E-1Application and Evidence
13 passages
EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended - and – IN THE MATTER OF An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of the 2026 DSM Extension for Demand-Side Management Activities between Efficiency...
AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for the 2026 DSM Extension and amendment to the 2023-2025 Purchase Agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the Public Utilities Act. The application is filed by EfficiencyOne as the holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise.
1.7 EXISTING BOARD APPROVED COST-EFFECTIVENESS TEST - E1 has applied the current NSUARB-approved cost-effectiveness test to the 2026 DSM Extension as the - 2023-2025 DSM Plan the Total Resource Cost (TRC). This test compares inputs (costs...
AI summary The NSUARB-approved Total Resource Cost (TRC) test was applied to the 2026 DSM Extension, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of 1.6, exceeding the 1.0 threshold under the Public Utilities Act (PUA). E1 plans to propose a new benefit-cost analysis framework for the 2027-2031 DSM Plan to the Energy Board in Q2 2025.
2. BACKGROUND TO 2026 DSM EXTENSION
AI summary The section outlines the background for extending Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs to 2026, involving regulatory considerations by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) under the Public Utilities Act (PUA).
2.1 DEVELOPMENTS IN LAW AND POLICY - Nova Scotia's electricity sector is in an era of significant change. Driven by ambitious federal and provincial - environmental goals, NS Power is phasing out its coal fleet by 2030, with a target to ac...
AI summary Nova Scotia's electricity sector is undergoing significant changes, driven by environmental goals. The province created the Clean Electricity Solutions Task Force, which recommended the creation of an independent energy system operator and a standalone energy regulator. These recommendations were implemented through the Energy Reform (2024) Act, which amended several existing statutes, including the Public Utilities Act.
- following factors in relation to regulatory decision-making function: 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2) In approving or fixing rates, tolls, charges, tariffs, capital applications and all other matters over which the Energy Board has authority, the Board...
AI summary The text outlines the Energy Board's regulatory decision-making function, emphasizing the need to support competition, innovation, sustainable development, and reliable energy supply in Nova Scotia, aligning with the More Access to Energy Act.
- 3 Cost-effectiveness results are provided for two cost effectiveness tests the Total Resource Cost (TRC), - 4 Program Administrator Cost (PAC). The TRC test compares the costs incurred to design and deliver - 5 programs and customers' co...
AI summary The document discusses cost-effectiveness tests used in Nova Scotia, including the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests. E1 plans to develop a new jurisdiction-specific BCA test for the 2027-2031 DSM Plan, following directives from the NSUARB and collaboration with the DSM Advisory Group.
RESID EN TIAL ENERGY EFFICIEN CY PROGRAM S
AI summary The document outlines residential energy efficiency programs under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework, involving entities like NSUARB and NSP. It references DSM, DCRR, and related acronyms for cost recovery and benefit analysis, with legislative context from the PUA.
4 5.2 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL - 5 The Existing Residential program provides residential customers with access to information, technical - 6 support, and financial assistance to identify, assess and implement energy efficiency behaviours and -...
AI summary The Existing Residential program, part of the 2023-2025 Plan, will transition from seven to six components by 2026, removing Green Heat due to declining participation. The 2026 DSM Extension includes six components, such as Home Energy Assessments and Mi'kmaw initiatives, while E1 cites reduced savings as the reason for ending Green Heat.
ine how to balance these different impacts. Instead, this balance will need to be drawn by efficiency planners, ultimately with guidance and final approval of regulators. ["](#page-116-1) 5 The original RBIA model, filed on 14 November 201...
AI summary The document discusses the development and revisions of the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) model for DSM, created by Efficiency Nova Scotia and Elenchus, reviewed by Synapse, and updated based on feedback from the NSUARB and DSMAG. It outlines the model's purpose to assess long-term impacts of DSM on rates and bills, with future work outlined in Section 6.
3.1 OVERALL RATE IMPACTS - DSM can lower rates by avoiding different types of electricity system costs (avoided energy, capacity, - transmission and distribution). DSM may also increase rates, a result of recovering program costs as well -...
AI summary The 2026 DSM Extension RBIA analyzes rate impacts of Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs, showing average rate changes ranging from +0.08% to +0.45% over 2026-2041. Initial cost recovery in 2026 causes higher impacts (+2.1% to +4.9%), but long-term effects (2027-2041) show smaller or negative impacts (-0.14% to +0.15%). These figures reflect long-term trends, not annual fluctuations.
6. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS - E1 understands that NS Power is currently developing an updated Cost of Service Study. Once concluded, - E1 will work with stakeholders to consider any potential implications to the RBIA as a result of this updat...
AI summary E1 acknowledges NS Power's updated Cost of Service Study and plans to collaborate with stakeholders on RBIA implications. The next RBIA applications will cover 2026-2031, part of E1's DSM Resource Plan filing in winter 2026.
Methodology for determination of changes in NS Power's base cost rates as a result of DSM-induced changes in class usage and total system costs November 27, 2020
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) outlines a methodology to assess changes in Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) base cost rates caused by Demand-Side Management (DSM)-induced shifts in class usage and total system costs. The analysis focuses on evaluating DSM's impact on cost recovery, rate design, and system-wide cost implications.
Data Inputs
AI summary The 'Data Inputs' section lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including organizations, legislation, and programs involved in energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulation.
E-15Evidence of J. Kallay - Synapse
2 passages
PUBLICATIONS Synapse Energy Economics, Climable, Brown University Climate and Development Lab. 2023. Power Play: Actions for New England's Equitable Energy Transition. Full report. Climable.org. Rickerson, W., E. Brousseau, A. Douglas, J....
AI summary The document lists publications by Synapse Energy Economics and affiliated organizations, focusing on energy transition, grid resilience, and regulatory frameworks. Reports address topics like distributed energy resources, energy equity, and resilience investments, commissioned by entities such as Texas Advanced Energy Business Alliance, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Sandia National Laboratories.
TESTIMONY New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board (Matter No. 552). Evidence regarding review of New Brunswick Power's 2024/25 to 2026/27 DSM Program Initiatives Update. On behalf of the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board Staff. Mar...
AI summary The document outlines multiple testimonies from regulatory proceedings in New Brunswick, Rhode Island, and New Mexico regarding energy efficiency programs and utility company initiatives. Each entry details docket numbers, entities involved, and the nature of the testimony provided by regulatory staff and legal offices.
E-16-(i)Resume of Theodore Love
5 passages
- Providing regulatory support to the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General on the Mass Save portfolio of programs and review of Eversource's geothermal network pilot. - Providing regulatory and policy analysis assistance to the Sma...
AI summary The text outlines professional experience in providing regulatory and policy analysis for energy efficiency programs across multiple jurisdictions, including Massachusetts, California, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and New Jersey. It highlights work with various organizations and utilities on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory support.
Chicagoland Energy Efficiency Portfolio People's Gas - Chicago, Illinois (September 2008 – January 2013) - Providing ongoing regulatory support; - Provided cost-benefit analysis of various program scenarios and aided in the analysis of con...
AI summary People's Gas provided regulatory support, conducted cost-benefit analyses for energy efficiency programs, evaluated contractor bids, and developed customized Excel tools for portfolio and cost-effectiveness analysis from 2008 to 2013 in Chicago, Illinois.
Energy Efficiency Potential in Texas Sierra Club, Texas (May 2012 – August 2012) - Research and development of alternative energy efficiency potential scenarios for the ten investor owned utilities (IOUs) in Texas; - Development of comment...
AI summary The Sierra Club conducted research on energy efficiency scenarios for Texas's ten investor-owned utilities (IOUs) between May and August 2012. Activities included developing comments for the Public Utility Commission of Texas and preparing a presentation for the Energy Efficiency Incentive Program Committee.
Energy Efficiency Potential in Arkansas Sierra Club/Audubon Society, Arkansas (September 2009 – March 2010) - Research and drafting assistance for expert testimony on energy efficiency' as an alternative to the White Bluff Steam Electric S...
AI summary The Sierra Club and Audubon Society conducted research and prepared expert testimony promoting energy efficiency as an alternative to the White Bluff Steam Electric Station. This was part of a proceeding before the Public Service Commission of Arkansas (Docket No. 09-024-U) from 2009-2010.
Testimony and Proceeding Participation Forum On Behalf Of Docket/Matter Date Issues Addressed Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board The Consumer Advocate of Nova Scotia Matter No. M10473 An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a 202...
AI summary This section outlines various utility and regulatory proceedings where entities have participated, addressing topics such as demand-side management plans, rate cases, and energy efficiency proposals. It includes details on the forums, participants, and issues addressed in each proceeding.
100400Board Decision
7 passages
4.1 Industrial Group [28] The Industrial Group argues that although the specific investment amount for the 2026 DSM extension has been prescribed by the legislation, the Board must still consider whether the proposed 2026 DSM Plan is in th...
AI summary The Industrial Group argues that the Board must evaluate the 2026 DSM Plan's cost-effectiveness, reasonableness, and spending allocation to ensure ratepayer interests. Recommendations include engaging DSMAG, rejecting exclusions of savings from specific programs, addressing cybersecurity breach impacts, and coordinating data collection between E1 and NSPI. The Group also urges E1 to manage budgeted spending by customer class and address tariff amendment requirements.
5.1 Scope of 2026 DSM Extension [40] The Industrial Group argued E1 filed this application as a "one year extension," and as a result, the application lacked the full consultative approach generally employed by E1. The Industrial Group als...
AI summary The Industrial Group argues that E1's 2026 DSM extension application lacked a full consultative approach and failed to meet filing requirements. E1 defends its submission, stating it provided sufficient information and that the one-year extension does not require multi-year planning. Long-term issues, like program design and test methodologies, are to be addressed in the 2027-2031 DSM Plan.
5.1.1 Findings [43] Although the amendments that changed the term of DSM Plans from three years to five years were made in November 2022, significant changes in electricity regulation in the province were made in the Energy Reform (2024) A...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board discusses amendments to DSM Plan terms, legislative changes in the Energy Reform (2024) Act, and a one-year extension for E1's plan under the 2025 Agriculture and Energy Act. The Board concludes the extension aimed to bridge transitions under new regulations and expects E1's new plan to address prior gaps.
5.2.1 Findings [49] The Board directs E1 to continue its engagement with the DSMAG on the Standardized Filing Framework. The Board also expects E1's engagement for its new DSM Plan will include a review of E1's "balanced plan", the relevan...
AI summary The Board directs E1 to continue engagement with DSMAG on the Standardized Filing Framework and to review factors for the new DSM Plan, including the impact of the Board's decision in Matter M12282.
ort for incentive programs. Based on a review of seven jurisdictions where incentives are available for compressed air leak projects, Econoler also said none require the recommended test be performed. [54] Regarding the pattern of claims,...
AI summary Econoler reviewed savings claims for compressed air leak projects, noting no other jurisdictions require the recommended test. Savings claims began in 2022 after customer-E1 discussions, with variations due to differing leakage rates across departments. Econoler disputed a 2024 adjustment claim.
5.7 NS Power Cyber Attack [75] On August 21, 2025, E1 advised the Board that the cybersecurity incident at NS Power affected NS Power's ability to transfer customer consumption advanced metering infrastructure data to E1, resulting in the...
AI summary A cybersecurity incident at NS Power disrupted data transfer to E1, suspending E1's Residential Behaviour Program. E1 stated no material changes to 2026 programs are anticipated but committed to updates. The Board accepted E1's response but emphasized prompt issue identification.
5.8.1 Findings [80] The Board accepts E1's response and declines to direct a reallocation of investment.
AI summary The Board accepts E1's response and declines to direct a reallocation of investment. This finding underscores the Board's approval of E1's position regarding investment allocation, without mandating changes to current financial strategies.