E-2Evidence of ENSC as DSM Administrator
21 passages
1 2. 2011 DSM RESULTS 2
AI summary The 2011 Demand Side Management (DSM) results are analyzed in this section, focusing on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) performance, Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) implementation, and oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). The proceeding evaluates energy efficiency outcomes and regulatory compliance under DSM programs.
REGULATORY OVERSIGHT – A BALANCED APPROACH FOR EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA Prepared by PHILIPPE DUNSKY, PRESIDENT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Submitted to: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION January 24th, 2012
AI summary A document prepared by Philippe Dunskey of Dunsky Energy Consulting and submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on January 24, 2012, outlines a balanced approach to regulatory oversight for energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
Dunsky Energy Consulting was tasked by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) with reviewing the oversight framework that currently applies to its Demand-Side Management plans. Specifically, we were tasked with identifying opportunities...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting reviewed the oversight framework for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Demand-Side Management (DSM) plans, identifying strengths such as stakeholder trust and operational flexibility, but highlighting the limited one-year approval period as a major hindrance that creates market uncertainty and operational challenges.
The chart below illustrates the recommended approach, including both the regulatory and extraregulatory oversight mechanisms. THREE-YEAR PLAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Multi-Year Plan F H A...
AI summary The text presents a chart outlining the recommended approach for regulatory and extraregulatory oversight mechanisms within a three-year plan, detailing various activities such as filings, hearings, meetings, reports, and approvals by the Board of Directors and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.
As can be seen, the regulatory process is designed to maintain a full schedule of evaluations, reporting to the UARB and stakeholders, and opportunity for input. It also involves additional oversight from ENSC's independent board of direct...
AI summary The regulatory process ensures regular evaluations, reporting to the UARB and stakeholders, and opportunities for input. It enhances oversight and ENSC's ability to commit to the market but lacks long-term certainty compared to similar organizations.
MANDATE Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) has tasked us with reviewing the current regulatory oversight model and proposing changes that may be useful toward improving the Corporation's ability to assist Nova Scotians in saving ene...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is reviewing the current regulatory oversight model to enhance its ability to improve energy efficiency in Nova Scotia. The review aims to ensure recommendations do not hinder the UARB and stakeholders from tracking ENSC's performance. Consultations with ENSC's Board of Directors, management, and stakeholders in November and December 2011 informed the recommendations.
CONTEXT Regulatory oversight of a dedicated DSM "utility" like ENSC is broadly analogous to regulatory oversight of other monopoly functions. In this respect, regulatory models exist on a continuum, ranging from pure "cost of service" mode...
AI summary The document discusses regulatory models for DSM in Nova Scotia, comparing cost-of-service and performance-based approaches. It highlights ENSC's creation under a performance-based contract with UARB and calls for reconsidering oversight models to improve energy cost savings for Nova Scotians.
OBJECTIVES: A BALANCED, EFFECTIVE APPROACH The purpose of this mandate is to recommend changes needed to arrive at an effective, balanced regulatory oversight approach for ENSC. While these are subjective terms, we have focused on ensuring...
AI summary The mandate aims to recommend regulatory changes for ENSC to ensure effective oversight through three keys: performance drivers for DSM success, market latitude for energy efficiency, and stakeholder oversight. ENSC must avoid disincentives, have flexibility to influence markets, and allow public scrutiny of ratepayer contributions.
PERFORMANCE DRIVERS Efficiency Nova Scotia may have a mandate to generate energy savings, but does it have the internal and external drivers to do so? In many regions throughout North America, regulators have adopted frameworks meant to ac...
AI summary The document examines whether Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) has internal/external drivers to achieve energy savings, contrasting its non-utility, not-for-profit status with utility-based frameworks like LRAMs and decoupling mechanisms. It highlights how U.S. and Canadian jurisdictions use incentives to align DSM performance with utility profits, noting ENSC's unique regulatory context.
LATITUDE Even if Efficiency Nova Scotia has the clarity of purpose and built-in incentives to perform, does it have the ability to do so to maximum effect? ENSC operates in an extremely complex market environment, one that is in many respe...
AI summary The document argues that Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) requires sufficient latitude to compete effectively in complex markets where energy efficiency is discretionary. ENSC faces challenges competing with non-energy priorities and must balance resources, responsiveness, and commitment to influence consumer behavior. The text emphasizes the need for adequate incentives, adaptability, and long-term credibility for Demand Side Management (DSM) programs to maximize ratepayer funds.
OVERSIGHT As with any regulatory oversight model, both the regulator and stakeholders should expect to be able to fully and effectively play their roles. This implies that any regulatory approach must strive to achieve three goals: - Trans...
AI summary The text outlines three goals for regulatory oversight: transparency, safeguards, and stakeholder influence. It emphasizes the need for timely information sharing, protections against misuse of funds, and stakeholder input in DSM plans. The report asserts that these criteria can be balanced with ENSC's operational flexibility.
STRENGTHS While the UARB's oversight of DSM is relatively new as compared to many other regions of North America, both the framework and the approach it has taken to the task offer benefits that others do not have. These include: - 1. Trus...
AI summary The UARB's oversight of DSM in Nova Scotia offers strengths such as trust, clarity of purpose, flexibility, resources, and a long-term view. These benefits stem from the transition of DSM administration to ENSC, the independent board structure, and the UARB's approval of a robust budget and flexible planning approach.
The table below summarizes our findings. CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e...
AI summary The table summarizes findings related to oversight and performance drivers for ENSC, highlighting areas such as incentives, resources, and transparency. It notes that ENSC has no sales disincentive, strong reputational incentives, and challenges with long-term commitment and annual approval processes. The section will provide recommendations to address these shortcomings while maintaining current strengths.
INTRODUCTION The electricity context in Nova Scotia is evolving, with the preservation of large industrial loads in flux, the pending arrival of new shipbuilding activity that could increase other loads, potential new renewable electricity...
AI summary Nova Scotia's electricity context is evolving with industrial load shifts, new shipbuilding, renewables, and an updated IRP. Long-term funding for ENSC is advocated, modeled on Oregon and Vermont's 15- and 12-year commitments. A six-part framework, including existing and new practices, is proposed to enhance ENSC's market engagement.
The following table provides an overview of the oversight process we have recommended, while also indicating the extra-regulatory oversight involved. THREE-YEAR PLAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4...
AI summary The text outlines a three-year oversight process with regulatory filings, hearings, meetings, and reports, emphasizing ongoing activities and approvals by the Board of Directors and the Utility and Review Board.
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES Through this process, we have sought to address the remaining weaknesses identified previously, while maintaining its inherent strengths, including the strength of the UARB's and stakeholders' ability to ensure eff...
AI summary The process aims to maintain the strengths of the UARB and stakeholders' oversight while addressing prior weaknesses. A table summarizes recommendations to tackle these issues.
CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e Co st Examples Are profits unaffected by...
AI summary The document evaluates the performance drivers and oversight criteria for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC), focusing on incentives, resources, transparency, and cost considerations. It notes that ENSC has no sales disincentives, has a budget on the higher end of the typical range, and has moved to a 3-year approval process with some long-term predictability still missing.
CONCLUSION The regulatory framework that oversees Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation includes a number of important strengths, including most notably a culture of focusing on results rather than micromanaging operations. Furthermore, the U...
AI summary The regulatory framework for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) emphasizes results-focused oversight and recent UARB flexibility improvements. However, the short-term approval process hinders ENSC's ability to engage market actors and meet DSM goals. Proposals include annual reports and protective triggers to offset longer approval lags, balancing ENSC's needs with UARB oversight responsibilities.
and in recommending changes to the DSM Cost Allocation Approach was presented to stakeholders for comment and feedback at the two Stakeholder Sessions conducted by ENSC in November and December 2011. - Mr. Todd's presentation at the Novemb...
AI summary ENSC conducted stakeholder sessions in 2011 to refine its DSM cost allocation approach. Key issues included maintaining a 25%/75% System/Participating Class Benefits split and transitioning from customer count to benefit-based allocators for Enabling Strategies. Elenchus recommended these changes based on stakeholder feedback.
KEY COMPONENTS
AI summary The document outlines key components of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, including acronyms related to energy management, utility regulation, and efficiency programs. It provides definitions for terms used in proceedings involving energy conservation, cost recovery, and utility oversight.
Reasons to Change
AI summary The document outlines reasons for changing energy programs and regulatory approaches in Nova Scotia, emphasizing updates to Demand Side Management (DSM) frameworks, cost recovery mechanisms, and efficiency initiatives. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). Topics involve regulatory review, program cost allocation, and energy efficiency measures.
E-2(r)Revised ENSC Evidence
18 passages
REGULATORY OVERSIGHT – A BALANCED APPROACH FOR EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA Prepared by PHILIPPE DUNSKY, PRESIDENT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Submitted to: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION January 24th, 2012
AI summary The document, submitted by Philippe Dunskey of Dunsky Energy Consulting to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on January 24, 2012, outlines a balanced approach to regulatory oversight for Efficiency Nova Scotia. It emphasizes the need for efficiency programs and cost recovery mechanisms, though specific details are not provided in the excerpt.
Dunsky Energy Consulting was tasked by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) with reviewing the oversight framework that currently applies to its Demand-Side Management plans. Specifically, we were tasked with identifying opportunities...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting reviewed the oversight framework for ENSC's Demand-Side Management (DSM) plans, identifying strengths such as stakeholder trust and operational flexibility, while highlighting the hindrance of a limited 12-month approval period that creates uncertainty and may lead to missed savings and diverted focus.
The chart below illustrates the recommended approach, including both the regulatory and extraregulatory oversight mechanisms. THREE-YEAR PLAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Multi-Year Plan F H A...
AI summary The chart outlines a three-year plan with regulatory and extraregulatory oversight mechanisms, detailing activities such as progress reports, evaluations, meetings, and approvals for the Multi-Year Plan and Rate Rider. It includes filing, hearing, meeting, and reporting requirements over the years 2012 to 2016.
As can be seen, the regulatory process is designed to maintain a full schedule of evaluations, reporting to the UARB and stakeholders, and opportunity for input. It also involves additional oversight from ENSC's independent board of direct...
AI summary The regulatory process ensures ongoing evaluations, reporting, and stakeholder input, enhancing oversight by the UARB and ENSC's independent board. This framework improves ENSC's market commitment and performance but lacks the long-term certainty available to similar organizations.
OBJECTIVES: A BALANCED, EFFECTIVE APPROACH The purpose of this mandate is to recommend changes needed to arrive at an effective, balanced regulatory oversight approach for ENSC. While these are subjective terms, we have focused on ensuring...
AI summary The mandate outlines three 'keys to success' for regulatory oversight of ENSC: ensuring performance drivers for DSM savings, granting ENSC market latitude, and enabling public oversight of ratepayer contributions. These principles aim to balance effectiveness and accountability in energy efficiency initiatives.
PERFORMANCE DRIVERS Efficiency Nova Scotia may have a mandate to generate energy savings, but does it have the internal and external drivers to do so? In many regions throughout North America, regulators have adopted frameworks meant to ac...
AI summary The text examines whether Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) has sufficient performance drivers to achieve energy savings, contrasting regulatory frameworks in North America that use mechanisms like LRAMs, decoupling, and shared savings to incentivize Demand Side Management (DSM). It notes ENSC's unique status as a non-utility, not-for-profit entity, unlike most jurisdictions where DSM is utility-administered.
OVERSIGHT As with any regulatory oversight model, both the regulator and stakeholders should expect to be able to fully and effectively play their roles. This implies that any regulatory approach must strive to achieve three goals: - Trans...
AI summary The document outlines three goals for regulatory oversight: transparency, safeguards, and stakeholder influence. It emphasizes the need for the UARB and stakeholders to stay informed, prevent fund misuse, and allow stakeholder input in DSM plans. The report argues these goals can coexist with ENSC's flexibility to advance energy efficiency.
STRENGTHS While the UARB's oversight of DSM is relatively new as compared to many other regions of North America, both the framework and the approach it has taken to the task offer benefits that others do not have. These include: - 1. Trus...
AI summary The UARB's oversight of DSM in Nova Scotia is highlighted for its strengths, including trust, clarity of purpose, flexibility, resources, and a long-term view. These factors contribute to effective DSM implementation and oversight, distinguishing Nova Scotia from other regions.
The table below summarizes our findings. CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e...
AI summary The table summarizes findings regarding the oversight framework for Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC). It outlines criteria such as performance drivers, latitude, oversight, and cost, with notes on ENSC's lack of sales disincentives, strong reputational incentives, and challenges related to annual approval processes and cost considerations.
INTRODUCTION The electricity context in Nova Scotia is evolving, with the preservation of large industrial loads in flux, the pending arrival of new shipbuilding activity that could increase other loads, potential new renewable electricity...
AI summary Nova Scotia's electricity context is evolving with industrial load shifts, new shipbuilding activity, and renewable energy potential. Long-term funding commitments for ENSC are emphasized, drawing parallels to Oregon and Vermont's models. A six-part framework is proposed, balancing existing practices with necessary updates to the IRP and regulatory framework.
The following table provides an overview of the oversight process we have recommended, while also indicating the extra-regulatory oversight involved. THREE-YEAR PLAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4...
AI summary The table outlines a recommended oversight process, including regulatory and extra-regulatory activities, with specific actions such as filings, hearings, meetings, and reports over a three-year period from 2012 to 2016, highlighting the sequence dependency of tasks prior to the start of the plan.
CONCLUSION The regulatory framework that oversees Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation includes a number of important strengths, including most notably a culture of focusing on results rather than micromanaging operations. Furthermore, the U...
AI summary The regulatory framework for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) emphasizes results over micromanagement, supported by recent UARB flexibility measures. However, the short-term approval process hampers ENSC's ability to engage market actors and meet DSM goals. Proposed solutions include annual reports and triggers to offset longer approval lags, balancing oversight and performance. The UARB retains discretion for unforeseen events.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Cost Allocation Report
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) submitted a cost allocation report, detailing its programs and cost recovery mechanisms, likely in response to regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). Key programs include Demand Side Management (DSM) and Business Energy Rebates (BER), with references to regulatory tests like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC).
tepayer and taxpayer funded programs is required for ENSC's annual financial statements; hence, that allocation by general ledger account is reviewed by ENSC's auditors. - 3. ENSC's CAM is used to establish the true-up adjustments that ens...
AI summary ENSC's cost allocation model (CAM) is reviewed for accuracy in allocating ratepayer-funded program costs. The CAM uses true-up adjustments to reflect actual costs, with preliminary allocations based on planned budgets. ENSC's unique non-capital-intensive nature influences its CAM, which adheres to cost causality principles. Elenchus developed a two-part model tailored to ENSC's operations.
efore, allocated in the same way as those costs (i.e., allocated to programs and, hence, to the electricity and other fuel mandates on the basis of the total directly allocated costs of each program). Salaries and Benefits Accounts: The va...
AI summary The document outlines a cost allocation methodology for ENSC, distinguishing between program-related expenses (e.g., program manager salaries) and office administration costs (e.g., executive staff salaries). Salaries and benefits are allocated to programs based on the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) staff assigned directly to each program.
Detailed Review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation October 17, 2011
AI summary This document, dated October 17, 2011, outlines a detailed review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury, conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The review involves Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), focusing on regulatory compliance and project outcomes.
KEY COMPONENTS
AI summary The document outlines key components and acronyms related to a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including energy efficiency programs, utility regulations, and cost recovery mechanisms. It lists organizations, programs, and technical terms involved in energy management and utility oversight.
Reasons to Change
AI summary The document outlines acronyms and entities involved in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including organizations, programs, and technical terms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and cost recovery mechanisms. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, Nova Scotia Power Inc., and various energy programs.
E-21Direct Testimony of Paul Chernick (Consumer Advocate)
5 passages
4 Q: Have you testified previously in utility proceedings? - 5 A: Yes. I have testified more than 250 times on utility issues before various - 6 regulatory, legislative, and judicial bodies, including utility regulators in thirty - 7 state...
AI summary The witness confirms over 250 prior testimonies in utility proceedings before regulatory, legislative, and judicial bodies across 30 U.S. states, 5 Canadian provinces, and two U.S. federal agencies, including reviews of power plants and purchased-power contracts.
18 Q: How were these costs allocated in the 2011 and 2012 DSM plans? - 19 A: The costs of these activities were previously allocated on customer number, 20 which is not appropriate. Customer number does not drive the cost of any of the 21...
AI summary The 2011 and 2012 DSM plans allocated costs based on customer number, which is criticized as inappropriate since customer count does not correlate with activity costs. The respondent recommends the NSUARB adopt ENSC's proposal for Enabling Strategies allocation.
- "ESCos or Utility Programs: Which Are More Likely to Succeed?" (with Sabrina Birner), The Electricity Journal 5:2, March 1992. - "Determining the Marginal Value of Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (with Jill Schoenberg), Energy Developments in...
AI summary The text lists academic publications focusing on environmental externalities, demand-side management, and utility regulation. Key authors include Emily Caverhill and co-authors, with works published in journals and conference proceedings, addressing topics like monetizing externalities and fuel switching in energy conservation.
"Evaluation and Cost Effectiveness" (principal author), Ch. 14 of "California Evaluation Framework" Prepared for California utilities as required by the California Public Utilities Commission. 2004. "Energy Plan for the City of New York" (...
AI summary The text lists publications by an individual and collaborators on energy planning, demand-side management, and utility regulation, including works from California, New York, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maryland. Topics include avoided energy costs, performance-based regulation, and integrated resource planning, with some submitted to regulatory bodies like the Vermont PSB.
; cost-effectiveness of oil displacement; nuclear economics. Joint testimony with S.C. Geller. 7. MDPU 19845; Boston Edison Time-of-Use Rate Case; Massachusetts Attorney General; December 4 1979. Critique of utility marginal cost study and...
AI summary Expert testimony covers utility rate design, nuclear power costs, demand forecasting, and conservation programs in Massachusetts regulatory cases. Testimonies critique utility studies, analyze Seabrook Nuclear Plant economics, and address rate structures. Joint testimony with S.C. Geller is noted, though some were withdrawn due to procedural delays.