Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Regulatory Compliance" in M03441

Matter: P-884 - NSPI - 2009 IRP Update - Action Plan Status Report (1st Progress Report)
3 passages 3 documents

Regulatory Compliance across all matters →

N-12009 IRP Update - Action Plan Status Report (First Progress Report) 8/4/2010 1 passage
Section 65 p. p. 0
Consider the recommendations arising out of the Nova Scotia government-led stakeholder process "N.S. Renewable Energy Consultations" (re: evolving renewable energy targets) and their effect on planning, if any. A Report is anticipated to b...

AI summary The document discusses the outcomes of the Nova Scotia government-led stakeholder process on renewable energy targets, including a report by Dr. Michelle Adams and Dr. David Wheeler, and subsequent policy changes such as the Renewable Electricity Plan and amendments to the Electricity Act, including the introduction of a community feed-in-tariff (COMFIT) and expanded net metering requirements.

05459Ecology Action Centre's comments on NSPI's Action Plan Status Report (IRP Update_ 10/8/2010 1 passage
Regarding Solar PV potential in Nova Scotia: p. p. 16
gimes in Canada. Kentville, Yarmouth and the Halifax International Airport all report 3.0+ on the solar energy resource potential assessment of Atlantic Canada (LA and Miami rank 5.0+ for comparison). The Wheeler report's downplay that PV...

AI summary The text highlights Nova Scotia's solar energy potential, referencing locations with high solar resource scores. It criticizes the Wheeler report and provincial policy-makers for not adequately supporting solar PV through regulations and feed-in tariffs, which has implications for energy security and economic opportunities. It calls for informed decision-making based on examples from other jurisdictions like Ontario.

05966Letter to EAC advising Board not accepting latest letter as part of the official record 1 passage
Section 2 p. p. 0
ised that parties had already been given the opportunity to provide the Board with their comments and that the Board would be reviewing those submissions before responding to NSPl's August 4th filing. Despite that advice, you proceeded to...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that parties had already submitted comments and that it would review them before responding to NSPI's filing. Despite this, additional comments were submitted, which the Board does not intend to accept as part of the official record.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →