N-1Application - Directory 5 filing
17 passages
December 12, 2025 Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Fl. Halifax, NS B3J3P6 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: Fourth Quarter 2025 Application of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. f...
AI summary The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC) has submitted an application to the Nova Scotia Energy Board for approval of revised regional reliability criteria, specifically revisions to NPCC Directory #5 Reserve, under a 2010 Memorandum of Understanding involving Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), NERC, and NPCC.
The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. ("NPCC") submits to the Nova Scotia Energy Board ("NSEB") an application for approval of revisions to NPCC Directory #5 Reserve ("Directory #5"). NPCC requests that based on a vote of the NPCC...
AI summary The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC) has submitted an application to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for approval of revisions to NPCC Directory #5 Reserve , effective October 15, 2025, following a vote by NPCC Full Members.
1. Memorandum of Understanding A Memorandum of Understanding dated May 9, 2010, among Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI"), the North American Electric Reliability Corporation ("NERC"), and NPCC ("May 2010 MOU") sets forth the framework...
AI summary A 2010 Memorandum of Understanding between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, NERC, and NPCC outlines the framework for implementing mandatory reliability standards in Nova Scotia. NPCC is required to file initial and updated regional reliability criteria with the Nova Scotia Energy Board for approval.
2. July 2011 Order In an application dated June 29, 2010 ("June 29, 2010 Application"), NPCC applied to the NSUARB for approval of the approved versions of the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria. In an order and decision dated July 20, 201...
AI summary In July 2011, the NSUARB approved the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria, making them mandatory in Nova Scotia. The order also established a quarterly review process for future amendments to the criteria, which require approval by the NSUARB (now NSEB) before becoming mandatory.
3. This Application This application requests the NSEB to approve revisions to NPCC Directory #5 Reserve, effective October 15, 2025. A description justifying the Directory #5 revisions is provided in Section C below.
AI summary This application requests the NSEB to approve revisions to NPCC Directory #5 Reserve , effective October 15, 2025, with justifications provided in Section C.
1. NPCC Process for NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria All NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria are contained in NPCC Directory documents. The process for establishing a new or revised NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria, or when retiring or...
AI summary The document outlines the process for establishing, revising, or retiring NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria. A task force of industry experts drafts or reviews criteria, which undergo a 45-day comment period before being approved by the RCC and then balloted by NPCC Full Members. Once approved, the criteria are published and filed with regulatory authorities.
C. Description of Directory #5 and Justification for Revisions In this application, NPCC requests the NSEB to approve revisions to the Regional Reliability Criteria contained in Directory #5 Reserve , effective October 15, 2025. Directory...
AI summary NPCC requests approval from the NSEB to revise Directory #5 Reserve , aligning it with NERC Standards and incorporating industry feedback. The revisions were reviewed by the TFCO and RCC, and obtained Full Member approval on October 15, 2025.
III. CONCLUSION By this filing, NPCC respectfully requests that the NSEB approve the revisions to the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria contained in NPCC Directory #5 Reserve, effective October 15, 2025. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Damase...
AI summary NPCC requests approval from the NSEB for revisions to the Regional Reliability Criteria, effective October 15, 2025. The filing is signed by Damase Hebert, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of NPCC.
6.2Data Retention Responsible Entities shall keep evidence of compliance for a minimum of three (3) years. A Responsible Entity found non-compliant shall keep information related to the non-compliance until found compliant. _______________...
AI summary The document outlines data retention requirements for Responsible Entities, requiring evidence of compliance to be kept for at least three years. It also details the review and approval process for revisions to the Directory, involving the Task Force on Coordination of Operation, RCC, and Full Member Representatives, and aligns with NERC and NPCC standards.
Appendix D – Guideline for Determining the Time T+0 The determination of time T+0 for resource losses is consistent with the methodology described in the NERC Performance Standard Reference Guide. For performing compliance evaluations, tim...
AI summary This guideline outlines the methodology for determining time T+0 for resource losses in compliance with NERC standards. It specifies that T+0 is based on the first observation of declining output within a sliding 60-second interval, with the DCS computation taking precedence if there is a conflict. The guideline also excludes resource loss preceding the interval from the calculation of megawatts lost.
Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking (New, Errata or Revisions) Version History2 Table of Contents3 1Introduction Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 0.46" 554 1.1 Title Reserve554 1.2 Directory Number 5554 1.3 Objective554 1.4 Eff...
AI summary The document outlines the version history and structure of a regulatory proceeding, including sections such as introduction, defined terms, compliance requirements, and appendices related to reliability standards and monitoring procedures. It includes formatting notes and references to reliability criteria from NERC and NPCC.
1.6.2 Applicability of NPCC Criteria Requirements to abide by an NPCC Directory may also reside in external tariff requirements, bilateral contracts and other agreements between facility owners and/or operators, and their assigned Reliabil...
AI summary This section outlines the applicability of NPCC Directory requirements, noting that compliance is enforced through external agreements and not by NPCC itself unless the entity is a Full Member. It also references NERC reliability standards and indicates no additional NPCC regional reliability standards.
Ten-Minute Reserve Requirements - R1. Each Balancing Authority shall have ten-minute reserve available to it that is at least equal to its first contingency loss Most Severe Single Contingency (MSSC). NPCC ten-minute reserve meets the requ...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for ten-minute reserve availability for Balancing Authorities, specifying that reserves must meet the first contingency loss Most Severe Single Contingency (MSSC) and align with NERC standards. Deficiencies must be addressed promptly, and if not possible, their impact must be minimized.
Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve R22. Balancing Authorities participating in the "Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve" , (SAR) program shall conform to the procedures, as specified in Attachment B.
AI summary The document outlines that Balancing Authorities participating in the 'Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve' (SAR) program must follow the procedures specified in Attachment B.
6.2 Data Retention Responsible Entities shall keep evidence of compliance for a minimum of three (3) years. A Responsible Entity found non-compliant shall keep information related to the non-compliance until found compliant. Prepared by: T...
AI summary The document outlines data retention requirements for Responsible Entities, specifying a minimum of three years for compliance evidence. It details the revision and approval process for the Directory, involving the NPCC Open Process, Task Forces, and RCC Members, ensuring alignment with NERC and NPCC standards.
Attachment A – Synchronized Reserve Detail Calculation Month ACE Recovery Failures and Successes Requirement Implementation Date Monthly Synchronized Reserve Penalty Total Synchronized Reserve Penalty Detail Behind Penalty September 2 Fail...
AI summary This document provides details on synchronized reserve penalties and their calculation based on failures and successes in September through May. It also includes information on simultaneous activation of ten-minute reserve contingencies.
Appendix C – Participation Request Form - Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve and ACE Diversity Interchange Instructions NPCC Balancing Authorities and adjacent Balancing Authorities must complete this form to request participati...
AI summary This document outlines the process for Balancing Authorities and adjacent Balancing Authorities to request participation in the NPCC's Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve (SAR) and ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) programs. The form must be completed and submitted to the NPCC Task Force on Coordination of Operation (TFCO) for approval.
N-2Application - Directory 7 filing
23 passages
December 12, 2025 Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Fl. Halifax, NS B3J3P6 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: Fourth Quarter 2025 Application of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. f...
AI summary The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC) has submitted an application to the Nova Scotia Energy Board for approval of revised Regional Reliability Criteria, specifically revisions to NPCC Directory #7 Remedial Action Schemes , as outlined in a May 11, 2010 Memorandum of Understanding.
The Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. ("NPCC") submits to the Nova Scotia Energy Board ("NSEB") an application for approval of revisions to NPCC Directory #7 Remedial Action Schemes ("Directory #7"). NPCC requests that based on a...
AI summary NPCC has submitted an application to the Nova Scotia Energy Board for approval of revisions to Directory #7, which outlines Remedial Action Schemes. The revisions, approved by NPCC Full Members on October 23, 2025, are requested to become effective on the same date in Nova Scotia. Clean and redlined versions of the directory are provided as supporting exhibits.
1. Memorandum of Understanding A Memorandum of Understanding dated May 9, 2010, among Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI"), the North American Electric Reliability Corporation ("NERC"), and NPCC ("May 2010 MOU") sets forth the framework...
AI summary A Memorandum of Understanding dated May 9, 2010, outlines the framework for implementing mandatory reliability standards in Nova Scotia, involving Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, NERC, and NPCC, with the NSUARB (now NSEB) responsible for approving the standards and their amendments.
2. July 2011 Order In an application dated June 29, 2010 ("June 29, 2010 Application"), NPCC applied to the NSUARB for approval of the approved versions of the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria. In an order and decision dated July 20, 201...
AI summary In July 2011, the NSUARB approved the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria, making them mandatory in Nova Scotia. The order also established a quarterly review process for future amendments to the criteria, which require NSUARB (now NSEB) approval before becoming mandatory.
1. NPCC Process for NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria All NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria are contained in NPCC Directory documents. The process for establishing a new or revised NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria, or when retiring or...
AI summary The document outlines the process for establishing, revising, or retiring NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria. It involves the formation of an NPCC Task Force, public comment periods, approval by the Reliability Coordinating Committee, and final approval by NPCC Full Members. Once approved, criteria are published and filed with regulatory authorities.
C. Description of Directory #7 and Justification for Revisions In this application, NPCC requests the NSEB to approve revisions to the Regional Reliability Criteria contained in Directory #7 Remedial Action Schemes , effective, October 23,...
AI summary NPCC requests the NSEB to approve revisions to Directory #7, which outlines the design criteria and review process for Remedial Action Schemes (RAS). The revisions aim to address the impact of evolving NERC Standards and industry technologies, based on a triennial review conducted by the Task Force on Coordination of Planning and the Task Force on System Protection.
requirements associated with RAS. See clean (Exh. A) and redlined (Exh. B) versions of Directory #7. The proposed revisions are provided in the table below: Section No Title Notable Changes/Additions A new bullet added for the replacement...
AI summary The document outlines proposed revisions to the Reliability Assessment System (RAS) requirements, including changes to the review process for RAS equipment replacement and the removal of certain PRC-012 requirements. These updates align with the revised NPCC RAS review process and Directory #1 and #7 requirements.
III. CONCLUSION By this filing, NPCC respectfully requests that the NSEB approve the revisions to the NPCC Regional Reliability Criteria contained in NPCC Directory #7 Remedial Action Schemes, effective October 23, 2025. Respectfully submi...
AI summary NPCC requests the NSEB to approve revisions to its Regional Reliability Criteria, specifically the Remedial Action Schemes in NPCC Directory #7, effective October 23, 2025. The filing is signed by Damase Hebert, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of NPCC.
1.6.2.2 Existing Facilities It is the responsibility of RAS -entities to assess their existing RAS and to make modifications that are required to meet the intent of these more stringent NPCC criteria as follows: 1.6.2.2.1 Planned Modificat...
AI summary The text outlines the responsibility of RAS-entities to assess and modify their existing RAS systems to meet updated NPCC criteria. It specifies procedures for reviewing modifications or replacements of RAS equipment and the need for assessments when criteria are not met.
1.6.2.2.2 Reclassification of RAS Any RAS that are identified as potentially requiring reclassification shall be submitted for review in accordance with Section 6. For Type I RAS , where the RAS -entity has determined that the cost and ris...
AI summary The reclassification of Remedial Action Schemes (RAS) is outlined, with Type I RAS requiring review by the Task Force on System Protection (TFSP) if the cost and risks of implementing more stringent NPCC criteria for physical separation cannot be justified.
5.11 Teleprotection Criteria - 5.11.1 Communication facilities required for teleprotection shall be designed to have a level of performance consistent with that required of the RAS , and shall meet the following: - 5.11.1.1 Where the desig...
AI summary This section outlines the communication facility design criteria for teleprotection systems, emphasizing performance consistency with the Remedial Action Scheme (RAS) and physical separation requirements to ensure redundancy and reliability.
7.0 Compliance Monitoring Process Compliance with the requirements set forth in this Directory will be in accordance with the NPCC Criteria Compliance and Enforcement Program (CCEP). NPCC will not enforce a duplicate sanction for the viola...
AI summary The compliance monitoring process for the NPCC Criteria Compliance and Enforcement Program (CCEP) outlines procedures for enforcing requirements, revising the Directory, and ensuring alignment with NERC standards. Revisions require approval from the RCC and Full Member Representatives, with updates occurring at least every three years.
3.0 Retirement of a Type I or Type II RAS - 3.1 The proposing entity shall notify the TFCP Chairman and Secretary of the intention to retire an existing Type I or Type II RAS. The notification shall include technical justification and anal...
AI summary This section outlines the procedure for retiring a Type I or Type II RAS. The proposing entity must notify the TFCP with technical justification, and TFCP will review the analysis and consult TFSS before making a decision. Retirement requires TFCP's agreement, and TFSS will update the NPCC RAS list accordingly.
5.0 Review and Approval of proposed planned replacement of RAS equipment of a Type I or Type II RAS (no functional modification) - 5.1 The proposing entity shall notify the TFSP Chair and Secretary of its intention to propose a planned rep...
AI summary The document outlines the process for reviewing and approving the planned replacement of RAS equipment without functional modification. It requires notification to the TFSP Chair and Secretary, compliance with NPCC guidelines, and forwarding of findings to TFCP for tracking.
1.0 Introduction In accordance with the applicable facilities described in Section 1.6.2 of this Directory, proposing entity should provide the Task Force on Coordination of Planning (TFCP) with advance notification of any of its new Remed...
AI summary The proposing entity must notify the Task Force on Coordination of Planning (TFCP) of new or modified Remedial Action Scheme (RAS) facilities early in the engineering design stage. TFCP will forward the request for design review to the Task Force on System Protection (TFSP), except for RAS equipment replacements without functional modifications, which should be reported directly to TFSP.
2.0 Presentation and Review of RAS Each new or modified Type I or Type II RAS shall be reported to the Task Force on System Protection. A presentation will be made to the TFSP on new RAS or a modification to an existing RAS .
AI summary The document outlines the requirement for reporting new or modified Type I or Type II RAS to the Task Force on System Protection (TFSP) and the need to present such changes to the TFSP.
5.0 Review by TFSP The TFSP will review the material presented and develop a response concerning the proposed RAS . This statement will indicate one of the following: - 5.1 The need for additional information to enable the TFSP to reach a...
AI summary The TFSP will review the proposed RAS and provide a response indicating acceptance, conditional acceptance, rejection, or a need for additional information. The outcome will be documented in meeting minutes and letters to the Chairperson of TFCP and the RAS-entity.
Appendix B. - 1.1.1. The information identified in NERC PRC-012 Attachment 1. - 6.1.1.1 The proposed RAS Type: I, II, or Limited Impact; and rationale for classification. - 6.1.1 For Type I and Type II, the proposing entity shall: - 6.1.2....
AI summary Appendix B outlines the requirements for designing, submitting, and reviewing Remedial Action Schemes (RAS) in accordance with NERC PRC-012 and NPCC criteria. Entities proposing RAS must follow specific procedures, including submitting documentation to the Task Force on System Protection (TFSP) and ensuring compliance with reliability standards.
7.0 Compliance Monitoring Process Compliance with the requirements set forth in this Directory will be in accordance with the NPCC Criteria Compliance and Enforcement Program (CCEP). NPCC will not enforce a duplicate sanction for the viola...
AI summary The compliance monitoring process for the Directory is governed by the NPCC Criteria Compliance and Enforcement Program (CCEP). Revisions require a 45-day review period and RCC approval. Updates are conducted at least every three years to ensure consistency with NERC standards and other NPCC documents.
The following table provides a summary of entity's proposed RAS and the required review from the various Task Forces. Entity's Proposal TFCO TFCP TFSP TFSS 1.New Limited Impact RAS or functional ✓ ✓ modification to an existing Limited Impa...
AI summary The text outlines a table summarizing the proposed RAS (Remedial Action Scheme) and the required reviews by various Task Forces. It details different scenarios of RAS proposals and the corresponding Task Forces involved in their review and approval.
by the RAS - 3.1.3.2.2.3. Changes to the actions the RAS is designed to initiate - 3.1.4.2.2.4. Changes to RAS hardware beyond in-kind replacement - 3.1.5.2.2.5. Changes to RAS logic beyond correcting existing errors or minor modification...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for modifying the Remedial Action Scheme (RAS), including changes to hardware, logic, and redundancy levels. It describes the roles of various task forces, such as TFCP, TFSS, TFSP, and TFCO, in reviewing and approving proposed RAS modifications to ensure compliance with reliability standards.
4.03.0 Retirement of a Type I or Type II RAS - 3.1 The proposing entity shall notify the TFCP Chairman and Secretary of the intention to retire an existing Type I or Type II RAS. The notification shall include technical justification and a...
AI summary This section outlines the process for retiring a Type I or Type II RAS, including notification requirements, review by TFCP and TFSS, and the need for TFCP approval. The RAS list is updated by TFSS with a 'to be retired' notation and the RAS is removed upon actual retirement.
5.04.0 Retiring Retirement of a Limited Impact RAS - A formal approval to retire a limited impact RAS is not required. 4.1 The RAS proposing entity shall informnotify TFCP of the proposed retirement and provide the technical justification,...
AI summary The document outlines the process for retiring a limited impact RAS, which does not require formal approval. The proposing entity must notify TFCP and provide technical justification. TFCP must inform Task Forces and RCC, and TFSS must update the NPCC RAS list. For planned replacement of RAS equipment, the proposing entity must notify TFSP and submit information for review.