N-3IESO (CA) RIR 1 to 10 - Redacted
7 passages
Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Consumer Advocate (CA) Information Requests 1 Request IR - 1 2 Reference: Application, p. 4, lines 9-17 3 Phase II involves the transfer of real-time dispatch o...
AI summary The document discusses Phase II of the transfer of real-time dispatch operations by IESO Nova Scotia, highlighting the complexity of the transition and the need for a third-party consultant to scope and plan the implementation. The current aspirational timeline for Phase II is Q1 2027/2028, but work in early 2026 is required to finalize the plan.
8. Risks Risk Potential Impact Mitigation Approach Knowledge gaps or staff turnover Loss of continuity in roadmap execution Embed multiple staff in each workshop; provide comprehensive documentation and "train the trainer" materials; recom...
AI summary The document outlines potential risks and mitigation strategies for a project involving the Independent Energy System Operator Nova Scotia (IESO) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP). Risks include knowledge gaps, limited data access, cybersecurity complexity, regulatory changes, and resource constraints, with corresponding measures to address these challenges.
As the transition process defines the split responsibilities between IESO NS and NSP, common and shared responsibilities will be considered as well. For shared responsibilities, we envision: - Connection process: IESO remains with operatio...
AI summary The document outlines the transition process and shared responsibilities between IESO NS and NSP, focusing on areas such as connection processes, emergency response, reliability, regulatory reporting, data exchange, cybersecurity, hybrid models, and inter-regional collaboration.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR - 4 2 Reference: Application, p. 8, lines 10-15 3 Subject to the proclamation of certain provisions of the Act, Phase II involves the transfer of real 4 time dispatch operations. Detailed transition planning i...
AI summary The text outlines a regulatory proceeding related to the implementation of Phase II of the Act, focusing on the transfer of real-time dispatch operations. It requests details on unproclaimed provisions of the Act and IESO NS's progress in assessing technology, regulatory compliance, and space requirements. IESO NS states no formal discussions have occurred regarding the proclamation of these provisions.
Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Consumer Advocate (CA) Information Requests
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia has responded to information requests from the Consumer Advocate (CA) in a regulatory proceeding. The responses pertain to matters related to energy system operations and consumer interests.
Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Consumer Advocate (CA) Information Requests
AI summary The document outlines the responses provided by the Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) to information requests made by the Consumer Advocate (CA). These responses are part of a regulatory proceeding and provide details on various aspects of energy system operations and customer service.
Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Consumer Advocate (CA) Information Requests 99 100 iii. Workstation PCs are required to operate the specialized software. No 101 workstation PCs were transferre...
AI summary The document outlines the transition of roles from NS Power to the IESO Nova Scotia, noting that 18 of 21 roles are filled, with three remaining vacant. It also mentions that workstation PCs were not transferred due to end-of-life or shared usage with other departments.
N-6IESO (NSEB) RIR 1 to 33 - Redacted
5 passages
Project Work Plan and Schedule Date: March 10, 2026 Project Key activities Estimated Completion MAEA Objects 2026/2027 Revenue Requirement and Fee Application (M12663) -Evidence by Intervenors and Board Counsel Consultants due March 31, 20...
AI summary The document outlines the project work plan and schedule for the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for 2026/2027, covering key activities such as evidence submission, stakeholder engagement, and the development of an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). Key projects include the 2026/2027 Revenue Requirement and Fee Application and the establishment of a permanent fee and cost recovery mechanism.
Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests 1 Request IR - 5 2 In its application Matter M12412, dated August 5, 2025, IESO Nova Scotia advised that Ph...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia responded to NSEB information requests regarding the progress of Phase I of the system operator transition from NS Power. Key steps were completed by December 31, 2025, including role transfers, system planning, and governance setup. NERC compliance was completed in February 2026. Delays were due to coordination with NS Power, NERC, and NPCC.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR - 6 2 In its application Matter M12412, dated August 5, 2025, IESO Nova Scotia advised that Phase II 3 of the transition of the system operator functions from NS Power was expected to occur in Q2 4 2027. On pa...
AI summary The document outlines a request for information regarding the transition of system operator functions from NS Power, specifically Phase II, with questions about the aspirational timeline, changes in expectations, RFP details, and the submission of a deliverable plan to the Board.
- 3 expects to incur costs associated with future energy resource procurement. - 4 (a) Please describe the nature of the capital-related costs expected to be incurred, and estimate 5 in which fiscal year(s) they are expected to be incurred...
AI summary The document outlines questions regarding the nature and timing of capital-related costs for future energy resource procurement by IESO Nova Scotia, whether IESO Nova Scotia intends to build and own energy resources, and how costs will be recovered and allocated. It also references regulatory pathways for NSEB review and approval in 2026.
7 and Regulatory Category 2025/2026 Actual 2025/2026 2026/2027 budget ($) 2025/2026 Annualized Proposed Difference ($) (Millions) at Dec 31 Expenditures Budget ($) (Millions) Cost category ($) ($) (Millions) (Millions) (increase)/decrease...
AI summary The table outlines legal and regulatory costs for 2025/2026 and 2026/2027, showing budget figures, actual expenditures, and proposed changes. It also references responses from IESO Nova Scotia to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board.
N-17Transition Plan and IT, OT & Cybersecurity Roadmap - IESO
9 passages
Under the authority of Nova Scotia's More Access to Energy Act (2024) (hereafter called 'the Act'), the newly established IESO Nova Scotia is charged with assuming key system-operator functions currently held by Nova Scotia Power (NSP). Tr...
AI summary The IESO Nova Scotia is transitioning key system-operator functions from Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in two phases. Phase 1, Transmission Planning & Procurement, is set for Winter 2025/26, and Phase 2, Dispatching & Control, is targeted for Spring 2027. The IESO is seeking proposals for Phase 2 transition planning, including IT/OT/Cyber security roadmaps and implementation plans to ensure system reliability and regulatory compliance.
admap must include detailed plans for Information Technology (IT), Operational Technology (OT), and Cybersecurity, and be holistic in nature capturing all dependencies such as facility changes, rule development for market participants, and...
AI summary The scope of work outlines requirements for an admap that includes detailed IT, OT, and cybersecurity plans, along with timelines, costs, and implementation sequencing. It also emphasizes the need for detailed system mapping, data flows, and risk management to support the IESO Nova Scotia's roadmap implementation.
Anticipated Work • A thorough review of the Legislative requirements - A review of relevant work to date including an Archer assessment of the split of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) compliance requirements between...
AI summary The anticipated work includes a comprehensive review of legislative requirements, NERC CIP standards, market rules, and infrastructure assessments, as well as evaluations of operational agreements and emergency frameworks related to the transfer of responsibilities.
Expected Deliverables - A report with details of the identified options, pros and cons, timelines, costs, extent to which IESO Nova Scotia processes and systems will be separated from or dependent upon NSP and additional other relevant inf...
AI summary The deliverables include a report on options for IESO Nova Scotia, collaboration with NSP, scalability considerations, back office technology changes, real-time operations, and a transition plan and roadmap for future development stages.
Proposed Approach and Methodology Describe your approach for defining each major stage of the engagement. Include methods for stakeholder engagement, workshops, and consensus building. Clearly explain how your approach ensures alignment wi...
AI summary The text outlines the need for a proposed approach and methodology for defining major stages of an engagement, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, workshops, consensus building, and alignment with regulatory obligations, NERC/NPCC standards, and IT/OT cybersecurity integration.
Deliverables and Outcomes Clearly describe what deliverables will be provided at each phase, including their expected form (e.g., reports, architectural diagrams, transition plans, SOW templates). Identify how each deliverable will support...
AI summary The text outlines the need to clearly describe deliverables at each phase of the project, including their expected form and how they will support decision-making and transition execution by IESO Nova Scotia.
Conflict of Interest Proponents must not engage in any activity or communication that would constitute or create a Conflict of Interest. IESO Nova Scotia may disqualify a Proponent for any conduct, situation or circumstance that constitute...
AI summary The document outlines rules to prevent conflicts of interest in the RFP process, stating that proponents must not engage in activities that could create a conflict and that IESO Nova Scotia may disqualify a proponent for various violations, including non-disclosure of conflicts or participation in other conflicting RFPs.
Illegal or Unethical Acts Proponents must not engage in any illegal bidding practices, including conspiracy, bidrigging, price-fixing, bribery, fraud or collusion. Proponents must not engage in any unethical conduct, including lobbying or...
AI summary The document outlines prohibited illegal and unethical acts for proponents in the RFP process, such as bid rigging, fraud, and inappropriate communications. IESO Nova Scotia reserves the right to disqualify any proponent engaging in these activities or submitting misleading information.
RETURN THIS SHEET WITH YOUR COST PROPOSAL
AI summary This document is a directive to submit a cost proposal along with the sheet, indicating a regulatory process involving cost considerations and submissions.
100963NSEB (IESO NS) IR 1 to 33 - Word
5 passages
lain how payments made on April 1, 2026 are effective January 1, 2026 or February 1, 2026”. On page 4 of its application, IESO Nova Scotia refers to its mandate under the More Access to Energy Act . 1. Please provide a detailed workplan of...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions directed at IESO Nova Scotia regarding its workplan, activities under the More Access to Energy Act , and the progress of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It also requests information on staffing and organizational structure, and notes that Phase I of the transition from NS Power has not been completed.
r functions from NS Power was expected to occur in Q4 2025. On page 4 of the present application, IESO Nova Scotia notes that Phase I has not yet been achieved, but significant progress has been made. 1. Please outline the steps in Phase I...
AI summary The document discusses the progress and delays in the transition of system operator functions from NS Power, referencing Matter M12412 and the current application. It outlines questions regarding the completion of Phase I, the definition of Phase II, and the meaning of the term 'aspirational' in the context of timelines.
and timelines” issued, when was the contract awarded and to whom? 4. Please indicate when in 2026 the deliverable plan, appropriate target date and budget will be available to be filed with the Board. On page 6 of the application, IESO Nov...
AI summary The document includes questions regarding the timeline and award of a contract, the availability of a deliverable plan and budget in 2026, discrepancies between actual and proposed expenditures in Matter M12412, compliance with reliability standards, and the IRP process transition from NS Power to IESO Nova Scotia.
or conducting an IRP analysis. On page 8 of its application, IESO Nova Scotia states it will incur capital-related costs and expects to incur costs associated with future energy resource procurement. 1. Please describe the nature of the ca...
AI summary The document outlines questions regarding IESO Nova Scotia's capital-related costs, procurement strategies, cost recovery methods, and regulatory pathways for cost categories. It also references Table 3 on page 12 of the application.
1. Will IESO Nova Scotia be preparing an administration manual detailing the policies and procedures applicable to its proposed deferral and variance account (and if so when)? 2. Please explain if interest or financing costs will be associ...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions directed at IESO Nova Scotia regarding the administration, financial implications, reporting requirements, and risk management of its proposed Net Revenue Requirement Deferral and Variance Mechanism.
102939Closing Submission - CA - Redacted
14 passages
26 This Application concerns IESO Nova Scotia's proposed expenditure and revenue requirement for 27 its second test year, ending March 31, 2027. 21 Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator's ("IESO NS" or "IESO") Application for 22 A...
AI summary The document discusses IESO Nova Scotia's application for approval of its revenue, expenditures, and fees for its second test year. While the CA does not oppose the application, it raises concerns about transparency, accuracy of information, and specific methodologies and timelines related to the IESO's transition from NS Power.
41 Cost recovery 42 43 30 (1) The IESO shall apply to the Energy Board for the recovery of costs for energy 44 resource supply contracts, and any costs incurred by the IESO for the administration of 45 those contracts, respecting settlemen...
AI summary This section discusses the Energy Board's authority to recover costs incurred by the IESO for energy resource supply contracts and the interpretation of the Act regarding the Board's power to approve or disallow costs. The Department of Energy's counsel did not take a firm position on the Board's authority to disallow costs, leaving the interpretation to the Board.
31 a) Does s. 29 of the Act permit the Board to "disallow" or "disapprove" forecast 32 costs? 33 34 First, the Board has broad regulatory authority over the IESO. Sections 5, 6, and 30 of the Energy 35 and Regulatory Boards Act describe th...
AI summary The document discusses whether section 29 of the Act permits the Board to disallow or disapprove forecast costs, referencing the Board's regulatory authority over the IESO and relevant sections of the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.
44 (b) by the More Access to Energy Act ; 3 [H](#page-4-1)earing Transcript, June 25, 2026, pp. 457-464. 1 2 3 4 (c) respecting the production, transmission, delivery or furnishing of electrical energy for the purpose of heat, light and po...
AI summary The text references section 44(b) of the More Access to Energy Act and outlines the Energy Board's regulatory authority under various acts, including the Public Utilities Act and the Electricity Act. It emphasizes the Board's responsibility to approve rates and consider factors such as competition, innovation, and sustainable development.
1 for private, competitive companies. For that reason, the 2 Province's electric service supplier is a cost-of-service 3 monopoly. In return for undertaking and continuing the costs 4 of electrification of the Province, the utility is perm...
AI summary The document discusses the regulatory framework governing Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) as a monopoly and the Board's role in ensuring fair and reasonable rates for customers while allowing the utility to recover its reasonable and prudent costs. The Board's regulatory power is described as a proxy for competition, not an instrument of social policy.
7 b) Does s. 29 of the Act permit the Board to "disallow" actual costs incurred by 8 the IESO where there is a finding of imprudence? 10 Section 29 of the Act does not explicitly address whether the Board has the authority to disallow 11 c...
AI summary Section 29 of the Act does not explicitly prohibit the Board from disallowing actual costs incurred by the IESO if there is a finding of imprudence. The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development argues that the Board has the authority to review the IESO's conduct and potentially order disallowances, especially where mechanisms for such reviews were previously approved.
15 2) IESO's Lack of Transparency in the Regulatory Process 16 17 The CA is concerned about the level of detail provided by the IESO in the course of this hearing, 18 and whether the IESO has provided a sufficient evidentiary record upon w...
AI summary The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) is concerned about the lack of transparency and insufficient evidentiary record provided by the IESO in its application for OM&A costs and transitional planning costs. The IESO did not provide detailed work papers or background costing information to support its estimates.
33 3) Forecast Accuracy 35 The CA is concerned about the limited information that has been provided as well as the reliability 36 and accuracy of the IESO's lack of transparency in this proceeding. 38 First, we note that IESO NS has been c...
AI summary The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) is concerned about the limited information and lack of transparency in the IESO's Application, particularly regarding the accuracy of forecasts. The IESO acknowledges that the Application was prepared with limited resources and based on prior submissions, with some forecasts lacking detailed justification.
34 4) OM&A – Reasonableness of Proposed Costs 36 Given the concerns expressed above regarding transparency and potential lack of accuracy, the CA 37 remains generally concerned about the IESO's forecasted costs, especially given the IESO's...
AI summary The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) expresses concerns about the IESO's forecasted OM&A costs, particularly in the Employees (Administration) and Governance categories, citing transparency and accuracy issues and the IESO's limited track record.
dequate planning given 3 the size of the organization and the number of employees. Given progress to date, this is certainly 4 something IESO NS could and should update. 5 6 As for a potential vacancy rate, the IESO has said the organizati...
AI summary The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) suggests that the IESO NS should reassess its forecast for Administration employee costs, as the current forecast may be too high. The CA also notes that the IESO NS should use comparator organizations to determine an appropriate vacancy rate.
17 ii. Employee Compensation 18 19 As noted above, the CA requested further information from IESO NS regarding its reliance upon 20 external consultants when establishing compensation for non-CEO roles. Although detailed 21 information was...
AI summary The CA requested information from IESO NS regarding the use of external consultants in setting employee compensation. IESO NS confirmed reliance on Timbar Consulting and HUB International Ltd., with HUB's work involving direct guidance rather than a written report. The CA requested the work product of these consultants, which IESO NS committed to providing.
izes the Board has the statutory authority to determine 4 its own remuneration, but the reasonableness of these rates is difficult to ascertain based on the 5 information IESO has provided to date. 6 7 In response to an undertaking request...
AI summary The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) questions the reasonableness of the Board's remuneration, noting insufficient evidence provided by the IESO NS. A confidential report by Hugessen Consulting was filed, but its details remain unclear.
9 5) Transition from NS Power to IESO NS 10 11 In addition to seeking approval for operating costs, the IESO's Application also seeks approval of 12 transitional costs and provides a general update regarding the IESO's progress in transiti...
AI summary The IESO NS is seeking approval for transitional costs associated with the transition from NS Power. The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (CA) is concerned about potential functional overlap and cost duplication, which could lead to higher costs for ratepayers. The Board has also expressed concerns about this issue and will monitor it closely.
ion, para. 8. [ 39 ](#page-26-7) Hearing Transcript, June 17, 2026, p.. 202-205; 258. [ 40 ](#page-26-9) Hearing Transcript, June 17, 2026, pp. 281-283. 1 discretion to then reallocate based on operational needs. This "robbing Peter to pay...
AI summary The CA is concerned that the IESO NS may engage in imprudent spending by reallocating underspent funds to other categories, potentially leading to over-spending. The CA also highlights the problematic approval of NB Power's RIGS facility before proper analysis and governance processes were in place, leading to significant risks for NB Power and its customers.
102945Closing Submission - IG
7 passages
fuel procurement process. This is particularly the case since the FAM proposed by NSPI would transfer 100% of the risk to ratepayers. Accordingly, the Board rejects the proposed FAM...[7](#page-2-2) The Board did not foreclose the possibil...
AI summary The Board rejected the proposed Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM) due to the risk it posed to ratepayers, emphasizing the need for a robust fuel procurement policy, transparency, and independent audits before considering such a mechanism in the future.
b. Unforeseen Costs Should Require a Board Application As proposed, the Deferral Account would effectively permit IESO-NS to incur costs, identify variances after the fact and recover those amounts from ratepayers in a subsequent period wi...
AI summary The Industrial Group argues that the Deferral Account should not be used to recover significant unforeseen costs without prior Board approval, as this would shift financial risk to ratepayers and bypass regulatory oversight. They propose that IESO-NS should apply to the Board for approval of such costs, ensuring transparency and accountability.
a. Limitations of the DGT Review DGT was retained by Board Counsel to conduct an independent review of the Application. However, DGT's scope of work and mandate in conducting its review was limited. In response to the Industrial Groups IRs...
AI summary The DGT Review was limited in scope, focusing on reviewing the Application, interrogatory responses, and mathematical accuracy, but not on verifying management representations, conducting detailed quantitative testing, or assessing prudence. The Industrial Group argues that the absence of unreasonableness does not imply prudence or necessity of costs.
une 17, pages 282–283. [ 61 ](#page-13-13) Transcript June 17, page 284. [ 62 ](#page-14-1) Transcript, June 25, page 322. interest would accrue, and how true-ups would work, the panel repeatedly deferred substantive answers to future docu...
AI summary The document highlights a lack of transparency and adequacy of evidence regarding the Deferral Account, with the IESO-NS not providing clear documentation or policy on how the account will be administered, leading to uncertainty and unresolved internal discussions.
6. IESO-NS AND NSPI COLLABORATION – TRANSPARENCY AND COST DUPLICATION The Industrial Group has consistently raised the importance of transparency in the relative obligations of IESO-NS and NSPI during the transition period, and the need fo...
AI summary The Industrial Group emphasizes the need for transparency and cost avoidance between IESO-NS and NSPI during the transition period, noting the lack of a formal governance framework and the risk of duplicate costs being charged to ratepayers. They recommend a certification process and a written framework to address this issue.
MAEA ), the Ontario IESO annual reporting includes a financial performance analysis comparing actual results for its core operations, with narrative explanation of material variances.[83](#page-17-0) In contrast with the approach taken by...
AI summary The text discusses annual reporting improvements, comparing the Ontario IESO's public disclosure of financial performance, executive compensation, and benchmarking methodologies with the IESO-NS approach. It notes the lack of comparable information from IESO-NS in this proceeding and references related regulatory matters and legal decisions.
CONCLUSION In reliance on the above submissions, the Industrial Group requests that the Board: - 1. decline to make the Deferral Account Mechanism permanent, and decline to expand its scope to include capital cost variances or catch-all un...
AI summary The Industrial Group requests the Board to not make the Deferral Account Mechanism permanent or expand its scope, and if approved for 2026/2027, to implement it on a limited, interim, and conditional basis with specific governance requirements.
102946Closing Submission - IESO
15 passages
22 23 IESO Nova Scotia submits that, based on the record provided to the Board under this matter to 24 date, IESO Nova Scotia's revenue requirement is reasonable and prudent, and is necessary for it 25 to carry out its important mandate un...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia argues that its 2026/27 revenue requirement is reasonable and necessary for fulfilling its mandate under the More Access to Energy Act (MAEA). It also defends the proposed DVM as a mechanism to ensure that approved revenue requirements are collected and that only actual costs are passed on to market participants and ratepayers.
ately hired, that there would 218 also likely be a variance in consulting support that would offset those. So it was the 219 best view that we could take in terms of budgeting at the time. 220 … - 221 Q. Has IESO looked into whether it wou...
AI summary The IESO Nova Scotia is in its early stages of operation and has not yet considered implementing a vacancy adjustment for revenue requirement calculations. The organization is still building its capacity and does not believe it is currently reasonable to include such an adjustment, citing the lack of sufficient data and maturity.
14 M12633 Transcript, June 25, 2026, pages 120 - 122. 297 Undertaking U-7. 298 299 The not-for-profit nature of IESO Nova Scotia is a significant factor that must be taken into 300 account. If IESO Nova Scotia does not have the funding to...
AI summary The not-for-profit status of IESO Nova Scotia is highlighted as a critical factor in its ability to fulfill its mandate. Without adequate funding, it would be unable to perform essential functions such as energy system planning, resource procurement, and ensuring electricity supply reliability. Mr. Johnston emphasized the importance of accurate forecasting in the context of the Board's expectations.
26 DGT response to IG IR-5, M12663, May 12, 2026. 572 presentation as provided in the Application. DGT found in its report in this proceeding that "The 573 modified calculation of the Deferral Mechanism fosters simplicity for tracking purp...
AI summary DGT discusses the modified calculation of the Deferral Mechanism and its alignment with the NSEB's Decision under M12412, including the +/- 10% variance threshold for OM&A Deferral and Variance Account. IESO Nova Scotia clarifies that the new DVM aligns with the Board's guidance and that prudency review thresholds would naturally extend to the DVM.
33 M12633 Transcript, June 25, 2026, pages 483 - 484. 682 stakeholders regarding IESO Nova Scotia's full expected expenditures, inclusive of both OM&A 683 and capital. 684 685 Recovery of All Costs Incurred 686 A fundamental purpose of the...
AI summary The transcript discusses the DVM and its purpose in recovering all costs incurred by IESO Nova Scotia, a not-for-profit organization established under the MAEA. The Board Chair McGrath questions the justification for the deferral account, emphasizing that it should be used for costs outside the entity's control, not for not-for-profit organizations to pass through all costs to customers.
37 M12633 Transcript, June 25, 2026, pages 503 - 505. 773 774 IESO Nova Scotia will produce a revenue requirement application each year developed based on 775 the best available evidence, demonstrating the prudency of the proposed expendit...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia will annually submit a revenue requirement application to demonstrate the prudency and reasonableness of proposed expenditures. The NSEB and stakeholders can review these applications at the start of the fiscal year. Expenditures beyond the +/- 10% variance threshold require additional review by the NSEB before recovery through revenue and fees.
784 785 Notwithstanding the procedural review protections in place as described above, IESO Nova Scotia 786 acknowledges that more work is to be done regarding documenting controls in place to limit 787 potential variations in spend and th...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia acknowledges the need for improved documentation of controls to limit spending variations and reduce risk for the DVM. They are compiling guidelines for the DVM in compliance with Board direction from M12412, and intend to include cost control measures in their '27/'28 Application.
38 M12633 Transcript, June 25, 2026, page 507-508. 799 844 to deem a cost imprudent, I think, because we have spent some time talking about today. 845 The challenge, of course, will be what to do with that. 846 Has that cost already been i...
AI summary The discussion centers on the establishment of a Net OM&A Deferral and Variance Account and the need for thresholds to manage cost variances. The NSEB's previous decision in M12412 emphasizes the importance of regulatory review for significant variances, while Doane Grant Thornton recommends defined thresholds to ensure accountability and control over cost overruns.
41 NSEB Decision, M12412, February 25, 2026, p.20. 875 that circumstance, the variance is subject to a further reasonableness review by the NSEB. IESO 922 fees for market participants via a fee recovery mechanism. IESO Nova Scotia's propos...
AI summary The text discusses the jurisdiction of the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) under section 29 of the MAEA, as raised by counsel for the Province of Nova Scotia. IESO Nova Scotia is concerned about the potential disallowance of costs and emphasizes the importance of the Board determining its jurisdiction early in the regulatory process to avoid significant impacts on its operations.
44 ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board [2006] 1 SCR 140 (" ATCO, 2006 "), at paras. 35 and 38. 954 IESO Nova Scotia submits that ATCO, 2006 has been consistently followed by Courts and 979 statutory interpretat...
AI summary The text references the case ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board) [2006] 1 SCR 140 and highlights how courts have consistently followed its interpretation of statutory language. It emphasizes the importance of considering the entire legislative context rather than focusing solely on the grammatical meaning of a section.
1026 IESO Nova Scotia submits that, with a single exception noted below, this wording is unique in the 1027 Canadian regulatory landscape. The legislature has not granted the Board broad jurisdiction, but 1028 rather, the clear, express la...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia argues that the MAEA grants the Board specific options following its review of expenditures and revenue requirements: either approval or referral back with recommendations. It emphasizes that the Board lacks the power to unilaterally disallow costs or fix revenue requirements differently, highlighting the iterative process outlined in subsection 29(4).
1102 1103 Further, the potential for outright denial or disallowance of costs has the potential to interfere with 1104 the exercise of IESO Nova Scotia's public interest mandate, rather than simply being absorbed by 1105 a shareholder. As...
AI summary The text discusses the implications of cost disallowance on IESO Nova Scotia's ability to fulfill its public interest mandate, highlighting the challenges posed by its not-for-profit status and the potential for a permanent deficit. It references the Ontario IESO's approach to approving expenditure and revenue requirements under the Electricity Act.
DATE FILED: July 24, 2026 Page 44 of 50 1225 …the Board's discretion is to be exercised within the confines of the statutory 1226 regime and principles generally applicable to regulatory matters, for which the 1227 legislature is assumed t...
AI summary The text discusses the scope of the Board's jurisdiction, emphasizing that it must be exercised within statutory limits. It references legal principles and precedents, including the OEB's decision in Re Consumers' Gas Co., and outlines conditions under which implied jurisdiction may be applied. IESO Nova Scotia argues that the Board lacks implied jurisdiction to disallow costs.
53 (ATCO, 2006, supra, at para. 73) 1259 "practically necessary to accomplish the objectives" of the MAEA and "essential to the Board 1260 fulfilling its mandate" under the legislation. IESO Nova Scotia submits that the Board's mandate 126...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia argues that the Board's mandate under the MAEA does not include the power to disallow costs, emphasizing that the express powers granted in section 29 are sufficient and that the legislature did not intend to implicitly confer such jurisdiction. The submission highlights the regulatory framework provided by the MAEA and its alignment with the principles from Re Consumers' Gas.
Closing Submission 1328 participants and ratepayers ultimately pay only IESO Nova Scotia's actual costs, while also 1329 recognizing the unique not-for-profit status of the organization and the absence of any shareholder 1330 to absorb var...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia emphasizes that participants and ratepayers pay only actual costs, while acknowledging its not-for-profit status. It commits to developing accounting policies and supporting prudency reviews. It also argues that Section 29 of the MAEA does not grant the Board authority to unilaterally disallow costs or substitute revenue requirements.
103127Reply Submission - IESO
9 passages
6 Ibid, p.15. - 1 Application.) Accordingly, IESO Nova Scotia submits that the Board's previous direction under - 2 M12412 also naturally extends to the Application. 3 - 4 IESO Nova Scotia is committed to carrying out its important mandate...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia requests approval of its 2026/27 revenue requirement and the DVM, arguing that staffing and procurement cost adjustments are unnecessary. It references prior Board direction in M12412 and asserts compliance with the MAEA regulatory framework.
1 2 NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE MECHANISM 2 Intervenor submissions provided comments and recommendations on IESO Nova Scotia's DVM. 3 Intervenor submissions include recommendations regarding interim approval only subject...
AI summary Intervenors recommend interim approval of the Net Revenue Requirement Deferral and Variance Mechanism (DVM) with safeguards, including a 10% variance cap and administrative framework requirements. The IESO supports full or interim approval of the DVM, noting that many issues raised by intervenors are addressed by the NSEB's direction in its Decision under M12412.
DATE FILED: AUGUST 7, 2026 Page 10 of 48 1 Intervenors also recommended the Board direct pre-approval of IESO Nova Scotia unforeseen 2 costs as they may arise throughout the fiscal year. The IG recommended the NSEB "require IESO-3 NS to ap...
AI summary Intervenors recommend pre-approval of unforeseen costs by IESO Nova Scotia, with the IG, CA, and PHP suggesting various oversight mechanisms. IESO Nova Scotia assesses the risk of large variances or new expenditures as low, citing budgeted amounts and existing mandates under the MAEA.
29 Ibid, p.13. 28 CA Closing Submission (M12633), July 24, 2026, p.5. 1 The CA relies heavily on the broad grant of powers contained in sections 5 and 6 of the Energy 2 and Regulatory Boards Act ("ERBA"), and regulatory decisions related t...
AI summary The IESO Nova Scotia argues that the CA's reliance on the ERBA and regulatory decisions involving for-profit utilities is misplaced, emphasizing that the Board's jurisdiction is defined by subsection 29(4) of the MAEA and must be exercised within the statutory regime as outlined by the Supreme Court in ATCO, 2006.
ity that lacks a shareholder to absorb such disallowances. Indeed, the submissions of the CA do 30 Please refer to footnotes 50 and 51 of IESO Nova Scotia's Closing Submission, M12633, July 24, 2026. 1 not address these implications, and m...
AI summary The IESO Nova Scotia agrees with the CA's position on the Board's jurisdiction to approve portions of the revenue requirements but disagrees on the process for addressing unapproved portions. The IESO emphasizes its obligation to respond to recommendations and align with its statutory mandate.
his regulatory framework is an appropriate balancing of the 23 NSEB's review of the revenue requirements of a not-for-profit entity with a public interest DATE FILED: AUGUST 7, 2026 Page 18 of 48 1 statutory mandate. This framework provide...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia argues that the regulatory framework appropriately balances the NSEB's review of revenue requirements for a not-for-profit entity with its public interest mandate. It emphasizes transparency and the Board's authority to direct disallowances on variance recovery. The IG intends to respond fully on jurisdictional issues once positions are clearly articulated.
60 IESO Nova Scotia Quarterly Report (M12859), May 15, 2026, p.5. 61 https://www.ieso-ns.ca/procurement/ 1 resulted in changes to the RFP documentation, ensuring the final Tolling Agreement and the 2 overall process achieved an appropriate...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia submits that its procurement process for fast-acting generation capacity appropriately balances ratepayer and industry interests, and that the Maritime Electric Act does not require NSEB review of energy procurement policies. The submission references prior documentation and a closing submission.
DATE FILED: AUGUST 7, 2026 Page 42 of 48 79 NSEB Decision (M12588), June 26, 2026, p.34. 1 that functions once belonging to NSPI are no longer with NSPI, with corresponding operational 2 staff having transferred to IESO Nova Scotia in Dece...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia argues that certain recommendations from the IG are not applicable due to the transfer of functions from NSPI to IESO Nova Scotia. They also state that implementing a cost duplication prevention framework would be inefficient and create new costs. A Joint Transition Committee continues to coordinate the transfer of responsibilities.
1 7 CONCLUSION 2 For the reasons set out in this Reply to Closing Submission, IESO Nova Scotia respectfully submits 3 that the Application should be approved as submitted. 4 5 The intervenor closing submissions raise a number of issues reg...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia submits that its application should be approved as submitted, emphasizing the need for funding to continue its operations during the 2026/2027 fiscal year. It acknowledges the importance of future transparency and improvements but argues that the current application is reasonable and necessary, and that proposed adjustments to staffing-related costs should not be adopted.
103134Reply Submission - IG
12 passages
Re: M12663 – IESO Nova Scotia – 2026/2027 Revenue Requirement Application These Reply Submissions are filed on behalf of the Industrial Group (" IG ") to address the legal issue of the Board's jurisdiction under s. 29 of the More Access to...
AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) supports the Consumer Advocate's position that the Board has jurisdiction under s. 29(4) of the More Access to Energy Act to set IESO-NS's revenue requirements at a level it deems just, reasonable, and necessary, including below what IESO-NS proposed. The IG disagrees with IESO-NS's interpretation of the provision, arguing it is inconsistent with statutory interpretation and regulatory functions.
T HE S TATUTORY T EXT A ND T HE C OMPETING P OSITIONS Subsection 29(4) of the MAEA provides: The Energy Board may approve the proposed expenditure and revenue requirements and the proposed fees or may refer them back to the IESO for furthe...
AI summary The text discusses the interpretation of Subsection 29(4) of the More Access to Energy Act (MAEA), focusing on the Energy Board's authority to approve or refer back revenue requirements. IESO-NS argues the Board can only approve or refer back as a whole or by category, while the CA and IG argue the Board has broader discretion to adjust revenue requirements as needed, consistent with its general regulatory powers under the ERBA.
2. The words of s29(4), read in context, do not impose the rigid binary IESO-NS proposes IESO-NS reads "approve" in s. 29(4) as meaning approval of the exact figures filed, with referral being the only other option. Nothing in the text req...
AI summary The text argues that s29(4) does not require the Board to approve IESO-NS's exact figures, but rather allows for adjustments based on the Board's review. It emphasizes that 'approve' includes the Board's determination of what is just and reasonable, not a rubber stamp of the exact figures filed. The Board has the authority to adjust proposed costs and set a revenue requirement accordingly.
R ETROACTIVE I MPRUDENCE R EVIEWS A RE D IFFERENT IESO-NS has asked the Board to rule on the full scope of its jurisdiction under s. 29(4), including its ability to make prudence findings or order disallowances because of the implications...
AI summary The IESO-NS is seeking clarification on the Board's jurisdiction under s. 29(4) to conduct prudence reviews and order disallowances. The IG argues that the Board must distinguish between prospective revenue requirement setting and retrospective imprudence reviews, citing the deferral and variance mechanism and Board decision M12412.
IESO-NS' S A PPROACH I S I MPRACTICAL A ND I NCONSISTENT W ITH T HE P URPOSE O F T HE M AEA Rizzo confirms that an interpretation should be avoided where it produces results that are illogical, incoherent, unreasonable, or inconsistent wit...
AI summary The text argues that IESO-NS's approach is impractical and inconsistent with the purpose of the MAEA. It suggests that the Board's statutory review would become a procedural loop if the proposed interpretation is accepted, which would hinder effective rate regulation and contradict legislative intent.
2. A category-level referral creates uncertainty rather than ratepayer protection Subsection 29(3) does not solve the problem of a revenue gap. Instead, it preserves the prior year's fees while a forward-looking application remains unappro...
AI summary Subsection 29(3) fails to resolve revenue gaps and creates uncertainty by maintaining prior-year fees without a mechanism for current-year adjustments. This can lead to unresolved disputes, ongoing delays, and potential over-spending by the IESO-NS without ratepayer protection. The Board should approve sound application parts and set disputed categories based on evidence to ensure fair outcomes.
4. A regulator confined to yes-or-no cannot do its job The CA correctly places s. 29 within the established purpose of utility rate regulation. Regulation stands in for the competitive market forces that would otherwise drive costs and pri...
AI summary The document argues that a regulator confined to yes-or-no decisions cannot effectively oversee a monopoly system operator like IESO-NS. The CA emphasizes the Board's role in ensuring fair rates and cost recovery, while IESO-NS highlights its not-for-profit status and lack of shareholder oversight. The text stresses the need for the Board to have the authority to adjust budgets based on evidence, as required by the ERBA.
2. The Ontario precedent does not support IESO-NS's position. IESO-NS relies on the Ontario OEB's decision in EB-2015-0275 as authority for its narrow reading of s. 29(4). IESO-NS submits that the OEB did not exercise a power to disallow c...
AI summary IESO-NS cites an Ontario decision to argue that the Board cannot disallow costs or fix revenue requirements. However, the Industrial Group (IG) contends that the Ontario precedent is not applicable here, as the context was different and the OEB did exercise authority by modifying the fee structure. The IG argues that the Ontario OEB's actions contradict IESO-NS's claim that the Board has no front-end authority.
3. Necessary implication supports the Board's authority to fix the revenue requirement Even if s. 29(4) were ambiguous on fixing the revenue requirement this point, which the IG does not accept, the doctrine of jurisdiction by necessary im...
AI summary The text argues that the Energy Board has the authority to fix the revenue requirement under the doctrine of jurisdiction by necessary implication, as supported by ATCO 2006. It emphasizes that the Board must have the power to ensure rates are just and reasonable, even if the legislation is silent on the mechanics.
T HE I MPORTANCE O F F RONT -E ND C ONTROLS , G IVEN T HE P RACTICAL L IMITS O F B ACK -E ND D ISALLOWANCE A GAINST A N OT -F OR -P ROFIT The distinction discussed above between setting a revenue requirement in advance and disallowing a co...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of front-end controls in regulatory proceedings, particularly for not-for-profit entities like IESO-NS, where backend disallowance mechanisms are limited. It argues that without strict front-end scrutiny, there is a risk of unrecoverable costs and impacts on system reliability. The Board's decision in M12412 is highlighted as an example of effective front-end discipline.
R ENEWABLES I NTEGRATION G RID S ECURITY (R IGS ) P ROJECT The CA raised the RIGS project in its closing submissions as a concrete example of the imprudence risk inherent in IESO-NS's procurement process and the proposed deferral account s...
AI summary The Consumer Advocate (CA) raised concerns about the imprudence risk in the RIGS project, citing issues with IESO-NS's procurement process and deferral account structure. The Industrial Group (IG) supports these concerns and notes that the NB EUB's approval of the project has been challenged through judicial review.
C ONCLUSION A ND R ELIEF S OUGHT The IG submits that the Board should conclude that s. 29(4) of the MAEA , read with the Board's general ratemaking powers under ss. 5 and 6 of the ERBA , authorizes the Board to approve IESO-NS's proposed e...
AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) argues that the Board has the authority under the MAEA and ERBA to approve IESO-NS's revenue requirements and fees. It also recommends that the Board consider the unresolved status of the RIGS project and its implications on the IESO-NS / NB Power contract and the governance framework for the deferral and variance mechanism.
20260617-1Hearing Transcript — 06/17/2026 (Johnny Johnston, Chris Milligan, Mike McFeters)
25 passages
LIST OF UNDERTAKINGS NO. PAGE NO. 14 approved by the Board due to sorry; by the Board to 15 "Avoid making the bad situation created by IESO Nova 16 Scotia even worse." 17 [9:10:09] Notably, the Board was also critical 18 of the fact that I...
AI summary The document outlines undertakings related to a regulatory proceeding, highlighting the Board's criticism of IESO Nova Scotia's incomplete application and the Consumer Advocate's concerns regarding cost reasonableness and the transition of functions from Nova Scotia Power to IESO Nova Scotia. It also mentions the Small Business Advocate's opening statement.
OPENING STATEMENT 27 IESO NOVA SCOTIA 1 In these roles, I've testified in 11 Brunswick Power for 100 megawatts of fast-acting capacity 12 from their new RIGS, or Renewables Integration Grid 13 Security Facility, a project which has recentl...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia discusses cross-provincial collaboration, including a project with Brunswick Power for fast-acting capacity, and highlights stakeholder engagement efforts in the Integrated Resource Plan. They also mention regulatory filings and progress in advancing renewable energy transition.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 43 Cr-ex, (Murphy) lead items needed to be procured in advance. This is not uncommon for large generation facilities that are under development. [9:40:09] Q. Okay. But what risk if the NB Board didn't approve that pr...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the IESO's participation in a power project before NB Board approval, with concerns about potential financial exposure to ratepayers. The IESO's 20% involvement could have resulted in a potential $15 million loss if the project was not approved, but the IESO argues that the project's approval by the Energy and Utility Board mitigates this risk.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 45 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 to progress a facility that has an extremely long lead 9 know, reflect the status and of that Application before 10 the Board? 11 MR. FUREY: So Mr. Chair, at this 12 point I'm going to object. 13...
AI summary The discussion focuses on the objection raised by Mr. Furey regarding the relevance of certain costs to the '26/'27 revenue requirement, and Mr. Murphy's clarification that the review pertains to the reasonableness of the IESO's application and cost minimization strategies.
reflected in the negotiation that was undertaken. To be specific about your question around an indemnity agreement, that would not have been a commercial position that we would have reached with our counterparty. Q. Okay. Thank you. In the...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the hiring status of the IESO, with confirmation that only nine of 23 management and administrative positions were filled as of the time of the response, with more expected to be filled in early 2026. The current employee count is 31, with nine vacancies remaining, and four roles still to be hired.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 81 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 you know, expectation? 2 A. (Johnston) I think it's fair to 3 say that some of our Board members, at least last year, 4 were pretty much working full time on this. So 40 hours a 5 week. These day...
AI summary The discussion focuses on the time commitment and remuneration of Board members involved in regulatory proceedings. It mentions that Board members previously worked full-time on matters but now meet less frequently. The Board hired Hugessen to assess remuneration levels for non-profit organizations, and there is a request for the work product to be shared as part of the application.
BY MR. MURPHY: 1 Q. And you're welcome to read to 2 that. I can paraphrase as well. IESO effectively says 3 that the timeline is aspirational because work "to 4 understand the feasibility and reasonableness of this 5 date" remain to be und...
AI summary Mr. Murphy is asking for an update on the timeline for the IESO's transition, noting that the original timeline was aspirational. The response indicates that work is ongoing, with completion expected by mid-2026/2027. The IESO explains that the transition involved significant planning and collaboration with IBM and Nova Scotia Power, and highlights the complexity of real-time operations.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 95 Cr-ex, (Murphy) happen. Our Board wasn't put in straight away, and so I think they sort of added two years to them coming along in April of 2025, February '25, so it pretty much added two years to that and just le...
AI summary The speaker discusses delays in the implementation timeline for the Independent Energy System Operator (IESO) in Nova Scotia, noting that the initial timeline was extended by two years. They emphasize the need to carefully evaluate the right pathway for implementation, considering various factors, and mention that a firm date for completion has not yet been determined.
1 2 3 4 5 describe the provisions of the Act which remain to be proclaimed, and also provide details on any discussions IESO Nova Scotia has had with government concerning proclamation of these provisions. 6 7 And the I'll ignore the part...
AI summary The document discusses the lack of formal discussions between IESO Nova Scotia and the government regarding the proclamation of certain provisions of an Act. It also touches on coordination between IESO and Nova Scotia Power during a transition, noting limited sharing of detailed financial information.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 125 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 from living in a different jurisdiction that does things a 2 little differently, but my understanding of the regulatory 3 compact is that the Board approves the revenue requirement 4 based on a...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the regulatory process for approving revenue requirements, emphasizing that decisions should be based on forecasts made at the time they were submitted, rather than real-time updates. The speaker argues that requesting new forecasts during hearings could lead to procedural issues and challenges related to new evidence.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 129 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 forecast, and so they focus on one item that they believe 2 they can demonstrate that, and then everything else goes 3 to the wayside. And that results in a misleading picture 4 for the Board. A...
AI summary The discussion centers on the challenges of forecasting and the importance of focusing on the reasonableness of forecasts at the time they were made, rather than requiring updates on specific items. Concerns are raised about the potential for misleading the Board if forecasts are revised based on current conditions rather than original assumptions.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 137 Cr-ex, (Murphy) stakeholders yesterday. I think are you referring to a slide deck was shared with stakeholders? A. (Johnston) Yes, I am. Q. Okay. And but the actual presentation that IESO is going to provide is h...
AI summary The IESO is preparing to file a Permanent Fee Application but is seeking stakeholder feedback before proceeding. The process is ongoing, with a meeting scheduled and potential delays if further input is needed. The IESO aims to align its position with stakeholder concerns to avoid complications during the Board review.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 139 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 province. 2 Those are all my questions. Q. 3 Thank you to the panel for your time. Appreciate it. 4 THE CHAIR: Thank you, Mr. Murphy. 5 Small Business Advocate? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1...
AI summary The text contains a cross-examination by Melissa MacAdam on behalf of the Small Business Advocate, focusing on the Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO NS) Procurement Guidelines. The guidelines, last updated in July 2025, were created by Barrington Consulting Group for the Board and are listed as a to-do item for review by IESO NS.
be defined as a public utility, and I don't have clarity of a path forward on how that would be changed. Q. And you say at some point, if it was determined to be a public utility, section 35 of the PUA may apply. And then, absent this, cap...
AI summary The discussion centers on whether a utility should be defined as a public utility under the PUA, and the implications for capital costs being reviewed and approved by the Board. It also touches on the submission timeline for a fee and cost recovery mechanism, with a note on the interchangeable use of Q1 2026/2027 and Q2 2026 for clarity.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 175 Cr-ex, (MacAdam) 1 undertake to investigate the difference between the 5.05 2 work hard to live within and provide greater transparency 3 on the range of costs that we ultimately receive as an 4 organization as w...
AI summary The text discusses IESO Nova Scotia's membership in NPCC, confirming that it became a full member in April 2026. It also references a response to the Board's IR-11, which includes a breakdown of administration employees by categorical function.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 199 Cr-ex, (MacAdam) 1 call it the deferral account, the prudency review for the 9 through the auditing process, whether it was exactly .2 or 10 not, but I can confirm that the sort of the total spend 11 that I talke...
AI summary The discussion centers on the reporting requirements for the Net Revenue Requirement Deferral and Variance Mechanism, with IESO Nova Scotia indicating that it is following the Board's directive for quarterly reporting rather than monthly, citing the potential burden on a small organization.
1 fulsome response. The question was: 2 3 4 5 6 Please specifically list all stated objects and activities under the More Access to Energy Act, which are not yet in force and the expected timeline. 7 I appreciate you had some questions 8 a...
AI summary The text discusses questions regarding the More Access to Energy Act, specifically about provisions not yet in force and their impact on Phase II plans. It also addresses the IESO's capitalization policy and the process for finalizing it, with references to audits and draft documents.
- Q. If we go onto page 19 of 45 of 1 the same document, Table 5 actually, I'll just go down 2 to the very bottom of that page 19 where the footnotes 3 are, and it does say, "Web Hosting line item was omitted 4 in the '25/'26 Application i...
AI summary The text discusses a discrepancy in the '25/'26 Application regarding the omission of a web hosting line item and mentions the development of guidelines for the OM&A Deferral and Variance Account. It also references the compensation philosophy for IESO Nova Scotia, targeting the 50th percentile of the market for roles in Atlantic Canada.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 241 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 application to say why we believe we need to continue to 7 UNDERTAKING U-6 - To provide the 8 confirmed WACC that the $5 9 million is being carried at 10 BY MS. RUDDERHAM: 11 And sorry, when...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the need for finalized accounting policies and the approval process by the organization's Board of Directors. There is a mention of prudency review and regulatory context, emphasizing the importance of finalized documents for regulatory decisions.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 249 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 THE CHAIR: So, Mr. Furey, we have 11 the last application without that, but I take your point. 12 MS. RUDDERHAM: That was in 13 apologies. It was an interim 14 THE CHAIR: Yes. 15 MS. RUDDERHA...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the creation of deferral or variance accounts by regulators, emphasizing that regulators retain jurisdiction over aspects like approval of what is charged to ratepayers and timing of recovery. There is also mention of an ongoing audit by BDO, expected to be completed by mid-July.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 283 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 (Johnston) So our Application A. 14 (Johnston) At least my reading of A. 15 the Board's decision was that: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IESOmust, in its applications, provide an explanation for cost...
AI summary The document discusses the IESO's application and the requirement to explain cost variances of more than 10 percent, with the burden on IESO to demonstrate prudence in overruns. It also touches on the transition from NS Power to IESO, specifically Phase I involving energy procurement, system planning, and generation interconnection, which has been completed.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 295 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 So that's what you're when you Q. 17 asked about whether: 18 19 20 the IESO-NS and NSPI [had] prepared a transition term sheet with milestones, decommissioning dates, data handover[s, et INTE...
AI summary The discussion centers on whether the IESO-NS and NSP have prepared a transition term sheet with milestones and decommissioning dates, and whether there is a risk of cost duplication during the transition. The response indicates that no such document has been prepared, and the basis for the initial statement is the clarity of accountabilities under NERC functional guidelines.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 301 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 [4:30:39] (Johnston) So yes, there have A. 2 been agreements with NS Power around confidentiality, 3 transition of resources, but I also mentioned many other 4 parties that we've had legal ag...
AI summary The discussion involves agreements with NS Power regarding confidentiality and resource transition, as well as the current status of a project plan and who is responsible for developing it. The IESO NS is mentioned as taking the lead with input from NSPI.
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 know there was some questions asked earlier. So we're 2 trying not to duplicate, but in terms of that project, has 3 the there's been Board approval in New Brunswick, 4 correct? 5 A....
AI summary The discussion revolves around a project that has received Board approval in New Brunswick but is not currently underway. The witness, Milligan, clarifies that the project is not stalled and that work is still ongoing, though specific details are not provided.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 303 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 the completion date currently, a status update on that? 2 (Milligan) Yeah, it's Fall of A. 3 2028. 4 Q. Okay. So it's still the Fall of 5 2028. 6 In terms of the final agreement with 7 NB Pow...
AI summary The discussion focuses on the completion date of a project set for Fall 2028 and whether there is a financial risk-sharing mechanism between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick ratepayers, similar to the Maritime Link Project. The IESO NS indicates that the mechanism may not apply due to tolling agreements in place with a third party.
20260625-1Hearing Transcript — 06/25/2026 (Johnny Johnston, Chris Milligan, Mike McFeters, Angie Brown)
23 passages
LIST OF UNDERTAKINGS NO. PAGE NO. 2 Upon commencing on Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 9:00 3 a.m. 4 THE CHAIR: Good morning. 5 This is the continuation of a hearing 6 of the Nova Scotia Energy Board for an Application by the 7 Nova Scotia Inde...
AI summary The text is a transcript excerpt from a hearing involving the Nova Scotia Energy Board and the Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator. It discusses a clarification regarding the scope of an undertaking related to compensation ranges and benefits package information provided by a consultant.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 321 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 (Johnston) I think I'm struggling A. 2 to understand the question or the point that you're 3 making. Clearly the IESO will follow the direction of the 4 Board from for our 2025/'26 Applicatio...
AI summary The text discusses the IESO's adherence to the Board's direction in its 2025/'26 and '26/'27 applications, as well as the reporting of cost category variances. It also touches on the current planning phase of IESO NS's Phase II transition.
1 you said last week, IESO NS continues to believe that the 2 initiation phase of Phase II will start as of April 2027, 3 based on the best information you currently have today, is 4 that right? And when I say, "Initiation" I mean 5 "Opera...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the timeline for the initiation phase of Phase II, with the IESO NS expressing an aspirational start date of April 2027, though acknowledging that this is subject to change based on ongoing analysis and stakeholder input.
1 the real-time dispatch operations, that timeline? 2 (Johnston) So the go light for A. 3 Phase II, because it is real-time operations, will 4 essentially have to be pretty much an overnight sort of 5 one day we're not doing it, the next d...
AI summary The discussion centers on the timeline for Phase II of real-time dispatch operations under the More Access to Energy Act. It highlights the legal requirements, including the proclamation of specific sections and the need for a transition order from the Minister, which are outside the control of IESO NS.
1 the go light was earlier than April '27 or later than 2 April '27. 3 [9:20:03] Q. Okay. And I guess I'm just 4 trying to understand what assumptions have been made 5 within that April 2027 timeline. So what's the assumption 6 for when th...
AI summary The discussion centers on the timeline for implementing a board, with a target of April 2027, set two years from when the board was established. The IESO acknowledges the importance of the deadline and believes it is attainable, depending on implementation choices. There is also mention of the need for government proclamation of certain provisions before the IESO can take control.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 331 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 A. (Johnston) Yeah, that would be INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 their recommendations and you're putting forward a 2 recommendation to the IESO Board; correct? 3 (J...
AI summary The proceeding discusses the IESO's implementation plan for a transition, which will be developed with input from NSPI and informed to the government. The IESO intends to provide quarterly updates on the status of the transition, including Phase I and Phase II.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 341 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 requirement there are and we went over this last week 2 $1.77 million forecast for in relation to the Phase 3 II transition costs; correct? 4 A. (Johnston) That would be correct. 5 And this 1...
AI summary The discussion centers on the $1.77 million forecast for Phase II transition costs, which does not include implementation or regulatory process costs. The entity acknowledges that regulatory and legal costs may need to be deferred and accounted for separately as they arise.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 343 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) budget there's no forecasted amount for the preparation and filing of a licence application for the Board under section 94 of the Act; correct? A. (Johnston) Sorry; I'm just going to check what...
AI summary The discussion centers on whether costs related to preparing and filing a licence application with the Energy Board are included in the budget. The witness confirms that no detailed costs for this process were included, and any additional costs would be accounted for through the implementation project or the regulatory and legal line item.
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 the IESO received comments from various interested 2 parties. And I'd looked online to see if there was, like, 3 a synthesized summary of those comments, and I couldn't 4 locate it....
AI summary The IESO NS has received comments from interested parties but has not yet released a synthesized summary of those comments. The IESO NS plans to release the summary but does not have a firm timeline. The discussion also touches on how procurement costs are treated in the Application.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 391 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 Q. Okay. So then does that mean 2 that the IESO NS's understanding of what the 3 administration of the costs means under section 30 does 4 not include the procurement cost or the administrati...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the interpretation of section 30 of the More Access to Energy Act, specifically regarding the recovery of costs related to energy resource supply contracts. The IESO Nova Scotia clarifies that costs such as those from tolling agreements and contract administration fall under section 30, while one-time costs like those for establishing contracts are not included in this mechanism.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 407 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 Q. What I'm wondering, is that 7 Would it outline what the quantum Q. 8 or maximum amount of a bonus would be? 9 (Johnston) No, it won't. A. 10 Is there currently a quantum or Q. 11 maximum a...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the IESO's annual reporting process under the More Access to Energy Act, including the status of designing the report and the timeline for filing it, with the IESO stating that the process has not yet started and is expected to be filed in October.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 441 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 Q. You've alluded to changes not of 15 MR. KAYTER: Mr. Chair, I just need to 16 grab my notes. 17 BY MR. KAYTER: 18 And in fact, I quoted your Q. 19 evidence today as saying "No section 30 co...
AI summary The text is a portion of a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP), where a witness, Mr. Johnston, is being questioned about filings and submissions related to the proceeding. The discussion touches on legal procedures and stakeholder engagement.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 451 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 they were questioned about section 29 and 30, they were 2 asked, "What's your interpretation of..." "What's your 3 understanding of..." That is perfectly valid to say to a 4 witness, "What's you...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the interpretation of sections 29 and 30 of legislation regarding the Board's authority to disallow costs. The participant raises concerns about the potential conflict of answering the question directly and the proper procedures for handling objections and evidence.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 453 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 talks about, you know, until the Board approves the 16 friend's very valid on-its-face objection about the 17 appropriateness of that question. 18 Over the two days of questions that we 19 have...
AI summary The text discusses the legislative authority of the Board to disallow parts or all of an application, referencing similar mechanisms in Ontario legislation. It highlights a theme from the hearing that the Board can approve or refer matters back to the IESO for further consideration with recommendations.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 457 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 MR. KAYTER: That may be a matter for 2 argument, ultimately, at the end of the hearing, Mr. 3 Chair, but when I look at the relief available under 4 subsection (4) of the operative provision of...
AI summary Mr. Kayter discusses the relief available under subsection (4) of a statute, noting that it allows for approval or sending back with recommendations, but not wholesale disallowance. He suggests that the Board will ultimately rule on the matter, and it is not clear from the discussion whether the Board would provide specific recommendations if approval is not granted.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 459 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 of, you know, the possibilities here?" 14 this Board doesn't have the ability to disallow costs that 15 it considers have been imprudently occurred on an actual 16 basis when it reviews those? 1...
AI summary The discussion centers on the Board's authority to disallow costs deemed imprudent under section 29 of the legislation. The speaker notes that while the legislation does not explicitly grant this authority, the Board may interpret its own statute to make such a ruling.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 463 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 behalf of the Department at this time, but it's a fair 14 you're raising in the context of the deferral and variance 15 account. 16 MR. KAYTER: I share your concerns. 17 I'm just unable to answe...
AI summary The discussion centers on the clarity of legislative authority regarding deferral and variance accounts, with Mr. Kayter expressing concerns about the lack of clear guidance in the Act. He emphasizes the need for the panel to be aware of the Board's ability to send recommendations back for approval.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 467 Cr-ex, (Kayter) 1 I don't think it raises a particular 19 could be, what's your understanding of what section 29 of INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 the More Access to Energy Act provides...
AI summary The discussion centers on the More Access to Energy Act and the Nova Scotia Energy Board's authority under section 29 to approve or refer back a revenue requirement application. The applicant emphasizes the Act's focus on system reliability and cost-effectiveness for customers.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 489 Questions, (Chair) 1 Canadian Analysis that came out in 2025, which was just 2 for Nova Scotia. 3 [1:00:28] Q. Okay. And that was you 4 anticipated my question, where I was going with that. And 5 that study, is t...
AI summary The discussion references a 2025 Canadian Analysis study on interregional transfer capability and addresses the NERC categorization of the NPCC Maritimes area as elevated risk. The study is to be filed as Undertaking U-11, and there is a question about the distinction between elevated and high-risk classifications by NERC.
wouldn't it? - leave us with a difficult situation to address if we get to that point. - Q. Leading me again into my next question. Thank you very much for that, Mr. Johnston. So practically speaking, the Board's remedy of imprudence, that...
AI summary The discussion centers on the challenges of implementing a remedy for imprudence by the Board, particularly in the context of a not-for-profit organization. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty of addressing the issue and the responsibility carried in making decisions moving forward.
1 later in the calendar year. 2 Q. Okay. Thank you. Those are my 3 questions. 4 THE CHAIR: Thank you. 5 And there was no-one else, other than 6 the Applicant, I think. 7 So Mr. Furey? 8 MR. FUREY: Thank you, Mr. Chair. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15...
AI summary The text includes a portion of a regulatory proceeding where Mr. Furey is conducting cross-examination, asking Ms. Brown about the scope of her review of the proposed revenue requirement for reasonableness, which was a prospective review of forecast future costs.
y particular questions about this, Ms. Brown. I just wanted to give you an opportunity to see it as I asked you this question. Would you agree with me that your description of good Cr-ex, (Furey) utility practice is not limited to a single...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the lack of specific standards referenced in evidence for assessing reasonableness and prudency, with the witness indicating reliance on common law definitions and NERC guidelines depending on the context of the review.
g on the level of assurance or opinion you're expecting that person to provide, within some of the other utility kind of guiding principles from NERC, there would be guidance BROWN Cr-ex, (Furey) INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COUR...
AI summary The discussion centers on the definition of prudency in regulatory reviews, emphasizing the use of hindsight and the importance of acting with appropriate care based on available information at the time. It also mentions that financial reporting standards do not apply to a prospective review.