he is unaware of other categories of projects where NS Power has identified material risks without filing a risk matrix. He also notes that no other jurisdiction requires utilities to file similar pre-construction budget filings like the ACE Plan, though some require CPCN applications for capital projects.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 4 2.0 RESPONSE TO CA (WILSON) EVIDENCE 5 5 2.1 Recommendation 1 – Work Management and Scheduling & Dispatch 5 6 2.2 Recommendation 2 – Maximo/Salesforce Capabilities5 7 2.3 Recomm...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which includes capital investments for 2026 and future spending forecasts up to 2030. It discusses responses to evidence from the Consumer Advocate and other stakeholders, as well as recommendations related to work management, project contingency, and reliability planning.

DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 3 of 19 Exhibit N-6 (C), NS Power (NSEB) IRs 1-202, February 13, 2026. Exhibit N-3 (C), NS Power (CA) IRs 1-32, February 13, 2026 Exhibit N-5, NS Power (IG) IRs 1-25, February 13, 2026 Exhibit N-7, NS Power (...

AI summary The document references exhibits submitted by NS Power in a regulatory proceeding, including evidence related to projects that the company seeks approval for from the NSEB. The context suggests ongoing regulatory review of electricity delivery and capital expenditure matters.

DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 4 of 19 1 2.0 RESPONSE TO CA (WILSON) EVIDENCE 2 3 The Wilson Evidence makes 15 recommendations and raises two additional concerns without 4 associated recommendations: (1) stakeholder consultation regarding...

AI summary The document responds to the Wilson Evidence, which includes 15 recommendations and two concerns regarding stakeholder consultation on synchronous condensers and uncertainty around the Mersey Hydro project. The response addresses the first recommendation related to reporting requirements for the Work Management and Scheduling & Dispatch project.

DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 11 of 19 1 2.10 Recommendation 10 – Accept NS Power's Clarification of "Scope Change" 2 3 4 The Wilson Evidence provides the following recommendation: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Accept NS Power's clarification to the de...

AI summary The document discusses a recommendation to accept NS Power's clarification of 'scope change' in the CEJC and to revise it to include a requirement for NS Power to file information when a change may result in a budget increase above a Board-specified threshold. NS Power accepts part of the recommendation and provides an amended definition for 'scope change'.

alternatives. This analysis provides transparency regarding the relative capital implications of the available options while clearly acknowledging the limitations of the analysis and the need for further system-level evaluation through the...

AI summary The Mersey Hydro project's future remains uncertain due to a lack of policy framework for redevelopment or decommissioning. NS Power is investing in sustaining capital to maintain safe operations, while deferring long-term decisions. The Board has directed NS Power to engage stakeholders and file regular updates as part of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process.

- Please accept the following as the opening statement of the Department of Energy, - Government of Nova Scotia (the Department), for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure - Plan (ACE Plan) hearing. The ACE Plan is intended to provide a comp...

AI summary The Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia, presents the opening statement for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) hearing. It emphasizes public concern over NSPI's capital investments and highlights the transition of responsibilities to IESO-NS, an independent organization, to ensure competitive and prudent spending.

Competitiveness - This ACE Plan fails to fully account for the fundamental shift in Nova Scotia's electricity - planning landscape. With the enactment of the More Access to Energy Act on April 1, 2025, - the responsibility for ensuring a c...

AI summary The ACE Plan does not adequately address the changes in Nova Scotia's electricity planning landscape following the enactment of the More Access to Energy Act. Responsibility for competitive energy planning now lies with the IESO-NS, and the Board is urged to defer certain projects until competitive processes are completed.

Document: 326514 Final Issues List Friday, January 29, 2026 NS Power's Responses to IRs Friday, February 13, 2026 Evidence filed by Formal lntervenors Monday, March 2,2026 Information Requests to Formal lntervenors Monday, March 16, 2026 R...

AI summary The document outlines the timeline and procedural steps for a regulatory proceeding, including key dates for submitting responses, evidence, and settlement agreements, and notes that the Board's Regulatory Rules, specifically Rule 7(3), will apply to the filing process.

- 4. The notice of this hearing be given, in a form to be approved by the Board, by publishing it in accordance with the following schedule: Halifax Chronicle Herald Saturday, December 27, 2025 Wednesday, December 31, 2025 The Cape Breton...

AI summary The document outlines the schedule for publishing the notice of a hearing, specifying the newspapers and dates for publication. The notice is dated December 18, 2025, and is related to a proceeding under the jurisdiction of the Board.

PORT HAWKESBURY PAPER LP James MacDuff, Counsel Melanie Gillis, Counsel BOARD COUNSEL: William L. Mahody, K.C. FINAL SUBMISSIONS: June 5, 2026 DECISION DATE: September 2, 2026 DECISION: The ACE Plan is approved, except for C0080111 – 2026...

AI summary The ACE Plan is approved except for C0080111 – 2026 RTU Deployment. The Board has provided directions to NS Power on other aspects of the application, as outlined in paragraph [241] of the decision.

- [1] Each year, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated files an Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlining its proposed capital expenditures for the upcoming year. In accordance with ss. 35, 35A and 35AA of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 198...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for approval, seeking Board approval for projects totaling $76.7 million and Routine Capital Expenditures of $207.3 million. The Board approved the plan, except for the RTU Deployment project, which was deferred pending a Synapse Energy Economics Consultants report. The Board also addressed broader issues related to capital spending and reliability planning.

weighted criteria, which included design criteria, operational impacts, regulatory considerations, and probable cost. NS Power included the options analysis report as an attachment to the application. - [15] The options analysis report cer...

AI summary The Board evaluated the refurbishment of a sheet pile structure and found it prudent, but raised concerns about the scoring methodology used in the options analysis report. The weighted criteria included design, operational impact, environmental considerations, and cost, but the Board questioned the scoring intervals and cost comparison approach.

2.2.4.1 Findings [32] As noted by NS Power, this project will add remote monitoring (i.e. visibility) and control (i.e. SCADA – Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) for the system operator for the sites where new RTU are installed. NS...

AI summary The Board acknowledges the benefits of installing RTUs for remote monitoring and control but is concerned about the lack of quantified benefits, the limited customer impact (3.6% of total customers), and the fact that RTUs do not enhance immediate fault-clearing capabilities. The project is not approved at this time due to pending reviews and insufficient benefit quantification.

2.4.2 Directives [88] The Board finds that the sustained growth and evolving composition of the Routine Program require requires enhanced prospective transparency. The additional information is intended to preserve the regulatory efficienc...

AI summary The Board requires NS Power to enhance transparency in the Routine Program by providing detailed cost and performance data, including five-year comparisons, cost breakdowns, and explanations for year-over-year changes. This is intended to ensure regulatory efficiency and proper cost justification.

3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations [99] Capital project Scope Change applications are currently addressed in Section 12.2 of NS Power's Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria. These are intended to address changes in...

AI summary The document discusses the need to amend the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) to better define 'Scope Change' in capital project applications. The Independent Governor (IG) raised concerns during the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding about the lack of clarity in the CEJC regarding what constitutes a Scope Change. The Board agreed and directed NS Power to consult with interested parties to propose amendments to the CEJC for inclusion in the 2026 ACE Plan.

3.2.1 Findings [110] NS Power believes that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides an appropriate regulatory balance, recognizing that the ATO and FIN processes would capture project Scope Changes beyond those that would be incl...

AI summary NS Power argues that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides an appropriate regulatory balance, while the IG criticizes it for shifting oversight to after-the-fact financial reviews. NS Power notes that many ATO applications are filed after work has been completed, suggesting that a separate Scope Change process would not change this reality.

A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a ratepayer cost exposure reporting that includes: - NSPI's ACE capital program (a...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) urges the Board to require NSPI to provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reporting in future ACE Plans, including capital program costs, reliability intertie costs, and IESO-NS-related expenses. NS Power argues that such analysis is not feasible due to uncertainties and complexities in estimating revenue requirements. The Board previously questioned the usefulness of this information and may reconsider based on recent developments and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

cilitate a competitive electricity market, coordinate system planning, and, section (m) conduct procurements for electricity supply, capacity, storage ancillary services and hybrid resources. The Minister's position is that all new system...

AI summary The Minister of Energy emphasizes the need for competitive procurement by the IESO for all new system needs, including electricity supply, capacity, storage, and ancillary services. This approach ensures best value for ratepayers and aligns with the IESO's statutory responsibilities. The Board is urged to uphold competitive procurement as a default for utility capital expenditure requests.

8.3 Considerations for Subsequent Submittal Items [212] There was discussion about IT or cybersecurity-related projects listed as subsequent submittal items in the 2026 ACE Plan. Two projects, in particular, raised several concerns. The Id...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised about the increasing costs of IT and cybersecurity-related projects, specifically the Identity and Access Management and Customer Information System (CIS) Replacement projects. The Industrial Group recommends that future submittals include detailed cost explanations related to the 2025 cyber incident. NS Power argues that current processes already provide necessary information, but the Board agrees that specific references to the impact of the cyber incident on cost variances should be included in future submissions.

ject. As such, NS Power is continuing conversations with Department of Fisheries and Oceans in order to understand requirements associated with fish passage that may not have been in place previously. [227] Mersey Redevelopment Project cap...

AI summary NS Power is deferring the Mersey Redevelopment Project due to the need for strategic direction from the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Instead, it is implementing incremental sustaining investments through the Hydro Investment Plan (HIP) to ensure safe and reliable operation of the Mersey Hydro System (MHS) while planning for the future redevelopment.

11.0 CONCLUSION [239] The Board has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, except for C0080111 – 2026 RTU Deployment. The approved projects are listed in the attached Schedule "A". [240] The Board has provided comments on specific capital proj...

AI summary The NSEB has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, excluding one project, and provided comments on various aspects including capital projects, decarbonization targets, and reliability planning. The Board has issued directives for future ACE Plan submissions, including updates and detailed financial reporting requirements.

ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board issued an Order on June 18, 2026, however, reserved the right to provide a...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which was partially approved by the Board. The Board deferred consideration of one project pending a final report and issued directives for future ACE Plan submissions, including updated appendices and detailed financial reporting requirements.

December 18, 2025 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Michael Willett Director, Regulatory Finance Nova Scotia Power Inc. PO Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 2W5 Dear Mr. Willett: M12619 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – 2026 A...

AI summary The Board panel has approved the confidential treatment of information in Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) application, as requested by NS Power, in accordance with the Board's Regulatory Rules.

Document: 326514 Final Issues List Friday, January 29, 2026 NS Power's Responses to IRs Friday, February 13, 2026 Evidence filed by Formal lntervenors Monday, March 2,2026 Information Requests to Formal lntervenors Monday, March 16, 2026 R...

AI summary The document outlines key dates and procedures for a regulatory proceeding, referencing the Board's Regulatory Rules, specifically Rule 7(3), which requires documents to be filed by 2:00 pm on due dates.

- 4. The notice of this hearing be given, in a form to be approved by the Board, by publishing it in accordance with the following schedule: Halifax Chronicle Herald Saturday, December 27, 2025 Wednesday, December 31, 2025 The Cape Breton...

AI summary This document outlines the schedule for publishing the notice of a hearing, which is to be approved by the Board and published in specific newspapers on designated dates. The document is dated December 18, 2025, in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

NOTICE OF INTERVENTION OF: CONSUMER ADVOCATE TAKE NOTICE that the Consumer Advocate hereby intervenes in the above Application and proceeding. The Consumer Advocate represents the interests of residential ratepayers, who may be impacted by...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate intervenes in the proceeding, representing residential ratepayers. They will address issues raised by the Energy Board and any other relevant matters. Legal representation is provided by Pink Larkin, with John Wilson as a consultant.

Eastward Energy Incorporated TAKE NOTICE that Eastward Energy ("Eastward") hereby requests to intervene in this proceeding. Eastward is a Nova Scotia-based company, formed for the purpose of providing natural gas distribution service to No...

AI summary Eastward Energy Incorporated, a Nova Scotia-based natural gas distribution company, has requested to intervene in a proceeding before the Nova Scotia Energy Board. The company provides contact information for its representatives and has dated the notice on January 5, 2026.

Request IR-149: - Pages 25 and 26 review the Stakeholder Engagement discussions for the CEJC update, and page 453 Appendix D explains that definition of Scope Change centres on a change in stated intent rather than include deliverables, bo...

AI summary The document requests information on Scope Changes filed by NS Power with the Board since 2020, including projects classified as Scope Changes in 2024 and 2025, and asks for clarification on how changes in stated intent are unambiguous and free from subjective interpretation.

Request IR-150: Page 563 of the application provides the updated definition of a scope change as follows: "A project is considered to have had a scope change when the overarching intent of the project description has been changed." Further...

AI summary The document defines a 'scope change' as a modification to the overarching intent of a project description and asks whether the Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment project would meet this definition and require a 'scope change application'.

Request IR-158: - Page 634, NS Power states: "in order to move forward with the Mersey Redevelopment, NS Power must have a clear understanding of the conditions associated with continued compliance with the Fisheries Act and requirements f...

AI summary NS Power is seeking clarification on new fish passage requirements from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for the Mersey Redevelopment project. The request includes understanding the impact of these requirements on the project and decommissioning options, as well as confirming if cost estimates include these new requirements.

Request IR-176: - Page 679, NS Power states "Upon receiving direction from the Province that procurement of fast- acting generation would be led by the IESO Nova Scotia, NS Power worked to consolidate and transfer all relevant project mate...

AI summary NS Power transferred employees to the IESO Nova Scotia to support the procurement of fast-acting generation. The Board is seeking confirmation on the number of employees transferred and their roles, as well as whether this transfer has affected NS Power's advisory role and support to IESO Nova Scotia.

Request IR-177: - On page 680, NS Power states "NS Power anticipates that clear direction on project timelines will be available in 2026, following completion of the IESO Nova Scotia-led RFP. If it is evident following this RFP that the cu...

AI summary NS Power anticipates clear project timelines to be available in 2026 following an RFP led by IESO Nova Scotia. If the timeline is unachievable, alternatives such as adjusting unit retirement dates or converting coal facilities to alternative fuels may be considered, requiring approval from both federal and Nova Scotia governments.

Request IR-180: - In reference to Section 8.3 Risk Management, pages 698 and 699. - a) Has consideration of the risks presented by the United States government changing tariff requirements been incorporated into the Supply Chain risks and...

AI summary The text raises questions about risk management in Section 8.3, specifically regarding the incorporation of risks from U.S. tariff changes, procurement restrictions to Canadian and European suppliers, and the consideration of geopolitical risks beyond the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Appendix G 5 Year Reliability Plan pages 703 to 773

AI summary The document outlines the 5-Year Reliability Plan, focusing on ensuring the reliability of the electricity grid in Nova Scotia. It includes details on infrastructure planning, generation and grid resources, and regulatory processes to meet reliability standards.

severe, and the remainder of the cells below the midtide zone where capacity is compromised. Without intervention, the continued deterioration poses serious risks to structural stability and safety.” 1. What are the net present value and t...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about the structural integrity of corroded steel sheet pile structures and requests for cost-benefit analyses, design drawings, RFP status, and permitting progress for a project. It highlights the need for economic assessments and regulatory engagement.

e explain any discrepancy with this amount and the amount identified in NS Power’s capital application under Matter M11921. 3. What is the expected final unit cost per km for “contracts” for Phase 10? The estimated unit cost estimate for C...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at NS Power regarding capital applications, cost estimates for distribution rights-of-way, long-term operational cost reductions, and the effectiveness of vegetation management and reliability plans. The questions seek clarification on discrepancies in costs, the use of automation technologies, and the Board's role in assessing future investments.

Engagement discussions for the CEJC update, and page 453 Appendix D explains that definition of Scope Change centres on a change in stated intent rather than include deliverables, boundaries or tasks. 1. Please site the applications NS Pow...

AI summary The text discusses the definition and application of scope changes in regulatory proceedings, specifically focusing on the updated criteria for when a project qualifies as a scope change. It also requests information on specific projects, like the Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment, and asks for clarification on the revised underspent threshold for FIN applications.

Request IR-17: - Please refer to the Application Page 99 of 782, Line 8-9, Metrics. - a) Did NS Power consider or evaluate the potential use of the following customer centric metrics: - i) Customers Experiencing Multiple Momentaries (CEMM)...

AI summary The document contains a series of requests (IR-17 to IR-28) directed at NS Power, focusing on outage metrics, event days, definitions, and governance milestones. It asks for clarifications on customer-centric metrics, outage causes, figures, and directives related to energy infrastructure and regulatory compliance.

plication Page 682 of 782, Lines 17-20. 1. Please provide a copy of the directive issued by the minister of DOE on January 16, 2024. Please refer to the Application Page 683 of 782, Lines 24 – 26. 1. What is the current status with respect...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions related to regulatory proceedings, including requests for directives, status updates on governance milestones, decisions on environmental impact assessments, definitions of terms like ‘Adverse Environment,’ and clarification on the definition and scope of ‘New Right-Of-Way.’ It also refers to figures and pages in the application document.

20 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 26, lines 19-23. The proposed Scope Change definition has been intentionally limited to changes in stated intent as this provides a practical trigger for when a Scope Change application is required. E...

AI summary The proposed Scope Change definition is limited to changes in stated intent to avoid unnecessary regulatory filings and complexity. Including changes in deliverables or boundaries would lead to more filings and increased regulatory burden.

1 and/or detailed tasks. Please describe the methodology and assumptions. - 2 (b) Please explain, with specific examples, how NSPI assesses the 3 "substantial regulatory burden" of an expanded scope change.

AI summary The text requests an explanation of how NSPI assesses the 'substantial regulatory burden' of an expanded scope change, with specific examples. It focuses on the methodology and assumptions used in this assessment.

- 4 (c) Please describe whether NSPI considered mitigation approaches (i.e. 5 thresholds for materiality, batching of minor changes, limits on filing 6 frequency, or defined categories of changes) that would allow broader 7 scope change co...

AI summary The question asks whether NSPI considered mitigation approaches to manage scope change filings, such as materiality thresholds, batching changes, limiting filing frequency, or defining categories of changes, and requests NSPI's conclusions on these approaches.

Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 7, lines 19-29 In 2024, the creation of a new Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) changed the electricity planning landscape in Nova Scotia, and starting in 2025, the IESO-NS...

AI summary The creation of the Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) in 2024 has changed the electricity planning landscape, leading to amendments in NS Power's The Path to 2030 report. The company is transitioning responsibilities to the IESO-NS and is working with federal and provincial governments to meet 2030 decarbonization targets in a cost-effective manner.

on of or forecasting within the 2026 ACE Plan, Five-Year Reliability Plan Update or the Updated Path to 2030? In relation to the transition to the IESO-NS, and work of the Joint Transition Committee: 1. Please provide: 1. the Terms of Refe...

AI summary The text requests information on the Joint Transition Committee's structure and activities related to the IESO-NS transition, as well as details on external funding for the 2026-2030 ACE Plan. It also notes that the 2027–2030 capital forecast excludes expected but unconfirmed external funding.

ubstantial regulatory burden on the Company, the Board, and stakeholders, requiring projects to be reviewed multiple times before completion without delivering any meaningful improvement in oversight. 1. Using historical ACE data (for at l...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory burden caused by frequent scope change filings and the need for mitigation strategies. It also references updated criteria for defining 'scope change' and asks for clarification on their application in future filings.

-Year Reliability Plan Update. Preamble: The Board directed NSPI to provide annual updates on the Five-Year Reliability Plan in each ACE Plan filing. NSPI states it has updated the Plan for 2026. 1. Please describe the process NSPI used to...

AI summary The document requests NSPI to provide updates on the Five-Year Reliability Plan for 2026, including the process used, changes from the 2025 Plan, and reasons for unchanged investment amounts. It also asks about the retirement date for Lingan 2, capital investments, related projects, and how IESO-NS procurement efforts influenced the decision.

INFORMATION REQUESTS To: Michael Willett Director, Regulatory Finance Nova Scotia Power Inc. P.O. Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 2W5 From: Staff of the Nova Scotia Department of Energy Responses Due: Friday, February 13, 2026 Copies: 1 electronic...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Department of Energy has issued an information request to Michael Willett, Director of Regulatory Finance at Nova Scotia Power Inc., seeking responses by February 13, 2026. The request was issued by the Board and sent to Nova Scotia Power Inc. with copies to Daniel Boyle, Counsel, and is part of a regulatory process.

1 M12619 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 5 6 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 7 8 – and – 9 10 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 11 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan 12 13 14 1...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is handling an application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. The Consumer Advocate has requested information from NS Power, with responses due by February 13, 2026.

34 Request IR-15: 35 36 With respect to Appendix I, CIs for transmission replacement and upgrade projects C0080110 and 37 C0080109, and 2024 ACE Plan Rebuttal Evidence (p. 22): 38 39 (a) Please confirm that NS Power's policy remains, "In t...

AI summary The proceeding requests Nova Scotia Power to confirm its policy on risk registers for transmission projects, explain the absence of risk registers for projects over budget, and justify the use of contingency budgets over ATO filings. It also asks about the impact of increased replacement structures on procurement and the Board's concerns regarding contingency amounts.

41 Request IR-27: 42 43 With respect to Appendix G, Section 5.1.2 and the referenced Appendix C: 44 45 a) Please confirm that of the five feeders identified in Appendix C, only feeder 85S-401 is 46 listed as one of the "Highest Priority Di...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding the prioritization of distribution feeders, compliance with standards for poles, and adherence to a Board directive on resilience improvements. It requests clarification on why certain feeders and poles are included or excluded from Appendix C and how NS Power plans to comply with the Board's direction on storm resilience.

LISR] technology," and encouraged NS Power "to develop 46 metrics to measure and validate the technology's performance." Please describe any steps Date Filed: January 23, 2026 CA (NSPI) Page 11 of 14 1 that NS Power has taken or plans to t...

AI summary The document outlines several requests directed at NS Power, including the development of performance metrics for LISR technology, the responsibility for reviewing PDM documentation, and the provision of post-project reviews conducted over the past 18 months. These requests are part of a regulatory proceeding.

- 4 i. Please identify any changes that have been made to the format of internal work 5 orders since January 1, 2025. - 7 ii. Please provide an update on NS Power's "continuous improvement initiative," 8 with any results or findings that h...

AI summary The document includes several requests directed at NS Power regarding changes in internal work orders, updates on a continuous improvement initiative, data accessibility, system upgrades, and future actions. These questions are part of a regulatory proceeding and focus on operational and technical aspects of NS Power's activities.

ening in the reliability program or reduce the cost of the forecast investment in the reliability program? Request IR-27: With respect to Appendix G, Section 5.1.2 and the referenced Appendix C: 1. Please confirm that of the five feeders i...

AI summary The document contains requests for clarification regarding the prioritization of pole replacement projects, compliance with CSA C22.3 standards, and adherence to the Board’s directions in M12012 concerning reliability and storm resilience. It also references specific appendices and exhibits for detailed information.

n plans (pre- and post-storm), and other elements of the plan necessary to provide a fulsome evaluation. Request IR-28: With respect to Appendix G, Section 5.3 and Exhibit N-7, RIR-12 in M12012: 1. Is NS Power a member of Grid Assurance’s...

AI summary The text contains several regulatory requests directed at NS Power regarding its participation in spare transmission equipment programs, reliability performance from FLISR projects, and the review process for PDM documentation. These requests aim to evaluate NS Power's preparedness, transparency, and compliance with regulatory expectations.

the 2016 ACE Plan stakeholder engagement process.) - Report 5 Q4 Requirement Only Unapproved Spending Report. This report includes all projects that have been removed from rate base per the conditions established and approved in the CEJC a...

AI summary The document discusses the 2016 ACE Plan's stakeholder engagement process and the requirement for an unapproved spending report. It outlines the conditions for removing projects from the rate base and includes the 2025 income statement impact. The report has been updated based on the Board's directives and reflects a new approval threshold of $1,000,000, effective October 30, 2019.

s included pursuant to the Board's directive relating to M09229 dated May 5, 2020.) The reports are provided in PDF and electronic Excel format. Yours truly, Lana Myatt Manager, Regulatory Capital Encl.

AI summary The document includes reports submitted in response to the Board's directive related to M09229, dated May 5, 2020. The reports are provided in both PDF and electronic Excel formats.

Request IR-3: - Reference: Exhibit N-9, Evidence of John D. Wilson, pages 21 24. - Preamble: Mr. Wilson reviewed NSPI's proposed "scope change", finding that significant - ambiguity remains, and expressing concern that the proposed definit...

AI summary John D. Wilson reviewed NSPI's proposed 'scope change' and identified significant ambiguity, expressing concern that the definition could shift oversight from proactive approval to retrospective ATO review. He proposed a two-step process for NSPI to file a threshold-triggered letter to the Board when potential budget increases exceed a specified threshold.

1 2 3 4 3. Whether or not NS Power has identified any new alternatives to the proposed project as a result of the information which led to the identified change; and, if so, a brief description of the alternative and a general statement as...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory questions regarding NS Power's identification of new project alternatives, potential revised applications, and the proposed two-step process for scope change notifications. It also seeks clarification on trigger thresholds and the uniform application of the process.

was not selected. 4. Whether or not NS Power intends to file a revised capital project application or ATO application prior to proceeding with project construction or implementation (as applicable). Second, the Board, on its own or in resp...

AI summary The document outlines questions for NS Power regarding its intentions to file revised applications and the specifics of a proposed two-step process for scope changes in the CEJC. It also asks for clarification on trigger thresholds, certainty of budget increases, and the uniform application of the process.

March 16, 2026 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M12619 – 2026 ACE Plan Dear Ms. Henwood: The Nova Scotia Energy Board's (NSEB, Board) public hearing proc...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board's public hearing process for M12619 – 2026 ACE Plan has set a deadline for submitting Information Requests to Formal Intervenors. NS Power has stated they do not intend to submit any IRs.

Please refer to: David Roberts Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Assistant: Alissa Whalen Assistant's email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) March 31, 2026 VIA WEB PORTAL Crystal Henwo...

AI summary A revised response to information requests by the Consumer Advocate is submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board, addressing an omitted response to IR 4 (c). The submission is part of a proceeding concerning a request for a 12-month waiver of late fees under Regulation 5.4.

April 7, 2026 Dear Parties: M12619 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 ACE Plan – Hearing Logistics The Consumer Advocate has requested that its consultant, John Wilson, appear virtually for this hearing. Could you please advise by 2:00 PM on...

AI summary The Clerk of the Board, Crystal Henwood, is informing parties of the logistics for the M12619 hearing related to Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan. The Consumer Advocate's consultant, John Wilson, is requested to appear virtually, and NS Power is directed to submit its witness panels by April 14, 2026.

"> Exhibit N-9, Wilson Report, p. 5 Exhibit N-9, Wilson Report, p. 6 Exhibit N-9, Wilson Report, p. 5 Exhibit N-9, Wilson Report, p. 6 Exhibit N-3, CA IR-8 Exhibit N-12, NS Power Rebuttal Evidence, p. 5 Undertaking U-1 Transcript, April 21...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate recommends adopting Mr. Wilson's proposal to revise reporting requirements for Work Management and Scheduling & Dispatch, including estimated quantified benefits and operating expenses, and to extend the reporting period by one year. NS Power argues that such reporting is already part of ongoing optimization efforts and may not add value.

CEJC Mr. Wilson's report addresses a number of issues concerning the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). In this regard, Mr. Wilson recommends the following: - Accept NS Power's clarification to the definition of "scope chan...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for revising the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), including clarifying 'scope change' and applying the $1 million threshold regardless of funding source. NS Power agrees with some revisions but opposes others, citing existing legislation. The Consumer Advocate supports the recommendations, arguing they align with the Board's prior decisions.

1 BEFORE THE 2 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended 6 -and - 7 8 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for Approval of...

AI summary This document is the closing statement by the Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia, in the matter of NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) application. It is part of a regulatory proceeding under Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act.

Delivered by E-mail Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Energy Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12619 – NSPI – 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure...

AI summary The Industrial Group has submitted closing comments on NSPI's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, expressing concerns about the increasing capital spending and the need for greater transparency and regulatory oversight. They highlight the need for updated reliability plans, improvements to capital expenditure justification criteria, and enhanced reporting on routine capital spending.

1. Five-Year Reliability Plan: Year 2 Updates Within the last ACE Plan proceeding, the Board directed NSPI to provide annual updates on the progress of its Reliability Plan[.](#page-1-0) 4 Accordingly, NSPI has filed its Reliability Plan -...

AI summary The document discusses the lack of updates or changes to NSPI's Five-Year Reliability Plan, despite the Board's directive for annual progress reports. NSPI claims no new information necessitated changes, but critics argue that no robust evaluation was conducted to assess the Plan's effectiveness or justify its static investment approach.

2. CEJC "Scope Change" Definition Must Allow for Meaningful Board Oversight Background Scope Change applications were separated from Authorization to Overspend (" ATO" ) applications as part of the 2017 ACE Plan proceeding, Matter M08278,...

AI summary The document discusses the separation of Scope Change applications from Authorization to Overspend (ATO) applications within the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) as part of the 2017 ACE Plan proceeding. The Board emphasized the need for distinct oversight of Scope Change applications, which can occur independently of overspend, and provided an example of a project approved without associated overspend.

expanded; more work being completed today than it was or than was budgeted in the 2023 ACE Plan. And the actual cost to complete similar work has been inflated since then as well.[44](#page-12-2) The Industrial Group does not dispute that...

AI summary The document discusses a significant increase in routine capital spending by NSPI, growing by 70% over four years. The Industrial Group questions whether this growth is due to genuine inflation and new program additions or a mischaracterization of the 'routine' category, which now includes new work categories and enhanced standards. This expansion raises concerns about the accuracy of the 'routine' classification and the lack of oversight.

4. Capital Spending Is Significantly Higher with no review of Rate Impacts

AI summary This section highlights that capital spending is significantly higher without a review of its impact on rates, raising concerns about the financial implications for customers and the regulatory process.

NSPI's capital program in the ACE proceeding, while major components of the total cost ratepayers will ultimately bear (through riders, or separate recovery mechanisms) are invisible in this process. At what point can ratepayers meaningful...

AI summary The text highlights concerns about the regulatory process in Nova Scotia regarding the assessment of capital expenditures. It argues that the ACE proceeding and GRA do not fully account for the total cost of infrastructure, creating a regulatory gap. The Board is urged to consider both individual projects and the overall cost trajectory for transparency and reasonableness.

CONCLUSION The Industrial Group respectfully requests that the Board: - 1. Direct NSPI to provide a more complete Year 3 update to the Five-Year Reliability Plan, including a reconciliation of planned versus actual spending, an explanation...

AI summary The Industrial Group requests the Board to direct NSPI to provide more detailed updates to the Five-Year Reliability Plan, revise the Scope Change definition, enhance cost-variance disclosure, and improve stakeholder engagement and coordination with IESO-NS in future filings.

- administrative matter for the Board and stakeholders to consider in future proceedings. - Specifically, NS Power respectfully submits that there may be value in reassessing the extent of - information and the number of figures included i...

AI summary NS Power suggests that the 2026 ACE Plan may benefit from a reassessment of the information included, particularly in Section 11.1.4, due to potential confusion and lack of probative value. It also proposes moving reliability-related information to the Five-Year Reliability Plan update to consolidate and streamline data presentation for the Board and stakeholders.

The IG does not take a position on any of the individual capital projects but requests that the Board: 1. Direct NSPI to provide a more complete Year 3 update to the Five-Year Reliability Plan; 2. Decline to approve NSPI's proposed Scope C...

AI summary The IG requests several actions from the Board regarding NSPI's capital projects, including updates to the Reliability Plan, revised definitions for Scope Change, and enhanced stakeholder engagement. NS Power opposes these requests, arguing they are unnecessary under the current regulatory framework.

The IG assumes that a scope change application would provide meaningful prospective oversight. This assumption does not reflect the operational reality that project decisions often must be made in real time to manage cost, schedule, and re...

AI summary The IG argues that scope change applications would typically be filed after decisions are made due to real-time operational needs, such as managing site conditions, safety risks, and planned outages. This makes prospective oversight impractical as regulatory processes cannot delay ongoing work.

2.2.3 Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project The IG effectively suggests that the Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project ATO proceeding proves that NS Power can materially change how a project is built without calling it a scope change, whic...

AI summary The Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project highlights the regulatory process and oversight by the NSEB regarding cost overruns and the use of contingency funds. NS Power argues that the ATO framework provides sufficient oversight without requiring a scope change application, as the Board reviews cost increases triggered by unforeseen circumstances.

2.4 Stakeholder Engagement to Review "Routine Expenditure" section of the CEJC support the conclusion that the work no longer meets the established definition of routine capital. The IG requests that the Board initiate a stakeholder engage...

AI summary The Intervenor Group (IG) requests the Board to initiate a stakeholder engagement process to review the 'Routine Expenditure' section of the CEJC and assess the need for a materiality threshold for significant year-over-year increases in routine spending. NS Power argues that existing annual review mechanisms already provide sufficient transparency and justification for routine expenditures.

General Rate Applications (GRA), where a complete and integrated set of assumptions is applied to determine rates by class based on a full revenue requirement framework. These studies are significant

AI summary The document discusses General Rate Applications (GRA) and their role in determining rates by class using a full revenue requirement framework, highlighting their significance in the regulatory process.

DATE FILED: June 5, 2026 Page 17 of 36 IG Closing Submissions, page 21. 1 2.7 IESO-NS Transition – Capital Coordination 2 3 The IG calls for evidence that NS Power is coordinating its capital planning decisions with the 4 IESO-NS to reduce...

AI summary The IG raises concerns about potential duplication of costs during the IESO-NS transition and calls for evidence of coordination between NS Power and IESO-NS. NS Power acknowledges the importance of collaboration but argues that current capital investments in the 2026 ACE Plan are not duplicative. The IG supports the Board Chair's suggestion of a joint panel with IESO-NS to discuss the Path to 2030.

5.0 REPLY TO NS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBMISSIONS NS Power notes that the Department of Energy's (DOE, Department) closing submissions contain a number of broad assertions that are not fully supported on the evidentiary record regarding the...

AI summary NS Power responds to the Department of Energy's closing submissions, noting that the assertions made are not supported by the evidentiary record. The Board's findings must be grounded in evidence and tested through the hearing process. The Department did not file evidence in this proceeding, and NS Power explains why certain assumptions about capital spending and governance are not supported.

5.5 Project Cost Escalation DOE submits: The evidence demonstrates that material project escalation is not limited to isolated projects or unique operational circumstances but instead reflects a broader and recurring pattern across the uti...

AI summary DOE argues that project cost escalation across multiple categories indicates a recurring pattern, not just isolated issues. They note that the ACE Plan is a planning process, not a fixed-price commitment, and emphasize that budget changes over time do not necessarily imply imprudence. The regulatory framework, including ATOs, provides accountability for significant variances.

June 18, 2026 M12619 Participants Dear Parties: M12619 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 ACE Plan Application The annual ACE Plan allows the Board to consider NS Power's capital expenditure program for 2026. To allow for a meaningful hearing...

AI summary The Board has decided not to approve the CI C0080111 2026 RTU Deployment at this time, deferring further consideration pending a report from Synapse Energy Economics on NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan. The 2026 ACE Plan Application is under review with a decision expected before the year is half over.

PORT HAWKESBURY PAPER LP James MacDuff, Counsel Melanie Gillis, Counsel BOARD COUNSEL: William L. Mahody, K.C. FINAL SUBMISSIONS: June 5, 2026 DECISION DATE: September 2, 2026 DECISION: The ACE Plan is approved, except for C0080111 – 2026...

AI summary The ACE Plan has been approved by the Board, except for the 2026 RTU Deployment. The Board has provided directions to NS Power on other aspects of the application, as detailed in paragraph [241] of the decision.

- [1] Each year, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated files an Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlining its proposed capital expenditures for the upcoming year. In accordance with ss. 35, 35A and 35AA of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 198...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for approval, seeking authorization for projects totaling $76.7 million and routine expenditures of $207.3 million. The Board approved the plan, except for the RTU Deployment project, which was deferred pending the final report from Synapse Energy Economics Consultants in Matter M12558. The Board also addressed several general issues related to capital spending and project approvals.

2.2.4.1 Findings [32] As noted by NS Power, this project will add remote monitoring (i.e. visibility) and control (i.e. SCADA – Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) for the system operator for the sites where new RTU are installed. NS...

AI summary The NSEB acknowledges the benefits of installing RTUs for remote monitoring and control but is concerned about the lack of quantified benefits for the project, which serves only 3.6% of customers. The Board also notes that RTUs are not the primary fault-clearing system and has decided not to approve the project until the Five-Year Reliability Plan is reviewed and benefits are quantified.

3.0 CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA [90] NS Power held an engagement session on October 29, 2025, in advance of filing the 2026 ACE Plan. The session reviewed NS Power's proposed changes to the CEJC. Changes were...

AI summary NS Power held an engagement session on October 29, 2025, to discuss proposed changes to the CEJC in advance of filing the 2026 ACE Plan. The changes clarify when an ATO is required for a sub-routine and its associated expenditure threshold, and include additional language in Appendix A for Transmission and Distribution Routines. These changes were supported by the CA and approved by the Board.

3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations [99] Capital project Scope Change applications are currently addressed in Section 12.2 of NS Power's Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria. These are intended to address changes in...

AI summary The document discusses the need to define 'Scope Change' in the CEJC, as raised by the IG during the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding. The Board agreed and directed NS Power to consult on incorporating a definition into the CEJC for the 2026 ACE Plan.

3.2.1 Findings [110] NS Power believes that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides an appropriate regulatory balance, recognizing that the ATO and FIN processes would capture project Scope Changes beyond those that would be incl...

AI summary NS Power argues that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides adequate regulatory balance, as ATO and FIN processes would capture project changes. However, the IG counters that Scope Changes are meant for advance oversight, not after-the-fact financial review. NS Power notes that many ATO applications are filed after work has been committed or completed.

iate benchmarks. [161] Based on this analysis, NS Power has not identified a new metric that it considers sufficiently superior to its existing reliability measures to warrant adoption at this point: Over the course of the last year, NS Po...

AI summary NS Power has evaluated potential new reliability metrics but does not currently see a need to replace its existing ones, which include SAIDI, SAIFI, CKAIDI, and CKAIFI. The NSEB has opened a new matter (M12376) to review performance standards and may introduce new metrics. NS Power will continue to evaluate emerging measures for future use.

6.2 Regulatory Compact [179] Any analysis of what affordability means in the public utility context starts with the regulatory compact enshrined in the Public Utilities Act . In essence, in return for fulfilling an obligation to provide re...

AI summary The regulatory compact under the Public Utilities Act establishes that public utilities must provide safe, adequate, and reliable electricity service without discrimination, in exchange for recovering prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return. Affordability is assessed based on whether the least costly option is selected to meet legislative or Board requirements, as seen in the CEJC framework and capital project approvals.

7.1.1 Coordination with the IESO Nova Scotia [201] In a letter dated October 9, 2024, the Minister of Energy directed NS Power "…to provide the equipment and systems necessary to maintain the stability, reliability, and power quality of th...

AI summary The Minister of Energy directed NS Power to ensure grid stability for renewable energy integration, including the use of synchronous condensers. The IESO is expected to lead competitive procurement for transmission and system resources, as outlined in the More Access to Energy Act.

9.0 CONTINGENCY ON PROJECTS WITHOUT RISK REGISTERS [214] Mr. Wilson noted that NS Power appears to routinely include a 15% contingency in transmission line and transformer project budgets where no risk matrix is prepared. He also noted tha...

AI summary Mr. Wilson recommends reducing the contingency on transmission projects without risk matrices to 10%, arguing that consistent projects require lower contingency. NS Power disagrees, stating the absence of a risk register does not imply lower risk. The CA supports Wilson's recommendation.

analysis comparing the Mersey Redevelopment Project to the decommissioning and partial decommissioning options. NS Power complied with these directives in Appendix E of its 2026 ACE Plan application. [224] The total cost of the Mersey Rede...

AI summary The Mersey Redevelopment Project's total cost has remained around $1.2 billion in recent ACE Plans, with construction deferred until 2031. NS Power is awaiting the outcome of the IESO Nova Scotia IRP process and is engaging with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to address environmental and regulatory requirements.

[242] An Order will issue accordingly. DATED at Halifax, Nova Scotia, this 2nd day of September 2026. Richard J. Melanson ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ Steven M. Murphy

AI summary An order is issued by the Nova Scotia Energy Board on September 2, 2026, with Richard J. Melanson and Steven M. Murphy signing the document. The content is brief and primarily consists of the order's issuance.

ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board issued an Order on June 18, 2026, however, reserved the right to provide a...

AI summary NS Power submitted its 2026 ACE Plan, which was mostly approved by the Board, except for CI C0080111-2026 RTU Deployment. The Board deferred further consideration of that project pending a final report from Synapse Energy Consultants. The Board also issued directives for future ACE Plans, including updates and additional reporting requirements.

I N D E X O F P R O C E E D I N G S April 21, 2026 PAGE NO. U-10 To provide the inspection reports for the one-year period starting before August 2024 for Project C0053234, and provide the two site assessment reports, dated October 2024 an...

AI summary The document outlines a hearing schedule and proceedings related to various regulatory matters, including inspection reports, vegetation management costs, and data discrepancies, taking place on April 21, 2026, with Richard Melanson as the Chair of the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

NS POWER PANEL 41 In-ch, (Power) 1 From there, I transitioned to the 2 unregulated side of the business, overseeing three large 3 generating facilities in New England as Vice President of 4 Operations for Emera Energy. And in 2018, I reloc...

AI summary The document introduces a witness who has held various leadership roles in energy companies, including Vice President of Operations at Emera Energy and Vice President of Energy Supply at Tampa Electric. The witness is currently the Chief Operating Officer at Nova Scotia Power and is responsible for power production, asset management, and the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative Project Team. The witness has testified in multiple proceedings, including ACE and GRA.

1 Thank you. 2 Upon recessing at 10:54 a.m. 3 Upon resuming at 11:10 a.m. 4 DAVID ARTHUR PICKLES, Resumed: 5 TREVOR ARCHIE BEATON, Resumed: 6 LYNNE ANNE DROVER, Resumed: 7 JONATHAN ROSS CLARK MacINTOSH, Resumed: 8 CHARLENE DEEANNE (Sp?) Ma...

AI summary The text is a transcript of a proceeding where Ms. Powell is cross-examining a panel, referencing NSP's rebuttal evidence (Exhibit N-12) and discussing scope changes related to the CEJC, such as a shift from replacement to refurbishment.

NS POWER PANEL 113 Cr-ex, (Powell) 1 A. (Beaton) That's correct. 2 And then similarly, if there Q. 3 wasn't even an alternative suggested 4 MS. POWELL: So for example, if we 5 pulled up the Application, Mr. Norwood, for Exhibit N-1. 6 And...

AI summary The discussion centers on a boiler refractory replacement project by NSP, where no alternative was suggested in the application. The panel is informed that any change in approach would constitute a scope change. The Consumer Advocate's rebuttal evidence is referenced for further clarification.

NS POWER PANEL 173 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 We added the Dam Safety Routine a 2 number of years ago. 3 So without going through the list line 4 by line, it's not I'm not solely attributing that to 5 the three new ones this year. 6 Okay. So tha...

AI summary The discussion centers on the Dam Safety Routine costs and NSP's review process for routine capital programs. The witness indicates that while there is no specific routine review process, all capital expenditures, including routines, follow the same procurement and scrutiny processes as other capital costs.

NS POWER PANEL 185 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 was the 9th of October. Similar directive. 9 satisfies the IG for now. 10 THE CHAIR: Ms. Rudderham. 11 MS. RUDDERHAM: I wasn't looking 12 specifics for the contract. I was trying to follow up on 13 w...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the transfer of the Condenser Project to the IESO, with a lack of clarity on how the transfer would proceed. There is no confirmation of discussions with the Province or the IESO regarding the transfer, and the Chair expresses concerns about the lack of information available at this stage.

NS POWER PANEL 265 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 estimate leading to an increase due to changes in the CSF, 2 which is the Cyber Security Framework, and advances in 3 available technology. So while we likely would have filed 4 this at potentially a...

AI summary The document discusses changes to the definition of 'scope' in the CEJC (likely the Clean Energy Justice Code) as proposed by NSPI (Nova Scotia Power Inc.). The changes aim to broaden the definition to include overall project objectives and end results, which would affect when a scope change filing is required.

INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 understanding of what scope is, it's being dictated based 2 on what your definition of scope change is; correct? 3 A. (Beaton) Yeah. We're changing it 4 so that we're only going to b...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the definition and management of scope changes in project applications, with NSPI planning to revise its approach if amendments to the CJEC are accepted. The focus is on ensuring that only necessary and value-adding applications are brought forward.

NS POWER PANEL 277 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 And it's also important that a large 2 number of the projects that this could happen to, 3 including this project, we've moved into the routine 4 program, where the level of oversight will remain the...

AI summary The discussion centers on the oversight of projects within a routine program, emphasizing that significant scope changes are rare but could lead to a large number of filings if quantified. The conversation references an international reporting document and a potential analysis of scope changes.

NS POWER PANEL 293 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 Q. And then in the 2025 ACE Plan, 13 to the issue of metrics themselves. And Ms. MacMullin, 14 are these questions for you? 15 (MacMullin) Likely, with A. 16 potentially my colleague, Mr. MacIntosh. 17...

AI summary The document discusses Nova Scotia Power's efforts to develop a metric or suite of metrics to evaluate the success of reliability-based projects, noting that such a metric is not currently in use in the utility sector. The Board has encouraged this development, and the discussion involves Ms. MacMullin and Mr. MacIntosh.

NS POWER PANEL 311 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 (MacIntosh) Mr. Mahody, we can A. 18 And if we just looked at the lagging 19 performance of transformers or feeders in the investment INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 plan to loo...

AI summary The document discusses a regulatory proceeding involving NS Power, focusing on transformer performance, proactive investments, and undertakings related to outage history and feeder load values. The discussion includes questions from the Chair and Mr. Mahody, as well as responses from Mr. Norwood.

NS POWER PANEL 319 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 this project. And the question I wanted to focus in on is 2 Question (i) down at the bottom of the page, Mr. Norwood. 3 BY MR. MAHODY: 4 Q. The company was asked: 5 6 7 Have there been any significant l...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power, focusing on a question regarding significant leaks requiring regulatory reporting. The context includes a legal proceeding and the company's response to a specific inquiry.

NS POWER PANEL 331 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 2 requirements. 4 available. So if the undertaking is to check to see if 5 there's an update and whether more information is 6 available in response to the Board IR what's the IR? 7 MR. MAHODY: 127, I b...

AI summary The document discusses a regulatory proceeding involving NS Power, specifically addressing the need to provide vegetation management costs for transmission lines in response to Board IR 127(a). An undertaking is mentioned to verify updates and provide the required information.

NS POWER PANEL 383 Questions, (Murphy) 1 order to be comparable at this particular scoring your 7 feedback that might be received from the Department of 8 Fisheries and Transport Canada and whatnot, and then in 9 response to Board IR-72, N...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the status of a Fisheries Act authorization for a project by Nova Scotia Power, with concerns raised about potential delays based on past experiences. Nova Scotia Power responds that the current submission differs from previous ones and that active engagement with relevant agencies suggests no delays are expected.

NS POWER PANEL 455 Questions, (Murphy) 1 (Beaton) Just for a point of A. 2 clarification, on lines that were completed in each 3 calendar year or in the years preceding? 4 Just with the lines that were Q. 5 identified in 128. 6 THE CHAIR:...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the need to provide detailed information on the completion of lines referenced in IR-128, specifically regarding customer interruptions and the timing of benefits from completed work. The Chair emphasizes the importance of using actual numbers to calculate percentages accurately.

NS POWER PANEL 521 Questions, (Chair) 1 that are reflected in this routine. It's also there is 13 Could we just hold on for one Q. 14 second? 15 (SHORT PAUSE) 16 Never mind. My apologies. THE CHAIR: 17 BY THE CHAIR: 18 Okay. I'm going to t...

AI summary The Chair of the NS Power Panel 521 is discussing the reasonableness of costs associated with transmission line replacement and upgrade projects approved since the 2021 ACE Plan. The Chair notes that while cost data is available, there is a need for a benchmark to assess whether these costs are reasonable.

NS POWER PANEL 543 Questions, (Chair) 1 27, obviously, if the plan changed, the future GRAs would 2 have to consider it as well? 3 A. (Beaton) Certainly. 4 If well, I'll leave that Q. 5 aside. I'll ask it later or ask it in a different way...

AI summary The discussion centers on how changes to the Five-Year Reliability Plan may affect future General Rate Applications (GRAs) and whether feedback from ratepayers has been sought regarding potential improvements to performance metrics. NS Power mentions that performance standards will be reviewed, with customer representatives having an opportunity to provide feedback.

INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 of the standards, and the NSEB will be able to make the 2 final decision on this after this feedback is received. 3 So there is a review that's, I guess 4 has it started yet? I'm not...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the ongoing review of reliability standards and the Five-Year Reliability Plan by Synapse, with no indication of relaxing standards. The review process is ongoing and is expected to be completed by September.

NS POWER PANEL 547 Questions, (Chair) 1 So while we certainly have, you know, 16 That's correct. A. 17 And you've given evidence, by my Q. 18 count, in over 25 matters before this Board and its 19 predecessor on behalf of the Consumer Advo...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power and the qualification of Mr. Wilson, who has appeared before the Board multiple times. It references his involvement in over 25 matters before the Board and its predecessor, including testimony on Annual Capital Expenditure Plans.

subject to that undertaking and reviewing it, I imagine that some of my thoughts around those topics that relate to that would be provided in greater clarity, I guess might be the best way to put it. INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED...

AI summary The witness discusses their experience as an expert witness in regulatory proceedings, including providing further opinions based on evidence not initially considered by the panel. They mention providing support for filing undertakings and suggest this is a normal process for the Board.

Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 panel? 2 That's a procedural question that A. 3 I don't think I'm qualified to answer. I think I would 4 defer to my counsel as to the appropriate procedure for 5 further responses. I really don't know. 6 But nothing that...

AI summary The exchange discusses procedural questions related to a proceeding, with a witness indicating that their opinions in their report remain unchanged despite new information. The witness refers to Exhibit N-9 and mentions potential changes in wording based on additional facts.

INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS know, there are ATO proceedings, at least, I'm certain, for Tusket Falls. The challenge there is that that ATO proceeding, a lot of evidence was developed in that proceeding and then t...

AI summary The speaker discusses the need for a clear process to reconsider large-scale project changes, such as those seen in the Tusket Falls ATO proceeding, where significant changes in project scope should trigger a full reconsideration by the Board.

WILSON 601 1 but I can't recall the details of that to mind 13 close, and a reply to closing date of June 5th. 14 THE CHAIR: Okay. So I've got May 6th 15 for undertakings, Friday, May 29th for all closing 16 submissions to be filed at the...

AI summary The hearing is being adjourned after setting deadlines for closing submissions and rebuttals. The NSEB aims to issue a decision as quickly as possible, considering the timing of the submissions and the need to manage the ACE Plan. The hearing is adjourned at 3:27 p.m.