Topic:"Regulatory Oversight" in M10473

2.1 PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - E1 is the current holder of Nova Scotia's electricity efficiency and conservation franchise, making it a - public utility in relation to franchise activities. - As the franchise holder, E1 has the exclusive right...

AI summary E1 holds Nova Scotia's electricity efficiency franchise, requiring it to supply NS Power with cost-effective conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act. The Act mandates a three-year agreement between E1 and NS Power, with the Board authorized to intervene if no agreement is reached, ensuring customer cost reduction.

Table 62: Three-Year Summary of the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies Annual Plan Investment ($M) 2023 Total 0.9 2024 Total 1.6 2025 Total 1.6 DSM Plan Development & Reporting: development of cyclical DSM Resource...

AI summary Table 62 outlines the investment in the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies over three years, with a focus on DSM Plan Development & Reporting, Stakeholder Engagement, and Other Regulatory Initiatives. Activities include the development of cyclical DSM Resource Plans, engagement with the DSM Advisory Group, and monitoring of regulatory environments.

7.4.3.3 OTHER REGULATORY INITIATIVES - Other regulatory initiatives include NSUARB processes, not directly tied to DSM Plan development or - reporting, such as industry research and jurisdictional scans, and legal work related to regulator...

AI summary This section outlines other regulatory initiatives, including NSUARB processes, industry research, jurisdictional scans, and legal work. It emphasizes engagement with other jurisdictions, collaboration with consultants, and monitoring of regulatory environments to support DSM planning and administration. The electricity system is undergoing transformation, leading to more complex regulatory proceedings interwoven with DSM.

8 A. No, I have never testified before the UARB. However, I have testified 9 multiple times in other regulatory jurisdictions, and authored multiple articles and 10 reports on technology economics, modeling, forecasting, and cost effective...

AI summary The witness has not testified before the UARB but has testified in other regulatory jurisdictions and authored articles and reports on technology economics, modeling, forecasting, and cost effectiveness, including in Nova Scotia.

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's performance under the Agreement is measured based on performance requirements established by the UARB under Section 79M of the Act, as outlined in Schedule 'C' – Performance Requirements.

22. AUDIT AND INSPECTION - 22.1 EfficiencyOne shall, during the Term and for a period of thirty-six (36) months thereafter, keep accurate records of all EECA supplied to NSPI, as necessary to determine that the EECA was provided in accorda...

AI summary This section outlines the audit and inspection requirements under the agreement. EfficiencyOne must maintain records of EECA supplied to NSPI for 36 months after the Term. NSPI can request access to these records or inspect the EECA through the UARB, with EfficiencyOne required to facilitate these inspections.

Governing Law - 14. This Agreement is governed and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia. - General Provisions - 15. This Agreement is binding on the Parties, their administrators, successors, execut...

AI summary The agreement is governed by the laws of Nova Scotia and is binding on the parties and their successors. This section outlines the general provisions of the agreement.

(v) " Personal Information " shall mean the information provided by NSPI to (t) " Minister " has the meaning ascribed to it in the Act. EfficiencyOne pursuant to Section 79K of the Act. NSPI.

AI summary The text defines key terms such as 'Personal Information' and 'Minister' in the context of NSPI and EfficiencyOne under the Act. It references Section 79K of the Act and mentions NSPI as a party involved.

(w) " Release " or " Released " means a releasing, adding, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, migrating, dispersing, dispensing, disposing or dumping. (x) " Significant Chan...

AI summary The text defines key terms in an agreement, including 'Release,' 'Significant Changes,' 'Subcontractor,' 'Term,' and 'UARB,' which refers to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. It also references CASL, a Canadian Act related to electronic commerce. The document outlines general interpretive rules for the agreement.

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's performance is measured based on performance requirements established by the UARB under Section 79M of the Act, as detailed in Schedule 'C' – Performance Requirements.

- 20.2 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in the event this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 20.1(a), EfficiencyOne shall: - (a) Immediately return all monies paid on account of the Contract Price whic...

AI summary This section outlines the terms of default and termination under the agreement, specifying the obligations of EfficiencyOne upon termination, the conditions under which a party is deemed in default, and the role of the UARB in overseeing the agreement.

AUDIT AND INSPECTION 7 22. - EfficiencyOne shall, during the Term and for a period of thirty-six (36) months thereafter, keep accurate records of all EECA supplied to NSPI, as necessary to determine that the EECA was provided in accordance...

AI summary The agreement outlines EfficiencyOne's obligation to maintain accurate records of EECA supplied to NSPI for 36 months after the Term. NSPI has the right to request access to these records and inspect the EECA, with EfficiencyOne required to facilitate inspections and provide safe facilities.

Governing Law 14. This Agreement is governed and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia.

AI summary The agreement is governed by the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia, establishing the legal framework for its interpretation and enforcement.

Tracking Sheet Audit Prior to performing any savings calculations, the Evaluator conducted an audit of the final 2021 ARet tracking sheet to ensure it was complete and the entered data were consistent. The detailed protocol used for the tr...

AI summary An audit of the final 2021 ARET tracking sheet was conducted to ensure completeness and data consistency prior to savings calculations. The audit protocol and results are detailed in Appendix I.

The second step of the tracking sheet audit involved repeating the calculations and comparing the related data fields of the tracking sheet to identify any potential inconsistencies. [Table](#page-180-0) 2 below lists the data fields of th...

AI summary The second step of the tracking sheet audit involved repeating calculations and comparing data fields of the ARet tracking sheet to identify inconsistencies. Table 2 lists the data fields compared for consistency.

APPENDIX VII GREEN HEAT: TRACKING SHEET AUDIT This appendix presents the results of the tracking sheet audit performed by the Evaluator, which was aimed at: - › Verifying that all data fields required for the evaluation were included and f...

AI summary This appendix outlines the results of a tracking sheet audit conducted to verify the completeness and accuracy of data submitted by EOne for the Green Heat program. The audit ensured consistency in calculation methods and highlighted changes in the tracking sheet format due to the implementation of a new Integrated Customer Information System in 2021.

Data Consistency The second step of the tracking sheet audit involved recreating calculations and comparing related tracking sheet data fields to identify any potential inconsistencies in the calculations and correct them in the tracked va...

AI summary The second step of the tracking sheet audit involved recreating calculations and comparing related tracking sheet data fields to identify and correct any inconsistencies in the tracked values. A table lists all the data fields compared for consistency.

Custom Appendix I Custom: Tracking Sheet Audit Appendix II Custom: OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot Participant Interview Guide Appendix III Custom: New Construction CPA Stage Participant Interview Guide Appendix IV Custom: New Constru...

AI summary The text lists various appendices related to audits, interview guides, project review protocols, and algorithms for a custom tracking sheet and energy management system. These appendices are likely part of a regulatory or program evaluation process involving energy efficiency initiatives.

APPENDIX VI CUSTOM: RETROFIT PROJECT REVIEW PROTOCOL This appendix describes the protocol used as part of Retrofit project reviews and follow-up participant interviews.

AI summary This appendix outlines the protocol for conducting Retrofit project reviews and follow-up participant interviews as part of the regulatory process.

Suggested Citation: Peach, H. Gil, Yvonne J. Whitelaw & John Mitchell, Verification Review of Program Year 2021 Evaluation Results, Report for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board . H. Gil Peach & Associates, June 2021.

AI summary The document is a verification review of the Program Year 2021 evaluation results, prepared for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board by H. Gil Peach & Associates. It assesses the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation data and findings.

. Kramer, H., Lin, G., Curtin, C., Crowe, E., and Granderson, J. Proving the Business Case for Building Analytics. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, October 2020. https://doi.org/10.20357/B7G022 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Building...

AI summary The text lists academic references and reports related to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and evaluation methodologies. Key entities include Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, NREL, and the Uniform Methods Project. Topics focus on energy evaluation, residential lighting protocols, and distributed energy resources.

E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-02:

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provides non-confidential responses to information requests from the Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) as part of a regulatory proceeding. The document outlines E1's position on matters related to utility regulation and stakeholder engagement.

E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-14:

AI summary E1 provides responses to IPOANS's information requests in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The document outlines E1's compliance with NECB standards and interactions with NSUARB. Key focus areas include utility regulation and data transparency, though specific claims or detailed arguments are not elaborated in the provided text.

E1 Responses to Municipal Electric Utilities (MEU) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL differential in costs and avoided emissions that would be applicable to any energy and demand savings that occur in those service territories? If so,...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) did not consider MEU-specific avoided cost methodologies in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. Instead, NS Power provides standardized avoided cost estimates (fuel and infrastructure) to E1 for DSM planning, per NSUARB guidelines. E1 refers to prior responses regarding NSUARB IR-13 for further details.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

10 Page 1 of 1 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Bo...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) has conducted third-party audits and reviews since 2010 to ensure the accuracy of financial and energy savings reporting. These reports are submitted annually to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. Internal audits were paused due to the pandemic, but remediation testing was completed in 2022.

NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 4 of 25

AI summary The text provides a section from a regulatory proceeding document, specifically NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 4 of 25. It includes information related to a regulatory process and may involve discussions on energy efficiency, utility regulations, and stakeholder engagement.

Partially remediated PIO-9 Lack of specificity in safeguards in the privacy policy PIO Remediated © 2022 KPMG LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affil...

AI summary The document outlines a follow-up review of privacy policies, highlighting gaps and recommendations identified during a 2018 privacy assessment by KPMG, as well as residual risks associated with these gaps.

NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 9 of 25

AI summary The provided text is a page from a regulatory proceeding document, specifically NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 9 of 25. It appears to be part of a larger proceeding and may contain information relevant to the regulatory process in Nova Scotia.

rporate data warehouse with access to PI corporate data through an embedded Excel macro. warehouse Management response N/A Residual Suggested ID # Original finding Original Finding Description Status Remaining gaps Recommendations risk lev...

AI summary This chunk discusses a finding related to the redaction of social insurance numbers in EfficiencyOne's corporate data warehouse. The concern is that the current method does not fully render the numbers irrecoverable, although physical security safeguards are in place for paper forms.

NSUARB IR-11, Attachment 1, Page 23 of 25 Appendix A – Classification of observations Rating Definition Action(s) required Rating Definition of mitigation timeline Issue represents control weaknesses, which could – Requires immediate notif...

AI summary The document classifies observations as 'Critical' due to control weaknesses that cause severe disruption or adverse effects on process objectives. Immediate actions required include notifying the Finance Committee and Senior Management, with mitigation needing immediate attention from EfficiencyOne.

Immediate summary of report Issue represents a control weakness, which could – Requires prompt management action The proposed mitigation timeline for these risks have or is having major adverse effect on the ability – Requires Senior Manag...

AI summary The issue identified represents a significant control weakness that could have a major adverse effect on achieving objectives. It requires prompt management action and attention from Senior Management. The proposed mitigation timeline requires action by EfficiencyOne Management within 90 days.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

te Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 49 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 50 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 51 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUA...

AI summary The text consists of a series of page numbers and filing details from a regulatory proceeding document submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) on April 29, 2022, as part of IR-17, Attachment 1. No content or arguments are present in the provided text.

nt 1, Page 122 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 123 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 124 of 204 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 1, Page 125 of 204 Date...

AI summary The provided text consists of multiple pages from a regulatory proceeding document filed with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) on April 29, 2022. However, the actual content of the pages is not visible, and the text is primarily composed of page headers and references.

NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 11 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page xi

AI summary The text references multiple documents from a regulatory proceeding, including NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, and pages from D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129. These references suggest a detailed regulatory process involving multiple filings and documents.

With respect to the response to RR-DPU-1, the Department strikes the two full paragraphs on page 2, the entire portion of page 3 following the bullet list, and pages 4 and 5 in their entirety. The attachments to RR-DPU-1 are not stricken a...

AI summary The Department has struck certain portions of responses to RR-DPU-1 and RR-DPU-3, while preserving attachments and footnotes. The Council includes 15 voting members representing diverse interests, including residential consumers, low-income programs, environmental groups, businesses, and government agencies. Non-voting members include representatives from Program Administrators, the heating oil industry, ISO New England, and energy efficiency businesses.

Time to Respond to DPU-Comm 3-2, DPU-Comm 3-7, DPU-Comm 3-15, and DPU-Comm 3-16 (November 18, 2021); D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129, Program Administrators’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Department’s Third Set of Comm...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) is requesting that Program Administrators not use participation in Council meetings as a reason for delaying responses to discovery and record requests. The DPU emphasizes the need for timely responses to ensure an efficient adjudicatory process within the 90-day review period for the Three-Year Plans.

electrification efforts, the Department notes that neither the parties, nor the Department have the legal authority to effectively modify the goals established by the EEA Secretary and it is not appropriate for customers of gas Program Adm...

AI summary The Department notes that the EEA Secretary's goals were set after the Program Administrators submitted their draft Statewide Plan, limiting their ability to align with the goals during the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan development. Future planning processes will allow more time for alignment, as per G.L. c. 21N, § 3B. The Department also states that electrification goals cannot be modified by the parties or the Department and that electric Program Administrators are responsible for meeting their GHG reduction goals.

ng mechanism otherwise available to municipal aggregators pursuant to a municipal aggregation plan or G.L. c. 164, § 134(b).179 It is a fully funded reconciling mechanism available to 176 As we have stated previously, while the Compact is...

AI summary The text discusses the oversight of energy efficiency programs by the Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) and the legal framework governing municipal aggregation plans and energy efficiency cost recovery mechanisms. It emphasizes the Department's role in ensuring proper cost allocation and the standards applied to energy efficiency plans.

horization of funds.” Further, the cite in question in no way addresses the Department’s authority to oversee the EES as alleged by the Compact. Instead, it addresses issues raised by Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3,...

AI summary The document discusses the Department of Public Utilities' authority to oversee the Energy Efficiency Service (EES) and the Compact's compliance with regulatory oversight. It references legal precedents and highlights the need for appropriate cost allocation methods in accordance with established ratemaking principles.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

1 • reduced costs through shared resources between energy efficiency and demand 2 response (such as marketing, program administration, measurement and 3 verification); 4 • E1 has valuable experience in delivering similar types of programs....

AI summary The text discusses E1's proposal for integrated energy efficiency and demand response programs, highlighting cost savings, E1's experience, and customer benefits. It also mentions the challenges of implementing new demand response initiatives and E1's commitment to transparency and third-party evaluation.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ies between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary The text refers to responses provided by E1 to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. This indicates a regulatory process involving DSM planning and stakeholder engagement.

1 increase in the DSM investment proposed in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan in addition to helping to 2 offset any potential electricity rate increases. 3 4 E1 has not requested changes to the existing or introduction of additional performance tar...

AI summary E1 has not requested changes to existing performance targets for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, emphasizing their relevance and the low-risk nature of DSM investments for ratepayers. E1 operates as a not-for-profit and ensures underspending is returned to ratepayers. Performance targets are subject to legislative and regulatory oversight.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) provided responses to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) regarding information requests related to the 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. The document outlines E1's engagement in regulatory proceedings involving DSM planning and compliance with NSUARB requirements.

is an eligible technology and loans range from $50,000 to $4 million and offer a 1% interest rate. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","There are currently no additional supportive policies to encourage CHP. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",0 out of 20,"...

AI summary Alabama has limited energy efficiency programs due to regulatory constraints and utility skepticism. The Alabama Public Service Commission (APSC) encourages Alabama Power but enforces a cost-effectiveness requirement that limits program offerings. Utilities like Alabama Power and TVA prioritize load management over energy efficiency, resulting in minimal investments in efficiency initiatives.

pproves SRP’s funding for demand-side management. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: April 2022 ","Under the...

AI summary Arizona's energy efficiency programs, administered by utilities like APS and TEP under the state's EERS, are funded via adjustor mechanisms or surcharges. The ACC approves funding, while utilities set targets such as Salt River Project's 20% retail sales goal through efficiency and renewables by FY2020.

3, the CPUC developed new electric and natural gas goals in 2008 for years 2012 through 2020, which call for 16,300 GWh of gross electric savings over the 9-year period (see CPUC Decision 08-07-047). In 2015, California essentially doubled...

AI summary The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has set energy efficiency goals since 2008, including doubling targets with SB 350 in 2015 and updating them in 2019. The evaluation of energy efficiency programs uses cost-effectiveness tests and is overseen by the CPUC.

"," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: The Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC) completed a baseline compliance study in 2017, which was submitted to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). The report prese...

AI summary The Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC) conducted a baseline compliance study in 2017 to assess energy code enforcement and compliance rates, and recommend improvements. The Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA) mandates utility involvement in promoting energy efficiency and conservation measures. The Energy Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) reviews proposed energy code changes and reports to the Florida Building Commission. Training and outreach initiatives are also conducted.

state’s other utilities have also made substantial reductions in similar programs. Since then, statewide levels of electric savings have fallen to just a fraction of those reported in previous years. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary Kentucky's energy efficiency programs have seen reduced savings in recent years. DSM programs are regulated by the KPSC, with cost recovery through tariff riders. The 2007 Energy Act and HB 240 increased oversight, requiring utilities to implement DSM programs and consider equity across customer classes. Natural gas programs are available for non-industrial sectors and administered by utilities with third-party contractors.

achusetts's energy efficiency programs to address current challenges related to climate and technology changes by decreasing dependence on fossil fuels and actively managing energy loads in real-time. Legislation enacted in 2021 went furth...

AI summary Massachusetts has enacted legislation to strengthen climate goals, including a 2050 net-zero emissions target. The state has decoupling in place for utilities, with shareholder incentives tied to program performance. Energy efficiency programs are governed by Massachusetts General Law and administered by distribution companies with oversight from the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council.

n technical assistance activities that encourage the deployment of CHP including outreach to project developers, conducting feasibility assessments, and encouraging the use of CHP in public buildings. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",3.5 out of...

AI summary Customer energy efficiency programs in Montana are provided by utilities or state agencies, funded by a universal system benefits charge. NorthWestern Energy is the largest utility, and the Montana Public Service Commission oversees the programs. Western Montana is part of the Bonneville Power Administration region, involving the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance.

r rental. New York requires state-owned facilities over 25,000 ft2 that are able to receive a score from the EPA Portfolio Manager to annually benchmark and disclose those Portfolio Manager scores. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","BuildSmart NY...

AI summary New York requires large state-owned facilities to benchmark and disclose energy efficiency scores annually. Governor Cuomo's BuildSmart NY initiative aims to improve energy efficiency in state buildings by 20% by 2020, with the New York Power Authority financing energy efficiency projects and achieving significant energy savings.

and circuit rider trainings. These trainings are new, since PA adopted the 2019 I-Code in October 2018. The intended audience is residential energy plan reviewers and inspectors, but is appropriate for builders, design professionals, and o...

AI summary The document discusses training programs related to energy efficiency in Pennsylvania, including circuit rider trainings and duct and envelope testing. It also highlights the inclusion of combined heat and power (CHP) as an eligible resource under Pennsylvania's alternative portfolio standard, along with policies encouraging CHP deployment and interconnection standards for distributed generation, including CHP, up to 5 MW.

n rules in 2008 that apply to all distributed generation projects up to 1 MW. There is a specific procedure for renewable energy generators from 1 MW to 5 MW, but this procedure does not apply to CHP. Last Updated: August 2017 ","There are...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory rules for distributed generation projects in Puerto Rico, highlighting the absence of state policies to acquire energy savings or incentivize energy efficiency investments. It notes the existence of a tax exemption for CHP under Act 73 of 2008 and mentions legislation related to smart growth and urban revitalization.

Last Updated: September 2020 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The baseline code compliance studies noted below included a comprehensive survey of all stakeholders in the building and code industry, with an emphasis on code offic...

AI summary The document discusses the development and implementation of the Code Compliance Enhancement Initiative (CCEI) in Rhode Island, including baseline and updated compliance studies conducted by National Grid. It highlights the involvement of utilities in supporting building energy code compliance and the establishment of a multi-year commitment to CCEI through regulatory guidelines and collaboration with various stakeholders.

ems in the state. The University of Tennessee Center for Industrial Services also helps companies evaluate, measure, and create a site-specific energy plan, which may include evaluating CHP options. In February 2019, the Board of Directors...

AI summary The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has initiated the DER Flexibility Research Project, aiming to deploy CHP, solar, and other technologies to address customer needs. TVA, a federally-owned electricity provider, is governed by a board of directors and has increased energy efficiency efforts. The Tennessee Regulatory Authority (TRA) oversees rate and service standards for utilities in Tennessee.

ective, reliable and feasible."" The legislation also requires utilities to use methodologies for analyzing and selecting demand-side resources that are consistent with the methodologies used by NPPC. The most recent budgets for energy eff...

AI summary Washington's energy efficiency programs are managed by various types of utilities, including investor-owned and publicly-owned entities, with oversight by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. The Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance supports market transformation efforts, and investor-owned utilities recover program costs through tariff riders. Program budgets and savings are detailed in the State Spending and Savings Tables.

ptim Government Solutions, LLC, includes a performance bonus mechanism for achievement in customer satisfaction and energy savings goals. Last reviewed: June 2020 ","Guidelines for Third party access PSC docket 9501-GF-101 provides limited...

AI summary The document outlines guidelines for third-party access to customer energy use data in Wisconsin, managed by the Public Service Commission (PSC). It details limited access by the Focus on Energy Administrator and notes the absence of standardized online systems for data availability. Additionally, it discusses transportation policies, including complete streets legislation and the lack of programs incentivizing low-income housing near transit facilities.

ide-management programs for Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) that began January 1st, 2009 (see Docket No. 20000-264-EA-06). These programs represent the state’s first significant energy efficiency activity. RMP’s 2011 Integrated Resource Plan (I...

AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency programs for Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) and other utilities in Wyoming, including their Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and the lack of an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS). The primary and secondary cost-effectiveness tests used for evaluating these programs are outlined, along with the regulatory oversight by the Wyoming Public Service Commission.

Prior Awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia

AI summary The document section addresses the prior awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in regulatory proceedings, focusing on its role and potential implications in energy efficiency initiatives.

- (w) "Release" or "Released" means a releasing, adding, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, migrating, dispersing, dispensing, disposing or dumping. - (x) "Significant Chang...

AI summary This section defines key terms in the agreement, including 'Release,' 'Significant Changes,' 'Subcontractor,' 'Term,' and 'UARB,' and outlines general interpretive rules for the agreement's language and structure.

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...

AI summary This section outlines how EfficiencyOne's performance will be evaluated under the Agreement, referencing the performance requirements established by the UARB under Section 79M of the Act, as detailed in Schedule 'C'.

22. AUDIT AND INSPECTION - 22.1 EfficiencyOne shall, during the Term and for a period of thirty-six (36) months thereafter, keep accurate records of all EECA supplied to NSPI, as necessary to determine that the EECA was provided in accorda...

AI summary This section outlines requirements for record-keeping and inspection related to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Agreement (EECA). EfficiencyOne must maintain accurate records for 36 months after the agreement's term, and NSPI may request access to these records or inspect the EECA through the UARB.

4.3.4 Regulatory Affairs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 As approved in the 2015 DSM Resource Plan, Regulatory Affairs initiatives outside of specific research conducted for DSM Resource Plans or Potential Studies are categorized as Enabling Strategies....

AI summary Regulatory Affairs initiatives outside of specific research for DSM Resource Plans are categorized as Enabling Strategies. These activities include UARB costs, DSM Advisory Group work, stakeholder consultation, and legal work related to regulatory initiatives, all of which are essential for future energy savings.

Signed and dated this 16th day of June 2015. EfficiencyOne T Witness Per: Nova Scotia Power Incorporated — Per:4yvw> Witness Consumer Advocate Witness Per: Small Business Advocate Witness Per: Witness Witness Ecology Action Centre APPENDIX...

AI summary The document lists various witnesses and entities involved in a regulatory proceeding, including EfficiencyOne, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the Consumer Advocate, the Small Business Advocate, and the Ecology Action Centre. It appears to be part of a formal proceeding with a date of June 16, 2015.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT and IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by by EfficiencyOne ("E1") to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board') for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Ele...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. Evidence is submitted by Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, and towns of Antigonish and Mahone Bay, sponsored by Don Regan and Al Dominie.

Expert Testimony FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTER Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Nova Scotia Small Business Advocate Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended Application by NS Power for approval of the 2019 Annual Capital Expe...

AI summary The document lists various regulatory matters involving utility companies and regulatory bodies across different jurisdictions. These include applications for approval of capital expenditure plans, tariff changes, and infrastructure projects, with a focus on Nova Scotia and other regions.

- Fulfilling on the Promises of Deregulation, paper published in 1999 on the Select Energy website and presented at the Utility Restructuring Conference in New York City. - A Practitioner's Toolkit for Current Issues, presented at EUCI's R...

AI summary The text lists various publications, presentations, and media appearances related to energy deregulation, including papers, conferences, and interviews. These materials cover topics such as utility restructuring, resource planning, and energy buying groups.

M. Chang., R. Broderick, R. Jeffers, K. Jones, M. DeMenno. 2021. The Resilience Planning Landscape for Communities and Electric Utilities. Synapse Energy Economics for Sandia National Laboratories. Napoleon, A., E. Camp, S. Letendre, E. Si...

AI summary This document lists publications by Synapse Energy Economics and collaborators, focusing on energy efficiency, utility regulation, decarbonization, and resilience planning. The works were commissioned by organizations like the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sandia National Laboratories, addressing topics such as building electrification, gas regulation, and distribution asset utilization.

Eash-Gates, P., K. Takahashi, D. Goldberg, A.S. Hopkins, S. Kwok. 2021. Boston Building Emissions Performance Standard: Technical Methods Overview. Synapse Energy Economics for the City of Boston. Shipley, J., Hopkins, A., Takahashi, K., &...

AI summary The text lists academic and industry publications on energy efficiency, building decarbonization, and regulatory frameworks, authored by experts affiliated with organizations like Synapse Energy Economics, the City of Boston, and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Topics include electrification strategies, gas regulation, and policy analysis for New York and Rhode Island.

TESTIMONY Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Docket No. M-2020-3020824): Revised Direct Testimony of Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi regarding PPL Electric Utilities' proposed Act 129 Phase IV Energy Efficiency and Conservation. On...

AI summary Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi provided testimony across multiple regulatory proceedings, representing the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and other entities on energy efficiency programs, rate mechanisms, and demand-side management (DSM) plans. Their testimonies addressed issues related to utility rate structures, DSM plan reviews, and regulatory compliance in various jurisdictions.

TESTIMONY ASSISTANCE Public Service Commission of South Carolina (Docket No. 2016-223-E): Direct Testimony of Alice Napoleon regarding South Carolina Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Efforts. On behalf of South Carolina Coastal Conservat...

AI summary This section lists testimonies from various U.S. regulatory proceedings, highlighting individuals and organizations involved in energy efficiency and demand-side management initiatives. Key figures include Tim Woolf (Sierra Club, NRDC) and David Nichols (Ratepayer Advocate), addressing topics like energy efficiency plans, renewable energy goals, and utility economics.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - AND –

AI summary This document initiates a regulatory proceeding under the Nova Scotia Public Utilities Act, involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. The text establishes the legal context for the proceeding but does not yet present specific arguments or evidence.

8. MUNICIPAL ELECTRICAL UTILITIES Within their evidence on behalf of the Berwick Electric Commission, The Riverport Electric Light Commission, The Town of Antigonish, and The Town of Mahone Bay (collectively, the "MEUs"), Al Dominie and Do...

AI summary The Municipal Electrical Utilities (MEUs), including Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, Antigonish, and Mahone Bay, submit recommendations to the Board via Al Dominie and Don Regan.

Figure 9: Phases in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Modelling Process

AI summary The text presents Figure 9, which outlines the phases in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Modelling Process. This figure is part of a regulatory proceeding and provides a visual representation of the steps involved in the modelling process.

Table 62: Three-Year Summary of the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies Annual Plan Investment ($M) 2023 Total 0.9 2024 Total 1.6 2025 Total 1.6 DSM Plan Development & Reporting: development of cyclical DSM Resource...

AI summary This section outlines the three-year investment plan for the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies, focusing on DSM Plan Development & Reporting, Stakeholder Engagement, and Other Regulatory Initiatives. It highlights activities such as the development of cyclical DSM Resource Plans, engagement with the DSM Advisory Group, and monitoring of regulatory environments.

7.4.3.3 OTHER REGULATORY INITIATIVES - Other regulatory initiatives include NSUARB processes, not directly tied to DSM Plan development or - reporting, such as industry research and jurisdictional scans, and legal work related to regulator...

AI summary This section outlines other regulatory initiatives undertaken by E1, including engagement with other jurisdictions, research on emerging regulatory topics, and participation in NSUARB processes. These initiatives aim to support continuous improvement in DSM planning and administration, as well as prepare for the evolving regulatory landscape.

Table 62: Three-Year Summary of the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies Annual Plan Investment ($M) 2023 Total 0.9 2024 Total 1.6 2025 Total 1.6 DSM Plan Development & Reporting: development of cyclical DSM Resource...

AI summary Table 62 outlines the three-year investment summary for the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies, including activities related to DSM Plan Development, Stakeholder Engagement, and Other Regulatory Initiatives. It highlights investments in 2023, 2024, and 2025, as well as key areas of focus such as DSM Advisory Group sessions and regulatory research.

7.4.3.3 OTHER REGULATORY INITIATIVES - Other regulatory initiatives include NSUARB processes, not directly tied to DSM Plan development or - reporting, such as industry research and jurisdictional scans, and legal work related to regulator...

AI summary This section outlines other regulatory initiatives, including NSUARB processes, industry research, jurisdictional scans, and legal work. It highlights activities such as engaging with other jurisdictions, supporting evaluation consultants, researching new regulatory areas, and monitoring regulatory environments for best practices.

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's performance is measured based on performance requirements established by the UARB under Section 79M of the Act, as outlined in Schedule 'C'.

1 Agreement for EECA provided up to the date of termination. Any claim for payment by 2 EfficiencyOne must be asserted within thirty (30) days from the date of such termination. 3 20.2 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement,...

AI summary The section outlines the terms for default and termination of the Agreement for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Agreement (EECA). It specifies that EfficiencyOne must assert claims for payment within 30 days of termination and outlines obligations upon termination, including returning unspent monies and providing transition assistance. The agreement is subject to the supervision of the UARB, and events of default are defined, including breaches, assignments, and changes in corporate control.

- 5 (e) " Contract Documents " means without limitation, the following documents, 6 including any amendments thereto agreed in writing by the parties: - 7 (i) this Agreement; and - 8 (ii) all Schedules to the Agreement. - 9 (f) " Contract...

AI summary The document defines key terms within a contract, including 'Contract Documents,' 'Contract Price,' 'EECA Plan,' 'Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities,' 'Event of Default,' and 'Environmental Laws.' It also outlines the scope of 'Force Majeure Event' and its exclusions.

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 12.1 EfficiencyOne's performance under the terms of this Agreement shall be measured in accordance with the performance requirements established by the UARB pursuant to Section 79M of the Act as...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's performance is measured based on performance requirements established by the UARB under Section 79M of the Act, as outlined in Schedule 'C'.

1 discontinue all EECA under this Agreement and will only finish such portions of the EECA 2 as may be necessary to preserve and protect the EECA already in progress. Such 3 termination does not relieve either Party from any of their respe...

AI summary This section outlines the procedures for default and termination under the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA). It specifies that termination does not relieve parties from prior obligations, requires EfficiencyOne to return unspent funds and provide transition assistance, and defines conditions for an Event of Default, including breach of terms, unauthorized assignment, false representations, and loss of business control.

22. AUDIT AND INSPECTION - 6 22.1 EfficiencyOne shall, during the Term and for a period of thirty-six (36) months thereafter, 7 keep accurate records of all EECA supplied to NSPI, as necessary to determine that the 8 EECA was provided in a...

AI summary The section outlines requirements for EfficiencyOne to maintain records related to the Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement (EECA) provided to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI). NSPI is granted the right to request access to these records and to inspect the EECA, with EfficiencyOne required to facilitate these inspections.

24. SHARING OF DATA AND INFORMATION - 24.1 EfficiencyOne shall work co-operatively with NSPI to provide NSPI with information and data from time to time in order to assist NSPI with planning and load forecasting as may be reasonably requir...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to cooperate with NSPI by providing information and data for planning and load forecasting, consistent with past practices. If a dispute arises, NSPI may seek resolution through the UARB.

19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION - 19.1 In the event of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, a senior representative of EfficiencyOne and a senior representative of NSPI shall promptly meet to discuss and resolve the dispute and the Parties...

AI summary The dispute resolution process requires EfficiencyOne and NSPI to promptly meet and resolve disputes within 30 days (or 10 days for urgent matters). If unresolved, disputes are referred to the UARB under Section 79P of the Act. EfficiencyOne must continue fulfilling the EECA obligations unless the UARB authorizes suspension.

Agreement for EECA provided up to the date of termination. Any claim for payment by EfficiencyOne must be asserted within thirty (30) days from the date of such termination. 20.2 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in th...

AI summary The agreement outlines termination procedures, requiring EfficiencyOne to assert payment claims within 30 days, return unspent funds, and provide transition assistance to NSPI. Default provisions include breaches of terms, improper assignments, and asset transfers. The agreement is subject to UARB oversight.

22. AUDIT AND INSPECTION - 22.1 EfficiencyOne shall, during the Term and for a period of thirty-six (36) months thereafter, keep accurate records of all EECA supplied to NSPI, as necessary to determine that the EECA was provided in accorda...

AI summary EfficiencyOne must maintain records of EECA supplied to NSPI for 36 months post-term. NSPI can request UARB access to these records and inspect the EECA, with EfficiencyOne facilitating inspections.

Table 62: Three-Year Summary of the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies Annual Plan Investment ($M) 2023 Total 0.9 2024 Total 1.6 2025 Total 1.6 DSM Plan Development & Reporting: development of cyclical DSM Resource...

AI summary Table 62 outlines the three-year investment plan for the Other Enabling Strategies Component of Enabling Strategies, with annual investments of $0.9M, $1.6M, and $1.6M for 2023, 2024, and 2025 respectively. The table highlights activities such as DSM Plan Development & Reporting, Stakeholder Engagement, and Other Regulatory Initiatives.

7.4.3.3 OTHER REGULATORY INITIATIVES - Other regulatory initiatives include NSUARB processes, not directly tied to DSM Plan development or - reporting, such as industry research and jurisdictional scans, and legal work related to regulator...

AI summary This section outlines other regulatory initiatives by E1, including engagement with other jurisdictions, research on new regulatory areas, and support for NSUARB processes. These activities aim to improve DSM planning and administration, and prepare for increased regulatory complexity in the electricity system.

9.7.1 DEFINITIONS - To provide clarity, the following definitions are used: - Performance Metric: A quantifiable measure that is used to track and assess the status of a specific achievement. - Performance Indicators: A set of particular p...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to performance metrics, indicators, targets, and thresholds, emphasizing their use in tracking and assessing achievements and progress toward goals approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB).

2 .0 BACKGROUND [13] ETs 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan application uses the Standardized Filing Framework (Framework), developed in consultation among E1, NS Power, and stakeholders, and filed with the Board in a Consensus Agreement on July...

AI summary The document outlines the use of the Standardized Filing Framework (Framework) for E1's 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan application. The Framework, developed with E1, NS Power, and stakeholders, ensures consistent DSM filings, requires alternate scenarios, and aligns with NS Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). E1 claims its plan meets these requirements.

e other 23.6 GWh of secondary incidental energy savings, E1 proposed this savings be designated as a performance indicator. In his closing submission, the CA said that counter-proposal was reasonable. [57] Considering the increased investm...

AI summary The Board establishes separate performance targets for low-income programs, accepting E1's proposal of 15.8 GWh for specific initiatives and designating 23.6 GWh of secondary savings as a performance indicator. The CA endorsed E1's counter-proposal as reasonable, emphasizing increased investment in underserved communities.

4.3 Avoided Costs [58] In determining the cost effectiveness of its DSM portfolio, E1's calculations incorporated the avoided costs of energy, capacity, transmission, distribution and carbon. The avoided costs of capacity and energy were c...

AI summary E1's DSM cost-effectiveness analysis uses avoided costs from NS Power's 2020 IRP, but stakeholders argue these need updating to reflect new climate legislation. NS Power notes updates aren't urgent, while the Board directs DSMAG to address this for the 2026-2028 DSM Plan. MEUs and CA recommend recalculating avoided costs, and Synapse highlights a conflict with Board's Matter M08888 ruling.

4.4 Cost-effectiveness Testing [65] Cost-effectiveness testing assesses the relative value of the Settlement Plan through a comparison of benefits and costs expressed as both the dollar value of the net benefit (or cost) and as a ratio of...

AI summary The document discusses cost-effectiveness testing for E1's Settlement Plan, emphasizing TRC and PAC tests. TRC evaluates benefits-to-cost ratios at the program level, requiring a 1:1 ratio. E1 included avoided carbon costs and non-electric benefits, but Synapse argued this contradicts Board rulings (M08888), recommending greater reliance on PAC tests or jurisdiction-specific methods.

generally. Indeed, for example, affordability has been on the Issues List in recent Annual Capital Expenditure Plans and in several hearings for Halifax Water which also is regulated under the PUA. [82] The Board finds that the inclusion o...

AI summary The Board emphasizes balancing short-term affordability with long-term cost savings in DSM programs, citing Section 79L(9) of the PUA. It rejects exclusive focus on short-term rate impacts, stressing the need to consider long-term benefits for customers. The text also references affordability barriers in energy efficiency programs, as highlighted by Mr. Love.

Q. ARE THERE OTHER ASPECTS OF AFFORDIBILITY THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED? A. Yes. One of the most important aspects of affordability is the effect of DSM investments on classes of customers who are most acutely affected by changes in energy c...

AI summary Affordability considerations include impacts on low-income, tenant, and First Nations customers, as well as equity in DSM program benefits. Legal discretion under PUA sections 79L(8)-(9) allows the Board to weigh affordability and customer interests. DSM programs may disproportionately benefit participants, necessitating design adjustments to address participation barriers.

4.5.3 Incentives [130] Mr. Drazen considered whether incentives were needed for all the measures where E1 proposed to use them and whether the proposed incentive levels were higher than necessary. He said that, in some cases, a customer's...

AI summary Mr. Drazen evaluated E1's proposed incentives, noting that over 50 measures have payback periods ≤36 months and eliminating incentives could save $9M. He recommended adding payback data for the Board's review. E1 rebutted, stating its methodology was approved by the Board in Matter M07544.

5.0 APPROVAL OF SUPPLY AGREEMENT [188] E1 asked the Board to approve the form of Supply Agreement with NS Power attached as Appendix F to the application. E1 said the operating terms and conditions of the Agreement are substantially consis...

AI summary E1 requested the Board's approval for a Supply Agreement with NS Power, aligning with past DSM Plans. No objections were raised, and NS Power confirmed the agreement's similarity to prior ones. The Board conditionally approved the agreement pending compliance filing review, citing alignment with PUA section 79J.

NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and – IN THE MATTER OF: EfficiencyOne (E1) application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between Effi...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board is considering EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for electricity efficiency and conservation activities from 2023-2025 under the Public Utilities Act.

Heritage Gas Limited TAKE NOTICE that Heritage Gas Limited ("Heritage Gas") hereby requests to intervene in this proceeding. Heritage Gas is a Nova Scotia‐based company, formed for the purpose of providing natural gas distribution service...

AI summary Heritage Gas Limited requests intervention in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The company provides natural gas distribution in Nova Scotia and has provided contact details for its representatives. The matter is referenced as M10473, with correspondence directed to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

NOTICE OF INTERVENTION TO: The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("Board") AND TO: EfficiencyOne ("E1") 1. The BERWICK ELECTRIC COMMISSION , the RIVERPORT ELECTRIC LIGHT COMMISSION , the TOWN OF MAHONE BAY , and the TOWN OF ANTIGONISH (...

AI summary The Berwick Electric Commission, Riverport Electric Light Commission, Town of Mahone Bay, and Town of Antigonish (collectively, Municipal Utilities) seek intervenor status in a Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board proceeding. They purchase power from NSPI under the BUTU rate and are impacted by OATT and Spill Tariff rates, requesting intervention to address rate-related issues.

Peter Polley [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Document Number: 292898 KWILMU'KW MAW-KLUSUAQN NEGOTIATION OFFICE (KMKNO) AKA MI'KMAQ RIGHTS INITIATIVE and THE ASSEMBLY OF NOVA SCOTIA MI'KMAQ CHIEFS (ANSMC) 75 Treaty Trail Millb...

AI summary A regulatory proceeding document listing participants including Indigenous groups, municipal utilities, and government agencies. Key entities include the Mi'kmaq Rights Initiative, Membertou First Nation, Municipal Utilities (MUNIS), and the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources and Renewables (NRR), with legal counsel from McInnes Cooper.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REQUESTS To: EfficiencyOne c/o James R. Gogan The Breton Law Group By email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) From: Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. Board Counsel Consultant Responses Due:...

AI summary Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. has been requested by EfficiencyOne to provide non-confidential information related to a regulatory proceeding. Responses are due by Friday, April 29, 2022, and should be submitted in both electronic and hard copy formats. Alice Napoleon of Synapse Energy Economics is the contact person for this request.

1 M10473 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD 4 5 6 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 7 8 – and – 9 10 11 IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne (E1) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for Approval of a Sup...

AI summary The document outlines an application by EfficiencyOne (E1) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The Consumer Advocate has issued information requests to E1, with responses due by April 29, 2022.

Proposed Low Income Program elements The Affordable Energy Coalition supports the proposed low income programs in the application submitted by EfficiencyOne and endorsed by Nova Scotia Power. Low income households and many moderate income...

AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition supports EfficiencyOne's and Nova Scotia Power's proposed low income programs, emphasizing the need for affordability in energy efficiency. They endorse the Affordable Single-family Homeowner program (ASFHP) for maintaining regulated system access post-2015, shifting to comprehensive retrofits, and ensuring equity in the zero carbon energy transition.

Municipal Electric Utilities With respect to the Municipal Electric Utilities (MEU) proposals, NS Power confirms that while it does not object to permissible administrative efficiencies that would assist the MEUs in the payment of their al...

AI summary NS Power supports administrative efficiencies for MEUs' DSM costs but opposes changes to the current DSM program evaluation and approval processes. They advocate maintaining the status quo with MEUs responsible for DSM costs.

6. UNDERSERVED MARKETS AND DIVERSE COMMUNITIES A key focus of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan was directed at alleviating longstanding DSM inequities and barriers for low-income, diverse, and underserved groups. As a guiding principle of the 2023-2...

AI summary The 2023-2025 DSM Plan by E1 focuses on addressing inequities for low-income and underserved communities through equitable, inclusive programs. E1 aims to remove barriers aligned with the Public Utilities Act, with a 177% investment growth commitment. Stakeholders support the proposed funding level for these initiatives.

7. DEMAND RESPONSE It is anticipated that demand response will become a key resource in Nova Scotia over the long-run, thereby empowering the utility to shift load when needed most. As a new portfolio item, E1 purposefully engaged the expe...

AI summary Demand response is anticipated to be a key resource in Nova Scotia, with E1 collaborating with NS Power and Guidehouse on a DR program. E1's statutory role under the Public Utilities Act is emphasized despite concerns from the Industrial Group. Existing pilot programs and joint working groups are highlighted as foundational to the DR initiative.

4.5 Allocation of Program Costs [74] Ei said it applied the following "guiding principles" in developing its 2023 2025 DSM Resource Plan: Transparency - E1 will provide stakeholders and customers with information and insight into the analy...

AI summary E1 outlined guiding principles for its 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, emphasizing transparency, accessibility/equity, and affordability. It aligned its approach with the 'Balanced Plan Approach' from the 2016 Consensus Agreement, referencing section 4.3.1.

generally. Indeed, for example, affordability has been on the Issues List in recent Annual Capital Expenditure Plans and in several hearings for Halifax Water which also is regulated under the PUA. [82] The Board finds that the inclusion o...

AI summary The Board emphasizes balancing short-term affordability with long-term cost savings in DSM programs under the PUA . It rejects exclusive focus on short-term rate impacts, citing risks to ratepayers. The Board acknowledges legislative changes but reaffirms prioritizing customers' best interests. Mr. Love raises affordability barriers in energy efficiency programs.

ther there are barriers to participation that should be addressed to ensure that all customers can equitably benefit from electricity service under a balanced DSM program at the lowest long-term cost. [107] DSM programs in this jurisdictio...

AI summary The text discusses the need to consider factors beyond cost-effectiveness in DSM programs to ensure equitable access, referencing the 2016 Consensus Agreement and the Board's decision in Re EfficiencyOne, which balanced budgets to maintain funding for under-served communities.

if its third-party evaluator determines that a customer would have implemented the measure without the incentive. As such, E1 said it is focused on limiting incentives to the lowest amount necessary. [136] The Industrial Group's closing su...

AI summary E1 argues incentives should be limited to the lowest necessary amount, while the Industrial Group advocates for payback analysis to adjust incentives based on three-year payback periods. E1 counters that restricting measure selection based on payback alone undermines its statutory DSM plan design responsibilities.

4.10 DSM Advisory Group [177] As a result of the Consensus Agreement approved by the Board for the 2020-2022 DSM Plan, revised Terms of Reference for the DSMAG were developed. This was intended to reinvigorate the then-existing DSMAG. By S...

AI summary The DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG) was restructured under the 2020-2022 DSM Plan Consensus Agreement, with revised Terms of Reference filed by September 2021. E1 and NS Power aligned on the Settlement Plan through stakeholder engagement, but disagreements arose over DSMAG's role and investment allocation. E1 claimed stakeholder feedback was limited during plan development, while Mr. Athas argued against binding investment splits.

6.0 STANDARDIZED FILING FRAMEWORK [191] As noted earlier in this decision, it appeared to the Board that there was some question over the application of the Framework, particularly around the factors for achieving a balanced DSM portfolio....

AI summary The Board notes concerns about the application of the Standardized Filing Framework, particularly regarding DSM portfolio balance. It approved additional Performance Targets and encourages DSMAG to reconsider the Framework due to developments in Nova Scotia's DSM programming over six years. The Board references legislative goals under the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act and the Public Utilities Act, which may influence future energy efficiency targets.

E1 is directed as follows: - 1. To provide detailed plans and processes for each of its research initiatives prior to proceeding with significant expenditures, to be documented and fully discussed with members of the DSM Advisory Group in...

AI summary E1 is directed to detail research plans, collaborate with NS Power and the DSM Advisory Group on cost-effectiveness and avoided costs, justify measures failing cost tests, include payback data, report on demand response projects, update on behavioral programs, and seek Board approval for new incentives. Directives emphasize transparency, stakeholder engagement, and compliance with regulatory expectations.