L-2Electricity and Gas Inspection Act Regulations
34 passages
Temporary dispensation Dispense temporaire (2) The director may grant permission for the putting into service, without verification and sealing or without sealing, of any meter or any class, type or design of meter on a temporary basis und...
AI summary The director has authority to grant temporary permission for meters to be put into service without standard verification and sealing, under specified terms, conditions, and duration as determined by the director.
Permanent dispensation Dispense permanente (3) The director may grant approval for the putting into service, without verification and sealing or without sealing, of any meter or any class, type or design of meter.
AI summary The director is authorized to approve the installation of meters without requiring verification and sealing, streamlining the process for putting meters into service. This provision allows flexibility in meter deployment by bypassing standard sealing requirements for specific classes or designs.
Director's approval required for verification Conditions préalables à la vérification (4) No meter shall be verified pursuant to this Act until it or the class, type or design of meter to which it belongs has received the approval of the d...
AI summary The Act mandates that no meter can be verified until the director approves the meter or its class/type. This provision is cited in the Revised Statutes of Nova Scotia (1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 9).
Accredited meter verifiers Vérificateur accrédité - 10 Subject to the regulations, any person - (a) may, on making application in prescribed manner, be accredited by the director for purposes of the verification, sealing, reverification an...
AI summary The text outlines the process for accrediting meter verifiers, including application procedures, certificate issuance, and conditions for revoking permissions. It references specific statutory provisions.
Revocation of approval or accreditation Révocation d'approbation ou d'accréditation (2) Any approval granted under subsection 9(3) or (4) or accreditation granted under section 10 may, by notice given in prescribed manner, be revoked by th...
AI summary The Minister has authority to revoke approvals or accreditations granted under subsection 9(3)/(4) or section 10 by notice in prescribed manner, if conditions attached to those approvals/accreditations are not met per regulations. This establishes a regulatory mechanism for enforcing compliance with approval/accreditation terms.
Requirement on revocation Effet de la révocation (3) Where a permission under subsection 9(2) or an approval under subsection 9(3) is revoked, any meter that is (2) Le directeur peut permettre, suivant les modalités et pour la période qu'i...
AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements for meter verification and approval processes, including provisions for temporary service without verification or sealing, and the director's authority to approve such actions. It references legislative provisions from 1980-83 and subsequent amendments, emphasizing compliance and procedural oversight.
Revocation of permission Révocation de la permission 11 (1) Le directeur peut, par avis donné de la façon réglementaire, révoquer la permission accordée en vertu du paragraphe 9(2) pour défaut d'observer les modalités fixées en conformité...
AI summary The director and minister may revoke permissions and approvals under specific regulatory non-compliance conditions. Revocation procedures are outlined, including service discontinuation unless otherwise specified in revocation notices.
Where shorter period determined Période plus courte (2) No period determined under paragraph (1)(c) for any reverification shall be shorter than the period specified therefor in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) unless the director so determines the...
AI summary The text outlines statutory provisions for reverification periods and revocation conditions. It specifies that reverification periods cannot be shorter than those in paragraphs (1)(a) or (b) unless approved by the Minister, with notice required. Revocation of permissions/approvals requires notice, opportunity for objection, and consideration of objections, citing statutory sections.
Reference to director for reconsideration Renvoi au directeur (3) Where a person who is provided with a certificate of findings by an inspector pursuant to subsection (2) gives notice to the inspector within a prescribed time that he is
AI summary The text outlines a procedural step in a regulatory process where an individual may request a director's reconsideration after receiving a certificate of findings from an inspector, within a prescribed timeframe. The context references subsection (2) and the role of inspectors in this process.
Loss by error Écart constaté 24 (1) Subject to subsections (2) to (4), where, on a proceeding in the matter of any request pursuant to section 23, a meter is found to register with an error not permitted by the regulations, the error shall...
AI summary The regulation outlines that meter errors detected during proceedings under section 23 are retroactively applied from either three months prior to the request date or the last sealing date, depending on reverification timelines. Errors are deemed to have existed from the last required reverification date if the meter was overdue for rechecking by more than three months.
Director's decision final La décision du directeur est sans appel (4) La décision du directeur sur une question qui lui est soumise conformément au paragraphe (3) est sans appel. 1980-81-82-83, ch. 87, art. 23. 24 (1) Sous réserve des para...
AI summary The director's decision on matters under section 23 is final and non-appealable. Section 24(1) addresses unauthorized meter discrepancies, deeming them to have existed from the start of the three-month period preceding the demand or from the last sealing date if applicable.
Fees recoverable Droits recouvrables (2) All prescribed fees and charges determined by virtue of any regulation that are payable pursuant to this Act shall be recoverable as a debt due to the Crown. 1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 27. - 28 (1) Th...
AI summary The text outlines that prescribed fees and charges under the Act are recoverable as Crown debts. It also grants the Governor in Council authority to regulate meter specifications, testing procedures, and associated fees, emphasizing compliance with measurement standards and regulatory oversight.
j) prescrire : - (i) les exigences auxquelles il faut satisfaire avant que le directeur puisse accorder une permission, approbation ou accréditation en vertu de la présente loi, - (ii) la procédure à suivre pour demander cette permission,...
AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements for permissions, procedures, and conditions under the law, including inspector functions, measurement unit determination, gas pressure regulations, and provisions for tests, delegations, exemptions, and prohibitions. It emphasizes procedural frameworks for compliance and oversight.
Publication of proposed regulations Publication des projets de règlement (2) Subject to subsection (3), a copy of each regulation that the Governor in Council proposes to make pursuant to this Act shall be published in the Canada Gazette a...
AI summary The text outlines a procedural requirement for publishing proposed regulations by the Governor in Council in the Canada Gazette, ensuring interested parties have a reasonable opportunity to submit representations. This aligns with regulatory transparency and stakeholder engagement principles.
Exceptions Exceptions - (3) Subsection (2) does not apply in respect of a proposed regulation that - (a) has been published pursuant to that subsection, whether or not it has been amended as a result of representations made pursuant to tha...
AI summary The text outlines exceptions to regulatory provisions under the Weights and Measures Act, including exemptions for regulations that have been amended or do not alter existing rules. It also details the Minister's authority to prescribe units of measurement for electricity and gas sales, with specific conditions for regulation publication and stakeholder input.
Ministerial regulations Règlements — ministre 28.1 (1) Malgré la Loi sur les poids et mesures , le ministre peut, par règlement, prévoir des unités de mesure en plus de celles prévues à l'article 3 pour la vente de l'électricité et du gaz.
AI summary The minister has authority to establish additional measurement units for electricity and gas sales beyond those specified in the Weights and Measures Act, overriding the existing legal framework for measurement standards in these sectors.
Expiry Expiration (2) Le règlement pris en vertu du paragraphe (1) cesse d'avoir effet à celui des moments ci-après qui est antérieur aux autres : - (a) the day on which a regulation made under paragraph 28(1)(b) that has the same effect a...
AI summary The regulation under paragraph (1) ceases to be effective on the earliest of: (a) the day another regulation with the same effect comes into force, (b) three years after its enactment, or (c) its repeal. This provision is from the 2019, c. 29, s. 162 legislation.
Contents of notice Contenu du procès-verbal - (2) Le procès-verbal mentionne : - a) le nom de l'auteur présumé de la violation; - b) les faits reprochés; - c) le montant de la pénalité à payer; - d) le délai et les modalités de paiement; -...
AI summary The notice outlines procedural elements including the alleged violator's name, alleged facts, penalty amount, payment terms, and a provision allowing for a reduced penalty under regulations. It emphasizes compliance requirements and procedural deadlines.
Summary of rights Sommaire des droits (3) Figure aussi dans le procès-verbal en langage clair un sommaire des droits et obligations de l'auteur présumé and sections 29.13 to 29.26 of the person to whom it is provided, including the right t...
AI summary The document outlines the rights and obligations of the alleged author, referencing sections 29.13 to 29.26 of the relevant legislation. It emphasizes the right to request a review of alleged violations, penalties, and the procedural steps for such requests.
Compliance agreements Conclusion d'une transaction - 29.14 (1) After considering a request made under paragraph 29.13(2)(a), the Minister may enter into a compliance agreement, as described in that paragraph, with the person making the req...
AI summary Section 29.14 outlines the Minister's authority to enter into compliance agreements with requestors, allowing penalty reductions or security requirements. Entering such an agreement deems the person as having committed the related violation, terminating ongoing proceedings under section 29.12.
Effect of payment Effet du paiement (2) Le paiement conforme à l'avis, que le ministre accepte en règlement, vaut déclaration de responsabilité à l'égard de la violation et met fin à la procédure.
AI summary Payment in accordance with the minister's accepted notice serves as an admission of responsibility for the violation and terminates the regulatory proceeding, as outlined in the document's provisions.
Deeming Présomption (3) L'omission de l'intéressé de faire le paiement conformément à l'avis vaut déclaration de responsabilité à l'égard de la violation. 2011, ch. 3, art. 6. 29.16 (1) After completing a review requested under paragraph 2...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for determining and correcting penalties following a review of alleged violations. It specifies that if the Minister finds a violation and the penalty amount is incorrect, the Minister must adjust it and notify the individual. The individual is then required to pay the corrected penalty within the specified time and manner.
Submissions in writing Contestation par écrit (5) The Minister is to consider only written evidence and written submissions in determining whether a person committed a violation or whether the amount of a penalty was established in accorda...
AI summary The Minister is restricted to considering only written evidence and submissions when determining violations or penalty amounts under the regulations, as per 2011, c. 3, s. 6.
Review — violation Décision du ministre : faits reprochés 29.16 (1) Saisi au titre de l'alinéa 29.13(2)b) d'une contestation relative aux faits reprochés, le ministre détermine la responsabilité de l'intéressé et lui fait notifier sa décis...
AI summary The minister reviews alleged violations under section 29.16(1), determining responsibility and imposing or adjusting penalties to ensure compliance with regulations. If penalties are deemed non-compliant, the minister substitutes them with amounts deemed appropriate.
Notice required Préavis (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any document unless the party intending to produce it at the trial referred to in that subsection has given to the party against whom the document is intended to be produced reas...
AI summary The text outlines procedural requirements for document production in trials, mandating reasonable notice to opposing parties. It also references legislative authority for the Governor in Council to designate a company's name for utility services, citing relevant statutes and amendments.
Application of subsections 28(2) and (3) Application des par. 28(2) et (3) (3) Subsections 28(2) and (3) shall, with any necessary adaptations, apply in respect of a proposed order under subsection (1) as they apply in respect of a propose...
AI summary The text outlines the application of subsections 28(2) and (3) to proposed orders, aligning them with regulatory procedures. It also mandates that orders under paragraph 39(1)(b) be presented to Parliament within 15 sitting days, referencing statutory provisions from 1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 38.
Coming into force of order Entrée en vigueur (2) An order referred to in subsection (1) shall come into force on the thirtieth sitting day of Parliament after it has been laid before Parliament pursuant to that subsection unless before the...
AI summary The text outlines procedural rules for when a regulatory order comes into force, specifying it takes effect on the 30th sitting day of Parliament after being laid before it, unless a motion is made before the 20th sitting day. It also details applications of modified legal provisions to devices, energy measurement methods, and energy supply categories.
Provincial government's request needed La demande des provinces est nécessaire (2) Le décret pris conformément au paragraphe (1) ne s'applique pas, dans une province donnée, aux appareils servant de fondement au calcul des redevances ou de...
AI summary The provincial government's request is necessary for the application of decrees under specific conditions, particularly regarding devices used in calculating fees payable to the Crown or others. The text outlines exceptions to decree applicability and references modifications to sections 28(2) and (3) for decree projects, citing legal provisions from 1980-81-82-83, ch. 87, art. 38.
Tabling order Dépôt du décret 40 (1) Le décret pris en application de l'alinéa 39(1)b) est déposé devant le Parlement dans les quinze premiers jours de séance suivant sa signature. (2) Le décret déposé dans les conditions prévues au paragr...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for depositing a decree under Canadian legislation, specifying a 15-day parliamentary session window for tabling, a 30-day effective period, and requirements for revocation motions requiring signatures from 50 House of Commons members or 20 Senators. It defines 'sitting day of Parliament' and references statutory provisions (1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 39).
Where motion adopted and concurred in Adoption et agrément 42 (1) Where a motion taken up and considered in accordance with sections 40 and 41 is adopted by the House of Parliament in which it was introduced and is concurred in by the othe...
AI summary Section 42(1) outlines that if a motion adopted by the introducing House of Parliament is concurred in by the other House, the related order is revoked. However, this revocation does not prevent the future issuance of similar orders under paragraph 39(1)(b). The provision emphasizes procedural mechanisms for legislative approval and subsequent order modifications.
Her Majesty Sa Majesté 44 This Act is binding on Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province. 1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 2. 45 The Electricity Inspection Act , chapter E-4 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, and the Gas Inspection 42 (...
AI summary This text outlines legal provisions related to the binding nature of an Act on Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, referencing the Electricity Inspection Act and Gas Inspection. It details procedures for annulment and enactment of decrees based on motions and parliamentary resolutions.
Repeals Abrogation 45 Sont abrogées la Loi sur l'inspection de l'électricité , chapitre E-4 des Statuts revisés du Canada de 1970, et la Act , chapter G-2 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, are repealed. 1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 41....
AI summary The text repeals the Loi sur l'inspection de l'électricité (chapter E-4 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970) and the Act (chapter G-2 of the same statutes). It also outlines provisions for verified meters and permissions under the repealed acts, ensuring continuity of approvals under the new Act.
Idem Idem (2) Les permis et les approbations accordés par le ministre ou le directeur conformément à l'article 8 ou à l'article 9 de la Loi sur l'inspection de l'électricité , chapitre E-4 des Statuts revisés du Canada de 1970, ou conformé...
AI summary The text outlines the continuation of permits and approvals under new legislation, referencing specific acts and chapters from the Revised Statutes of Canada. It addresses the treatment of certificates of registration for electricity and gas suppliers, with conditions for their authenticity in legal proceedings. The Act's effective date is determined by proclamation.
Commencement Entrée en vigueur \ 47 La présente loi ou l'une de ses dispositions entrent en vigueur à la date ou aux dates fixées par proclamation; des dates différentes d'entrée en vigueur peuvent être prévues pour l'électricité et le gaz...
AI summary The law's commencement dates are set by proclamation, with separate dates for electricity and gas. The Minister of Industry must review the Act within five years of royal assent and submit a report to Parliament. The law was effective January 25, 1986, as per TR/86-20.
L-9-IAppellants Supplement to Exhibit L-9 (redacted)
9 passages
re half-year period was only $782.82 for 6 full months, yet i was charged $803 per month for those same 6 months totalling $4818. Thats an incredible theft from anyone let alone a disabled Veteran. This completely exposes their data manipu...
AI summary The complainant alleges that Nova Scotia Power manipulated data to create an artificial arrears balance by using unverified estimations and unauthorized agreements, resulting in overcharging for electricity. The complainant claims that the billing was fraudulent and demands a forensic audit and restitution for a disabled veteran.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is a confidentiality notice sent to multiple recipients, including Nova Scotia Power employees and officials, regarding a regulatory proceeding (M12733) involving a procedural nullity and a demand for a stay following a Board admission of regulatory non-compliance.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace, Your previous email explicitly stated...
AI summary The email highlights a procedural fairness issue where Nova Scotia Power (NSP) is accused of withholding a confidential document (PCON) that supports a disputed debt balance. The sender claims they never signed any agreement with NSP and demands the release of the document or its removal from the record. The email also references Regulation 6.5(3) and cites Matter No. M12733.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is a confidential communication regarding a notice of procedural nullity (M12733) related to a regulatory non-compliance admission by the Board. It is being sent to multiple stakeholders including Nova Scotia Power and government officials.
Proof of Systemic Collusion and Board Non-Compliance: - 1. Defiance of the Mandatory Stay (Regulation 6.5-3): I formally appealed the DRO's final decision on March 4th—within 24 hours of its release—after the DRO avoided every single regul...
AI summary The text outlines claims of systemic collusion and regulatory non-compliance by the Board, including failure to enforce a mandatory stay, allowing collection of disputed debts, and applying new rate increases to a frozen, disputed profile while ignoring consumer protection duties.
If the Board Continues its Failure to Act If the Board continues its failure to act and continues to enable the unlawful and blatant non-compliance of this power monopoly to continue, I will file a formal statutory appeal with the Nova Sco...
AI summary The sender threatens legal action against the Energy and Utilities Board for failing to regulate Nova Scotia Power, alleging systemic over-billing and regulatory failure, particularly affecting disabled veterans. The sender also mentions a potential class action lawsuit involving 13,000 people and calls for immediate action to protect consumers.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This notice alerts recipients of a procedural nullity due to regulatory non-compliance admitted by the Energy and Utilities Board, requesting an immediate stay. It is sent to multiple stakeholders, including government officials, Nova Scotia Power representatives, and legal counsel.
Conclusion: The fact that the Board is now "seeking information" to see if NSP is in compliance proves that you cannot allow enforcement to continue. You do not collect on a debt first and check if it's legal later. I am reiterating my dem...
AI summary The text argues that the Board's continued enforcement of a $21,000+ debt is unlawful and demands an immediate stay of enforcement, citing non-compliance and predatory billing practices. The author threatens media action if the Board does not halt enforcement.
Lincoln DRO Appeal (NSEB M12733) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 4
AI summary The document is titled 'Lincoln DRO Appeal (NSEB M12733) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests' and appears to be related to a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power and the Energy and Utilities Board.
102742Appellant Notice re Appeal with NS Court of Appeals (redacted)
8 passages
Appellant appeals The appellant, Dave Lincoln, appeals from the decision and order made by the Nova Scotia Energy Board. The appellant appeals from the whole of the final decision in the proceedings before t he Nova Scotia Energy Board und...
AI summary Dave Lincoln appeals the decision made by the Nova Scotia Energy Board in Matter M12733, with the appeal being directed against the entire final decision rendered by Board Member Marc L. Dunning.
Grounds of appeal The grounds of appeal are: l.Error of Law Regarding Shifting Nomenclature. Deception. and Regulation 6.5(3) Nullity: The Board erred in law on Page 3 of its decision by ruling that a utility can escape the mandatory signa...
AI summary The appeal argues that the Board made an error in law by allowing a utility to avoid mandatory signature requirements under Regulation 6.5(3) by retroactively renaming debt collection schedules as an Equal Billing Plan. The utility had previously executed these arrangements as budget settlement agreements, and the Board's validation of the name change is seen as enabling void financial arrangements.
2.Violation of the Common Law Doctrine of Privity of Cont.rad and Third- - ~ Party Precedent: The Board erred in law on Page 4 by validating an unauthorized financial contract executed behind the Appellant's back between Nova Scotia Power...
AI summary The Appellant argues that the Board made a legal error by validating an unauthorized financial contract between Nova Scotia Power and a former employee of Veterans Affairs Canada. The Appellant also claims that the Board relied on fabricated evidence, including internal system logs, to support this decision, which violates consumer protections and procedural fairness.
4.Breach of Procedural Fairness and Tolerance of Ex Parte Service Violations: The Board erred in law by failing to log procedural violations and strike Exhibit L-11 from the record. The Board permitted Nova Scotia Power to file formal Info...
AI summary The Board is accused of procedural errors, including failing to log violations, allowing ex parte submissions, misinterpreting statutory stay protections, and ignoring accounting errors in Nova Scotia Power's billing data. The Appellant claims these actions violated procedural fairness and natural justice.
9.Complete Disregard of Mental Health. Family Trauma. and Natural Justice: The Board erred in law and fundamentally breached the principles of natural justice by completely failing to evaluate, address, or weigh the profound personal and m...
AI summary The Board is criticized for failing to consider the mental health and family trauma related to an active criminal assault case involving the Appellant's minor child, leading to a decision that ignored critical safety and stability factors.
Authority for appeal Section 36 of the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act, SNS 2024, c. 11, and the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules.
AI summary This section references Section 36 of the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act and the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules, which provide the legal basis for appeals in regulatory proceedings.
Order requested The appellant says that the court should allow the appeal and that the judgment appealed from be reversed and the following relief be granted: - •An Order setting aside the decision of Nova Scotia Energy Board Member Marc L...
AI summary The appellant is appealing a decision by Nova Scotia Energy Board Member Marc L Dunning, requesting the court to reverse the judgment, declare that the appellant is not evading lawful payments, and declare various billing arrangements as void. The appellant also seeks a forensic audit, financial restitution, and a stay of collection actions, along with a declaration of liability for court costs.
failed to follow the applicable regulatory framework in a way that invalidates the charges. On the evidence before it, the Board does not find that standard has been met Accordingly, your appeal is denied, subject to the direction above re...
AI summary The appeal is denied as the evidence does not meet the required standard to invalidate the charges. The Board allows for a repayment arrangement over up to 24 months for the arrears, subject to agreement between the parties.
102917Appellant's Formal Notice to NSEB and Ombudsman (redacted)
11 passages
From: To: Ombudsman; Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal Cc: Mayhunga, Miranda; Lawson, Hollie; Penney, Nicole; Blake Williams; Carley Freeman; Chris Lanteigne; Jennifer Ross; Kathleen Murray; Lisa Forsey; Sofia Reiner; info@macqillivray...
AI summary A formal notice regarding Matter M12733 is sent to the Ombudsman and Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal, alleging systemic regulatory fraud, procedural unfairness, and human rights violations. The notice is addressed to multiple individuals and offices, and includes attachments.
MANDATORY DEMANDS: Immediate Billing Freeze: Instruction to NSP to cease all collection and "current bill" enforcement until this appeal is resolved. Disclosure of Evidence: Immediate production of Exhibit L-7 and any signed documents NSP...
AI summary The text includes a demand for an immediate billing freeze, disclosure of evidence, ombudsman intervention, and a forensic audit of an account. It also includes a response from Lisa Wallace regarding an appeal process related to a DRO appeal.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is part of a regulatory proceeding related to M12733 and involves a response from NSPI to the NSEB regarding a DRO appeal by Dave Lincoln. The message includes confidentiality instructions and is addressed to multiple stakeholders.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Good day, As i havent heard anything back since and...
AI summary A disabled veteran, Dave Lincoln, is frustrated with NS Power for continuing to bill him despite his dispute and requests an update on a proceeding and access to documents. The email also references a response from NSPI to the NSEB in Matter No. M12733, which has been posted as Exhibit L-8.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is part of a regulatory proceeding related to M12733, concerning a response from NSPI to NSEB regarding a DRO appeal by Dave Lincoln. It is marked as confidential and includes multiple recipients from Nova Scotia Power and the Nova Scotia Energy Board.
Re: M12733 – DRO Appeal – Dave Lincoln (Account This reply addresses NS Power's last-minute March 19 Exhibit L-7 (filed on deadline, proving delay tactics), which systematically evades my core complaints while fabricating compliance. Their...
AI summary The document discusses an appeal by Dave Lincoln against NS Power, highlighting last-minute filings, alleged regulatory violations, unauthorized contracts, meter issues, and continued billing during the appeal, which is claimed to harm disabled veterans and others.
6. Continued Billing During Live Appeal (Reg 6.4 + DRO Violation) Two bills in dispute: First ($3,188 due Mar 11, bal $2,305.12) Feb 21—19 days post-DRO email Feb 2. Emailed NSPI Feb 21 for hold (cc DRO), got auto-refusal. Second ($592 due...
AI summary This section discusses a dispute involving continued billing during a live appeal, where NSPI implemented a DRO despite an ongoing appeal, leading to accusations of contempt and willful non-compliance. The issue was raised with the DRO but was ignored, and a freeze and suspension of the DRO are requested.
Core Issues Raised with DRO, Never Addressed—Clear DRO Bias These violations—Reg 6.5 unsigned agreements, Reg 5.5 meter errors, equal billing failures, disability ignorance— fully detailed in DRO submission (Feb 4, page 15 Confidential Att...
AI summary The text highlights violations such as unsigned agreements and meter errors, which were detailed in a DRO submission but not addressed by the DRO. It claims the DRO showed bias by ignoring these issues and only focusing on a math-related figure of $592, suggesting the need for Board intervention.
Demands - 1. Void unsigned "agreements," wipe arrears - 2. Full 2017-present billing/meter audit + credits - 3. Income-based disability plan (VAC-only) - 4. Billing freeze during review - 5. Mitzi termination explanation post-$800 "deal" -...
AI summary The document outlines a list of demands including voiding unsigned agreements, conducting audits, implementing an income-based disability plan, freezing billing, and investigating NSPI and the DRO for non-compliance and bias. These demands highlight concerns around transparency, fairness, and regulatory oversight.
Attachment: Mar 19 $592 bill From: Penney, Nicole Sent: 19 March 2026 15:12 To: Sofia Reiner Cc: Carley Freeman ; Chris Lanteigne ; Forsey, Lisa ; Wallace, Lisa ; Nakhatovych, Maryna ; Murray, Kathleen ; Ross, Jennifer ; Williams, Blake ;...
AI summary An email from Nicole Penney to Sofia Reiner and others regarding NSPI's response to a DRO appeal in matter M12733, involving the Nova Scotia Energy Board.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace: Please note that NS Power has uploaded...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power has uploaded documents related to a dispute resolution appeal (M12733) in response to Dave Lincoln's appeal. The contact for this matter is Jennifer Ross, and the email was sent by Sofia Reiner from Nova Scotia Power.
102926Appellant Correspondence - Final Notice - redacted
7 passages
FINAL DEMAND You have 48 hours to: Issue an Immediate Stay on all current billing and enforcement. Order Immediate Restitution of the $21,000+ taken via void, unsigned agreements. Order a Full Forensic Audit back to 2017. If these illegal...
AI summary A disabled veteran, Dave Lincoln, is demanding an immediate stay on billing and enforcement actions by Nova Scotia Power (NSP), restitution of over $21,000 taken via void, unsigned agreements, and a full forensic audit dating back to 2017. He accuses NSP and the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) of corruption, greed, and willful inaction, impacting a vulnerable individual and potentially leading to a large class-action lawsuit.
Disabled Veteran Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: "Wallace, Lisa" Date: 2026-04-27 11:21 a.m. (GMT-04:00) To: "Smith, Chase" , "Murdock, Tom E" , [email protected] Cc: Carley Freeman , Chris Lanteigne , "Forsey, Lisa" , "M...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) received a correspondence regarding a statutory breach and regulatory fraud in Matter No. M12733. The Board reaffirms its position and will continue its standard process, including gathering additional information to determine if there was an overpayment.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Dear Ms. Wallace, This is a formal notice that the...
AI summary The sender alleges that the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) is in breach of its statutory duties under the Public Utilities Act and its own regulatory rules by enabling non-compliant conduct by Nova Scotia Power (NSP), which is claimed to be a case of regulatory fraud against a vulnerable disabled veteran. A motion to dismiss is being demanded due to these alleged violations.
2. Breach of Mandatory Stay (Regulation 6.5-3) - The Law: Board-approved policy and Regulation 6.5-3 mandate that a customer does not have to pay the disputed amount while an appeal is active. There is also a mandatory 12-day stay of enfor...
AI summary The text discusses a breach of Regulation 6.5-3 by the Board, which mandates a mandatory 12-day stay of enforcement after a DRO decision. The Board refused to enforce the stay despite a timely appeal, allowing illegal collection actions and economic duress during the active appeal.
Conclusion: The Board's silence on these specific breaches, while continuing to facilitate NSP's noncompliance, is an absolute failure of your office's mandate. I am requesting an immediate Cease and Desist of all enforcement and the dismi...
AI summary The text is a strongly worded letter from Dave Lincoln, a disabled veteran, to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), expressing frustration with the Board's perceived inaction on regulatory breaches and requesting a cease and desist and dismissal of the matter due to lack of evidence. The letter also references a legal proceeding (M12733) and mentions involvement of the Office of the Ombudsman and Class Counsel.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is a confidentiality notice regarding a refiled response by NSPI to the NSEB in response to a DRO appeal, identified as M12733. The message warns against disclosing the content and requests deletion if received by mistake.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace: Please note that NS Power has uploaded...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power has uploaded documents related to a dispute resolution appeal (M12733) via the Board's secure file transfer service. The documents include responses to Dave Lincoln from the DRO. Jennifer Ross is the contact for this matter, and the email was sent by Sofia Reiner from Nova Scotia Power.
102928Appellant's Forensic Calculation - redacted
7 passages
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary The email is a confidentiality notice sent to multiple recipients, including government officials and representatives from Nova Scotia Power, regarding a regulatory proceeding (M12733) involving a procedural nullity and a demand for a stay following the Board's admission of regulatory non-compliance.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace, Your previous email explicitly stated...
AI summary The email from Dave Lincoln highlights a procedural fairness issue regarding a hidden document (PCON) submitted by Nova Scotia Power, which he claims contains fraudulent agreements without his consent. He demands the Board order the release of the unredacted document or strike Exhibit L-11 from the record. The email also references Regulation 6.5(3) and a debt balance of $4,530.81.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is a confidentiality notice related to a regulatory proceeding involving a notice of procedural nullity and a demand for a stay due to regulatory non-compliance. It is sent to multiple recipients, including representatives from Nova Scotia Power and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal.
Proof of Systemic Collusion and Board Non-Compliance: - 1. Defiance of the Mandatory Stay (Regulation 6.5-3): I formally appealed the DRO's final decision on March 4th—within 24 hours of its release—after the DRO avoided every single regul...
AI summary The document outlines three major allegations: defiance of a mandatory stay, enforcement of a disputed debt, and application of new rates to a frozen profile. The author claims the Board is non-compliant and colluding with NSP, using illegal and unverified charges to benefit the utility.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien SUBMISSION OF IR-1 RESPONSES AND FORMAL DEMAND FOR...
AI summary The submitter responds to Information Requests issued by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, emphasizing unresolved issues regarding NS Power's alleged non-compliance with regulations, fraudulent practices, and ongoing enforcement of disputed charges. They argue that the Board has failed to hold NS Power accountable despite years of non-compliance and that approving a rate increase under these circumstances is unacceptable.
Unresolved Concerns the Board Has Failed to Address Despite the Board's questions to NS Power, the following issues remain unanswered and unaddressed: No Signed Agreement: The Board itself has questioned NS Power's compliance with Regulati...
AI summary The text outlines unresolved concerns regarding NS Power's compliance with regulations, including lack of signed agreements, unauthorized third-party contracts, use of overcharges as arrears, violation of mandatory stays, continued use of outdated hot tub estimates, lack of energy audits, and systemic non-compliance leading to a potential class action.
If the Board Continues its Failure to Act If the Board continues its failure to act and continues to enable the unlawful and blatant non-compliance of this power monopoly to continue, I will file a formal statutory appeal with the Nova Sco...
AI summary The writer threatens to file a statutory appeal with the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal if the Board does not act on the alleged unlawful and non-compliant behavior of Nova Scotia Power. The writer also plans to escalate the issue to the Office of the Premier, veterans' advocates, and the media, citing systemic over-billing and predatory billing against disabled veterans. A class action lawsuit involving at least 13,000 people is being prepared.
102930Appellant Email re Stay of Enforcement - redacted
9 passages
From: Penney, Nicole; Wallace, Lisa; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] To: Blake WIlliams; Carley Freeman; Chris Lanteigne; Jennifer Ross; Lisa Forsey; Sofia Reiner; Premier; Cc: [email protected]; King...
AI summary A motion for an immediate emergency order is filed under Matter No. M12733, citing systemic economic duress and failure to enforce regulation. The motion references Section 6.5(3) and is addressed to multiple stakeholders, including the Premier and various legal and regulatory entities.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace and Board Staff, I am writing to formal...
AI summary The email writer accuses the Board of enabling economic hardship by not issuing an Emergency Stay of Enforcement, citing Nova Scotia Power's submission as evidence of triple-billing, data manipulation, and missing customer signatures. The writer claims the Board is delaying action while allowing a regulated monopoly to unlawfully extract money from their family.
re half-year period was only $782.82 for 6 full months, yet i was charged $803 per month for those same 6 months totalling $4818. Thats an incredible theft from anyone let alone a disabled Veteran. This completely exposes their data manipu...
AI summary The complainant alleges that Nova Scotia Power (NSP) manipulated data to create an artificial arrears balance by using unverified estimations and unauthorized ghost agreements. They claim that NSP overrode their daily usage system to demand excessive payments and submitted fraudulent metrics to the Board, demanding a full forensic audit and restitution for a disabled veteran.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace, Your previous email explicitly stated...
AI summary The email highlights a dispute over a confidential document (PCON) uploaded by Nova Scotia Power, which the sender claims contains evidence of a fraudulent agreement. The sender asserts that Nova Scotia Power has not provided access to the document, violating procedural fairness and regulatory requirements. The sender demands the release of the document or its removal from the record.
Statement of Confidentiality This message (including any attachments) may contain private or protected information meant for a specific person or organization. If you received this by mistake, please let the sender know, do not communicate...
AI summary This email is part of a regulatory proceeding related to M12733, concerning a procedural nullity and the immediate demand for a stay following the Board's admission of regulatory non-compliance. The message is marked as confidential and includes a notice to the recipients.
Proof of Systemic Collusion and Board Non-Compliance: - 1. Defiance of the Mandatory Stay (Regulation 6.5-3): I formally appealed the DRO's final decision on March 4th—within 24 hours of its release—after the DRO avoided every single regul...
AI summary The text outlines three key allegations: defiance of a mandatory stay by the Board, enforcement of a disputed debt by NSP, and application of new rate increases to a frozen profile. These actions are claimed to be part of systemic collusion and non-compliance by the Board.
Final Demand for Administrative Action: You do not collect on a debt first and check if it is legal months later. By acknowledging my clear evidence of statutory breaches in Exhibit L-9 and refusing to halt this billing, the Board is no lo...
AI summary The sender, Dave Lincoln, a disabled veteran, is demanding an Immediate Emergency Stay Order to halt a $1,776.00 invoice issued by Nova Scotia Power due to alleged statutory breaches. The claim references Regulation 6.5(3) and alleges active collusion between the Board and Nova Scotia Power.
Demand for Immediate Relief Given the above, I respectfully demand: An Immediate Stay of Enforcement of all disputed amounts stemming from invalid or non consented "agreements," over-billed usage, or third party arrangements. - Full Revers...
AI summary The applicant is requesting an immediate stay of enforcement of disputed charges, including those related to fraudulent arrears, a disconnected hot tub, and a third-party arrangement with VAC. They also seek reversal of overcharged amounts and confirmation that NS Power cannot enforce disputed charges during the appeal, citing Regulation 6.5 3 and consumer protection duties.
Conclusion: The fact that the Board is now "seeking information" to see if NSP is in compliance proves that you cannot allow enforcement to continue. You do not collect on a debt first and check if it's legal later. I am reiterating my dem...
AI summary The sender argues that the Board's enforcement actions are unlawful and demands an immediate stay, citing a $21,000+ theft and non-compliance. The email includes a reference to a matter (M12733) and mentions multiple individuals and organizations involved in the proceeding.
102932Appellant Further Response to Board Decision - redacted
14 passages
Wallace, Lisa From: Dave Lincoln Sent: May 29, 2026 12:36 AM To: Penney, Nicole; Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal; Premier; Kings West Constituency Office; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; h...
AI summary A legal escalation notice is formally sent regarding the Board's attempt to rewrite a Canadian contract, potentially enabling corporate fraud. The notice is part of Matter M12733 and is addressed to multiple stakeholders including the Premier, Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal, and various media outlets.
Dear All I am writing in response to the Board's decision issued the morning of, May 28, 2026, and to restate, in a clear and organized way, the major regulatory issues that remain unresolved. I remain deeply concerned that the Board has a...
AI summary The writer expresses concern over the Board's decision to accept Nova Scotia Power's position, arguing it undermines consumer protections related to signed agreements and consent. They highlight the potential creation of a dangerous precedent for all consumers in Nova Scotia and reference the importance of these protections for disabled veterans.
IV. REGULATION 6.4 - STAY OF ENFORCEMENT Regulation 6.4 is critical because it protects consumers from immediate enforcement while a dispute is still alive. The explicit, binding text of Regulation 6.4 (Dispute Resolution) states: "The Com...
AI summary Regulation 6.4 provides a 12-day stay of enforcement after a Dispute Resolution Officer's decision. Nova Scotia Power violated this regulation by initiating collection actions within hours of the decision, denying the customer the right to appeal. The complainant argues that immediate enforcement undermines the purpose of the regulation and runs contrary to case law.
VII. THIRD-PARTY CONSENT AND DISABLED VETERAN PROTECTIONS I consented for Veterans Affairs Canada to speak with Nova Scotia Power. I did not consent for VAC or any third party to form a contract on my behalf. That distinction matters. Spea...
AI summary The individual objects to Nova Scotia Power's acceptance of a verbal agreement made by a third party, arguing that it violates consumer protections and legal doctrines such as Privity of Contract and Economic Duress. They emphasize that no signed agreement exists and that the Board's decision to accept verbal consent is legally invalid and harmful, especially for a disabled veteran.
X. FORMAL REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM SYSTEMIC OVERREACH Immediate recognition that the enforcement of disputed amounts while appeal rights remain active is improper. A clear explanation of how Nova Scotia Power's reliance on a third-party ver...
AI summary The document requests relief from enforcement of disputed charges by Nova Scotia Power, arguing that immediate billing during an active appeal violates regulatory protections. It emphasizes the need for reconsideration of the account and confirmation that the Board will not weaken consumer protections or violate settled case law, particularly for a disabled veteran.
From: Sent: May 25, 2026 11:40 PM To: Penney, Nicole ; Wallace, Lisa ; [email protected]; [email protected];\[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; tips@the...
AI summary A formal notice of proceeding is being filed with the NS Court of Appeal regarding allegations of systemic collusion, perjury, and theft in Matter M12733. This notice is sent to multiple stakeholders, including government officials, media outlets, and legal representatives.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace and Board Staff, Let this email serve a...
AI summary The email claims systemic bias and collusion by the Board, alleging that Nova Scotia Power and the Dispute Resolution Officer (DRO) have engaged in unlawful conduct, including fabricating evidence and failing to produce contracts. The sender plans to escalate the matter to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.
e half-year period was only $782.82 for 6 full months, yet i was charged $803 per month for those same 6 months totalling $4818. Thats an incredible theft from anyone let alone a disabled Veteran. This completely exposes their data manipul...
AI summary The customer alleges that Nova Scotia Power (NSP) engaged in data manipulation and fraudulent billing practices, leading to an overcharge of thousands of dollars. The customer claims that NSP used unverified estimations and unauthorized agreements to create an artificial arrears balance and demands the Board void the fabricated balance and issue an emergency stay order.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Wallace, Your previous email explicitly stated...
AI summary The email discusses a dispute over a confidential document (PCON) submitted by Nova Scotia Power, which the sender claims contains evidence of a fraudulent agreement without their consent. The sender asserts that Nova Scotia Power has violated procedural fairness by withholding the document and demands its immediate release or removal from the record.
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links / Faites preuve de prudence si vous ouvrez une pièce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Dear Ms. Wallace and Board Staff, I am writing to f...
AI summary The sender submits a power bill to the record, alleging predatory billing by Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and non-compliance by the Board. The sender claims the Board is allowing NSP to collect unverified charges while ignoring its duty to protect consumers and enforce a mandatory stay of enforcement.
in the worst case, like wilful tolerance or collusion. This conduct is so far outside the public interest that I will be including the Board in the class action level legal review of this situation. If this were any other organization that...
AI summary The letter from Dave Lincoln, a disabled veteran, criticizes Nova Scotia Power for failing to meet standards for over nine years and calls for legal action against the Board. The letter is part of a proceeding (M12733) involving a notice of procedural nullity and a demand for a stay following the Board's admission of regulatory non-compliance.
Admission of Statutory Breach (Request IR-4): The Board has formally questioned NSP on its compliance with Regulation 6.5. By asking NSP to explain how they are compliant "if no signed agreements exist," the Board has admitted that a signe...
AI summary The document outlines a dispute involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the regulatory board, highlighting NSP's non-compliance with Regulation 6.5, lack of consent for third-party actions, and ongoing violations of a Mandatory Stay of Enforcement. The applicant also details their efforts to conserve energy and the overbilling by NSP.
Conclusion: The fact that the Board is now "seeking information" to see if NSP is in compliance proves that you cannot allow enforcement to continue. You do not collect on a debt first and check if it's legal later. I am reiterating my dem...
AI summary The document is a conclusion from a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and a disabled veteran, Dave Lincoln, who is disputing the enforcement of a billing issue. He demands an immediate stay of enforcement and threatens media action if the Board continues to facilitate what he views as illegal billing practices. NSP has been asked to respond to information requests by May 20, 2026.
× Lincoln DRO Appeal (NSEB M12733) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 4
AI summary This document pertains to the Lincoln DRO Appeal (NSEB M12733) and includes NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests. It is part of a regulatory proceeding involving dispute resolution and information disclosure.